Perilaku Dewasa Muda Terhadap Pencegahan Hipertensi Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kartini Kota Pematangsiantar Tahun 2015

Lampiran 1

PERNYATAAN KESEDIAAN MENJADI RESPONDEN

yang bertanda tangan dibawah ini;

Nama

:

Janis kelamin

:

Tanggal lahir/umur

;………../………tahun

Alamat

: ………..

Setelah mendapat penjelasan, dengan ini saya menyatakan bersedia dan mau

berpartisipasi menjadi responden penelitian yang akan dilakukan oleh Dor Mutiara

Hutabarat dari minat studi Administrasi Kesehatan Komunitas / Epidemiologi

Program Studi Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Pada Pasca Sarjana Fakultas Kesehatan

Masyarakat Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Saya tidak mempunyai ikatan apapun dengan penelitian ini. Keikut sertaan

saya dalam penelitian ini tidak dibebani biaya pemeriksaan, tidak ada tekanan dan

konsekwensi lain. Bentuk kesediaan saya dalam penelitian ini adalah bersedia

diperiksa dan memberikan keterangan yang diperlukan dalam penelitian ini.

Demikian surat pernyataan ini saya buat dengan keadaan sadar dan tanpa

paksaan. Saya memahami bahwa keikut sertaan saya memberikan manfaat dan akan

terjaga kerahasiaannya.

Pematangsiantar, ……….

Lampiran 2 KUESIONER PENELITIAN

PERILAKU DEWASA MUDA TERHADAP PENCEGAHAN HIPERTENSI DI WILAYAH

KERJA PUSKESMAS KARTINI

KOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

I.Identitas Responden

1.

Nomor

:

e. Pegawai Swasta/Wiraswasta

6.

Pendidikan

:

a. Tidak Pernah Sekolah

b. SD

c. SLTP/Sederajat

d. SLTA/Sederajat

e. Perguruan Tinggi/Akademi

Petunjuk: Pilihlah salah satu jawaban

II.

Peran Media Massa dan keluarga/teman

a.

Majalah

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari majalah?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari majalah

tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari majalah?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari

majalah?

b.

Koran

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari koran?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari koran

tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari koran?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

c.

Poster

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari poster?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari poster

tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari poster?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari

poster?

d.

Liflet

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari liflet?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari liflet

tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari liflet?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari

dari liflet?

e.

Keluarga/teman

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari keluarga/teman?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari

keluarga/teman tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari keluarga/teman?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari

keluarga/teman?

f.

Televisi

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari televisi?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari televisi

tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari televisi?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

g.

Radio

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari radio?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari radio

tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari radio?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari

radio?

h.

Internet

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari internet?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merasa informasi yang diperoleh dari internet

tersebut akurat?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari internet?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari dari

internet?

III. Informasi dari Puskesmas

No

Pertanyaan

Ya

Tidak

1

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari internet?

2

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah menerima informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari petugas puskesmas?

3

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah mencari informasi tentang pencegahan

hipertensi/penyakit darah tinggi dari petugas puskesmas?

4

Apabila Bapak/Ibu ingin mengetahui informasi tentang pencegahan

penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi, apakah Bapak/Ibu akan mencari ke

puskesmas?

5

Apakah Bapak/Ibu menginginkan agar puskesmas memberikan

informasi/penyuluhan tentang pencegahan hipertensi/darah tinggi?

6

Apakah Bapak/Ibu menginginkan agar puskesmas mengadakan

kegiatan untuk mencegah terjadinya hipertensi/darah tinggi?

IV. Pengetahuan

1.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu mengetahui apa yang dimaksud dengan hipertensi/darah tinggi?

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

2.

Apakah menurut Bapak/Ibu hipertensi/darah tinggi dapat dicegah?

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

3.

Apakah menurut Bapak/Ibu hipertensi/darah tinggi merupakan penyakit yang berbahaya?

a.

Ya

4.

Apakah menurut Bapak/Ibu bahwa Bapak/Ibu mempunyai resiko terkena penyakit

hipertensi/darah tinggi?

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

5.

Apakah kegunaan pemeriksaan tekanan darah?

a.

Untuk mengetahui apakah kita menderita penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi sehingga cepat

ditanggulangi

b.

Untuk mencegah penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi

c.

Tidak tahu

6.

Berapa kali dalam 1 tahun tekanan darah diperiksa?

a.

2 kali

b.

1 kali

c.

Tidak tahu

7.

Berapakah tekanan darah yang disebut dengan hipertensi/tekanan darah tinggi?

a.

b.

c.

8.

Bagaimanakah cara mencegah hipertensi/darah tinggi?

a.

Kurangi makan makanan yang asin, tidak merokok, berolah raga, mengendalikan stres dan

mengukur tekanan darah secara teratur

b.

Banyak makan makanan berlemak

c.

Tidak tahu

9.

Tanda-tanda dari hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah

a.

Pusing, nyeri dada dan sesak

b.

Banyak kencing, banyak minum dan lapar

c.

Tidak tahu

10.

Penyebab hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah

a.

Kurang olah raga, makan makanan berlemak dan banyak menggunakan minyak jelantah

b.

Banyak makan

c.

Tidak tahu

11.

Makanan yang dapat mencegah terjadinya hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah

a.

Makan sayuran, ikan dan buah

b.

Makan jeroan, daging dan udang

c.

Tidak tahu

12.

Apakah penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi merupakan penyakit keturunan

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

c.

Tidak tahu

13.

Komplikasi hipertensi/darah tinggi adalah

a.

Stroke, gagal jantung dan kebutaan

b.

Kencing manis/DM

c.

Tidak tahu

14.

Hipertensi/darah tinggi biasanya dapat terjadi pada usia……..

a.

tahun

b.

tahun

15.

Stres dapat menyebabkan hipertensi/darah tinggi

a.

Ya

b.

Tiak

c.

Tidak tahu

16.

Hipertensi/darah tinggi dapat menyebabkan kematian

a.

Ya

1

Bapak/Ibu senang mendapatkan nformasi

tentang penyakit hipertensi/darah tinggi

2

Bapak/Ibu dapat mencegah penyakit

hipertensi dengan mengurangi konsumsi

makanan yang terlalu asin

3

Bapak/Ibu dapat terkena penyakit

hipertensi/darah tinggi apabila terlalu

banyak memakan makanan berlemak

4

Bapak/Ibu merasa takut terkena penyakit

hipertensi/darah tinggi karena dapat

menimbulkan penyakit stroke dan

jantung

5

Bapak/Ibu bersedia melakukan

pemeriksaan tekanan darah secara teratur

minimal 6 bulan sekali

6

Dengan berolah raga teratur dapat

mencegah hipertensi/darah tinggi

7

Jika Bapak/Ibu sering merasa pusing dan

pegal di tengkuk maka Bapak/Ibu akan

segera memeriksakan diri ke fasilitas

kesehatan

8

Merokok dapat menimbulkan penyakit

hipertensi/darah tinggi

9

Minum alkohol terlalu banyak dapat

menimbulkan penyakit hipertensi/darah

tinggi

10

Stress harus dikendalikan karena dapat

menimbulkan hipertensi/darah tinggi

VI. Tindakan

1.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu melakukan pemeriksaan tekanan darah secara teratur?

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

2.

Berapa kali Bapak/Ibu memeriksakan tekanan darah dalam setahun?

a.

2 kali

b.

1 kali

3.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu berolah raga?

a.

≥ 3 kali seminggu

b.

1- 2 kali seminggu

c.

Tidak pernah

4.

Jika Ya, Jenis olah raga apa yang sering dilakukan?

a.

Olah raga yang menggerakkan tubuh sehingga menghasilkan keringat

b.

Olah raga yang duduk saja (Bermain catur, domino dll)

5.

Apakah Bapak/ibu sedang mengalami masalah yang menimbulkan stres?

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

6.

Bagaimanakah cara Bapak/Ibu mengatasi stress?

a.

Dikendalikan agar tidak jadi pikiran

b.

Dicari kesibukan lain agar terlupakan

7.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu pernah merasa jantung berdebar, pusing dan tengkuk terasa pegal?

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

8.

Jika ya, apakah Bapak/Ibu segera memeriksakan diri ke fasilitas kesehatan?

a.

Ya

b.

Tidak

9.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering memakan makanan asin?

a.

Tidak

b.

Kadang-kadang

c.

Ya

10.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering memakan makanan berlemak?

a.

Tidak

b.

Kadang-kadang

c.

Ya

11.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering makan daging?

a.

Tidak

b.

Kadang-kadang

c.

Ya

12.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu merokok?

a.

Tidak

b.

Kadang-kadang

c.

Ya

13.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu minum alkohol?

a.

Tidak

b.

Kadang-kadang

c.

Ya

14.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering memakai minyak jelantah?

a.

Tidak

b.

Kadang-kadang

c.

Ya

15.

Apakah Bapak/Ibu sering makan makanan bersantan?

a.

Tidak

b.

Kadang-kadang

c.

Ya

Lampiran 3

Hasil Uji Reabilitas dan Validitas

Berdasarkan tabel nilai r dengan taraf signifikansi 5% diperoleh nilai r tabel 0,361

Reliability Scale: majalah

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.532 4

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 2.20 3.959 .364 .422

p2 2.87 4.326 .219 .545

p3 2.73 3.444 .460 .324

p4 3.00 4.345 .248 .517

Reliability Scale: koran

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.757 4

Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 1.27 3.720 .603 .675

p2 1.53 4.326 .506 .727

p3 1.73 4.340 .670 .648

p4 1.67 4.713 .469 .743

Scale: poster

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.706 4

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 .60 1.972 .512 .671

p2 .93 2.133 .706 .491

p3 1.13 2.947 .612 .608

p4 1.13 3.499 .271 .749

Scale: leaflet

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 .90 3.882 .643 .898

p2 .90 3.310 .887 .795

p3 1.03 3.892 .818 .828

p4 1.10 4.453 .693 .876

Scale: keluarga/teman Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.732 4

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 4.13 4.947 .505 .711 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.835 4

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 2.13 6.051 .624 .809

p2 2.60 5.559 .702 .774

p3 2.73 5.926 .634 .805

p4 2.93 5.995 .706 .775

Scale: radio

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 30 100.0

Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.790 4

Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 .80 2.648 .673 .708

p2 1.13 3.775 .486 .789

p3 1.00 2.966 .689 .688

p4 1.27 3.995 .644 .746

Scale: internet

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.887 4

Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 3.13 7.085 .739 .860

p2 3.20 6.786 .789 .841

p3 3.53 7.085 .677 .884

p4 3.53 6.533 .812 .832

Scale: puskesmas Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.887 6

Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 7.20 12.855 .722 .864

Scale: pengetahuan Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.908 16

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Scale: sikap

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.905 10

Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item

Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

p1 20.23 22.392 .465 .915

Scale: tindakan

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.836 15

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item-Total Correlation

Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted

Lampiran 5

Hasil Pengolahan Data

5.1 Uji Univariat

Frequency Table

Umur

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid SLTP/Sederajat 5 5.0 5.0 5.0

SLTA/sederajat 35 35.0 35.0 40.0

perguruan tinggi/Akademi 60 60.0 60.0 100.0

Majalah

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid kurang 37 37.0 37.0 37.0

Umur

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid kurang 80 80.0 80.0 80.0

Baik 20 20.0 20.0 100.0

Tindakan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid kurang 80 80.0 80.0 80.0

Baik 20 20.0 20.0 100.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

5.2

Uji Bivariat (chi-square)

1.

Hubungan karakteristik responden terhadap tindakan

Crosstab

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

umur * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

umur * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .127a 1 .722

Continuity Correctionb .004 1 .953

Likelihood Ratio .130 1 .718

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .490

Linear-by-Linear Association .126 1 .723

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,60. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

j kelamin * tindakan Crosstabulation Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.722a _{1 .054}

Continuity Correctionb 2.760 1 .097

Likelihood Ratio 3.541 1 .060

Fisher's Exact Test .065 .051

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.685 1 .055

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.722a 1 .040

Continuity Correctionb 2.760 1 .097

Likelihood Ratio 3.541 1 .060

Fisher's Exact Test .065 .051

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.685 1 .055

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,40.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pkrj (1 / 2) 2.636 .965 7.199

For cohort tindakan = 1 1.241 .963 1.599

For cohort tindakan = 2 .471 .218 1.016

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pddk 2 * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

pddk 2 * tindakan Crosstabulation Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.900a _{1 .029}

Continuity Correctionb 2.110 1 .146

Likelihood Ratio 2.981 1 .084

Fisher's Exact Test .132 .072

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.871 1 .090

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

phsl 2 * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

phsl 2 * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.000a _{1 .046}

Continuity Correctionb 3.063 1 .080

Likelihood Ratio 4.093 1 .043

Fisher's Exact Test .078 .039

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.960 1 .047

N of Valid Cases 100

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for phsl 2 (1 / 2) 2.852 .995 8.173

For cohort tindakan = 1 1.222 1.000 1.494

For cohort tindakan = 2 .429 .179 1.025

N of Valid Cases 100

2. Hubungan peran media massa, peran keluarga/teman dan peran puskesmas

Crosstab

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

majalah * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

majalah * tindakan Crosstabulation Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.469a 1 .225

Continuity Correctionb .877 1 .349

Likelihood Ratio 1.405 1 .236

Fisher's Exact Test .273 .174

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.454 1 .228

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

koran * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.068a _{1 .150}

Continuity Correctionb 1.079 1 .299

Likelihood Ratio 1.813 1 .178

Fisher's Exact Test .223 .149

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.048 1 .152

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,20. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

poster * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

poster * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .346a _{1 .557}

Continuity Correctionb .010 1 .922

Likelihood Ratio .318 1 .573

Fisher's Exact Test .625 .426

Linear-by-Linear Association .342 1 .559

N of Valid Cases 100

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

liflet * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

liflet * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .694a 1 .405

Continuity Correctionb _{.174 1 .677}

Likelihood Ratio .634 1 .426

Fisher's Exact Test .414 .319

Linear-by-Linear Association .688 1 .407

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,00. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

televisi * tindakan Crosstabulation Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.911a _{1 .167}

Continuity Correctionb 1.247 1 .264

Likelihood Ratio 2.045 1 .153

Fisher's Exact Test .195 .131

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.892 1 .169

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,60. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

radio * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

radio * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .026a 1 .873

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .026 1 .872

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .618

Linear-by-Linear Association .025 1 .874

N of Valid Cases 100

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

internet * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

internet * tindakan Crosstabulation Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.544a 1 .214

Continuity Correctionb _{.968 1 .325}

Likelihood Ratio 1.616 1 .204

Fisher's Exact Test .302 .163

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.529 1 .216

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,40. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

kel/teman * tindakan Crosstabulation Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.690a _{1 .101}

Continuity Correctionb 1.915 1 .166

Likelihood Ratio 2.633 1 .105

Fisher's Exact Test .127 .084

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.663 1 .103

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,80. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for kel/teman (1 / 2) .441 .163 1.190

For cohort tindakan = 1 .842 .674 1.052

For cohort tindakan = 2 1.912 .873 4.187

N of Valid Cases 100

CROSSTABS /TABLES=Puskesmas BY tindakan /FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES /STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK /CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN TOTAL /COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs [DataSet1]

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Puskesmas * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

Puskesmas * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .822a 1 .365

Continuity Correctionb _{.429 1 .513}

Likelihood Ratio .835 1 .361

Fisher's Exact Test .454 .258

Linear-by-Linear Association .814 1 .367

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,80.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Puskesmas (1 / 2) 1.598 .577 4.425

For cohort tindakan = 1 1.095 .903 1.328

For cohort tindakan = 2 .685 .299 1.571

N of Valid Cases 100

2.

Hubungan pengetahuan dengan tindakan

Crosstabs

[DataSet1] D:\pengolahan data\data spss.sav

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

ptahuan * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

ptahuan * tindakan Crosstabulation

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 6.646a 1 .010

Continuity Correctionb 5.157 1 .023

Likelihood Ratio 10.686 1 .001

Fisher's Exact Test .006 .005

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.579 1 .010

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,20.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

For cohort tindakan = kurang 1.339 1.178 1.522

N of Valid Cases 100

3.

Hubungan sikap dengan tindakan

Crosstabs[DataSet1] D:\pengolahan data\data spss.sav

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

sikap * tindakan 100 100.0% 0 .0% 100 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value Df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (2-sided)

Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 67.366a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 62.504 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 60.616 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 66.692 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,40.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for sikap (kurang / baik)

171.000 29.027 1007.365

For cohort tindakan = kurang 5.359 2.207 13.013

For cohort tindakan = baik .031 .008 .125

N of Valid Cases 100

5.3. Uji Multivariat (Regresi Logistik)

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 75.979 9 .000

Block 75.979 9 .000

Model 75.979 9 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 24.101a .532 .842

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 20 because maximum iterations has been reached. Final solution cannot be found.

Classification Tablea

Observed

Overall Percentage 95.0

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a pddk2 -2.383 1.663 2.054 1 .152 .092

phsl2 .764 1.257 .369 1 .543 2.147

majalah .420 1.334 .099 1 .753 1.522

koran 2.719 1.716 2.510 1 .113 15.170

televisi -3.044 1.702 3.200 1 .074 .048

internet 1.750 1.510 1.343 1 .246 5.753

kelteman 1.240 1.664 .555 1 .456 3.456

ptahuan 18.580 7842.806 .000 1 .998 1.172E8

sikap 7.866 2.401 10.737 1 .001 2607.877

Constant -51.868 15685.613 .000 1 .997 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, majalah, koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, ptahuan, sikap.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a _{pddk2 .004 2.401}

phsl2 .183 25.234

majalah .111 20.770

koran .525 438.406

televisi .002 1.338

internet .298 110.915

kelteman .132 90.224

ptahuan .000 .

sikap 23.595 288241.296

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, majalah, koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, ptahuan, sikap. Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 74.150 8 .000

Block 74.150 8 .000

Model 74.150 8 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 25.931a .524 .828

Classification Tablea

Observed

Predicted

tindakan

1 2 Percentage Correct

Step 1 tindakan 1 78 2 97.5

2 3 17 85.0

Overall Percentage 95.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a pddk2 -2.781 1.677 2.749 1 .097 .062

phsl2 1.410 1.178 1.433 1 .231 4.096

majalah .667 1.305 .261 1 .609 1.949

koran 2.963 1.741 2.895 1 .089 19.352

televisi -3.135 1.674 3.506 1 .061 .043

internet 2.521 1.378 3.347 1 .067 12.435

kelteman 1.727 1.614 1.145 1 .285 5.623

sikap 8.677 2.632 10.866 1 .001 5865.578

Constant -19.196 6.842 7.872 1 .005 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, majalah, koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, sikap.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a pddk2 .002 1.659

phsl2 .407 41.206

majalah .151 25.178

koran .638 587.348

televisi .002 1.158

internet .835 185.110

kelteman .238 132.965

sikap 33.706 1020726.773

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 73.882 7 .000

Block 73.882 7 .000

Model 73.882 7 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 26.198a .522 .826

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

Classification Tablea

Observed

Overall Percentage 95.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, koran, televisi, internet, kelteman, sikap.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

sikap 33.435 1027180.189

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 72.348 6 .000

Block 72.348 6 .000

Model 72.348 6 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 27.732a .515 .814

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 8 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

Classification Tablea

Observed

Overall Percentage 96.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, phsl2, koran, televisi, internet, sikap.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

sikap 43.752 46632.610

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 70.329 5 .000

Block 70.329 5 .000

Model 70.329 5 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 29.751a .505 .799

Classification Tablea

Overall Percentage 94.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, koran, televisi, internet, sikap.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

sikap 42.432 30989.634

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pddk2, koran, televisi, internet, sikap.

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa _{N Percent}

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Predicted

tindakan

1 2 Percentage Correct

Step 0 tindakan 1 80 0 100.0

2 20 0 .0

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables Koran 2.068 1 .150

Televisi 1.911 1 .167

Internet 1.544 1 .214

Sikap 67.366 1 .000

Overall Statistics 70.057 4 .000

Block 1: Method = Ente

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 68.498 4 .000

Block 68.498 4 .000

Model 68.498 4 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 31.583a .496 .784

Classification Tablea

Observed

Predicted

tindakan

1 2 Percentage Correct

Step 1 tindakan 1 77 3 96.3

2 4 16 80.0

Overall Percentage 93.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a koran 2.926 1.467 3.975 1 .046 18.646

televisi -1.629 1.053 2.392 1 .122 .196

internet 1.257 1.024 1.507 1 .220 3.516

sikap 6.113 1.284 22.680 1 .000 451.600

Constant -13.567 4.050 11.220 1 .001 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi, internet, sikap.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a koran 1.051 330.825

televisi .025 1.545

internet .472 26.170

sikap 36.491 5588.841

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi, internet, sikap.

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 66.882 3 .000

Block 66.882 3 .000

Model 66.882 3 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 33.199a .488 .771

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

Classification Tablea

Observed

Overall Percentage 94.0

Variables in the Equation

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi, sikap.

Variables in the Equation 95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a _{koran .957 240.419}

televisi .022 1.383

sikap 34.958 4239.160

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, televisi, sikap.

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Variables not in the Equation

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 63.866 2 .000

Block 63.866 2 .000

Model 63.866 2 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 36.215a .472 .746

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than ,001.

Classification Tablea

Observed

Overall Percentage 94.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a koran 2.433 1.379 3.112 1 .078 11.397

sikap 5.648 1.138 24.624 1 .000 283.658

Constant -12.386 3.155 15.412 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: koran, sikap.

Variables in the Equation 95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a koran .763 170.168

sikap 30.479 2639.876

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 100 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 100 100.0

a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Overall Percentage 80.0

a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -1.386 .250 30.749 1 .000 .250

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables Sikap 67.366 1 .000

Overall Statistics 67.366 1 .000

Block 1: Method = Ente

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 60.616 1 .000

Block 60.616 1 .000

Model 60.616 1 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 39.465a _{.455 .719}

Classification Tablea

Observed

Predicted

tindakan

1 2 Percentage Correct

Step 1 tindakan 1 76 4 95.0

2 2 18 90.0

Overall Percentage 94.0

a. The cut value is ,500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a sikap 5.142 .905 32.291 1 .000 171.000

Constant -8.779 1.536 32.684 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: sikap.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper

Step 1a sikap 29.027 1007.365