• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:B:Biological Psichatry:Vol48.Issue5.2000:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:B:Biological Psichatry:Vol48.Issue5.2000:"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Expression in the Prefrontal Cortex of Subjects

with Schizophrenia

Leisa A. Glantz, Mark C. Austin, and David A. Lewis

Background:

Previous studies have reported that the

38-kd synaptic vesicle-associated protein, synaptophysin,

is decreased in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with

schizophrenia.

Methods:

To determine whether the decreased protein

levels reflect diminished expression of the synaptophysin

gene by prefrontal cortex neurons, we used in situ

hybrid-ization histochemistry to determine the cellular levels of

synaptophysin messenger RNA in prefrontal cortex area 9

from 10 matched pairs of schizophrenic and normal

control subjects.

Results:

Neither the density of neurons with detectable

levels of synaptophysin messenger RNA nor the mean level

of synaptophysin messenger RNA expression per neuron

differed between schizophrenic and control subjects in any

cortical layer.

Conclusions:

These findings indicate that the expression

of synaptophysin messenger RNA is not altered in this

brain region in schizophrenia. Consequently, reduced

levels of synaptophysin protein in the prefrontal cortex of

subjects with schizophrenia are more likely to reflect

either posttranscriptional abnormalities of synaptophysin

in prefrontal cortex neurons or a diminished number of

axonal projections to the prefrontal cortex from other

brain regions.

Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:389 –397 ©

2000

Society of Biological Psychiatry

Key Words:

Prefrontal cortex, schizophrenia, synaptic

proteins, synaptophysin, thalamus

Introduction

A

variety of studies (for reviews, see Goldman-Rakic

and Selemon 1997; Weinberger et al 1994) have

demonstrated that certain cognitive symptoms of

schizo-phrenia reflect dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex (PFC).

Nonetheless, the absence of gross structural abnormalities

in this brain region suggests that the pathophysiology of

schizophrenia may involve subtle disturbances in PFC

connectivity (Lewis 1997; Selemon and Goldman-Rakic

1999). Consistent with this hypothesis, immunoreactivity

for synaptophysin, a 38-kd integral membrane protein of

small synaptic vesicles (Jahn et al 1985; Wiedenmann and

Franke 1985), has been reported to be decreased in the

rostral PFC (areas 9, 10, and 46) of schizophrenic subjects

(Glantz and Lewis 1997; Honer et al 1999; Karson et al

1999; Perrone-Bizzozero et al 1996). Because

synaptophy-sin appears to be present in virtually all presynaptic axon

terminals (Jahn et al 1985) and to serve as a reliable

marker of the number of cortical synapses (Hamos et al

1989; Masliah et al 1990), these findings may reflect a

decreased number of presynaptic terminals in the PFC of

subjects with schizophrenia. This interpretation is

sup-ported by reports of decreased gray matter volume

(An-dreasen et al 1994a; Goldstein et al 1999; Schlaepfer et al

1994; Shelton et al 1988; Sullivan et al 1998; Zipursky et

al 1992), increased cell packing density (Daviss and Lewis

1995; Selemon et al 1995, 1998), decreased dendritic

spine density (Garey et al 1998; Glantz and Lewis 2000),

and diminished levels of

N

-acetylaspartate (Bertolino et al

1996, 1998; a marker of neuronal/axonal integrity) in the

PFC of subjects with schizophrenia. Although other

ex-planations for each of these abnormalities are possible, all

would be expected to accompany a decrease in presynaptic

terminal number.

Understanding the pathophysiologic significance of a

decreased number of presynaptic terminals depends, in

part, on which populations of axons are affected. Axon

terminals can be divided into two general categories: those

that arise from neurons located within that region (intrinsic

terminals) and those that arise from neurons in other brain

regions (afferent terminals; White 1989). If the decreased

synaptophysin protein in the PFC of schizophrenic

sub-jects reflects an abnormality in intrinsic axon terminals,

then one might expect to see altered expression of

synap-tophysin messenger RNA (mRNA) in PFC neurons. For

example, if the decreased dendritic spine density on PFC

From the Departments of Neuroscience (LAG, DAL) and Psychiatry (MCA, DAL), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Address reprint requests to David A. Lewis, M.D., University of Pittsburgh, Western Psychiatric Institute & Clinic, 3811 O’Hara Street, W 1651 BST, Pittsburgh PA 15213.

Received January 7, 2000; revised April 26, 2000; accepted April 28, 2000.

(2)

layer 3 pyramidal cells in schizophrenia (Garey et al 1998;

Glantz and Lewis 2000) is due to a reduced number of

intrinsic excitatory synapses, then one might expect to see

altered synaptophysin expression in the sources of such

inputs—namely, pyramidal neurons in layers 2, 3, and 5

(Levitt et al 1993; Melchitzky et al 1998). To test this

hypothesis, we used in situ hybridization histochemistry to

examine the cellular levels of synaptophysin mRNA in

PFC area 9 from matched pairs of schizophrenic and

control subjects.

Methods and Materials

Characteristics of Subjects

Specimens from 20 human brains were obtained during autopsies conducted at the Allegheny County Coroner’s Office (Table 1) after informed consent for brain donation was obtained from the

next of kin. No neuropathologic abnormalities were detected except in two subjects. Subject 622 died from an acute infarction limited to the distribution of the inferior branch of the right middle cerebral artery; however, the cortical region of interest for the present study did not appear to be affected. In addition, thioflavin-S staining revealed a few senile plaques in one subject (685), but the density of plaques was insufficient to meet diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease (Mirra et al 1991), and there was no history of dementia in this subject. An independent committee of experienced clinicians made consensus DSM-III-R diagnoses for each subject using information obtained from clinical records and structured interviews conducted with one or more surviving relatives of the subject (Glantz and Lewis 1997). The University of Pittsburgh’s Institutional Review Board ap-proved all procedures for Biomedical Research.

Seven male and three female subjects with diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were examined in this study (Table 1). All of these subjects had been used in a previous Table 1. Characteristics of Matched Pairs of Subjects

Control subjects Schizophrenic subjects

Pair Case Race

of death Case Diagnosis Race Gender/

1 630 W M/65 21.2 6.94 12 ASCVD 566 Schizophrenia, chronic undifferentiatedb

W M/63 18.3 6.80 23 ASCVD

2 643 W M/50 24.0 6.02 11 ASCVD 581 Schizophrenia, chronic paranoidc,d

W M/46 28.1 6.99 20 Accidental drug overdose 3 567 W F/46 15.0 6.72 22 Mitral valve

prolapse

597 Schizoaffective disorder

W F/46 10.1 7.02 18 Pneumonia

4 585 W M/26 16.0 6.67 20 Trauma 547 Schizoaffective disorder

B M/27 16.5 6.94 26 Heat stroke

5 685 W M/56 14.5 6.57 5 Hypoplastic coronary

W M/48 8.3 6.07 75 Pneumonia

6 557 W M/47 15.9 6.77 24 ASCVD 537 Schizoaffective disordere

W F/37 14.5 6.68 27 Suicide by hanging 7 546 W F/37 23.5 6.74 26 ASCVD 587 Schizophrenia,

chronic undifferentiatedb

B F/38 17.8 7.02 19 Myocardial hypertrophy

9 659 W M/46 22.3 6.77 8 Peritonitis 625 Schizophrenia, chronic disorganizedf

B M/49 23.5 7.05 13 ASCVD

10 592 B M/41 22.1 6.72 18 ASCVD 533 Schizophrenia, chronic undifferentiated

W M/40 29.1 6.82 18 Asphyxiation

Mean 47.5 19.1 6.66 17.1 45.2 18.5 6.82 25.2

SD 11.5 3.8 0.24 7.6 10.4 6.9 0.29 18.1

PMI, postmortem interval in hours; W, white; M, male; ASCVD, atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease; F, female; B, black; MCA, middle cerebral artery.

aStorage time (at280°C) is in months. bAlcohol abuse, in remission at time of death. cAlcohol dependence, current at time of death. dOther substance abuse, current at time of death.

(3)

study of GAD67mRNA expression (Volk et al 2000). Four of these subjects also met diagnostic criteria for an alcohol-related disorder at some point during their life. Two subjects (537 and 622) had been off antipsychotic agents for 9.6 and 1.2 months, respectively, before death. Each schizophrenic subject was matched as closely as possible for gender, age, and postmortem interval (PMI) to one control subject who had no lifetime history of any neurologic or psychiatric disorder (Table 1). Subject groups did not significantly differ (t,1.77,p..11) in mean age or PMI (Table 1).

Preparation of Tissue

At the time of autopsy, the brain was removed and placed into cold phosphate buffer. Within 2 hours, coronal blocks (1.0 cm thick) were cut from the right hemisphere, frozen by immersion in 2-methylbutane on dry ice, and stored at280°C. Brain pH, determined using the procedure of Harrison et al (1995), did not differ (t 5 1.35, p5 .21) between subject groups (Table 1). Blocks containing the superior frontal gyrus immediately ante-rior to the genu of the corpus callosum were then sectioned coronally at 20mm and thaw-mounted onto gelatin-coated slides. Every tenth section was stained for Nissl substance and exam-ined to identify the location of area 9 using cytoarchitectonic criteria (Daviss and Lewis 1995; Rajkowska and Goldman-Rakic 1995). Slide-mounted tissue sections were stored at280°C until processed. Total tissue storage time (t51.12,p5.29) did not differ across subject groups (Table 1). For the range of sections determined to contain area 9, a random number table was used to select a starting section and then a total of five, equally spaced (200 mm) sections containing area 9 were selected from each subject. All 100 sections were processed for in situ hybridization simultaneously and in the same solutions.

In Situ Hybridization Procedure

Sections were processed for in situ hybridization histochemistry with a cocktail of two commercially synthesized (Oligos Etc., Wilsonville, OR) oligonucleotide probes complementary to bases 1–33 and 803– 842 of the synaptophysin cDNA sequence (Sudhof et al 1987). The probes were 39-labeled with35S-dATP (NEN, Boston) by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Be-thesda Research Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). Labeled oli-gonucleotides were separated from unincorporated nucleotides using Nuc-trap push columns (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).

Tissue sections were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.12 mol/L sodium phosphate-buffered saline at room tempera-ture for 5 min, washed, and then placed in a 0.1 mol/L triethanolamine/0.9% sodium chloride solution containing 0.25% acetic anhydride for 10 min. Next, sections were dehydrated and delipidated in a graded series of ethanol washes and chloroform and then incubated for 2 hours at 37°C with 50 mmol/L nonradioactive dATP in hybridization buffer (100mL per slide) consisting of 50% deionized formamide, 600 mmol/L sodium chloride, 80 mmol/L tris hydrochloric acid, 4 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1% tetrasodium pyrophosphate, 0.2% sodium dodecylsulfate, 0.2 mg/mL heparin, 10% dextran sulfate, and 100 mmol/L dithiothreitol. This buffer was removed and sections were then

incubated overnight at 37°C in hybridization buffer (50mL per slide) containing both 35S-dATP-labeled probes (1.5

3 106 dpm/section). Following four washes for 15 min each in 23

saline-sodium citrate (SSC) (13 SSC: 0.15 mol/L sodium chloride, 0.015 mol/L sodium citrate, pH 7.2)/50% deionized formamide at 40°C, slides were washed twice for 30 min in 13

SSC at 40°C, briefly rinsed in distilled water and 70% ethanol, and then allowed to dry. The sections were dipped in photo-graphic emulsion (NTB2, Kodak) diluted 1:1 with distilled water, and exposed for 2.5 weeks at 4°C. After the emulsion was developed, slides were lightly counterstained with cresyl violet and then coded so that the investigators were blind to subject number and diagnosis.

To assess the specificity of the hybridization signal, additional sections were pretreated either with RNase or excess unlabeled probe. No signal was detected in either case. In addition, other sections were treated using only one of the two synaptophysin probes. Identical patterns of labeling were observed with each probe used alone or in combination.

Analysis

(4)

Statistical Analyses

Within each layer of every section, the values of the three dependent variables (neuron density, grain density per neuron, and somal size) were averaged across the two sampling frames, with the value of each frame weighted by the number of observations in that frame. Thus, for each cortical layer of every subject, five observations were obtained for each of the three dependent variables. Because these values were possibly corre-lated and were also exchangeable within a given subject, the five observations were treated as repeated measures with a compound symmetric covariance structure (Neter et al 1996). This ance structure was reflected in a multivariate analysis of covari-ance (MANCOVA) that examined the effect of diagnostic group on each of the three dependent variables using age, gender, PMI, storage time, and brain pH as covariates. Analyses were imple-mented in SAS PROC Mixed (Littell et al 1996) andFtests for the effect of diagnostic group were based on type III sum of squares.

Results

On tissue sections hybridized with the

35

S-labeled

synap-tophysin probes and counterstained with cresyl violet,

silver grains were clustered over the cell bodies of both

pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons (Figure 1). In

con-trast, few grains were present over glial cells, and grain

clusters were virtually absent in the subjacent white matter

(Figure 2). Consistent with the neuronal localization of

synaptophysin, the distribution of grain clusters reflected

the relative size and packing density of neurons across the

layers of the cortex (Figure 2), although the density of grain

clusters was somewhat lower than expected in layer 2.

Neither the density of neurons with detectable levels of

synaptophysin mRNA [Figure 3A;

F

(1,13)

,

2.16,

p

.

.17] nor the mean level of synaptophysin mRNA

expres-sion per neuron [Figure 3B;

F

(1,13)

,

2.84,

p

.

.12]

differed between schizophrenic and control subjects in any

layer. In addition, neither the schizophrenic subjects with

comorbid diagnoses of alcohol abuse or dependence or the

schizoaffective subjects differed from their matched

con-trol subjects on either measure. Interestingly, among the

subjects with schizophrenia, two of the schizoaffective

subjects (547 and 597) had the lowest values for mean

grain density in all layers except layer 6; however, the

third schizoaffective subject (537) had mean grain

densi-ties well above most of the other subjects with

schizophre-nia in all of the layers.

The somal size of synaptophysin mRNA-positive

neu-rons was decreased by 4.9% to 12% in superficial layer 3,

deep layer 3, layer 5, and layer 6 in the schizophrenic

subjects compared with the matched normal control

sub-jects, but none of these differences achieved statistical

significance [Figure 3C;

F

(1,13)

,

2.63,

p

.

.13]. In

addition, grain density did not differ between the

schizo-phrenic and control subjects when examined as a function

of somal size (Figure 4). Finally, mean grain number per

neuron did not differ between schizophrenic and control

subjects in any layer (Figure 5).

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that the cellular

expres-sion of synaptophysin mRNA, whether assessed by the

density of labeled neurons or by grain density or number

per labeled neuron, is not altered in PFC area 9 of

schizophrenic subjects. These observations are supported

by recent preliminary reports, using regional analyses of

film autoradiographic images (Eastwood and Harrison

(5)

1998; Rodriguez et al 1998) or Northern blots (Karson et

al 1999), of normal levels of synaptophysin mRNA in the

PFC of schizophrenic subjects.

Although the findings across studies are consistent in

revealing normal levels of synaptophysin mRNA

expres-sion in schizophrenia, the possibility of a type 2 error

needs to be considered. First, our sample size (

n

5

10

subjects per group) was relatively small; however, similar

numbers of subjects were examined in the studies that

found decreased levels of synaptophysin protein in the

PFC of schizophrenic subjects ( Glantz and Lewis 1997;

Honer et al 1999; Karson et al 1999; Perrone-Bizzozero et

al 1996). In addition, a recent investigation of the same

schizophrenic subjects examined in our study detected a

significant decrease in the expression of GAD

67

mRNA in

layers 3, 4, and 5 of PFC area 9 (Volk et al 2000). Second,

the tendency for neuronal size to be smaller in layers 3, 5,

and 6 of the subjects with schizophrenia may have

contributed to less overcounting of synaptophysin

mRNA-labeled neurons in these subjects. Nonetheless, because

this difference was small relative to both the measured

somal size and section thickness, use of an Abercrombie

correction did not alter the relative densities of

synapto-physin-labeled neurons (Guillery and Herrup 1997). Third,

the stringent threshold employed for specifically labeled

cells (defined as those with grain densities at least 5

3

background) may have excluded cells with decreased

expression of synaptophysin mRNA in subjects with

schizophrenia; however, the use of a threshold of 3

3

background also failed to reveal differences between

schizophrenic and control subjects in any measure of

synaptophysin mRNA expression. Fourth, some (Selemon

et al 1995; 1998) but not all (Akbarian et al 1995) studies

suggest that neuronal density is increased in the dorsal

PFC of schizophrenic subjects. Thus, it is possible that our

failure to detect an increase in the density of

synaptophy-sin-labeled neurons in the subjects with schizophrenia

actually represents a decrease in the number of neurons

with detectable levels of synaptophysin expression.

None-theless, other studies using tissue homogenate based

tech-niques have also failed to find altered levels of

synapto-physin mRNA expression in the PFC of schizophrenic

subjects (Eastwood and Harrison 1998; Karson et al 1999;

Rodriguez et al 1998). Finally, because this study

exam-ined the right hemisphere and our previous study of

synaptophysin protein examined the left hemisphere, it is

possible that the synaptophysin alterations in

schizophre-nia are lateralized; however, Perrone-Bizzozero et

al(1996) also found decreased synaptophysin protein

lev-els in right area 9 of schizophrenic subjects, and two

studies failed to find decreased synaptophysin mRNA in

the left PFC of schizophrenic subjects (Eastwood and

Harrison 1998; Karson et al 1999).

Although different PFC regions (areas 9 and 10, right

hemisphere [Perrone-Bizzozero et al 1996]; areas 9 and

46, left hemisphere [Glantz and Lewis 1997]; area 10, left

(6)

hemisphere [Karson et al 1999]; and anterolateral inferior

or middle frontal gyrus, hemisphere unspecified [Honer et

al 1999]) were examined, four of four studies found

decreased levels of synaptophysin protein in the rostral

PFC of schizophrenic subjects. In addition, another study

of left PFC areas 45 and 46 found a 19% decrease in

synaptophysin levels in schizophrenia, although this

dif-ference did not achieve statistical significance (Davidsson

et al 1999). The only study that did not find a decrease in

synaptophysin protein examined a caudal PFC region

(area 8; Gabriel et al 1997). Thus, decreased

synaptophy-sin protein in the rostral PFC appears to be common

bilaterally in schizophrenia, but it does not appear to be

attributable to diminished synaptophysin gene expression

by PFC neurons (Eastwood and Harrison 1998; Karson et

al 1999; Rodriguez et al 1998; the study under discussion);

however, these observations do not necessarily rule out an

abnormality in PFC neurons as a cause of decreased

synaptophysin protein levels in schizophrenia for several

reasons. First, it is possible that the 15 to 40% decrease in

synaptophysin protein reported in previous studies

(Dav-idsson et al 1999; Glantz and Lewis 1997; Honer et al

1999; Karson et al 1999; Perrone-Bizzozero et al 1996)

may be associated with a reduction in synaptophysin

Figure 3. Scatter plots illustrating the (A)

density of synaptophysin messenger RNA (mRNA)-labeled neurons, (B) grain density per synaptophysin mRNA-labeled neuron, and

(7)

mRNA that is too small to be detected by in situ

hybrid-ization techniques. Indeed, synaptophysin mRNA and

protein levels may not be tightly correlated. For example,

although the amount of synaptophysin protein in cultured

hippocampal cells increases substantially during

develop-ment, mRNA levels show a more modest increase,

sug-gesting that the levels of synaptophysin protein are

con-trolled posttranscriptionally (Daly and Ziff 1997). In

addition, the mRNA and protein levels of synapsin,

another synaptic-vesicle associated protein, do not always

correspond in the rat hippocampus (Melloni et al 1993).

Second, abnormal protein levels but normal levels of

synaptophysin mRNA expression in the PFC of subjects

with schizophrenia could reflect posttranslational

modifi-cations of synaptophysin that impair the recognition of the

protein by immunologic techniques. Third, our

observa-tion of a trend toward a 5% to 12% decrease in somal size

in layers 3, 5, and 6 of the schizophrenic subjects may be

consistent with an intrinsic PFC abnormality. This slight

reduction in somal size is in agreement with recent reports

of decreased layer 3 pyramidal neuron size in the PFC of

subjects with schizophrenia (Pierri et al 1999; Rajkowska

et al 1998).

Another possible explanation of decreased

synaptophy-sin protein with normal synaptophysynaptophy-sin mRNA levels in the

PFC of subjects with schizophrenia may be that one or

more afferent projections to the PFC are abnormal in this

disease. For example, schizophrenic subjects have been

reported to have decreased levels of synaptophysin mRNA

in anterior cingulate (area 24) and superior temporal (area

22) cortices ( Davidsson et al 1999; Eastwood and

Harri-son 1998; Mitchell et al 1985), cortical areas known to

project to PFC area 9 (Barbas 1992; Goldman-Rakic

1987). In addition, subcortical sites, such as the

mediodor-sal thalamic nucleus, may also contribute fewer afferents

to the PFC in schizophrenia. For example, this nucleus has

been reported to be smaller in size and to have fewer

neurons in subjects with schizophrenia (Andreasen et al

1994b; Manaye et al 1998; Pakkenberg 1990; Popken et al

1998). The decreased density of dendritic spines on

pyramidal neurons in deep layer 3 of the PFC, the thalamic

recipient zone, may also reflect a decreased number of

thalamic afferents to the PFC (Glantz and Lewis 2000).

In summary, although the source(s) of a decreased

synaptophysin protein in the rostral PFC of subjects with

schizophrenia remains to be determined, diminished

ex-pression of synaptophysin mRNA by PFC neurons does

not appear to be a contributing factor.

This work was supported by USPHS Grants Nos. MH00519 and MH45156 and the Scottish Rite Schizophrenia Research Program, N.M.J. We thank Dr. Allan Sampson and Ms. Sungyoung Auh for statistical consultations, Mrs. Mary Brady for photographic assistance, and Sandra O’Donnell and David Volk for assistance with the methodology of this study.

References

Akbarian S, Kim JJ, Potkin SG, Hagman JO, Tafazzoli A, Bunney WE Jr, et al (1995): Gene expression for glutamic acid decarboxylase is reduced without loss of neurons in prefrontal cortex of schizophrenics. Arch Gen Psychiatry

52:258 –266.

Andreasen NC, Arndt S, Swayze V II, Cizaldo T, Flaum M, O’Leary D, et al (1994b): Thalamic abnormalities in schizo-Figure 4. Bar graph illustrating the mean (6SD) grain density

in control (open bars) and schizophrenic (solid bars) subjects across all of the layers for different cell size groupings. No significant differences in grain density were observed between schizophrenic and control subjects for any cell size.

(8)

phrenia visualized through magnetic resonance image aver-aging.Science266:294 –298.

Andreasen NC, Flashman L, Flaum M, Arndt S, Swayze V II, O’Leary DS, et al (1994a): Regional brain abnormalities in schizophrenia measured with magnetic resonance imaging.

JAMA272:1763–1769.

Barbas H (1992): Architecture and cortical connections of the prefrontal cortex in the Rhesus monkey.Adv Neurol57:91– 115.

Bertolino A, Callicott JH, Nawroz S, Mattay VS, Duyn JH, Tecleschi G, et al (1998): Reproducibility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in patients with schizophre-nia.Neuropsychopharmacology18:1–9.

Bertolino A, Nawroz S, Mattay VS, Barnett AS, Duyn JH, Moonen CTW, et al (1996): Regionally specific pattern of neurochemical pathology in schizophrenia as assessed by multislice proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Am J Psychiatry153:1554 –1563.

Daly C, Ziff EB (1997): Post-transcriptional regulation of syn-aptic vesicle protein expression and the developmental con-trol of synaptic vesicle formation.J Neurosci17:2365–2375. Davidsson P, Gottfries J, Bogdanovic N, Ekman R, Karlsson I, Gottfries C-G, et al (1999): The synaptic-vesicle-specific proteins rab3a and synaptophysin are reduced in thalamus and related cortical brain regions in schizophrenic brains. Schizo-phr Res40:23–29.

Daviss SR, Lewis DA (1995): Local circuit neurons of the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia: Selective increase in the density of calbindin-immunoreactive neurons.Psychiatry Res

59:81–96.

Eastwood SL, Harrison PJ (1998): Hippocampal and cortical growth-associated protein-43 messenger RNA in schizophre-nia.Neuroscience86:437– 448.

Gabriel SM, Haroutunian V, Powchik P, Honer WG, Davidson M, Davies P, et al (1997): Increased concentrations of presynaptic proteins in the cingulate cortex of subjects with schizophrenia.Arch Gen Psychiatry54:559 –566.

Garey LJ, Ong WY, Patel TS, Kanani M, Davis A, Mortimer AM, et al (1998): Reduced dendritic spine density on cerebral cortical pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia.J Neurol Neu-rosurg Psychiatry65:446 – 453.

Glantz LA, Lewis DA (1997): Reduction of synaptophysin immunoreactivity in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia: Regional and diagnostic specificity.Arch Gen Psychiatry54:943–952.

Glantz LA, Lewis DA (2000): Decreased dendritic spine density on prefrontal cortical pyramidal neurons in schizophrenia.

Arch Gen Psychiatry57:65–73.

Goldman-Rakic PS (1987): Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In: Plum F, Mountcastle V, editors. Handbook of Physiology.

Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society, 373– 417. Goldman-Rakic PS, Selemon LD (1997): Functional and

ana-tomical aspects of prefrontal pathology in schizophrenia.

Schizophr Bull23:437– 458.

Goldstein JM, Goodman JM, Seidman LJ, Kennedy DN, Makris N, Lee H, et al (1999): Cortical abnormalities in schizophre-nia identified by structural magnetic resonance imaging.Arch Gen Psychiatry56:537–547.

Guillery RW, Herrup K (1997): Quantification without pontifi-cation: Choosing a method for counting objects in sectioned tissues.J Comp Neurol386:2–7.

Hamos JE, DeGennaro LJ, Drachman DA (1989): Synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.Neurology39: 355–361.

Harrison PJ, Heath PR, Eastwood SL, Burnet PWJ, McDonald B, Pearson RCA (1995): The relative importance of premortem acidosis and postmortem interval for human brain gene expression studies: Selective mRNA vulnerability and com-parison with their encoded proteins.Neurosci Lett200:151– 154.

Honer WG, Falkai P, Chen C, Arango V, Mann JJ, Dwork AJ (1999): Synaptic and plasticity-associated proteins in anterior frontal cortex in severe mental illness. Neuroscience 91: 1247–1255.

Jahn R, Schiebler W, Ouimet C, Greengard P (1985): A 38,000-dalton membrane protein (p38) present in synaptic vesicles.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A82:4137– 4141. Karson CN, Mrak RE, Schluterman KO, Sturner WQ, Sheng JG,

Griffin WST (1999): Alterations in synaptic proteins and their encoding mRNAs in prefrontal cortex in schizophenia: A possible neurochemical basis for “hypofrontality”.Mol Psy-chiatry4:39 – 45.

Levitt JB, Lewis DA, Yoshioka T, Lund JS (1993): Topography of pyramidal neuron intrinsic connections in macaque mon-key prefrontal cortex (areas 9 & 46).J Comp Neurol 338: 360 –376.

Lewis DA (1997): Development of the prefrontal cortex during adolescence: Insights into vulnerable neural circuits in schizophrenia.Neuropsychopharmacology16:385–398. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996):SAS

System for Mixed Models.Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Manaye KF, Liang C-L, Hicks PB, German D, Young KA

(1998): Nerve cell numbers in thalamic anterior and me-diodorsal nuclei are selectively reduced in schizophrenia.Soc Neurosci Abstr24:1236.

Masliah E, Terry RD, Alford M, DeTeresa R (1990): Quantita-tive immunohistochemistry of synaptophysin in human neo-cortex: An alternative method to estimate density of presyn-aptic terminals in paraffin sections.J Histochem Cytochem

38:837– 844.

Melchitzky DS, Sesack SR, Pucak ML, Lewis DA (1998): Synaptic targets of pyramidal neurons providing intrinsic horizontal connections in monkey prefrontal cortex.J Comp Neurol390:211–224.

Melloni RH Jr, Hemmendinger LM, Hamos JE, DeGennero LJ (1993): Synapsin I gene expression in the adult brain with comparative analysis of mRNA and protein in the hippocam-pus.J Comp Neurol327:507–520.

Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM, et al (1991): The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neu-rology41:479 – 486.

Mitchell IJ, Cross AJ, Sambrook MA, Crossman AR (1985): Sites of the neurotoxic action of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine in the macaque monkey include the ven-tral tegmental area and the locus coeruleus. Neurosci Lett

(9)

Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996):

Applied linear statistical models,4th ed. Chicago: Irwin. Pakkenberg B (1990): Pronounced reduction of total neuron

number in mediodorsal thalamic nucleus and nucleus accum-bens in schizophrenics.Arch Gen Psychiatry47:1023–1028. Perrone-Bizzozero NI, Sower AC, Bird ED, Benowitz LI, Ivins KJ, Neve RL (1996): Levels of the growth-associated protein GAP-43 are selectively increased in association cortices in schizophrenia.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A93:14182–14187. Pierri JN, Edgar CL, Lewis DA (1999): Somal size of pyramidal

neurons in deep layer 3 of prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia.Schizophr Res36:84.

Popken GJ, Bunney WE Jr, Potkin SG, Jones EG (1998): Neuron number and GABAergic and glutamatergic mRNA expres-sion in subdiviexpres-sions of the thalamic mediodorsal nucleus of schizophrenics.Soc Neurosci Abstr24:991.

Rajkowska G, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995): Cytoarchitectonic definition of prefrontal areas in the normal human cortex: I. Remapping of areas 9 and 46 using quantitative criteria.

Cereb Cortex5:307–322.

Rajkowska G, Selemon LD, Goldman-Rakic PS (1998): Neuro-nal and glial somal size in the prefrontal cortex: A postmor-tem morphometric study of schizophrenia and Huntington disease.Arch Gen Psychiatry55:215–224.

Rodriguez RM, Weickert CS, Herman MM, Hyde TM, Webster MJ, Weinberger DR, et al (1998): Synaptophysin mRNA in normal postnatal prefrontal cortex development and in schizophrenia versus normal control. Soc Neurosci Abstr

24:987.

Schlaepfer TE, Harris GJ, Tien AY, Peng LW, Lee S, Federman EB, et al (1994): Decreased regional cortical gray matter volume in schizophrenia.Am J Psychiatry151:842– 848. Selemon LD, Goldman-Rakic PS (1999): The reduced neuropil

hypothesis: A circuit based model of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry45:17–25.

Selemon LD, Rajkowska G, Goldman-Rakic PS (1995): Abnor-mally high neuronal density in the schizophrenic cortex: A morphometric analysis of prefrontal area 9 and occipital area 17.Arch Gen Psychiatry52:805– 818.

Selemon LD, Rajkowska G, Goldman-Rakic PS (1998): Elevated neuronal density in prefrontal area 46 in brains from schizo-phrenic patients: Application of a three-dimensional, stereo-logic counting method.J Comp Neurol392:402– 412. Shelton RC, Karson CN, Doran AR, Pickar D, Bigelow LB,

Weinberger DR (1988): Cerebral structural pathology in schizophrenia: Evidence for a selective prefrontal cortical defect.Am J Psychiatry145:154 –163.

Sudhof TC, Lottspeich F, Greengard P, Mehl E, Jahn R (1987): The cDNA and derived amino acid sequences for rat and human synaptophysin.Nucleic Acids Res15:9607.

Sullivan EV, Lim KO, Mathalon D, Marsh L, Beal DM, Harris D, et al (1998): A profile of cortical gray matter volume deficits characteristic of schizophrenia.Cereb Cortex8:117–124. Volk DW, Austin MC, Pierri JN, Sampson AR, Lewis DA

(2000): Decreased GAD67mRNA expression in a subset of prefrontal cortical GABA neurons in schizophrenia.Arch Gen Psychiatry57:237–245.

Weinberger DR, Aloia MS, Goldberg TE, Berman KF (1994): The frontal lobes and schizophrenia.J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci6:419 – 427.

White EL (1989):Cortical Circuits. Synaptic Organization of the Cerebral Cortex. Structure, Function and Theory. Boston: Birkha¨user.

Wiedenmann B, Franke WW (1985): Identification and localiza-tion of synaptophysin, an integral membrane glycoprotein of Mr 38,000 characteristic of presynaptic vesicles. Cell 41: 1017–1028.

Gambar

Table 1. Characteristics of Matched Pairs of Subjects
Figure 1. Brightfield photomicrograph fromprefrontal cortex area 9 processed with 35S-synaptophysin oligonucleotide probes andcounterstained with cresyl violet
Figure 2. Darkfield photomicrograph from prefrontal cortex area9 illustrating the size and packing density of synaptophysinmessenger RNA–positive neurons across cortical layers
Figure 4. Bar graph illustrating the mean (� SD) grain densityin control (open bars) and schizophrenic (solid bars) subjectsacross all of the layers for different cell size groupings

Referensi

Dokumen terkait