HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005 | 73
MedicationSafety
Abstract
During the spring of 2004, in the Calgary Health Region (CHR) two critical incidents occurred involving patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU). The outcome of these events resulted in the sudden death of both patients.
The Department of Critical Care Medicine’s Patient Safety and Adverse Events Team (PSAT), utilized the Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) tool to review the process and conditions surrounding the ordering and administration of potassium chloride (KCl) and potassium phosphate (KPO4) in our ICUs.
The HFMEA tool and the multidisciplinary team structure provided a solid framework for systematic analysis and prioritiza-tion of areas for improvement regarding the use of intravenous, high-concentration KCL and KPO4 in the ICU.
I
NTRODUCTIONFortheCalgaryHealthRegion(CHR),patientsafetywas broughttotheforefrontinthespringof2004,whentherewere twocriticalincidentsthatresultedinthedeathoftwopatients receivingCRRTintwodifferentICUsoftheCHR(ISMPalert March25,2004).Hereisabriefdescriptionoftheincidents fromtheExternalPatientSafetyReview(June2004):
“An83-year-oldwomanwhowasapatientinthecardio-vascularcareunitattheFoothillsMedicalCenter(FMC) site of the CHR died suddenly in the presence of her physicianandmembersofherfamily.Shewasalertand orientedatthetimeandhercondition,whileveryserious, didnotseemtoindicatereasonsforimmediateconcern. Herunexpecteddeathwasdevastatingforherfamilyand extremelydistressingforallthoseinvolvedinhercare.An ICUphysiciansuspectedthecause—thecompositionof dialysatesolutionbeingusedtotreatherkidneyfailure. Thiswasquicklyconfirmedand30bagsofthesolution madeinthesamebatchwereremovedfrompatientcare areas,undoubtedlypreventingthedeathsofotherpatients. Ananalysisoftheotherbagsfromthatbatchaswellas asystematicreviewofpatientrecordsidentifiedasecond patientwhosedeath,oneweekearlier,waslikelycausedby thesamesetofcircumstances.Thiswasnotsuspectedatthe timeofdeathduetothepatient’sseriouscondition.”
Upon further investigation, it was determined that in February2004,pharmacytechniciansinthecentralproduction facilityoftheCHRpharmacydepartmentpreparedadialysate solutionforpatientsreceivingCRRT.Duringtheprocess,KCL
Using Healthcare Failure Mode
and Effect Analysis Tool to Review
the Process of Ordering and
Administrating Potassium Chloride
and Potassium Phosphate
RosminEsmail,CherylCummings,DeonneDersch,GregDuchscherer,JudyGlowa,GailLiggett, TerranceHulmeandthePatientSafetyandAdverseEventsTeam*
74 | HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005
wasinadvertentlyaddedtothedialysatebagsinsteadofsodium chloride(NaCl)solution.Itisbelievedthattheseincorrectly preparedsolutionswereusedinthedialysisofthetwopatients whodied(ExternalPatientSafetyReview,CHRJune2004).
The CHR publicly disclosed the facts and initiated an externalpatientsafetyreview.TheDepartmentofCriticalCare Medicine(DCCM)alsoundertookareviewoftheprocessfor orderingandadministeringintravenous,high-concentration
KClandKPO4,usingtheHFMEAtooldevelopedbyDeRosier,
Josephetal.(2002).Thefocusofthisarticleistodescribethe applicationofthetoolwithrespecttoreviewingtheprocesses
involvedinorderingandadministeringintravenous,high-concentrationKClandKPO4,therebyallowingtheDCCM
toproactivelyidentifyhazardsthatmayexistandestablisha saferprocess.
B
ACKGROUNDTheDCCMhasbeenengagedinongoingqualityimprove- mentandpatientsafetyinitiativesbothformallyandinfor-mallyforover10years(Esmailetal.2005).Atpresent,the regionincludesthreeadultacutecareteachinghospitalsand onepediatrichospital:FoothillsMedicalCentre(FMC),Peter LougheedCenter(PLC),RockyviewGeneralHospital(RGH) andtheAlbertaChildren’sHospital.TheDepartmentofCritical CareMedicineoverseesfouradultintensivecareunits: •A24-bedMultisystemICU(FMC)
•A14-bedCardiovascularICU(FMC) •A12-bedMultisystemICUs(PLC) •A10-bedMultisystemICUs(RGH)
HFMEA
VSF
AILUREM
ODEANDE
FFECTA
NALYSIS(FMEA)
Inthepast,medicineusedahumanerrorapproachwhich identifiedtheindividualasthecauseoftheadverseevent. Wenowrecognizethaterrorsarecausedbysystemorprocess failures(McNallyetal.1997).FMEAwasdevelopedforuse bytheUnitedStatesmilitaryandisutilizedbytheNational AeronauticsandSpaceAdministration(NASA),topredict and evaluate potential failures and unrecognized hazards andtoproactivelyidentifystepsinaprocessthatcouldhelp reduceoreliminateafailurefromoccurring(Reilingetal. 2003).FMEAfocusesonthesystemwithinanenvironment andusesamultidisciplinaryteamtoevaluateaprocessfroma qualityimprovementperspective.TheJointCommissionfor AccreditationofHealthcareOrganizations(JCAHO)inthe UShasrecommendedthathealthcareinstitutionsconduct proactiveriskmanagementactivitiesthatidentifyandpredict systemweaknessesandadoptchangestominimizepatientharm (Adachietal.2001).
In2001theVeteran’sAdministration(VA)NationalCentre forPatientSafety(NCPS)specificallydesignedtheHFMEA
toolforriskassessmentinthehealthcarefield.TheHFMEA toolwasformedbycombiningindustry’sFMEAmodelwith theU.S.FoodandDrugAdministration’sHazardAnalysisand CriticalControlPoint(HACCP)tooltogetherwithcompo-nentsfromtheVA’srootcauseanalysis(RCA)process.HACCP wasdevelopedtoprotectfoodfromchemicalandbiological contamination and physical hazards.The HACCP system usessevensteps:(1)conductahazardanalysis,(2)identify criticalcontrolpoints,(3)establishcriticallimits,(4)estab-lishmonitoringprocedures,(5)establishcorrectiveactions, (6)establishverificationprocedures,and(7)establishrecord-keepinganddocumentationprocedures(CenterforFoodSafety andAppliedNutrition,1997).Itusesquestionstoprobefor foodsystemvulnerabilitiesaswellasadecisiontreetoidentify criticalcontrolpoints.Thedecisiontreeconceptwasadapted bytheVAfortheHFMEAtool.
TheHFMEAtoolhasbeensubsequentlyrecognizedinthe WhitePaperpreparedbytheAmericanSocietyforHealthcare RiskManagement(ASHRM).Inanefforttogloballysharethe meritsofthisprocess,avideo,instructionalCDandworksheets ontheuseandapplicationofHFMEAhasbeensenttoevery hospitalCEOintheUStobesharedwithindividualsandrisk managersresponsibleforpatientsafety(AmericanSocietyfor HealthRiskManagement2002).
HFMEA T
OOLTherearefivestepsintheHFMEAtool.Steponeistodefine thetopic;steptwoistoassembletheteam;stepthreerequires thedevelopmentofaprocessmapforthetopicandconsecu-tivelynumberingeachstepandsubstepsofthatprocess;step fouristoconductthehazardanalysis.Thisstepinvolvesfour processes:theidentificationoffailuremodes,identificationof thecausesofthesefailuremodes,scoringeachfailuremode usingtheHazardScoringMatrix,andworkingthroughthe DecisionTreeAnalysis.Thefinalstepistodevelopactionsand outcomes.ThenextsectionwilldescribehowtheDCCM’s PatientSafetyandAdverseEventsteam(PSAT)workedthrough eachstepoftheHFMEAtooltoreviewtheprocessofordering processoforderingintravenous,high-concentrationKCland KPO4.
HFMEA — Step One
SteponeistodefinetheHFMEAtopic.Thetopicisusuallya processthathashighvulnerabilitiesandpotentialforimpacting patientsafety.ItisimportantinaHFMEAanalysistodefine boundariesandlimitthescopeofthetopicbeingreviewed.
HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005 | 75
concentrationKClandKPO4priortoreviewingtheprocess
ofpreparingCRRTbagsfordialysis.Itwasunderstoodthat someofthestepsinthisprocesswouldoverlapwiththeCRRT process.
HFMEA — Step Two
SteptwointheHFMEAtoolistoassembleateam.Theteam administeringKClandKPO4(Figure1).Afterreviewingthese 11steps,theteamfocusedontwocriticalsteps:obtainingthe drug(step#6)andmixingthedrug(step#7)andthenidentified thesubstepsforeachofthesetwoHFMEAsteps(Figure2).Site visitstoreviewwhereKCLandKPO4 werestoredandconversa-tionswithfrontlinestaffintheunitstoverifytheprocesswere alsoconducted.
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
STEP 1 Pre-order lab
through OPSCAR/TDS
STEP 2 Order ordered by
residents or attending; or residents/attending
may tell nurse to order in TDS
STEP 3 Unit Clerk takes order to beside
STEP 5 Unit clerk gets attention of nurse
re; order but this does not always
occur
STEP 6 Nurse gets drug
from narcotic cupboard
6A. Pharmacy assistant stocks narcotic cupboard. 6B. Nurse gets the key. 6C. Nurse goes to narcotic cupboard in desk A. 6D. Opens narcotic cupboard. 6E. Gets KCI or KPO4
6F. Locks cupboard. *Sign for KCI
*If any discard then co-sign. 6G. Nurse puts key back.
7A. Nurse takes KPO4 7B. Need to do calculations
(rate and volume). 7C. Mix and label drug.
STEP 11 Patient monitoring
of drug
STEP 10 Patient gets drug
STEP 9 Nurse administers
the drug
STEP 8 Nurse brings drug to
bedside or can be another RN
STEP 7 Nurse mixes and
labels drug if potassium phosphate. Another
RN can mix if busy DAY- pharmacy mixes Kphosphate
NIGHT- (2200-0700)- Nurse mixes
6A
Pharmacy Assistant stocks narcotic
cupboard
6B
Nurse gets the key
6C
Nurse goes to narcotic cupboard in
Desk A
Failure Mode: 1. Stocking Error.
Failure Mode: 1. Key not there.
Failure Mode: 1. Leave discard on counter
This Failure Mode is illustrated on the
worksheet 6D
Opens narcotic cupboard
6E
Gets KCI or KPO4
6F
Locks cupboard * Sign for KCL *If any discard then
co-sign
6G
Nurse puts key back
7A
Nurse takes KPO4
Failure Mode: 1. Nurse takes wrong drug.
7B
Need to do calculations (rate
and volume)
Failure Mode: 1. No worksheet/ reference to do calculations.
7C
Mix and label drug
Failure Mode: 1. Incorrect mixing. 2. No routine double checking of mixing
3. Inaccurate (not reliable) label. This Failure
Failure Mode:
1. Picks the wrong drug
76 | HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005
HFMEA —Step Four
InstepfouroftheHFMEAtool,theareaoffocusisfurther
HFMEA — Step Five
InstepfiveoftheHFMEAtool,actionsaredeveloped.Actions
recommendationsaddressedhowKClandKPO4aretobe
storedandwho,where,andhowthedrugsaretobemixed. Theserecommendationsalsofocusedontheidentificationof look-alikeandsound-alikeproductsbasedonhumanfactor
UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool Rosmin Esmail et al.
6A. Pharmacy assistant stocks narcotic cupboard.
6B. Nurse gets the key. 6C. Nurse goes to narcotic cupboard in desk A. 6D. Opens narcotic cupboard. 6E. Gets KCI or KPO4
6F. Locks cupboard. *Sign for KCI
*If any discard then co-sign. 6G. Nurse puts key back.
7A. Nurse takes KPO4 7B. Need to do calculations
(rate and volume). 7C. Mix and label drug.
STEP 11
Patient monitoring of drug
STEP 10
Patient gets drug
STEP 9
Nurse administers the drug
STEP 8
Nurse brings drug to bedside or can be
another RN
STEP 7
Nurse mixes and labels drug if
potassium phosphate. Another
RN can mix if busy DAY- pharmacy mixes Kphosphate
NIGHT- (2200-0700)- Nurse mixes
6A
Pharmacy Assistant stocks narcotic
cupboard
6B
Nurse gets the key Nurse goes to 6C narcotic cupboard in
Desk A
Failure Mode: 1. Stocking Error.
Failure Mode: 1. Key not there.
Failure Mode: 1. Leave discard on counter
This Failure Mode is illustrated on the
worksheet
6D
Opens narcotic cupboard
6E
Gets KCI or KPO4
6F
Locks cupboard * Sign for KCL *If any discard then
co-sign
6G
Nurse puts key back
7A
Nurse takes KPO4
Failure Mode: 1. Nurse takes wrong drug.
7B
Need to do calculations (rate
and volume)
Failure Mode: 1. No worksheet/ reference to do calculations.
7C
Mix and label drug
Failure Mode: 1. Incorrect mixing. 2. No routine double checking of mixing
3. Inaccurate (not reliable) label.
4. Stab bag by accident. 5. Forget to sign or co-sign waste.
6. Put solution in wrong bag. 7. Not throwing out waste.
This Failure Mode is illustrated on the worksheet
Failure Mode:
1. Picks the wrong drug
Figure2:FailureModesforStep6and7
Step#6:NursegetsDrugfromNarcoticsCupboard
HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005 | 77
principles(Gosbeeetal.2002andWickensetal.2004).Key recommendationsweresummarizedintoanactionplanwith delegated responsibility and timelines for implementation (Figure3).
D
ISCUSSIONTE AM LE SSONS LE ARNE D
HFMEAStep4–HazardAnalysis HPMEA–IdentifyActionsandOutcomes FailureMode: PotentialCauses
Severity Probability Hazar
d
Person/ Responsible Follow-up
Date
Picksthe wrongdrug
6E1 Nurseinahurry, frustratedlookingfor
equent 12 No Yes
Recommendations
alikedrugs Phar
macy
7C3 Distractions,doctor callsnurse,time
78 | HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005
Pharmacy Lessons Learned
Thedialysatemanufacturingerrorcameasaharshreminder totheCHR’spharmacydepartmentofitsneedforstructured policiesandproceduresforerroravoidance.Thiserroroccurred despiteexistingsafetyproceduresthatincludingfourdouble checksbypharmacists.Therisksassociatedwithintravenous potassiumcametotheforefrontofthepharmacydepartment’s focusandtherewasaheightenedawarenessofpharmacy’srole inpatientsafety.
Since 2002, intravenous high concentration KCL vials have not been available in most patient care areas in the CHR.PremixedKCLbagsareavailableandanyspecialbags notcommerciallyavailablearetobemixedinthepharmacy department.ThesepoliciesarebasedontheISMPCanada recommendations (2002) and also reiterated in the PSAT recommendations.Priortotheincidents,intravenouspotassium vialswereavailableinthenightdispensaryforusewhilethe pharmacywasclosed;thesehavenowbeenreplacedbypremixed bags.Theonlyvialsofintravenouspotassiumavailableoutside thepharmacydepartmentincludeasmallsupplyofKClvials keptinnarcoticcupboardsofcriticalcareanddialysisunits. ThesevialsaretobeusedforspecialCRRTsolutionsonly.
Beforethedialysatemanufacturingerroroccurred,intra-venouspotassiumvialswerestoredontheregulardrugshelves withinthepharmacydepartment.Sincetheerror,allintra-venouspotassiumvialsarestoredinaseparate,lockedarea within the pharmacy. All intravenous potassium vials and minibagsarenowlabelledwithawarningstickertofurther distinguish them, as per the recommendation from ISMP Canada(ISMPalert2002).
Additionally,drugidentificationnumbershavebeenadded tothemanufacturingworksheetsusedbypharmacytechni- ciansinthesterileproductpreparationarea.Thisaddsredun-dancythroughcheckingoftheprocedureforsterileproducts, includingdialysate.Batchesofdialysatearenowquarantined untilpotassiumlevelsineachbatchareconfirmedtobezeroby laboratorytesting.
By changing preparation, manufacturing, labelling and storageproceduresforintravenouspotassiumproducts,therisk oferrorhasbeensubstantiallyreduced.
C
ONCLUSIONThisarticledescribedtheuseoftheHFMEAtooldevelopedby
theVAanditsapplicationintheprocessoforderingandadmin-istrating intravenous high-concentration KCL and KPO4.
Elevenrecommendationsresultedfromthisanalysis.TheICU- specificrecommendationsthatdidnotincurcostswereimple-mentedexpeditiously.Generalrecommendations,whichwere notunderthepurviewoftheDCCM,weresharedwithCHR’s RegionalPatientSafetyCommittee,whichhassincedeveloped aregionalpolicyonKCl.
Inadditiontothiswork,theknowledgeandunderstanding gainedfromtheapplicationoftheHFMEAtoolbyDCCM’s PSATwillbesharedwiththeRegionalPatientSafetyTransport workinggroupreviewingpatienttransportbetweenhospitals. Thisgrouphasbeenformedbasedonrecommendationsfrom theExternalPatientSafetyReview(June2004).TheQuality, Safety&HealthInformationPortfoliooftheregionisalsoin theprocessofdeterminingtheuseormodificationofthistool toproactivelyidentifyhazardsinthesystem.
Moreimportantly,thetwocriticalincidentsservedastriggers thatbroughtpatientsafetytotheforefrontfortheCHRand theDCCM.Numerouschangesandinitiativesbasedonthe recommendationsfromtheinternalandexternalreviewshave beeninitiatedorareunderwaywithanattempttotransformthe cultureoftheorganizationtoonewithamuchgreateraware-nessofhazardidentification,incidentandnearmissreporting andpatientsafety.
References
Adachi,W.andA.E.Lodolce.2005.“UseofFailureModeand EffectsAnalysisinImprovingtheSafetyofI.V.DrugAdministration.”
AmericanJournalofHealth-SystemPharmacy62:917–20. AmericanSocietyforHealthcareRiskManagement.2002.White paper:StrategiesandTipsforMaximizingFailureModeEffectAnalysis inYourOrganizationAmericanHospitalAssociation.
CalgaryHealthRegion.2004.ExternalPatientSafetyReview.
CenterforFoodSafetyandAppliedNutrition,AdvisoryCommittee onMicrobiologicalCriteriaforFoods.1997.HazardAnalysisand CriticalControlPointPrinciplesandApplicationGuidelines.U.S.Food andDrugAdministration.U.S.DeptofAgriculture.RetrievedAugust 5,2005.<http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/nacmcfp.html>
DeRosier,J.,E.Stalhandske,J.P.BagianandT.Nudell.2002.“Using HealthCareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTM:TheVANational
CentreforPatientSafety’sProspectiveRiskAnalysisSystem.”Journal onQualityImprovement28(5):248–67.
Esmail,R.,A.Kirby,T.InksonandP.J.E.Boiteau.2005.“Quality ImprovementintheICU.ACanadianPerspective.”JournalofCritical Care20:74–6.
Gosbee,J.2002.“HumanFactorsEngineeringandPatientSafety.”
QualityandSafetyinHealthcare11:352s–54.
InstituteforSafeMedicationPracticesCanada.2004.ISMPCanada SafetyBulletin4(3):1–2.
Langley,J.G.,K.M.Nolan,T.W.Nolan,C.L.Norman,L.P.Provost. 1996.TheImprovementGuide:APracticalApproachtoEnhancing OrganizationalPerformance.NewYork(NY):Jossey-Bass.
McNally,M.K.,M.A.PageandV.B.Sunderland.1997.“Failure-modeandeffectsAnalysisinImprovingaDrugDistributionSystem.”
AmericanJournalHealth-SystemPharmacy54:171–7.
Reiling,G.J,B.L.KnutzenandM.Stoecklein.2003.FMEA–the CureforMedicalErrors.QualityProgress36(8):67–71.
HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005 | 79
AppendixI:Recommendations
General/ICU
1. Usepremixedsolutionsforhigh-riskdrugsasmuchas possible.
(a)Pharmacypremixesthehigh-riskmedications. (b)Unusualornonstandarddosesnotbemixedor
administered,further,minimizingtheneedtomix potassiumsolutions.
General/ICU
2. Education,tore-emphasizethe5(7)RIGHTSofdrug administration:Rightpatient,rightdrug,rightdose,right route,andrighttime,and,
Rightreasonandrightdocumentation.
(a)Encourageacultureofdouble-checkingoforderswith physicians,whenhigh-riskdrugsareordered. (b)Promotetheidentificationofhigh-riskdrugs.
General
3. Concentratedpotassiumsolutions(high-concentrated vials)areremovedfromwardstockandthenightphar-macy.
(a)Sodiumphosphateissubstitutedforpotassium phosphate.
(b)Monobasicpotassiumphosphatesolution,when needed,istheonlysolutionused.
ICU
(c)WithrespecttoCRRT,concentratedsolutionsare CRRT-specificorpatient-specificmedications.Onlya smallsupply(4–6vials)isavailable,afterpharmacy hasclosed,forCRRTuseonly.
ICU
4a.Betteridentificationandstorageofthevariousminibags, withlargecolour-codedlabelsused.
(i) Storageandmedicationareasarereorganizedto separatebins,makethemmoredistinctandplacedat anappropriateandsafeworkinglevel.
(ii)Thebinsfortherespectivepotassiumconcentrations arecolourcoded(i.e.,withauxiliaryfluorescent labels).
(iii)Minibagsbelabelledanddistributedfrompharmacy. (iv)Pharmacyparticipatesinthisreorganizationandtakes
ownershipofthelong-termorganizationofmedication areas.
(v)Haveamagnifyingglassavailableinallmedication areas.
ICU
4b.Reducetherangeofpremixedpotassiumsolutions available.
(i)Restrictaccessanduseof40-mmolKCLminibagsto onlyICUpatients,whosepotassiumisbeingreplaced, perICUpotassiumprotocol.Providedthatrecommen-dation4aisimplemented.
(ii)Usemultiplesofpremixedbagsforpatientswhose potassiumisnotbeingreplacedperprotocol. (iii)Goalshouldbetostandardizetheorderingof potassiumwithuniversaldosesorprotocol, concentrationsandsetinfusionrates.
Wickens,D.C.,J.D.Lee,Y.Liu,S.E.G.Becker.2004.AnIntroduction toHumanFactorsEngineering.UpperSaddleRiver,NewJersey:Pearson PrenticeHall.
About the Authors
RosminEsmail, MSc, is the Quality Improvement and Patient
Safety Consultant for the DCCM, CHR.
CherylCummings, RN, is an ICU nurse at the Peter Lougheed
Hospital, CHR
DeonneDersch, RPh, is a pharmacist at the Foothills Medical Center, CHR
GregDuchscherer, RRT, is a clinical development specialist, CHR
JudyGlowa, RN, BN, is an ICU Clinical Nurse Educator at the Foothills Medical Center, CHR
GailLiggett, RN, BN, is an ICU/CCU Clinical Nurse Educator at the Peter Lougheed Hospital, CHR
Dr.TerranceHulme, MD, FRCPC, is an intensivist at the Rockyview Hospital, CHR
Corresponding Author: Rosmin Esmail, Email: rosmin.esmail@ calgaryhealthregion.ca
Acknowledgment
*Special thanks to the contribution of the other members of the Patient Safety and Adverse Events Team. They are Dr. Paul Boiteau, Colin Dececco, Judy Duffett-Martin, Alyce Kolody, Bobbi Sheppy, Arkadi Shuman, Teresa Thurber, Doug Vanstaalduine, and Peter Wiesner.
Rosmin Esmail et al. UsingHealthcareFailureModeandEffectAnalysisTool
80 | HE A LT H CA R E QU A RT E R LY VO L. 8, SP E C I A L IS S U E •O C T O B E R2005
General/ICU
4c.Ifpossible,useoralpotassiumsupplementsinlieuofintra-venoussolutions.
ICU
5a.IntheFMCsite,the“A”medicationareaismovedaway fromtheunitclerk’sdesk.AttheRGHsite,medication areamovedorrenovatedtodecreasenoiseanddistrac-tions.
General/ICU
5b.Educateandencourageadonotdisturb policywhenmedi-cationsarebeingmixed.
General/ICU
6. Look-alikeandsound-alikedrugsarehighlightedbetter. (a)Usethesamewarninglabels,consistently,throughout
theregion.
(b)“Medicationalert”labelsbereplacedwithmore specificlabelsstatingeitherlook-alike,sound-alike, differentdosesorroutes.
ICU
7. Whenbolusesofpotassiumarebeinggiventheordersand medicationbedouble-checkedandchartedinQS.This shouldincludepatientsreceivingbolusesof40mmolsor greaterorwhentheICUKprotocolisused.
General/ICU
8a.WhenmedicationsaremixedintheICUorontheward, properlabellingistoincludepatientname,drug,concen-tration,date/timeandwhomixedthemedication.
ICU
8b.Astandardizedprotocolisdevelopedandimplementedfor theadministrationandmonitoringofpotassiumreplace-mentinseverelifethreateninghypokalemia.
General/ICU
9a.Clearandsimpleinstructionsformixingasolutionare includedintheregion’sintravenoustherapymanual. (i) Goalistominimizecalculationsanderrors.
(ii) Considerationisgiventouseofcalculationgridsinthe instructionmanuals.
(iii) Revisethepharmacyinformationsectiononthe internalICUwebsite,makinginformationmoreeasily available.
General
10.Considerusingsatellitepharmaciesinareaswherehigh-riskdrugsareused.
ICU
9b.Usea“keypadbox”forthenarcoticskeyattheFMCsite. (CurrentlyusedatthePLCandRGH.)
General
11.ImmediatechangestotheTDSordersetsaremade. (a)Reducetheoptions;i.e.,solutions,concentrations,
volumesandratesavailablefororderingpotassium. (b)Promotetheculturalchangesnecessarytoreducethe
useofverbalordersforallhigh-riskdrugs.General/ ICU
(c)Introducebarrierswhenorderingpotassiumto preventduplicatedormultiplepotassiumordersforan individualpatient.
(d)ImplementKCLprotocolswithappropriateinclusion andexclusioncriteria,timelimitsortermination pointsaredevelopedfornon-ICUpatients.Includein theprotocollinkstoserumcreatinineandprevious potassiumdoses(similartocurrentCoumadinorder setsinTDS).
(e)Tablesshowingestimatedpotassiumdeficitsandrate ofreplacementareincludedintheprotocols.