2. Guyton A, Hall J. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran. 9th ed. New york: Guyton dan Hall; 2007.
3. Jemal A, BRAY F, Melissa M, Parkin D, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. Global Cancer Statistics. A Cancer J Clin. 2011;61–90.
4. Sulaiman A, Lesmana N. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Hati. Jakarta: Jayabadi; 2007.
5. Marrer W. Orthorectifying Historical Imagery Using the Rational Function Model. University of Redlands; 2012.
6. Hirlan. Gastroenterohepatology : From Theory to Clinical Practice. Semarang: Univeristas Dipenogoro; 2011.
7. Feldman B. Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 9th ed. Elsevier S, editor. Canada; 2010.
8. Rilling W, Drooz A. Carcinoma, Multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular. Radiol JVI, editor. 2002. 259-63 .
9. Mor E, Kaspa R, Sheiner P. Treatment of hepatocelluker carcinoma associated witch cirrhosis in the era of liver transplantation. 1998;643–53. 10. Kew MC. Hepatocelluler carcinoma: Epidemology and riskfactor. J
12. Sherman M. Principles and Practice of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Kelsen D, Daly J, B L, Tepper J, editors. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Business; 2008.
13. Caldwell S. The epidemiology of hepatocelullar cancer : from the
perspectives of public health problem to tumor biology. Gastroenterology. 2009;96–100.
14. N I, Wanda J. The increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Med, N Engl J; 1999. 798-9 .
15. El-Serag H, Mason A. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. United States: N Engl J med; 1999. 745-50 .
16. Heintges T, Wands J. Hepatitis C virus: epidemiology and transmission. 1997;26:521–6.
17. Sherlock S, Dooley J. Disease of the Liver and Biliary System. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 2001.
18. Nurdjanah S. Sirosis Hati. In: Sudoyo A, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, Simadibratam M, Setiati S, editors. Buku Ajar Ilmu Penyakit Dalam. Jakarta: Interna Publishing; 2009.
19. Teufel A, Weinman A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:578–82. 20. Kamel I, Bluemke D. Imaging evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
2002;13:73–83.
2006.
22. Bertino G, Carlo D, Ardiri A, Calvagno G, MalaguarneramG. Systemic therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Futrue oncol. 2013;10:1533–48. 23. Xu H, Yun-PengLiu, Guleng B, Ren J-L. Hepatitis B Virus-Related
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Pathogenic Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Interventions. Gastrointest Tumors. 2014;1:135–45.
24. Chien R, Hsu Y, Yeh C, Sheen I, Chu C. Long-term outcome after spontaneous HbeAG seronversion in patients witch chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2002;35:1522–7.
25. Wu C, Salvay D, Forgues M, Valerie K, Farnworth J, Markin R. Distinctive gen expression profiles associated with Hepatitis B virus x protein. Oncogone. 2001;20:3674–82.
26. Schafer D, Sorrel M. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. 1999;353:1253–7. 27. Murray-lyon. Primary and secondary cancer of the liver. In: JC G, editor.
Carcinoma of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas. London: Edward Arnold; 2002.
28. Okuda K. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J H, editor. 2000;32:225–7. 29. Attali P, Houssin D, Roche A, Buffet C, Bismuth H, Etienne J. Hepatic
2011;135:704–15.
32. Kenwal K, Richardson P, El serag H. A new laboratory based algorithm to predict developmentof hepatocelluler carcinoma patients with hepatic and chirosis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:1249–55.
33. Tanaka S, Ari S. Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 2012;39:486–92.
34. Namieno T, Kawata A, Sato N, Kondo Y, Uchino J. Age-Related, Different Clincopathologic Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.
2005;24:256–9.
35. Kew MC. Hepatitis B virus infection : the burden of disease south Africa. shoutern African J Epidemiol Infect. 2008;1:4–8.
36. Hajime S, Osamu Y, Seki N, Arai M, Imzaeki F. Influence of Hepatitis B virus Genotypes on the Progression of Chronic Type B Liver Disease. 2003;
LAMPIRAN 1
OUTPUT SPSS
Frequencies
Frequency Table
Tempat tinggal
79 76.7 76.7 76.7
24 23.3 23.3 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
Desa Kota Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Jenis kelamin
84 81.6 81.6 81.6
19 18.4 18.4 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
Laki-laki Perempuan Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Pekerjaan
71 68.9 68.9 68.9
32 31.1 31.1 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
Bekerja Tidak bekerja Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Koma hepatikum
4 3.9 3.9 3.9
99 96.1 96.1 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
Ada Tidak ada Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Performance
40 38.8 38.8 38.8
25 24.3 24.3 63.1
38 36.9 36.9 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
PC SC IC Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Trombus
40 38.8 38.8 38.8
63 61.2 61.2 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
Ada Tidak ada Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Asites
34 33.0 33.0 33.0
13 12.6 12.6 45.6
56 54.4 54.4 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
Tidak ada Ringan Berat Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Nodul
9 8.7 8.7 8.7
94 91.3 91.3 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
Single Multiple Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
CP
14 13.6 13.6 13.6
54 52.4 52.4 66.0
35 34.0 34.0 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
A B C Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
BCLC
7 6.8 6.8 6.8
41 39.8 39.8 46.6
21 20.4 20.4 67.0
34 33.0 33.0 100.0
103 100.0 100.0
A
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Case Summaries
103 47.07 12.810 47.00 15 76
103 3.4144 4.29519 1.9000 .33 25.15
103 3.0399 .76704 3.0000 1.50 6.37
103 14.8495 3.61060 14.2000 10.20 40.70
103 11.3680 1.18489 11.2000 9.00 14.90
103 3.4816 3.24958 2.8000 .10 27.60
103 165.7164 194.03591 1.4800 .00 400.00 Umur
Bilirubin Albumin PPT PPT kontrol PPT selisih Kadar AFP
Crosstabs
Jenis kelamin * Tempat tinggal
Crosstab
62 22 84
64.4 19.6 84.0
78.5% 91.7% 81.6%
17 2 19
14.6 4.4 19.0
21.5% 8.3% 18.4%
79 24 103
79.0 24.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Laki-laki
Perempuan Jenis kelamin
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
2.127b 1 .145
1.341 1 .247
2.441 1 .118
.229 .120
2.107 1 .147
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4. 43.
Pekerjaan * Tempat tinggal
Crosstab
56 15 71
54.5 16.5 71.0
70.9% 62.5% 68.9%
23 9 32
24.5 7.5 32.0
29.1% 37.5% 31.1%
79 24 103
79.0 24.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Bekerja
Tidak bekerja Pekerjaan
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.604b 1 .437
.276 1 .599
.591 1 .442
.458 .296
.599 1 .439
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 46.
Koma hepatikum * Tempat tinggal
75.9 23.1 99.0
94.9% 100.0% 96.1%
79 24 103
79.0 24.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Ada
Tidak ada Koma hepatikum
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
1.264b 1 .261
.272 1 .602
2.171 1 .141
.571 .340
1.252 1 .263
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 93.
Performance * Tempat tinggal
Crosstab
30 10 40
30.7 9.3 40.0
38.0% 41.7% 38.8%
20 5 25
19.2 5.8 25.0
25.3% 20.8% 24.3%
29 9 38
29.1 8.9 38.0
36.7% 37.5% 36.9%
79 24 103
79.0 24.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal PC
SC
IC Performance
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.220a 2 .896
.225 2 .894
.020 1 .887
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.83.
Trombus * Tempat tinggal
Crosstab
31 9 40
30.7 9.3 40.0
39.2% 37.5% 38.8%
48 15 63
48.3 14.7 63.0
60.8% 62.5% 61.2%
79 24 103
79.0 24.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Ada
Tidak ada Trombus
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.023b 1 .878
.000 1 1.000
.024 1 .878
1.000 .538
.023 1 .879
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9. 32.
Asites * Tempat tinggal
Crosstab
27 7 34
26.1 7.9 34.0
34.2% 29.2% 33.0%
10 3 13
10.0 3.0 13.0
12.7% 12.5% 12.6%
42 14 56
43.0 13.0 56.0
53.2% 58.3% 54.4%
79 24 103
79.0 24.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Tidak ada
Ringan
Berat Asites
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.231a 2 .891
.233 2 .890
.228 1 .633
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.03.
Nodul * Tempat tinggal
72.1 21.9 94.0
91.1% 91.7% 91.3%
79 24 103
79.0 24.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Single
Multiple Nodul
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.006b 1 .936
.000 1 1.000
.006 1 .936
1.000 .650
.006 1 .936
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2. 10.
Explore
Tempat tinggal
Case Summaries
79 79 79
46.39 3.4418 3.1115 12.568 4.14554 .80562 47.00 1.9800 3.0000
15 .33 1.50
76 25.15 6.37
24 24 24
49.29 3.3242 2.8042 13.614 4.85008 .57671 51.50 1.8900 2.7500
18 .57 1.60
74 23.16 3.80
103 103 103
47.07 3.4144 3.0399 12.810 4.29519 .76704 47.00 1.9000 3.0000
15 .33 1.50
76 25.15 6.37
N Mean
Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum N
Mean
Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum N
Mean
Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Total
Case Summaries
79 79 79
14.7278 11.4316 3.2962 3.83202 1.15654 3.46870 14.2000 11.2000 2.4000
10.20 9.30 .10
40.70 14.90 27.60
24 24 24
15.2500 11.1583 4.0917 2.79223 1.27686 2.34945 14.9000 11.0000 3.5000
10.90 9.00 1.40
21.50 13.80 10.20
103 103 103
14.8495 11.3680 3.4816 3.61060 1.18489 3.24958 14.2000 11.2000 2.8000
10.20 9.00 .10
40.70 14.90 27.60
N Mean
Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum N
Mean
Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum N
Mean
Std. Deviation Median Minimum Maximum Tempat tinggal
Desa
Kota
Total
PPT PPT kontrol PPT selisih
Tests of Normality
.045 79 .200* .996 79 .998
Tempat tinggal Desa
PPT kontrol
PPT selisih
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Umur
Albumin
PPT kontrol
PPT selisih
T-Test
Group Statistics
79 46.39 12.568 1.414
24 49.29 13.614 2.779
Tempat tinggal Desa
Kota Umur
N Mean Std. Deviation
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Independent Samples Test
.083 .774
-.971 -.930
101 35.745
.334 .359
-2.899 -2.899
2.987 3.118
-8.824 -9.225
3.025 3.426
F Sig. Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances
t df
Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of
Means
Equal variances assumed
Equal variances not assumed Umur
Ranks
79 52.40 4139.50
24 50.69 1216.50
103 Tempat tinggal
Desa Kota Total Bilirubin
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test Statisticsa
916.500 1216.500 Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W
T-Test
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Group Statistics
79 3.1115 .80562 .09064
24 2.8042 .57671 .11772
Tempat tinggal Desa
Kota Albumin
N Mean Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
Independent Samples Test
1.373 .244
1.736 2.069
101 52.874
.086 .043
.30735 .30735
.17704 .14857
-.04385 .00934
.65855 .60537
F Sig. Levene's Test for
Equality of Variances t df
Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference
Std. Error Difference
Lower Upper 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference t-test for Equality of
Means
Equal variances assumed
Equal variances not assumed Albumin
Ranks
79 49.85 3938.50
24 59.06 1417.50
103
79 53.63 4237.00
24 46.63 1119.00
103
79 48.50 3831.50
24 63.52 1524.50
103 Tempat tinggal
Desa
PPT kontrol
PPT selisih
Crosstabs
Tempat tinggal * CP
Crosstab
12 40 27 79
10.7 41.4 26.8 79.0
85.7% 74.1% 77.1% 76.7%
2 14 8 24
3.3 12.6 8.2 24.0
14.3% 25.9% 22.9% 23.3%
14 54 35 103
14.0 54.0 35.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count % within CP Count
Expected Count % within CP Count
Expected Count % within CP
Chi-Square Tests
.849a 2 .654
.917 2 .632
.152 1 .697
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
1 cells (16.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.26.
Tempat tinggal * BCLC
Explore
Tempat tinggal
Crosstab
7 31 15 26 79
5.4 31.4 16.1 26.1 79.0
100.0% 75.6% 71.4% 76.5% 76.7%
0 10 6 8 24
1.6 9.6 4.9 7.9 24.0
.0% 24.4% 28.6% 23.5% 23.3%
7 41 21 34 103
7.0 41.0 21.0 34.0 103.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % within BCLC Count
Expected Count % within BCLC Count
Expected Count % within BCLC Desa
Chi-Square Tests
2.481a 3 .479
4.053 3 .256
.470 1 .493
103 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
2 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.63.
a.
Case Summaries
Kadar AFP
44 333.7166 142.65508 400.0000 .88 400.00 10 238.5260 189.94657 350.1900 .50 400.00 54 316.0887 155.01795 400.0000 .50 400.00 Tempat tinggal
Desa Kota Total
Kadar AFP
Tests of Normality
.492 44 .000
.726 10 .002
Tempat tinggal Desa
Kota Kadar AFP
Statistic df Sig. Shapiro-Wilk
NPar Tests
Mann-Whitney Test
Ranks
44 28.91 1272.00 10 21.30 213.00 54
Tempat tinggal Desa
Kota Total Kadar AFP
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test Statisticsa
158.000 213.000 -1.749 .080 Mann-Whitney U
Wilcoxon W Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Kadar AFP
NPar Tests
Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Kadar AFP * Tempat tinggal Crosstabulation
8 4 12
9.8 2.2 12.0
18.2% 40.0% 22.2%
2 1 3
2.4 .6 3.0
4.5% 10.0% 5.6%
34 5 39
31.8 7.2 39.0
77.3% 50.0% 72.2%
44 10 54
44.0 10.0 54.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal Count
Expected Count % within Tempat tinggal < 200
200 - 400
> 4000 Kadar
AFP
Total
Desa Kota
Tempat tinggal
Total
Chi-Square Tests
3.021a 2 .221
2.784 2 .249
2.775 1 .096
54 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases
Value df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .56.
a.
Frequencies
44 Tempat tinggal
Desa Kadar AFP
Test Statisticsa
.273 .000 -.273 .778 .579 Absolute
Positive Negative Most Extreme
Differences
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
Kadar AFP
C434557 Pati Desa 30 P >400 C 10 D
C422837 Demak Desa 49 L >400 C 12 D
C425557 Grobogan Desa 45 L >400 C 12 D
C498017 Rembang Desa 66 L >400 C 11 D
C467637 Brebes Desa 29 L Tidak ada C 12 D
C546321 Brebes Desa 64 L Tidak ada C 10 D
C536030 Demak Desa 20 L Tidak ada A 6 B
C548650 Tegal Kota 46 L Tidak ada B 9 B
C554043 Grobogan Desa 49 L >400 B 9 B
C522413 Batang Desa 76 L Tidak ada B 7 B
C515784 Demak Desa 43 L 392,22 B 8 C
C547424 Kudus Desa 50 P Tidak ada A 6 B
C527014 Kendal Desa 39 L Tidak ada C 10 D
C529734 Kendal Desa 48 L Tidak ada B 7 B
C544044 Kendal Desa 67 L Tidak ada B 8 C
C561706 Semarang Kota 54 L 2,01 B 7 B
C544044 Semarang Kota 42 L Tidak ada B 9 C
C554524 Grobogan Desa 61 P Tidak ada C 10 D
C519956 Semarang Kota 44 L >400 A 6 C
C533936 Brebes Desa 30 L Tidak ada C 12 D
C513717 Pati Desa 57 L >400 B 9 B
