• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Nothing About Me Without Me Engaging Citizens in Health Research with Dr Jennifer Zelmer

N/A
N/A
NI PUTU

Academic year: 2022

Membagikan "Nothing About Me Without Me Engaging Citizens in Health Research with Dr Jennifer Zelmer"

Copied!
26
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

1

(2)

Nothing About Me Without Me

Engaging Citizens in Health Research

International Society for Quality in Healthcare Webinar July 5, 2016

(3)

3 Objectives

• Understand the motivations and context for evolving global efforts to strengthen the engagement of patients, family, informal caregivers, and healthy individuals in the health research process.

• Describe various ways that these efforts have been operationalized.

• Explore promising practices to strengthen engagement in health research.

• Identify a series of resources designed to support those who wish to strengthen engagement in research.

(4)

4

Introductions: Who’s Here?

Polling Question #1 (choose all that apply to you)

• Patient/client/service user

• Informal carer or advocate

• Researcher

• Research funder

• Health professional

• Manager or policy-maker in the health sector

• Other

(5)

5 What is citizen/patient engagement in research?

“Patient engagement occurs when patients meaningfully and actively collaborate in the governance, priority setting, and conduct of research, as well as in summarizing,

distributing, sharing, and applying its resulting knowledge”

- CIHR

“Meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, and other healthcare stakeholders throughout the

research process—from topic selection through design and conduct of research to dissemination of results”

- PCORI

(6)

6

Passive

• Person is a data point/

subject

• 'doing to'

Active

• Person

contributes/

co-creates

• ‘doing with’

(7)

7 What citizen/patient engagement is not

• Analyzing data from health records or a survey completed by citizens

– i.e. citizens/patients only as subjects of research

• Having someone on a committee so you can check a box

– Don’t ask unless you’re prepared to listen

• Turning patients into researchers (necessarily)

(8)

8

(9)

9 Why people choose to get involved in research

Personal benefit

Altruistic reasons

“In practice most people we talked to were motivated by a mixture of reasons which might change over time”

healthtalk.org

(10)

10

Why involve citizens/patients in research?

Hypothesized impacts of engagement

Source: Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. (2015). Evaluating Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in Research: Moving from Theory to Practice. J. Comp. Eff. Res., 4(2), 133-45.

(11)

11 Goals of Community Engagement (Tindana, et al.)

• To ensure the relevance of research

• To assess whether relevant research is culturally and practically acceptable in the context it is intended

• To ensure that community disruption is minimized, i.e., avoiding the displacement of local medical staff from pressing local needs

• To avoid exploitation, by ensuring a fair distribution of the benefits of research

• To take into account the ethical hazards that may be part of the social, economic, and political landscape of the

community

Tindana PO, et al. (2007). Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries. PLOS Medicine, 4(9): e273. LINK

(12)

12

Which Goal is most important for you?

Polling Question #2

• Better quality research

• More applicable/relevant

• Empowering patients

• Increased acceptability and uptake

• Democratic ideals

• Moral obligation

• Minimize community disruption

• Avoid exploitation

(13)

13 Opportunities for Engagement in Research

(14)

14 Who to Involve and How?

Source: Abelson J. et al. 2015. A framework for patient and public involvement in Ontario’s health technology assessment process. Draft manuscript. Cited in Patient Engagement and Canada’s SPOR Initiative A Resource Guide for Research Teams and Networks

(15)

15 Identifying Participants: Considerations

• Approach should reflect intended goals

Alignment with research plan

• Can influence nature of engagement and outcomes

“We found no comparative analytic studies to provide evidence supporting a particular method to identify or select patients for engagement in research.” – Domecq et al.

• Expectations for all parties need to be clear

Successful relationship takes effort and resources Shared language and understanding

(16)

16 Identifying Participants: Examples of Options

• e.g. direct approach, advertised, social media, snowball Convenience sample

• e.g. some citizen juries or panels Random(ish) selection

• Usually based on pre-identified criteria Purposive recruitment

• "communities of inquiry and action evolve and address questions and issues that are significant for those who participate as co-researchers” (Reason and Bradbury) Participatory action research

(17)

17 How to Involve? Many Different Approaches

Surveys

Focus groups

Interviews Deliberation Organizational

participation Participatory

action research

Open innovation

Structured review

etc.

(18)

18 Frequency of Reports of Use of Various Engagement Methods: Domecq

Source: Domecq JP. (2014). Patient Engagement in Research: A Systematic Review. BMC Health Services Research, 14:89. LINK

(19)

19 Addressing Risks, Barriers & Opportunities

“Of the few studies that described potential solutions [to risks and barriers], the most commonly described were spending adequate time to build reciprocal

relationships (between patients and researcher), fostering mutual respect and developing clear expectations that are explicitly described and documented in study protocols.”

– Domecq et al.

(20)

20 Considerations in Involvement in Research (1)

LANGUAGE

a

EXPECTATIONS

j

RISK OF TOKENISM

x

WHO’S ON FIRST?

j

DIVERSITY

X

t

BIAS

COMMUNITIES

& INDIVIDUALS

5

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

y

(21)

21 Considerations in Involvement in Research (2)

RESOURCES

w

LOGISTICS

!

TRAINING

Y

VALUING CONTRIBUTION

-

MUTUAL RESPECT

N

CAPTURE

^

SUSTAINING INTEREST

p

INNOVATIVE APPROACHES

P

(22)

22 Starting Points: Selected Resources

• About patient engagement in research

Why, effectiveness, outcomes

• Experiences of patient engagement in research

Case studies, personal experiences

• Tools and guides to facilitate patient engagement in research

What resources have you found useful?

Who do you follow?

Please type suggestions in the chat box or tweet with

hashtag #ISQuaEd

(23)

23 Starting Points: Selected Resources

About Patient Engagement in Research

Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public

involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expectations. [Online] 2012; 17:637-650. LINK

Domecq JP. (2014). Patient Engagement in Research: A

Systematic Review. BMC Health Services Research, 14:89. LINK

Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. (2015). Evaluating Patient and

Stakeholder Engagement in Research: Moving from Theory to Practice. J. Comp. Eff. Res., 4(2), 133-45.

Staley K. (2015). ‘Is It Worth Doing?’ Measuring the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in Research. Research

Involvement and Engagement, 1(6). LINK

Tindana PO, Singh JA, Tracy CS, Upshur REG, Daar AS, et al.

(2007) Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community

Engagement in Research in Developing Countries. PLoS Med 4(9): e273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273 LINK

(24)

24 Starting Points: Selected Resources Case Studies and Experiences

Cochrane Consumer Network: LINK

Global health case studies: Tindana PO, Singh JA, Tracy CS, Upshur REG, Daar AS, et al. (2007) Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries. PLoS Med 4(9): e273. doi:

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273 LINK

PACER (Canada): a cadre of patient researchers who have undertaken a year-long internship in engagement research LINK

UK: Citizen and researchers experiences with research engagement LINK

(25)

25 Starting Points: Selected Resources Guides and Tools

• Cochrane training for consumers: LINK

• INVOLVE briefing notes for researchers: LINK

• PCORI Engagement Rubric: LINK

• Research Involvement and Engagement Journal LINK

• SPOR (Canada) resource guide for research teams and networks undertaking patient engagement in Canada by Julia Abelson: LINK

• TOPPER Toolkit with orientation materials: LINK

(26)

26

@jenzelmer

Thank You

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The objective of research was to find out the correlation between students’ achievement in vocabulary and reading comprehension of the eleventh grade students of

Results: Tobacco smoke significantly lov\€red VEGF level, the number of spiralis arterioles, anduterine cervix epithelial cells compared with control group (P

Sisa cairan tersebut disaring dan diccamour dengan 10 – 15 liter air.cairan ini sudah dapat disemprotkan pada tanaman yang terserang hama.. Untuk satu hektar lahan diperlukan 5 –

Sebelum tahun 1980an, sebagian besar perbaikan tanah lunak untuk mengatasi pemampatan yang terjadi dilakukan dengan menggunakan sand drains dan horizontal sand

Transboundary Haze Pollution Act yang mengatakan bahwa parties (dalam hal ini negara anggota ASEAN yang meratifikasi AATHP) memiliki kewajiban dalam semangat solidaritas

Through its infrastructure, the firm strives to effectively and consistently identify external opportunities and threats, identify resources and capabilities, and support

Mengharap dengan hormat kehadiran Bapak/Ibu pada Pendidikan dan Latihan Profesi Guru (PLPG) Tahun 2012 Tahap 4, Periode 6 yang akan dilaksanakan pada tanggal 29 Juni –

Dengan diberlakukannya Peraturan Bupati ini, maka Peraturan Bupati Banjar Nomor 37 Tahun 2015 tentang Pelaksana Penyusunan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah