AN ANALYSIS OF METAPHOR IN CRADLE OF FILTH'S SONG LYRICS.

AN ANALYSIS QF META?TioR

IN CR,{DIE

O]''1'?{

S SONG LYRICS

SubhAL.t in Panitl

Futilndl

oJlh.

Requirtutlot

th. D.Ere

ol

gtujono

sdn

f,NCLISIt DEPARTMEi'T - FACULTY OF LTTTERS

AND{AS

iJNI!'ERSTTY

D.lam skipsi nri. penuh

ncnbals

penggmM mctalbra

drlm

hnk lagu, larena

lnik

ke!

nerupaks salan salu bcntuk karla sstra.

Tuliff

if,i

benbku kepada lip€'lipe

da

Darm

mclalifa

ydg

€rdapat

dalm lirik

laaD

mdk

af

lihh.

t'qlA

de\

p.nulise

ini

a.laLn menemukan tipe-lip€

nehlon

Landa(d teori _tmB disunahm

ddm

ncngdalisis dan adalah teori

ybg

dikenukals

oleh

Ldkolt

&

Johnen.

Mcrka hcngmuka*d

bahsa inti metaldh adalan

pengeni

d

penahme

ses@d hal denAan me.eemaltur nenah@an

at

hal lain. Densm dcnikian.

nelalbh

tidak

haya

uskane,

ndun

jusa

_nrerupake

konep pcmikiro

ndusia.

Deid6ar*d

_proscs

kodeplualisi.

Lahotl

&

Johnson ncmbagi netatbE

keddm

iga gdis

bcs!

raitu:

otientatioul netapho\ odrtosical netaphoL dan

etrctut

ndqhor.

Ontoloaical netaphor dibasi nenjadi liga lipe,

f^itu

:

s"bstance

anl

e

tilr

netaphor. cortuike/ netaphor, dak

p$ohilinhn

Bcrdslr&u

konsep i1uloh

sknFi

ini

dibut.

Selsjubya

penbalam

malna neratbra rcBebur drMrkm berdAarku konleks dan isi kesclumnb hgu,

Ddu

pensunpuld tlara p€nutis mensaunahe metode obseryasi (leieamalan), dm

dalm

_{!€nBrnslisan iata}

penulis mengeealM nel.de

ellEnsial

dd

merode disribuional. Kenrudiar

hail

dalhis disajikm

dalm

benllk kala-kala

da

didutus

dengd

lengsuntr

tllel

unrk menpedeld

hasil

alisis,

Dalm

ualisis

y

g dilakukM p.dd 13 lagu

yeg

dimbil

scbalai

datl

penuh nenenukan

balwa/o^,,,:/i.dn,

nerupakm jenis

nolrldn

_ymg

Flina

bdyak

diguakd,

yaitu denCm fi€lueNi 6

lemuc

tu.Koudi4ori.

tationo] netaphor dak

sbtctttul

nduphor dense frekuensi ₄

l.ductld.

Sthidhc.

and

entjt!

etuphot .l^n

cantat.r

udrapr..

maing

nsirA

dcrge

Ackuensi

CHAPTER

I

1

l

The Bxclgmund of rhe Study

Lmrra8e is a

nedim

in

vhi.h

someone or sonc _Aoups ofpeople, such

as a bad, cm

dprss

lndnelves lhough

it.

By lmguaAe- p@plc cid express

th€ir fecline, idea thousht

ad

so fonh.

There

re

$

mmy ways to

dpre$

tftush

lmeMee, il can

be

Mift€n or spokcn

fom.

&d

song lync is one of

it

Lyric is the languogc

ol

music in

which n cm _rErrom bolh in spoken, by singine il md in wrinen. in tom otsons Tre $ng lync can be

res

ded as a

*orl

ol liteBture sincc it is a kird of an

ibm.

Hockctt ( 1953:553) s,id $at _lilerarure h _{dhtinguished trom othg 0rr foms by thc}

medim in Bhich

n

wo

sr leeuage. Thc chracteristic oa lilealure is lh3r ir

conlains la.sua8e which is

difcienl

lrcn

ordinary lmguage

usse

Chapman (1973:60) cxplained thal lilerary vrircrs have

a

habit

of

going belon'l lhe

conventions of conmon sp€ech in questions of whal

is

c6ftecr', which choiccs

de lappropnat. even whar is 1o

b.

_Essrded as conpehensible, _{d in olhei}

expession

in

whicn

a

mrd

or

ph6e

d

the concept repEsented nand

fi gdarilely fo. dother word

.r

phraie and ils conept 11 is a conpaJiso bclwEen

two

lhi4s

in which lhe

fi6t

thins compared Io the scon,l dinss indirtclly The spcalcr or

wrird

uses meLphor ro

meu

sn€$nlg

difetonl

lrun

ll,e

lilcnl

D@ing,

that tbe listene$

or

€ades

sbelch then imasination

Ior

mother

inierpElalion. Such

mn

lned

inleruelalion

of

smtnccs

m

callcd mcraphor (rronkin elal, 1990:230).

Mebthor h a lbguag€ cxtression in which people

uF

itlo

exprcss iheir

ide!" leelin8, emolion, even Ltr influence emeonc s nind.

!

nnctioE to lr@sfcr

fic

ncanin8thai _{emeone Bes} in mind lo the odre^. Wellcr Enblcr in Kouler md

When

se *ish

lo

say sonething aboui ouBclvcs

oi

ou

c.ulomen!

we

choose a

vay of

orderin8 oLU thoughls,

a

wry rhich

will

bc, we hopc meminctul lo

ou^clles

d our Ustcn€*, a wry Bhich wilr dojusticc to thc

eaCcr .ctivity in

ou ni.ds.

Mctaphor apped to be a very efectiv€ way

of

Tbllinr

abour literar)

so

s

is

ralkine

ah.d

l&CU.€e

ad

meanine

especi.lly thc use of mclaploi

imtlied in it. The

lbCuge ced

in lnal

innuences rhe inrerpElarion

ol$e

*orks

ikllsu(e

metaphor concms witn rhc process ofnearine trmsfeired

ed

bow the mctuing is cxpressed, so n affech rhe proccss

orund6lrndi.g,4

blolrstated

_{in his papcr ( 200s}

)

whal I md odres lound is that mebphor _llays a najor rcle in semulics.

The lyncs that the witer takes

s

dara is the lyncs oa a bdd nmed Cradle

of Ftlth. Cradle

d

Filth is

1991.

Ilis

band is categorird

6

blacl nelal one since Lhey play D

rtdly

hL{vy

ne1.l. b€side their lyrical thenes and

imagery

e hcavily

iinrencsl

by go0tc lncmtuc. pocty.

n'dolory

d homr filns.

The

witer

is inrere{ed

ii

dal}zing this blnd s lydcs because the Miter

lound lhd $ey have a

uiq@

style in

{itins

rheir lyrics in

siich

they

u*

a lot ol figuraiile

lofrs

in it. As se know, pcople assme $al

!

deol

bdd, such rs Cla.le oJ Firh

^a

a ttut\tal style in

wilins

then lyric bur in facr. rhc $aird

loud

lnat they

se

figurarive

lbm

to expre$ Rhat they

med

in order to trasfer dre m.ssaBe thcy

*dl

lo

scnd

lo

dDir listcnc6 Bcsides. _{lnis scmc}

is

lne nost conmunicative wilh lhen listenes in express,ng lheir Lhouaht lnd i{leolo8y. ln addilio'r. it has nore enolive md poelic comunication

{ithin

ihe nusic, so rhai

ficir

lisre.e$ do not oniy llslen 1o lhen husic but also 10 shst thcy say

h

lhcn

1.2 The ldcntificltion of Problem

This

Esedh

is focused oD the analysis ofnLlapbor as ]nund in

aidile

o/

Frrri

sone lydcs

ed

aho its neanins.

Atul thcr

m

two rcscdch qucsrions rclated to this oalysh, they

mr

L wbal are rhe fom of netaphot

f.ud

in i},e (radle ol Firh s sane

lyiics

s

Latoffdd

Joh.son proposed?

In rhis chapter. the sriier prcscna rhe rcsuh otl

r

aiatys( ot ,nsraph..

ii

eng lyrics. ner :ml}?ine thc dar. latcn 6om t3 engs

ofaz/.rs,/F/rri

ihey arc20olrhem. the witer linds rhar

pa orrlzrb,ijtheqpeotmdaphormont}

Nd

ii

thosc eng Llrici wilh thc mo{ peNena8e.6 _ofrobt

(cumccs Tl'o

orietu1i.h.l nerarhar

^nd etudxrul ?,!r4pr.r, c&h .4 occurenc.s.

Jl,rr,r.,

dtul

tditr

mlophat sd

.a

dret,"rarrol

rnh :l mcurcncs 6ch oa$em.

Funhermorej thc inlcrpRhrion olrhe mcaning oi nclaphor in thir tyic 6 ba*d on rhe conlext ol rhe son!. the line b.toE and _{atcr il.} ln tac! mcbpho. is

Ihc

sr]

used by thc song wrirer ro exprcs his idea or ro cmphash hn$oushr [)

lhe lineneE. In inldrpreting rhe neaning of neiophoricat expE$io _. rhe wirer

rh.uLd reler to thc {hole conrenl ofrhc song and rake thenr as a union ihai

influcnce ro each orher in order lo _eel $c nght tnrerprdarion. Hcrc, rhe wner t,Lnd ho.

rt.

n

.n

' Cor

Thpho

,u

o.

I.I

e.i I

.a

s. Finally, rhe wirer congludes rhar

BIBLIOCRAPHY

Chapnm,

Ray

ond.l9T3

Linguittsdrd

Ln.nnure: an inta.lrction

b

li!..dt|

rl,lrir.a.

Un iled States o I Am eric a: Wh ilehall Companl'

(

h^mn,

_{S. 11)68. ,1, intrcdu.liok ]D the lonxuE! .t}

podrr

_{lJ.sron: Hargnnn} MiminConpa.y.

Croh. Willirm nnd Cruse,

D

Alan.2!011. (b8r,?ir.

rirsrnrir.

Cmbrid-ae: Clmbidse

tlnireEil]

Press.

Clruf.l).

Al!n. 200rl. ,UearDA in Lohqaage An ln1r.&!cti.n

to\c

dnicsahd

/'r"ArarLr

Manche$er: Oxaord Univesitl

lres.

Gow, Cordon. 2001.

ljd/ial

,i/d td"har nt lhe

i:ork.f

Mo^rall

t

tL&un

Canadian lounral of Connnnic.lnh vol.26. No

L

Rcricvcd lDrn

htpL

rwtit

ohtin

at

jtettitb.php!4.Allelllt!!!

Ilrll

tlockcr!F. Charlcs. 1958.,{ ai,u'st 11M.t1em

Lihgtjii.\

Ncs

\.tt:

the Ma.nrillm Conrpa.y.

Emblcr, wcller. I967.

'li!e

meraphoA tion thc frodem

rtpeno.y

inGd)Rartrer Konlerand Marlin Lisht. Tite

r?/1zl,lwr.t.

Donon:

lloudtonMifln1

Fmnrknr. Vicioria et aU. 1984.

/h tnh-.lftthr

to t,unlrun!? tJ\d

Aulruhu

tLt)

Austalil

H.h

Ri.ehan dnd Winsr.n

l-akoli: Cieorec md JohnsoD. Mdk. l 9S0. Met plio6 Wo Llve

Br

l Jnircd

Sd.s

of

Anoic.: rI.

Unive^i!, olChicago l,rcss.

Lalofi. Cco+.. ?005.

P,sro,

P/Per an M.ta?hot A\^il^bL at

h

,

//vwv

6 nloz

4l/o.t/Tlt3i/tfil7

_t09l ptt{

Leech,Ceollrey.1981 Sehahti!: the

nLlt

_{oJh.ohihs (1r etl) Lonnan:tlg}

LevnNon. a. Stcphcn.

1931.|'lsu!rtr.

Cambndse: cmbndse Univcnit}