Outline of Loan Agreement

(1)

i

TABLES

Table 1. 1 Budget Allocation for Component 1 by Executing Agency and Package (in USD) ... 4

Table 1. 2 Budget Allocation for Component 2 (in USD) ... 5

Table 1. 3 Contract, Loan and APBN/D Sharing by Packages (in million IDR) ... 5

Table 1. 4 Floodways, Canals and Retention Basins of Construction Packages under the Project ... 6

Table 1. 5 Dredged Volume and Embankment Rehabilitation ... 7

Table 1. 6 Sequencing of Project Construction Works ... 8

Table 2. 1 Established Consultant Head Office and Site Offices ... 14

Table 2. 2 Consumed Person-Month (December 2017) ... 14

Table 2.3 Financial Status of the Consultant ... 18

Table 2.4 Contractors and Construction Status under JUFMP/JEDI ... 19

Table 2.5 Dredged Volume at Upper Sunter Floodway ... 24

Table 2.6 Volume of Sludge Disposal of each station at West Banjir Canal ... 25

Table 3.1 Package under Construction ... 30

Table 3.2 Packages Completed Defect Liability Period... 30

Table 3. 3 Contract, Loan, and APBN/D Sharing by Package (in IDR) ... 30

Table 3. 4 Contract Price and Disbursement by Package and Source of Fund (in IDR)... 31

Table 3. 5 Dredging Work up to Q4-2017 ... 31

Table 3. 6 Construction Work and Financial Progress, Q4 2017 ... 31

Table 3. 7 Completion Date and Defects Liability Period ... 44

FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Loan allocation among Executing Agencies ... 2

Figure 1.2 Budget Allocation for Component 1 of JUFMP (in million USD) ... 5

Figure 2. 1 Overall Implementation Arrangement ...11

Figure 3.1 Financial Progress (Q4 2017, billion IDR) ... 32

Figure 3.2 Dredged Material Disposed at CDF Ancol (in thousand m3_{), Q4-2017 ... 32}

(3)

Korea Engineering Consultants Corp. in joint venture with PT. Puser Bumi Mekon, 1 in associated with PT. Tetira International Consultants, PT. Duta Cipta Mandiri Engineering Consultant

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Outline of Loan Agreement

The outline of loan agreement of the Project is.

Executing Agency

: Directorate General of Water Resources, Ministry of Public Works and Housing

Date of Loan Sign

: February 17, 2012

Effective Date

: 90 days after Loan Signing

Closing Date

: March 31, 2017

–

Original Loan Agreement

February 28, 2019

–

Amendment No.2

Loan Amount

: USD 139,640,000

Amendment No. 2 to the Loan Agreement

The Project consists of the following parts:

Part 1. Dredging, rehabilitation and flow capacity improvement of selected key floodways, canals and retention

basins.

(a)

Dredging and rehabilitation of the Project sites consisting of eleven (11) floodways, with total length of

approximately 67.5 kilometers long, and four (4) retention basins, with a total area of approximately 65.1 hectares,

which have been identified as priority sections of the Jakarta flood management system in need of urgent

rehabilitation and improvement in flow capacity; and transportation and disposal of materials dredged from the

Project Sites in Disposal Sites.

(b)

Rehabilitation and/or construction of approximately 42.2 kilometers of embankments within the Project Sites and

replacement or repair of mechanical equipment as necessary.

(c)

Construction of a drainage pumping station of approximately forty (40) cubic meters per second capacity within the

DGWR Project Sites.

Part 2. Technical assistance for project management, social safeguards and capacity building.

(a)

Supporting contracts management, engineering design reviews, construction supervision and technical assistance

for implementing the Project, including the Resettlement Policy Framework, Resettlement Plan and the Grievance

Redress System.

(b)

Improving institutional coordination for operation and maintenance of Jakarta’s flood management system, as well

as establishing a Flood Management Information System.

(c)

Implementation of Resettlement Plans.

(d)

Establishment and operation of the Grievance Redress System.

(e)

Carrying out technical studies and analytical assessment to review the master plan on flood management in

Cisadane

–

Jakarta

–

Bekasi area.

Loan Category

becomes

Category

Amount of the Loan Allocated (USD)

Expenditures (%) to be financed (inclusive of Taxes)

Original Amendment

(1) Works under Part 1 of the Project

(a) Works under Part 1 of the Project for the DGWR Project Sites 42,400,000 71,100,000 80% (b) Works under Part 1 of the Project for the DGHS Project Sites 17,800,000 17,800,000 80% (c) Works under Part 1 of the Project for the DKI Project Sites 69,340,000 40,640,000 67% (2) Consultant Services, Goods and Non-Consulting Services under 10,100,000 6,800,000 100%

(3) Incremental Operating Cost under Part 2(a) of the Project - 300,000 100% (4) Consultants Services, Goods and Non-Consulting Services under - 3,000,000 100%

(4)

Figure 1.1 Loan allocation among Executing Agencies

1.2 Project Location

DGWR

78.2

56% DGHS

17.8

13% RDA

3.0

2%

DKI

40.6

29%

(5)

1.3 Background of the Project

Jakarta is the preeminent urban center of Indonesia

. It is the main commercial hub of Indonesia. Regional urbanization

has contributed to making Jakarta one of the largest metropolitan areas in the world. The Special Capital District of Jakarta

(DKI Jakarta)1 covers an area of approximately 650 km

2

_{with a population of about 9.6 million in 2010, while the population}

of Greater Jakarta

2

_{(covering about 7,300 km}

2

_{) stood at 27.9 million}

2

_{. Rapid growth and inadequate development of public}

services have contributed to a host of problems the most severe of which are manifested in disastrous perennial flooding.

Flood management infrastructures in Jakarta

. Greater Jakarta is surrounded by several dormant volcanoes whose

slopes form the upstream catchment areas of the 13 major rivers that flow through Jakarta to the Java Sea. The rainy

season begins in late November and ends in early April. Jakarta sits in the lowest lying areas of the basin. Forty percent of

Jakarta lies below sea level, including most of North Jakarta, which is being severely threatened by acute land subsidence.

The basic principle of flood management in Jakarta is to divert peak flows from upstream areas around the core of the city,

directing flows to the East and West of Jakarta via two major flood canals emptying into Jakarta Bay. Within the city, the

macro drainage system consists of 13 rivers and a large number of drainage channels. The macro drainage system can be

divided into several subsystems that are separated by floodgates. In low-lying areas, there are polders, which are protective

systems that utilize retention reservoirs at the lowest point and regulate excess water levels by pumping out of the system.

Poor condition of the system, under-implementation of operations and maintenance (O&M), and inadequate local drainage

management result in rapidly occurring inundations during rainfall conditions.

Causes of flood in Jakarta

. The overall urbanization trends are central to the causes of Jakarta flooding. This has led to

the deterioration of several critical factors. The encroachment and/or development of critical catchment areas have resulted

in both increased rainwater runoff and lack of natural stormwater retention areas both within the city and in upstream areas

of the catchment. Increased generation and inadequate management of solid waste have contributed to waste choked

canals and floodways, exacerbated by insufficient maintenance resulting in weakening structures and sediment build-up.

Some canals are operating at less than a third of their original capacity. Land subsidence continues at increasingly alarming

rates, principally caused by intensive deep groundwater abstraction. Land subsidence results in increased vulnerability to

flooding due to the reduced gravitational capacity to channel storm flows to the sea and an increased risk of tidal flooding.

Flood management institutions in Jakarta

. Responsibility for the development and management of flood infrastructure in

Jakarta is shared between two central government agencies and the Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta (DKI) i.e. The

Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung - Cisadane (BBWSCC)3 under the Directorate General of Water Resource (DGWR) of

the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MoPWH); the Directorate General of Human Settlements (DGCK) of the MoPWH;

and DKI, through its provincial public works office (DTA-DKI)4, is responsible for the remaining drains, floodways and

retention basins.

1.4 Project Objectives

The Project Development Objective (PDO) of the Jakarta Urgent Flood Mitigation Project/Jakarta Emergency Dredging

Initiative (JUFMP/JEDI) is to contribu

te to the improvement of the operation and maintenance of priority sections of Jakarta’s

flood management system. The PDO will be achieved through:

a)

Dredging sections of selected key floodways, canals and retention basins to improve their flow capacities, and

disposing the dredge material in proper facilities;

b)

Rehabilitating and constructing embankment in sections of, and repairing or replacing mechanical equipment in,

the same selected key floodways, canals and retention basins to sustain and improve their operations;

c)

Establishing institutional coordination between the three responsible agencies to encourage coordinated

development, and operations and maintenance (O&M) of Jakarta's flood management system, and

d)

Strengthening the capability of the responsible agencies to improve the operations, maintenance and

management of Jakarta's flood management system.

1 Jakarta is officially designated a province with special status as the capital of Indonesia i.e., DKI Jakarta (or ‘Special Capital City District of Jakarta’). 2 More than double the population of 11.9 million in 1980.

3 River basin management agency for the Ciliwung and Cisadane rivers, which is a Central Government institution designed to function as a river basin organization.

(6)

1.5 Construction Packages

The ultimate goal is to improve Jakarta’s flood management system and reduce the time and duration of floods by dredging

selected floodways, channels and retention basins and to dispose of the excavated (or dredged) materials at three managed

facilities each being many kilometers from the proposed construction sites. As discussed in other sections of this Inception

Report, there are 13 (thirteen) rivers flowing northwards through Jakarta. These form its macro drainage system. Overtime,

poor operation and maintenance (O&M) and ineffective solid waste management, has resulted in significant sediment

deposition and solid waste build up. Additionally, uncontrolled (intentional) upstream land development has resulted in both

increased surface runoff and lack of natural storm water retention areas due to the alteration of the surface (less forested

areas, more houses and roads, etc.). Effects of climate change has also changed the hydrology of the region resulting in

intense and longer duration downpours at times and shifting of the timing of wet and dry seasons.

This Project will focus on 11 (eleven) channels and 4 (four) retention basins which have been identified as priorities. The

major scope of works under the Project include the following: (i) dredging of floodways, channels, and retention basins and

disposing the excavated material at three separate disposal facilities; (ii) rehabilitating and constructing embankments and

repairing or replacing mechanical equipment on various structures, and (iii) constructing Sentiong pump station

One management concern with respect to this Project will be the development of effective coordination and cooperation of

three separate government authorities. Under Indonesian law, the Ministry of Public Works and Housing Affair (MoPWH),

[through two departments - DGHS and DGWR], and the provincial government of Jakarta, DKI are responsible for managing

different aspects of Jakarta's flood control system. The MoPWH departments are responsible for floodways that cross

provincial boundaries; while the Jakarta Public Works Department (DTA-DKI) is responsible for drains and retention basins

within its boundaries.

For this Project, these are the works that are under the three separate authorities:

Under MoPWH-DGHS: (i) Tanjungan drain, (ii) Lower Angke drain, and (iii) Cideng-Thamrin drain;

Under MoPWH-DGWR: (i) Cengkareng floodway, (ii) West Banjir canal/floodway, (iii) Lower Sunter floodway; (iv) Upper

Sunter floodway, and (v) Sentiong Pump Station;

Under DPU-DKI: (i) Ciliwung-Gunung Sahari floodway, (ii) Sentiong-Sunter drain (including Ancol canal), (iii)

Grogol-Sekretaris drain, (iv) Pakin-Kali Besar-Jelakeng drain, (v) Krukut-Cideng drain; and (vi) Krukut Lama drain;

and

Under DPU-DKI: (i) North Sunter retention basin, (ii) South Sunter retention basin, (iii) East Sunter III retention basin, and

(iv) Melati retention basin.

Table 1. 1 Budget Allocation for Component 1 by Executing Agency and Package (in USD)

Executing Agency/Package

Budget

(Loan+APBN/D) Loan Allocation APBN/D Share

DTA - Jakarta 60,656,716 40,640,000 20,016,716

Package 1 21,517,910 14,417,000 7,100,910

Package 4 27,555,224 18,462,000 9,093,224

Package 7 11,583,582 7,761,000 3,822,582

DGWR 88,875,000 71,100,000 17,775,000

Package 2A 31,000,000 24,800,000 6,200,000

Package 2B 8,125,000 6,500,000 1,625,000

Package 6 13,875,000 11,100,000 2,775,000

Package 8 35,875,000 28,700,000 7,175,000

DGHS 22,250,000 17,800,000 4,450,000

Package 3 6,717,421 5,373,937 1,343,484

Package 5 15,532,579 12,426,063 3,106,516

(7)

Figure 1.2 Budget Allocation for Component 1 of JUFMP (in million USD)

Table 1. 2 Budget Allocation for Component 2 (in USD)

Items Total Loan IBRD APBD/N Sharing

Supervision Consultant* 6,800,000 6,800,000 -

Incremental Operating Cost under Part 2(a) of the Project 300,000 300,000 - Review the Master Plan on Flood Management in Cisadane-Jakarta-Bekasi area 3,000,000 3,000,000 -

Total Component 2 10,100,000 10,100,000 -

Total Project Cost (Comp 1+2) 181,880,716 139,640,000 42,241,716

*) Originally budget allocation of Supervision Consultant was 10,100,000 USD but 3,000,000 USD allocated for Review the Master Plan on Flood Management in Cisadane-Jakarta-Bekasi Area under Center for Water Resources of Research Development Agency of MPWH.

Table 1. 3 Contract, Loan and APBN/D Sharing by Packages (in million IDR)

Executing Agency/Package Contract Price Loan APBN/D Sharing

Prov Gov of DKI 829,021 555,444 273,557

Package 1 276,443 185,217 91,226

Package 4 315,384 211,308 104,077

Package 7 237,194 158,920 78,274

DG Cipta Karya 258,074 206,459 51,615

Package 3 67,177 53,742 13,435

Package 5 190,897 152,717 38,179

DG Water Resources* 534,443 427,555 106,889

Package 2A 261,002 208,802 52,200

Package 2B 80,387 64,310 16,077

Package 6 193,054 154,443 38,611

T OTAL 1,621,539 1,189,458 432,081

*) The last package under DG Water Resources, namely Package 8 – Sentiong-Ancol Pump Station is waiting for Pre-qualification. DGWR

88.9 52% DGHS

22.3 13%

DKI 60.7 35%

Total Budget Allocation for Component 1 = 171.8 (million USD)

(8)

1.5.1 Works of Construction Packages

Dredging and embankment rehabilitation of selected key floodways, canals and retention basins. This component will

support the dredging and rehabilitation of 11 floodways / canals and four retention basins which have been identified as

priority sections of the Jakarta flood management system in need of urgent rehabilitation and improvement in flow capacities.

The 11 floodways / canals are estimated to have a total length of 67.5 km, while the four retention basins estimated to cover

a total area of 65.1 hectares. The main project activities for the dredging and rehabilitation of selected key floodways,

canals and retention basins have been divided into eight works packages. The detailed description of the selected key

floodways, canals and retention basins are provided in Table 1.4 below.

Table 1. 4 Floodways, Canals and Retention Basins of Construction Packages under the Project

Contract Works Package

Location Note 3 Location Coordinates

(WGS 84) Note 4

Description of Drains (Estimated)

Length (m) Width (m) _(m2Area _{or ha.)}

1 (DKI)

Ciliwung-Gunung Sahari Drain from 48M 702 674 m E, 931 7919 m S

to 48M 702 501 m E, 932 2469 m S 5,100 21.50 – 45.90 171,870 m2

6 (DGWR) West Banjir Canal (sea side)

from 48M 696 390m E, 932 2730 m S Note 1 For contracting purposes, the Sunter Floodway has been divided into two sub-packages- Upper Sunter Floodway and Lower Sunter

Floodway.

Note 2 For contracting purposes, the Krukut Drain has been divided into two sub-packages- Krukut Cideng Drain and Krukut Lama Drain. Note 3 Approximate length, width, area and coordinates may vary without an amendment to this Agreement provided that the variance is

(9)

1.5.2 Volume of Works

Surveys of the selected key floodways, canals and retention basins carried out during project preparation estimated the total

volume of dredge material to be dredged to be about 3.4 million m

3

_{(of which about 95,000 m}

3

_{are estimated to be solid}

waste). About 42.2 km of embankments are expected to be rehabilitated or constructed within these floodways, canals and

retention basins. Details of the project achievement to this period summarized in Table 1.5 below.

Table 1. 5 Dredged Volume and Embankment Rehabilitation

Package/Site Dredged

practices during project preparation period. The sediment to be dredged consists mainly of soft soils (silt and clay), mixed

with garbage and various solid waste

6

_.

The dredging considers the removal of under-water obstacles, such as rubble and piles from old structures or old

embankments, especially under bridges. Also, trunks and branches of trees could be found in the water. All sediment from

5 The exact methodology and equipment for dredging will be proposed by the works contractor, subject to the approval of the Supervision Consultant. The bidding document specifies the minimum parameters to be adhered to by the contractor.

(10)

under the bridges and other obstacles including sediment on the embankment will be removed as well. All dredging works

will be executed from the water, except some temporary disposal and the truck loading works.

All equipment used for the removal (excavation) of the sediment must be able to position themselves in the water during

dredging operations with spuds. This is to guarantee that each section of the drains, floodways and waduks are dredged.

Damage of embankments, obstacles or any other assets before, during and after the dredging works will be repaired.

1.5.4 Transportation Methods

All transport of sediment should avoid leakage or spills and dump trucks should be 100% watertight

7

_{. Any leakage of the}

dump trucks on the truck loading location and along the route to the disposal sites will be cleaned immediately. Each truck

movement, limited to 22.00 pm to 05.00 AM, will be registered. In particular, for disposal at Ancol CDF, this will include daily

reports mentioning type of truck, license plate number, time of truck departure from the loading location, and time of arrival at

the deposit area in Ancol CDF.

1.5.5 Sequenced Project Implementation

A sequenced implementation design has been adopted as a key implementation risk management mechanism for the

project. Table 1.6 summarized the Phase 1 and Phase 2 sites.

Table 1. 6 Sequencing of Project Construction Works

Sequencing Contract Package and Implementation Responsibility

Phase 1

1 (DKI-Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta) 2A (DGWR-Directorate General of Water Resource) 2B (DGWR)

3 (DGHS - Directorate General of Human Settlement)

Phase 2

4 (DKI) 5 (DGHS) 6 (DGWR) 7 (DKI) 8 (DGWR)

1.5.6 Disposal Sites

The disposal sites are not financed by the project; however, they are considered an integral part of the project. The

approximately 3.4 million m

3

_{of sediment material and the approximately 95,000 m}

3

_{of solid waste that will be removed from}

the floodways, canals and retention basins that are being dredged by this project will be disposed of in the following manner

.

•

Non-Hazardous Sediment Material - will be transported and disposed of at the Ancol Sea Reclamation Works, known as the Ancol confined disposal facility (CDF). The project will not incur any charges for disposing the material at the CDF.

•

Hazardous Sediment Material (if any are found) - will be disposed of at the PPLi Hazardous Waste Facility in Bogor, West Java8_{. Disposal at PPLi is subject to a disposal fee, funding for which is included in the JUFMP dredging contract.}

•

Solid Waste - will be transported and disposed of at City of Jakarta's landfill in Bekasi, West Java, known as the Bantar

Gebang Landfill. Disposal at Bantar Gebang Landfill is subject to a landfill tipping fee, funding for which is included in the JUFMP dredging contract.

7 The exact methodology and equipment for transportation will be proposed by the works contractor, subject to the approval of the Supervision Consultant. The bidding document specifies the minimum parameters to be adhered to by the contractor.

(11)

CHAPTER 2. ACTIVITIES OF CONSULTANTS

2.1 Summary of Consultants Key Activities

The Consultant has undertaken and conducted the following activities to achieve the above objectives.

2.1.1 Supervision of Works

Review / check detailed engineering designs and drawings, method statements, specifications, and activity schedules, carry

out additional survey and investigation as required, as well as conduct any revisions deemed necessary and to obtain their

approval by the CPIU and concerned PIUs.

Supervise and monitor the testing of all sections of each project site by the works contractors for hazardous material prior to

dredging works.

Supervise the implementation of the works, including (but not limited to):

• Dredging (including the separation of solid waste from dredge material, and their transportation, disposal and

spreading at approved landfill and Ancol CDF respectively), embankment and rehabilitation of canals, pumps, rack

repairs and maintenance.

• Provide assistance to PIUs for process of payment requests made by the contractors, and loan disbursement

procedures as well as the preparation of Annual Work Plan (AWP) and loan disbursement prediction, as required.

• Maintain site records and prepare detailed monthly progress reports.

• Prepare work as executed drawings and records, and operation manuals and hand over the completed works to

the PIU and CPIU.

• Prepare a Practical Completion and Outstanding Defects Report for each construction contract supervised.

• Prepare Final Completion and Handover Report for each construction contract supervised.

Supervise and monitor the construction activities (including inspecting the quality, standards and adequacy of the confined

facility) at the Ancol CDF site during project implementation, and at all its off-site locations such as the source locations for

the sand and laterite soils used for reclamation works.

Provide CPIU and PIUs with technical assistance as needed from time to time. This may include the provision of support

and advice to the CPIU regarding implementation of Project works, particularly on the technical, overall planning, financial

management, and procurement aspects of the Project.

2.1.2 General Project Management

Advise and assist CPMU, CPIU and PIUs with planning and implementation of all components of the JUFMP program and

monitor and report their progress relative to agreed implementation targets.

Assist JUFMP management with identifying, evaluating, and developing methods and procedures that are efficient, effective

and meet good implementation practice.

Assist CPMU, CPIU and PIUs with planning, managing and controlling implementation activities to ensure successful

delivery of the program objectives.

Facilitate coordination and cooperation among the CPMU, CPIU and the PIUs.

(12)

2.1.3 Environmental Management

The implementation of environmental protection measure in the project refers to

the Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (RKL/RPL) of each work site and the Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (EMMP). With these 2 guidances, the international and national environmental engineer conducted the activities below:

• Review and compare the EMMP reports and the application in the field for every package.

• Monitor and supervise implementation of environmental management in every package according to the

Environmental Management Plan (RKL)

• Supervise implementation of environmental monitoring in every package according to the Environmental monitoring

plan (RPL)

• Assist in preparation of RKL

–

RPL implementation Report every 3 months

• Coordinate with BPLHD about environmental matters related to implementation of RKL

–

RPL.

2.1.4 Resettlement Plans (RPs)

Supervise and support the implementation of Resettlement Plans (RPs), consistent with

• The Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) of each work site where involuntary resettlement is

required.

• The Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) of the Project.

Provide technical and administration assistance in land acquisition and resettlement process.

2.1.5 Grievance Redress(GR)/Complaint Handling Mechanism (GRM)

Develop and operate the Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM), which will include but will not be limited to administering

complaints from Project Affected Persons (PAPs) in a systematic way on a day to day basis.

Update complaints on the website, informing those who complained the status of their complaint as well as providing

feedback or follow up actions.

Assist DKI in providing acceptable follow-up actions on complaints, ensuring that decisions were made based on

transparent, fair, independent, and accountable processes through Grievance Redress or Complaint Handling Advisory.

Provide recommendations to DKI authorities on status of complaints, from the on-site unit through the provincial level

processes.

2.1.6 Others

Design, develop, and operate a web-based project communications and reporting system.

2.2 Project Organization

2.2.1 Project Implementation Arrangement

(13)

(14)

2.2.2 Central Project Management Unit (CPMU)

No. Central Project Management Unit (CPMU) – JUFMP/JEDI Position

1. Director Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Ketua

2. Direktur Pengairan dan Irigasi, Bappenas Wakil Ketua _{Merangkap Anggota}

3. Direktur Bina Program, Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Anggota

4. Direktur Permukiman Perumahan, Bappenas Anggota

5. Direktur Pendanaan Multi Lateral, Bappenas Anggota

6. Kepala Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan, DKI Jakarta Anggota

7. Asisten Pembangunan Sekretaris Daerah, DKI Jakarta Anggota

8. Kepala Biro Administrasi Prasarana Kota, DKI Jakarta Anggota

9. Kepala Biro Perencanaan dan Kerjasama Luar Negeri, PU Anggota

10. Direktur Bina Program, Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya Anggota

11. Kepala Sub Direktorat Kelembagaan Infrastruktur Sumber Daya Air, Bappenas Anggota 12. Kepala Sub Direktorat Kerjasama Luar Negeri, Direktorat Bina Program, Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Anggota 13. Kepala Sub Direktorat Program dan Anggaran, Direktorat Bina Program, Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Anggota 14. Kepala Bagian Kerjasama Luar Negeri, Biro Perencanaan dan Kerjasama Luar Negeri, Sekretariat Jenderal,

PU Anggota

15. Kepala Sub Direktorat Kerjasama Luar Negeri, Direktorat Bina Program, Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya Anggota 16. Kepala Bidang Program dan Perencanaan Umum, Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung Cisadane, Direktorat _{Jenderal Sumber Daya Air} Anggota 17. Kepala Sub Bagian Kerjasama Multi Lateral, Biro Perencanaan dan Kerjasama Multi Lateral, Sekretariat

Jenderal, PU Anggota

18. Kepala Seksi Kerjasama Multi Lateral, Sub Direktorat Kerjasama Luar Negeri, Direktorat Bina Program, _{Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air} 19. Kepala Seksi Multi Lateral Kerjasama Luar Negeri, Direktorat Bina Program, Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya Anggota

20. Pejabat Fungsional Perencana Pertama, Bappenas Anggota

2.2.3 Central Project Implementation Unit (CPIU)

No. Central Project Implementation Unit (CPIU)-JUFMP/JEDI Position

1. Direktur Sungai dan Pantai, Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Ketua

2. Kepala Sub Direktorat Wilayah II, Direktorat Sungai dan Pantai Merangkap Anggota

3. Kepala Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung-Cisadane, Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Anggota 4. Direktur Pengembangan Penyehatan Lingkungan Pemukiman, Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya Anggota

5. Kepala Dinas Pekerjaan Umum, DKI Jakarta Anggota

6. Kepala Bidang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air, Dinas Pekerjaan Umum, DKI Jakarta Anggota 7. Kepala Sub Direktorat Pengembangan Drainase, Direktorat Pengembangan Penyehatan Lingkungan _{Pemukiman, Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya} Anggota 8. Kepala Sub Direktorat Perencanaan Teknis, Direktorat Pengembangan Penyehatn Lingkungan Pemukiman, _{Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya} Anggota 9. Kepala Sub Direktorat Perencanaan Teknis, Direktorat Sungai dan Pantai, Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air Anggota 10. Kepala Bidang Pelaksanaan, Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung-Cisadane Anggota 11. Kepala Seksi Bimbingan Perencanaan Teknis Sungai dan Pantai, Direktorat Sungai dan Pantai Anggota 12. Kepala Seksi Pengendalian Pelaksanaan Sungai dan Pantai, Direktorat Sungai dan Pantai Anggota 13. Kepala Seksi Perencanaan, Subdit Perencanaan Teknis, Dit.Pengembangan Penyehatan Lingkungan _Permukiman Anggota 14. Kepala Seksi Wilayah II, Dit. Subdit Perencanaan Teknis, Dit. Pengembangan penyehatan Lingkungan _Permukiman Anggota

15. Kepala Seksi PJSA, Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung-Cisadane Anggota

2.2.4 Secretariat Central Project Implementation Unit (CPIU)

No. Name/Jabatan/Unit Kerja Position

1. Ir. Ferdinand Pakpahan, ME Koordinator

2. Kepala Bidang Pelaksanaan, Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung-Cisadane Sekretaris Merangkap Anggota

3. Kepala Seksi Drainase Wilayah 1 Direktorat Pengembangan Penyehatan Lingkungan Pemukiman, Direktorat

Jenderal Cipta Karya Anggota

4. Kepala Seksi Perencanaan Tata Air Dinas Pekerjaan Umum, DKI Jakarta Anggota 5. Kepala Seksi PJSA Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung-Cisadane Anggota

6. Nila Aliefia, ST,MT Anggota

(15)

2.2.5 Project Implementation Units (PIUs)

Package Name of FPMO Head Head of Working Unit

(Satker)

Commitment Making Officer (PPK)

1, 7

DKI Jakarta H. Tegu Hendarwan, S.Sos, M. SI Ir. Robert, MT Ir. Robert, MT

4 Ir. Mariyana Ir. Mariyana

2A, 2B, 6 BBWS Ciliwung-Cisadane Ir. T. Iskandar Ir. Fikri Handri Alun Bawono, ST, MT 3, 6 Directorate PLP, DGHS Ir. Djoko Mursito Dipl. SE, MM. Ir. Bustami, MM Mickael F. Tiwang

CSC Directorate River and Coastal, DGWR Review* Master

Plan on Flood Management

Research Center for Water Resources, RDA

*) Research Center for Water Resources as PIU proposed to cancel on-going procurement of study based on the letter sent to the World Bank with number Um 01 11-La/365 dated December 13, 2017.

(16)

2.3 Major Activities of the Consultant

2.3.1 Consultant Head Office and Site Offices

The Consultant established a consultant head office near the Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR) and site

offices for each package and CDF Ancol. The office was equipped with necessary office furniture, telephone, internet

connections, etc.to accommodate its mobilized personnel and facilitate construction supervision activities.

In April 2017, all site offices were closed except head office at Jl. Hang Jebat VIII No. 1. In May 2017, head office of the

consultant moved from Jl. Hang Jebat VIII No.1 to Jl. Langsat 8. Site offices for Package 6, CDF Ancol and Design Team for

Sentiong Pumping Station were opened to support implementation of the project for the extended period.

Table 2. 1 Established Consultant Head Office and Site Offices

Classification Address of the Office

Head Office Jl. Langsat 8 Kramat Pela, Kebayoran Baru, Jakarta Selatan

Package 6 Jl. Industri Raya No. 9-11, Griya Kemayoran Blok R.23 Jakarta Pusat

CDF Ancol Rusun Boing 3A Lt. 2 No. 208. Kemayoran. Jakarta Pusat

Sentiong Design Team Jl. Penjernihan Dalam I No. 34, Bendungan Hilir, Jakarta Pusat

2.3.2 Mobilization of Consultant Personnel

The construction supervision consultant of Korea Engineering Consultant Corporation (KECC) in joint venture with PT. Puser

Bumi Mekon in association with PT. Tetira and PT. Duta Cipta Mandiri mobilized their staff from November 18, 2013 to

render consultancy services for implementation of JUFMP/JEDI. In May 2017 after signing of Addendum No. 3, the

consultant resumed mobilization o

f consultant’s personnel to

assist construction of Package 6 and detailed engineering

design of Sentiong pumping station (Package 8). Table 2.2 shows mobilized personnel of the consultant up to end of 4th

quarter of 2017.

Table 2. 2 Consumed Person-Month (December 2017)

No Name Position Date of

B,1 Provision for Supervision Works

1 Bambang Sigit Suryono Co Team Leader 18-11-13 63.4 48.43 14.97

Sri Sadono E, Kartono 21-10-14 28.33

01-5-17 7.9

9 Isti Cahya Suci Murwati Complaint Handling Advisor 20-1-14 28.46 1.83 0

(17)

10 Puger Suryono Complaint Handling Advisor 08-5-17 23 7.73 15.27

11 Sutjahjo Complaint Handling Advisor 03-2-14 33.73 25.73 0

Harly Complaint Handling Advisor 01-5-16 8

12 Ahmad Muhammad Complaint Handling Advisor 13-10-14 11.63 11.63 0

13 Alvin Hidayat Complaint Handling Advisor 20-10-14 6.4 6.4 0

Bistok Sigalingging 01-2-16 14

01-5-17 7.9

21 Feby Miranti Conflict Resolution Specialist 27-7-15 31.17 18.13 5.14

01-5-17 7.9

Total 693.38 532.4 160.98

B,2 Provision of Support to CPIU

1 Ahmad Syahroni Budget and Programing to CPIU 02-1-14 59.16 5.97 14.43

Bambang Sukamto 08-9-14 38.76

2 Teguh Ungsiadi Procurement Expert 10-2-14 24.38 5.6 0

Kusdayat M 26-10-14 18.78

Total 83.54 69.11 14.43

B,3 Provision for Field Supervision

1 Asnawi Marzuki Field Supervisor 18-11-13 10.2 10.2 0

2 Asril Syaer Field Supervisor 18-11-13 25.4 25.4 0

3 Bambang Supriyanto Field Supervisor 25-11-13 34.83 24.83 0

(18)

B,4 Provision for Design Team Sentiong Pump Station

1 Hadi Purwanto Team Coordinator/Hydrologist 08-5-17 5 3.77 1.23 2 Mohamad Faridi Senior Mechanical Engineer 22-5-17 4.5 3.33 1.17 7 Zaki Mubarrak/Ismail/Rivaldi Surveyor (P1) 09-12-13 12.53 12.53 0 8 H. Albar A / Ligardi B / Haidir Ali Surveyor (P3) 03-3-14 7.4 7.4 0

19 Eko Djunarno/Alwi R/M. Herdiawan Surveyor (CDF Ancol) 11-9-14 22.64 22.64 0

20 Rizwan Maulana/Adhy Kurnia Surveyor (CDF Ancol) 17-6-15 14.47 14.47 0

(19)

Enumerator (P4) 18-11-15 13.43 13.43 0

12 Uut Kaharudin/Joel kamaruzaman Enumerator (CDF Ancol) 01-4-14 32.9 32.9 0

13 Rikson Pangihutan Enumerator (P2B) 02-4-14 16.93 16.93 0

20 Luth Galih Tosan/Hendrawan Enumerator (CDF Ancol) 25-8-14 27.43 27.43 0

08-5-17 14 7.77 6.23

24 Joko Saputra/Feldi Bilianto Enumerator (P5) 11-10-14 25.63 25.63 0

25 Feldi Bilianto Enumerator (P6) 08-5-17 14 7.77 6.23

Budi Sumartoyo 24-2-14 29.23

Atik Nawi 01-8-16 6

Bayu Jati Pameling 26-5-14 22.19

(20)

Sarah Nidaul Fajri 01-9-14 20

Diah Kurniati 17-3-14 39.46

Yuana Dwi Eka Aprilia 04-9-17 4

15 Asep Suhendar/ Bambang Sukadi/

Abdurrahman Hidayat Driver 16-12-13 63 47.7 15.3

Ngasiffudin Driver 01-10-14 37

21 Nizar/ R, Gunarto/ Ilham Driver 07-4-14 32.24 32.24 0

22 Junaidi/ Eko Asep Tarwoto Driver 08-9-14 33.77 33.77 0

23 Gunawan Wibisono/Rusdan Driver 01-10-14 29 29 0

24 R, Gunawan/ Riza Baihaki Driver 13-10-14 27.13 27.13 0

25 Syafrudin/Eddi/Amsar Driver 03-12-14 51 34.93 16.07

26 Andy Purwanto Driver 02-3-15 20.97 20.97 0

report for July 2017

–

September 2017 were submitted.

2.3.4 Cost of Consulting Services

Up to end of the reporting quarter, the received payment by the consultant is shown in Table 2.3.

Table 2.3

Financial Status of the Consultant

Currency Contract Received up to Q3- 2017 Q4- 2017 Total Received Balance

USD 2,380,990 1,558,663 273,245 1,832,108 548,882

IDR 48,582,756,925 30,615,743,914 5,495,064,767 36,110,808,681 12,471,948,244

2.4 Construction Supervision Activities

(21)

Table 2.4 Contractors and Construction Status under JUFMP/JEDI

Package Floodway/Drain/Waduk Contractor Status

PK 1 Ciliwung-Gn. Sahari-Waduk Melati PT. Brantas Abipraya FHO

PK 2A Cengkareng Floodway PT. Adhi Karya, PT Hutama Karya, PT Jaya Konstruksi Wait FHO

PK 2B Lower Sunter Drain PT. Hutama Karya Wait FHO

PK 3 Cideng Thamrin Drain PT. Dutaraya Dinametro Wait FHO

PK 4 Sentiong Sunter, Waduk Sunter Utara, Sunter Selatan, Waduk Sunter Timur III

PT. Adhi Karya, PT. Hutama Karya, dan PT. Jaya

Konstruksi Wait PHO

PK 5 Tanjungan, Lower Angke and Kamal Drain PT.SAC Nusantara, PT Penata Karva Keluarga Utama Wait PHO

PK6 West Flood Canal and Upper Sunter Drain PT. Pembengunan Perumahan Construction

PK 7 Grogol Sekretaris, Krukut CIdeng, Krukut

Lama, Pakin, Kali Besar, Jelakeng Drains PT. Waskita Karya Wait PHO

The construction supervision team provided their services mainly on the following activities and necessary assistances to the

PIUs and the contractors:

• Commented review findings recommending amendments, additions to these documents, or other corrective actions

considered necessary for the proper execution of the works by the contractor.

• Reviewed of the working drawings, work method statement, construction schedule, etc. submitted by the

contractors based on relevant standards, specifications, and engineering observation.

• In association with the CPIU and relevant PIUs, organized coordination meetings to discuss various issues on

designs and specifications, work method statement, etc.

• Assisted the contractors to properly locate contract/project signage and to establish appropriate survey control

systems and supervised field survey executed by the contractors.

• Conducted supervision of construction activities, like dredging, embankment rehabilitation and disposal of dredge

material at CDF Ancol, of the contractor of Package 6, attended regular and any arranged meetings with PIU and

contractors.

• Monitored physical and financial progress of each package.

• Recording and reporting at site offices as well as at head office

2.4.1

Quality Assurance/Quality Control

Quality Control / Quality Assurance Engineer carried out monitoring and evaluating the method of works and work progress

of contractor related to its plan and target for each month to keep the project activities in due diligence of the contract. The

sequence of construction activities and method of works by contractor was concerned from QA/QC point of view. In

particular, dredging and rehabilitation of the existing slope protection at Upper Sunter floodway were planned at the same

location.

From QA/QC point of view, implementation of package 6 is in line with the contractor Quality Plan provided in the beginning

of contract commencement. A set of procedures and communication between supervision consultant and contractor as well

as with engineer has been established well. Regular meeting such as weekly and monthly meeting has been arranged at

fi

eld contractor’s office (weekly meeting) and at the

PIU office (BBWS Cilicis).

West Banjir Canal:

Execution of dredging and rehabilitation of slope protection and embankment (CCSP) run well. However, the daily dredging

progress was slower than the contractor plan.

Meanwhile, the physical progress of contract slightly behind the schedule. Capacity of logistic deployed by contractor in

West Bank Canal zone which consisted of float excavators and dump trucks was less than that calculated in pre-construction

analysis.

(22)

works performed by contractor were not fully supported by other facilities such as temporary disposal and traffic

management of disposal transportation from site to CDF Ancol.

To solve this problem, the consultant has instructed the contractor to prepare a new working plan increasing its capacity by

mobilize more equipment and temporary disposal area in order to allow more trucks and loader to bring disposal to CDF

Ancol.

Upper Sunter Floodway:

Rehabilitation of slope protection at Upper Sunter floodway exceeded original contract volume. Unexpected land sliding at

several places changed the type of construction design and volume of works in respect to local resident beneficiary.

Consultant advised contractor to improve their equipment capacity and working method to catch up the remaining contract

period.

Dredging was referred to the shop drawing proposed by contractor and have been approved by the engineer. However, the

dredging to a certain limit caused degradation of bed level of canal, in consequence destabilized existing aged, deteriorated

slope protection work. In some places, existing concrete blocks and retaining wall were fallen down after dredging works in

the place finished.

QA/QC insisted contractor to avoid any dredging activity until rehabilitation of slope protection work is completed. The

contractor was advised to propose detailed design and shop drawing for rehabilitation of slope protection work. Technical

advisory has been given to the contractor to construct concrete pile to increase stability of the slope.

Issues Recommendation Actions/Impacts

The contractor advised to propose detailed design and shop drawing for rehabilitation of slope protection work. Technical advisory has been given to the contractor to construct concrete pile in order to increase stability of the slope.

Sliding of existing concrete blocks and retaining wall occurred after dredging in the place finished.

Contractor, consultant and engineer agreed to inventory actual condition slope protection both sides of the canal and prepare amendment to the contract based on new slope protection plan.

Contractor agreed to start rehabilitation as soon as possible to avoid further collapse of existing slope protection.

Consultant has strongly recommended to prepare a new working plan and mobilize more equipment and temporary disposal area.

In some days, daily dredged volume reached to about 4,000 m3_{which is near} the target plan

(23)

Tensile strength test and strand test at Puspitek Serpong as independent laboratory

Placement stockpile of CCSP

Reference with technical specification of material produced by supplier was checked in independent laboratory before approval to be procured. QA/QC witnessed the test accordingly. Strength of CCSP with its technical specification was shown in laboratory report.

Broken CCSP stockpiled on unflatten ground should be removed from the site.

Contractor removed the broken CCSP from site and prepare a flat surface ground for placement of stockpile on field.

Project coordination meeting on monitoring and evaluation of the project implementation was chaired by CPIU. Sentiong Pump preparation was discussed in the meetings.

Consultant is preparing document of tender and design drawing.

Sliding of existing slope protection at Upper Sunter floodway occurred at number of places.

The existing slope protection works built more than 20 years ago are aged, deteriorated, unstable and foundation eroded in some parts of the construction. Even more, heavy loads of many houses along both sides of canal as well as traffic using the both side inspection road weekened the embankment. Dredging and construction activities might contribute to the stability of the slope protection.

Quick action to prevent more sliding must be taken by contractor. Technical advices has been provided for design of protection.

Contractor started to construct mini piles and slope protection at the places where damage was severe.

Float excavators were used for dredging and at least two or three times move to reach to temporary disposal.

Contractor was advised to improve working method of works as well as number of equipment.

(24)

Documentation and record of data must be managed properly in order to avoid any dispute in future.

Control survey of dredging works which is extremely important: QA advised to the Survey Team to keep survey book and data, calculation results and drawing to be signed by all parties, to be known by field supervise and head office.

Field supervisors and survey team were reminded to follow the standard operation procedures as mentioned in Quality Control Plan prepared by the consultant.

Volume of dredging is an object of auditing by BPK. The computation must be supported with valid evidence and survey data.

Cross monitoring/joint survey on dredging was advised by CPIU every two weeks or once a month.

Surveyor used total station in surveying the dredge volume.

CPIU advised contractor and consultant to check the dredging works regularly in order to avoid discrepancy of volume at site and at CDF Ancol.

Kali Adem is unlikely to be dredged due to social problems not exposed in LARAP document.

A joint site visit by all related agencies was advised to examine the Kali Adem actual condition. It is expected that team will decide whether dredging of Kali Adem to be continued or not.

The consultant, contractor and PIU conducted site inspection to evaluate technical, social and environment impacts of dredging at Kali Adem.

The remaining time of 181 calendar days may not sufficient to complete remaining construction work.

The contractor was requested to prepare a revised action plan with improvement of method of works, number of equipment, trucks and its facilities etc.

2.4.2

Site Activities of Package 6

(25)

Canal slope sliding at Upper Sunter floodway was not expected when design was prepared. Factual condition of existing

slope protection in some places is not shown because sediment covers it. Dimension of designed canal was smaller than

dimension of existing canal. That means dredging of sediment are not up to the original cross section of the canal. When

dredging reach to the designed profile, remain sediment was fallen and disturbed stability of existing slope protection.

Consequently, some were cracked and even broken down in to the canal.

There are some factors contribute to the existing slope protection at Upper Sunter canal. It was found at some places

sewerage from houses poured into canal without proper drain outlet caused scoring at the toe of slope weakening stability of

canal slope and slope protection work. Seepage may occur under inspection road caused softening soil material of

embankment and decreased its bearing capacity. As the inspection road is used also as communal road, vehicles beyond

capacity of the road also contributed to cracking of concrete pavement of the inspection road.

Issues Recommendation Actions/Impacts

Driving mini piles to stabilize slope or existing retaining wall were done manually using simple tripod and hammer seems not to reach hard ground.

Contractros was instructed to drive mini pile reach up to 2.5 m at least.

It requested the contractor to use a proper hammer to push mini piles up to design level.

Mini piles were driven as instructed.

Soil of embankment of the drain is soft and unstable.

Instructed the contractror not to leave mini piles uncompletely driven.

Contractor has used proper equipment to drive mini pile to design elevation.

The Mini Pile that was not properly driven using excavator.

Instructed to use a proper hammer in driving of mini piles.

(26)

Other canal slope sidings occurred at STA 11+350 until STA 11+425 at the right side. Slid material was sediment and garbage.

Canal embankment was composed with sediment and garbage dumped along canal side and communal access road with concrete pavement was constructed above the unstable embankment.

When the canal is dredged the stability of the embankment slope weakened and the paved road cracked and slid.

It was instructed to stop dredging until the canal slope is protected with mini pile and stabilized.

Dredging was stopped as instructed.

2.4.3 Dredging Work

Up to December 2017, the dredged volume disposed at Ancol CDF was counted by the volumes in the trucks 310,752.82

m

3

_.

A. Sludge Dredging at Upper Sunter Floodway

The dredging at Upper Sunter floodway was halted on 27 November 2017 with the disposed volume of 61,603.17 m

3

_.

Table 2.5 Dredged Volume at Upper Sunter Floodway

No. Station Vol. 65%+35% MC 0 Deviation

(27)

No. Station Vol. 65%+35% MC 0 Deviation

B. Dredge Volume at West Banjir Canal

Table 2.6 Volume of Sludge Disposal of each station at West Banjir Canal

(28)

Zone Station

Mechanical/Electrical Engineer

reviewed draft design and tender document for Package 8 and

had site

visits to Packages 1, 2A, 4, 5, and 7 to check working condition, operation, and maintenance status of all installed gates to

ensure good operation of water gates during floods.

2.4.5 Package 8 (Sentiong Pumping Station)

The Consultant submitted draft PQ document for Package 8 -Sentiong-Ancol Pump Station to CPIU and BBWS. Preparation

of detailed engineering design and tender document for Package 8 - Construction of Sentiong-Ancol Pump Station was

Main activity of Environmental Engineer of the supervision consultant in this quarter was monitoring the important

environmental issues occurred and ongoing in implementation of the project, especially package 6 and assisting the

contractor of package 6 in environmental management at construction sites and preparation of environmental reports.

(29)

Monitoring of the impacts of flood to the project: The floods in rainy season in Jakarta hampered construction works as well

as disrupted the stability of the river slopes, especially at Upper Sunter floodway. Soil erosion from the banks at Sodong

area, STA 13+125, STA 14+600 and other locations increased the sediment volume in the floodway, causing increase of

turbidity, total suspended solid (TSS) and sediment quality (TCLP) of river water. However, in terms of environmental quality,

water quality over the threshold quality standard set by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia was not found.

Canal slope sliding occurred and can occur again if the slope is not strengthened. So that, various factors that can affect to

slope sliding should be considered in the design for the slope strengthening. The impact of flood in the rainy season such as

rising of river water to an extreme level could not be prevented at present field condition.

Analytical review on the constraints in project implementation at Muara Angke: Various constraints need to be assessed

prior to project implementation. Especially, constraints in compliance to the environmental regulations in addition to technical

and social constraints in dredging around the protected forest at the left side of Muara Angke downstream should be

carefully assessed. It is estimated that dredging at site could cause damage to protected forests and wildlife migration and to

residential areas. The mangrove forest that has been managed by the mangrove forest conservation community located

should not destructed by the dredging work at Muara Angke downstream.

Monitoring of sampling for RKL/RPL quarterly report (October 2017 - December 2017): PT. PP Tbk. has conducted sampling

of Water and Air and TCLP was done by an accredited laboratory i.e. PT. Sucofindo (Persero). Implementation of these

samplings and preparation of RKL / RPL quarterly report were reviewed and guided. As a reference, supervision consultant

with PT. Unilab Perdana has also conducted the same environmental inspection on December 26-27, 2017.

The watersheds of Upper Sunter Floodway and West Banjir Canal generally has been contaminated by organic compound

pollutants in the range from medium contaminated to heavily contaminated. Anaerobic fermentation process happened

along the river flow and raised the precipitation of fermentation mix to the sediment erosion from the upstream. The fineness

of precipitation from these fermentations influenced the overall river sediment structure.

Issues concerned with project implementation and handling the impact for compliance

Impact Detected Potential Problems Management and Monitoring Plans

Community Perceptions ➢ At some areas dredging was not permitted by community warrying the effect on their daily life and economic activity ➢ Socials and technical problems found at

Muara Angke estuary

✓ Coordinated between BBWS with related agencies ✓ Conducted site survey at Muara Angke estuary area ✓ Re-Inventoried WTP / LARAP

✓ Re-socialized the project to the communities ✓ Design changes coordinated with related agencies Transportation

/ Traffic Issues

➢ Secure and maintenance of access road ✓ Provide access without damage to the existing infrastructure

✓ Door to door socialization at Karet–Tanah Abamg area Facilities and City

Infrastructure

➢ Design for dredging at some location was changed to avoid river bank sliding ➢ Access road to CDF Ancol

✓ Repair the slid river bank

✓ Repair access road to the disposal area at CDF Ancol

Regular Environmental Quality Checking

➢ Checking Environment Quality Regularly not completely complied or delayed.

✓ Planned

✓ Make a contract with Environment Laboratory. Flora dan Fauna ➢ Found NGO Mangrove Community at

Muara Angke estuary

➢ Found protected forest at Muara Angke estuary

✓ Renegotiate and re-socialized to the Mangrove community

✓ State the administration border of protected forest area and coordinates to related agencies

✓ Redesign the project implementation Sludge Quality and

Disposal Procedures

➢ MoU with PT. PJA related to CDF Ancol not signed yet

➢ Access and disposal activity of sludge to CDF Ancol coincide with Dinas PU DKI and conflict with PT. MKY

➢ Dredging volumes change with MC 0%

✓ Coordinating with PT. Jaya Ancol for extending the MoU of disposal sludge to CDF Ancol

✓ Coordinate with K/L/D/I and related agencies (BBWS CC and DSDA DKI Jakarta)

✓ Reviewed dredging plan at Muara Angke estuary

Outline of Loan Agreement

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLES

FIGURES

CHAPTER 1.

INTRODUCTION

1.1