LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I. Hasil pada Tahapan Uji untuk Variabel Faktor Penyebab Perceraian terhadap Variabel Status Cerai. Uji Korelasi Spearman

(1)

79

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran I. Hasil pada Tahapan Uji untuk Variabel Faktor Penyebab Perceraian terhadap Variabel Status Cerai

1.1 Tabel Uji Korelasi Spearman

Uji Korelasi Spearman

Variabel X Usia

(X₁)

Tingkat Pendidikan

(X2)

Pekerjaan (X₃)

Jumlah Pemicu Perceraian

(X4)

Usia Pernikahan

(X5)

Kepunyaan Anak (X₆)

Usia (X1)

Correlation

Coefficient 1.000 0.060 0.059 -0.127 0.692 -0.129

Sig. (2-tailed) . 0.577 0.584 0.233 0.000 0.224

Tingkat Pendidikan (X2)

Correlation

Coefficient 0.060 1.000 0.207 -0.220 -0.040 -0.002

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.577 . 0.050 0.037 0.711 0.983

Pekerjaan (X3)

Correlation

Coefficient 0.059 0.207 1.000 -0.275 -0.066 0.068

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.584 0.050 . 0.009 0.534 0.523

Jumlah Pemicu Perceraian (X4)

Correlation

Coefficient -0.127 -0.220 -0.275 1.000 -0.051 0.113

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.233 0.037 0.009 . 0.633 0.287

Usia Pernikahan (X5)

Correlation

Coefficient 0.692 -0.040 -0.066 -0.051 1.000 -0.452

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 .0711 0.534 0.633 . 0.000

Kepunyaan Anak (X6)

Correlation

Coefficient -0.129 -0.002 0.068 0.113 -0.452 1.000 Sig. (2-tailed) 0.224 0.983 0.523 0.287 0.000 .

Jumlah Sampel (N) 90 90 90 90 90 90

1.2 Uji Independensi (Uji Chi-Kuadrat)

Chi-Square Tests (Status Cerai * Usia)

Value df

Asymptotic Significance (2-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.462^a 7 .382

Likelihood Ratio 9.748 7 .203

Linear-by-Linear

Association .027 1 .870

N of Valid Cases 90

(2)

80 Chi-Square Tests

(Status Cerai * Tingkat Pendidikan)

Value df

sided)

Linear-by-Linear

Association .001 1 .979

N of Valid Cases 90

Chi-Square Tests (Status Cerai * Pekerjaan)

Value df

sided) Pearson Chi-Square 34.532^a 5 .000

Linear-by-Linear

Association 16.328 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 90

Chi-Square Tests

(Satus Cerai * Jumlah Pemicu Perceraian)

Value df

sided) Pearson Chi-Square 16.631^a 4 .002

Linear-by-Linear

Association 14.983 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 90

Chi-Square Tests (Status Cerai * Usia Pernikahan)

Value df

Asymptotic Significance

(2-sided)

Linear-by-Linear Association

4.362 1 .037

N of Valid Cases 90

(3)

81 Chi-Square Tests

(Status Cerai * Kepunyaan Anak)

Value df

Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .119^a 1 .730

Continuity Correction^b .003 1 .954

Likelihood Ratio .117 1 .732

Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association

.118 1 .732

N of Valid Cases 90

1.3 Uji Serentak untuk Model Awal Regresi Logistik Biner

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 74.025 17 .000

Block 74.025 17 .000

Model 74.025 17 .000

1.4 Uji Parsial untuk Model Awal Regresi Logistik Biner

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig.

Step 1^a

tingkat pendidikan .913 3 .822

tingkat pendidikan(1) 38.659 6756.786 .000 1 .995 tingkat pendidikan(2) 19.981 26401.111 .000 1 .999 tingkat pendidikan(3) 1.014 1.061 .913 1 .339

pekerjaan .628 5 .987

pekerjaan(1) -54.106 8145.639 .000 1 .995

pekerjaan(2) -.062 2.563 .001 1 .981

pekerjaan(3) .811 2.096 .150 1 .699

pekerjaan(4) .595 2.571 .054 1 .817

pekerjaan(5) 19.557 11099.827 .000 1 .999

jumlah pemicu perceraian -2.171 .861 6.358 1 .012 status kepunyaan anak(1) .064 1.716 .001 1 .970

usia pernikahan 4.276 7 .747

usia pernikahan(1) 54.675 31290.207 .000 1 .999 usia pernikahan(2) 55.284 31290.207 .000 1 .999 usia pernikahan(3) 35.878 30695.182 .000 1 .999 usia pernikahan(4) 57.274 31290.207 .000 1 .999 usia pernikahan(5) 55.792 31290.207 .000 1 .999 usia pernikahan(6) 37.661 31557.661 .000 1 .999 usia pernikahan(7) 54.081 31290.207 .000 1 .999

Constant -52.569 31290.207 .000 1 .999

(4)

82

1.5 Uji Serentak untuk Model Akhir Regresi Logistik Biner

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 66.367 13 .000

Block 66.367 13 .000

Model 66.367 13 .000

1.6 Hasil Uji Parsial untuk Model Akhir Regresi Logistik Biner

B S.E. Wald df Sig.

Step 1^a

Pekerjaan 2.271 5 .810

Pekerjaan(1) -20.006 6056.587 .000 1 .997

Pekerjaan(2) .694 1.742 .159 1 .690

Pekerjaan(3) .949 1.733 .300 1 .584

Pekerjaan(4) -1.020 1.975 .266 1 .606

Pekerjaan(5) 37.238 12540.585 .000 1 .998

Jumlah pemicu perceraian -1.641 .759 4.675 1 .031

Usia Pernikahan 5.457 7 .604

Usia Pernikahan(1) 53.299 21345.073 .000 1 .998 Usia Pernikahan(2) 53.801 21345.073 .000 1 .998 Usia Pernikahan(3) 34.606 19844.779 .000 1 .999 Usia Pernikahan(4) 56.156 21345.073 .000 1 .998 Usia Pernikahan(5) 54.311 21345.073 .000 1 .998 Usia Pernikahan(6) 54.730 21345.073 .000 1 .998 Usia Pernikahan(7) 53.760 21345.073 .000 1 .998

Constant -51.829 21345.073 .000 1 .998

1.7 Hasil Uji Kesesuaian Model (Uji Hosmer dan Lemeshow)

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 1.708 8 .989

1.8 Hasil Uji Kebaikan Model

Model Summary Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 43.588^a .522 .740

(5)

83

1.9 Hasil Odds Rasio

Exp(B) Step 1^a Pekerjaan

Pekerjaan(1) .000

Pekerjaan(2) 2.002

Pekerjaan(3) 2.582

Pekerjaan(4) .361

Pekerjaan(5) 14871923318706016.000

Jumlah pemicu perceraian .194

Usia Pernikahan

Usia Pernikahan(1) 140453064377996580000000.000 Usia Pernikahan(2) 231947565689426300000000.000

Usia Pernikahan(3) 1069873499814502.200

Usia Pernikahan(4) 2444679074868117000000000.000 Usia Pernikahan(5) 386337630741662200000000.000 Usia Pernikahan(6) 587206877619924300000000.000 Usia Pernikahan(7) 222686894628122800000000.000

Constant .000

(6)

84

Lampiran II. Hasil pada Tahapan Uji untuk Variabel Faktor Pemicu Perceraian menurut Putusan Pengadilan terhadap Variabel Status Cerai

2.1 Uji Korelasi Spearman

Uji Korelasi Spearman

Variabel Faktor Pemicu Perceraian

Perselisihan dan Pertengkaran

terus menerus

Pergi mening-

galkan

Ekonomi Perseling-

kuhan KDRT Dihukum penjara

Judi/

Mabuk/

Narkotika

Penyim- pangan seksual

Perselisih an dan Pertengka ran terus menerus (X1)

Correlation Coefficient

1.000 -0.677 0.210 0.064 -0.089 -0.201 -0.026 -0.144

Sig. (2-tailed) . 0.000 0.047 0.549 0.404 0.057 0.808 0.174

Pergi meningga lkan (X2)

-0.677 1.000 -0.109 -0.126 0.021 -0.047 -0.098 0.160

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.000 . 0.307 0.238 0.845 0.659 0.360 0.133

Ekonomi (X3)

0.210 -0.109 1.000 -0.040 0.030 0.024 -0.030 -0.033

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.047 0.307 . 0.708 0.779 0.824 0.780 0.755

Perseling kuhan (X4)

0.064 -0.126 -0.040 1.000 -0.013 -0.101 0.212 -0.125

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.549 0.238 0.708 . 0.904 0.342 0.045 0.241

KDRT (X5)

-0.089 0.021 0.030 -0.013 1.000 -0.081 0.115 -0.099

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.404 0.845 0.779 0.904 . 0.450 0.281 0.352

Dihukum penjara (X6)

-0.201 -0.047 0.024 -0.101 -0.081 1.000 -0.047 -0.028

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.057 0.659 0.824 0.342 0.450 . 0.659 0.793

Judi/Mab uk/

Narkotika (X7)

-0.026 -0.098 -0.030 0.212 0.115 -0.047 1.000 -0.058

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.808 0.360 0.780 0.045 0.281 0.659 . 0.587

Penyimpa ngan seksual (X8)

-0.144 0.160 -0.033 -0.125 -0.099 -0.028 -0.058 1.000

Sig. (2-tailed) 0.174 0.133 0.755 0.241 0.352 0.793 0.587 .

Jumlah Sampel (N) 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

(7)

85

2.2 Uji Independensi (Uji Chi Kuadrat)

(Status Cerai * Perselisihan dan Pertengkaran terus menerus)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.699^a 1 .192

Fisher's Exact Test .269 .182

1.680 1 .195

N of Valid Cases 90

(Status Cerai * Pergi Meninggalkan)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .105^a 1 .746

Continuity Correction^b .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .108 1 .743

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .550

.103 1 .748

N of Valid Cases 90

Chi-Square Tests (Status Cerai * Ekonomi)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

Continuity Correction^b 13.536 1 .000

15.134 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 90

Chi-Square Tests (Status Cerai * Perselingkuhan)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

2.822 1 .093

N of Valid Cases 90

(8)

86

Chi-Square Tests (Status Cerai * KDRT)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

4.844 1 .028

N of Valid Cases 90

(Status Cerai * Dihukum Penjara)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square .877^a 1 .349

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .488

.867 1 .352

N of Valid Cases 90

(Status Cerai * Judi/Mabuk/Narkotika)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

1.266 1 .260

N of Valid Cases 90

(Status Cerai * Peyimpangan Seksual)

Value df

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

1.315 1 .251

N of Valid Cases 90

(9)

87

2.3 Uji Serentak untuk Model Awal Regresi Logistik Biner

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 38.904 7 .000

Block 38.904 7 .000

Model 38.904 7 .000

2.4 Uji Parsial untuk Model Awal Regresi Logistik Biner

B S.E. Wald df Sig.

Step 1^a perselisihan dan pertengkaran terus menerus(1)

-1.788 1.229 2.115 1 .146

ekonomi(1) 2.960 .748 15.647 1 .000

perselingkuhan(1) 1.600 .714 5.015 1 .025

kdrt(1) 2.176 .895 5.904 1 .015

dihukum penjara(1) 20.134 27811.136 .000 1 .999 judi/mabuk/narkotika(1) .655 1.220 .288 1 .592 penyimpangan seks(1) 21.316 21289.212 .000 1 .999

Constant -47.654 35024.132 .000 1 .999

2.5 Uji Serentak untuk Model Akhir Regresi Logistik Biner

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 28.389 3 .000

Block 28.389 3 .000

Model 28.389 3 .000

2.6 Uji Parsial dan Odds Rasio untuk Model Akhir Regresi Logistik Biner

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Step 1^a KDRT(1) 1.956 .850 5.298 1 .021 7.068

Ekonomi(1) 2.590 .702 13.600 1 .000 13.328 Perselingkuhan(1) 1.370 .638 4.609 1 .032 3.936 Constant -5.286 1.220 18.763 1 .000 .005

2.7 Hasil Uji Kesesuaian Model (Uji Hosmer dan Lemeshow)

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 .911 5 .969

2.8 Hasil Uji Kebaikan Model

Model Summary Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1 81.567^a .271 .384