A STYLISIIC ANALYSTS OF LEXICAj- COSESION
AS FOI'ND IN WILLIAM FATJLKNER'S SIIORT STORY 'BARN BVRNING'
A TIIESIS
Subniled i" Ptf,idl
Futli
n
l to the Requlftmfot Soiato
Sdtu
De{eeFITRA ADELIZA
ABSTRAK
Dalan sk.ipsi ini dibahd renrMs kemuncul.n k.hcsi l€ksikaL yan!
t
rdapatddm
cerita pendek karya Willianr Faullner. NilLianrFrulkiq
3d3l3h sallh*ru
De.ulis,Amerika yang tulisanny! menginspirlikrqr Lrrlr
tulnrn modern sekdrn! ini.Tuju
phulhd
skipsi ini adalah umul nen8eranui lipe kohesi leksikJ yanB muncul, apa clekny! yang dirdskap oleh pembacadsi
kenunculan kohesi lekikalien
apa makna sdra yda bk! dibngkap oleb pemblca dllcm cerirateDebut. D3r. salisis diambilddi @dta pendek william Faulknerdcnsanjudul lram Buningdan dibabsi hdya sbanyak 20pragEt
Kemudim anrliris Jlta dilakuku dengM ncnggunakan merode padan distribusional. Dara tcrsebut dianalhis densd heng8unakm teori lohesi yonA dikemukaku olch Hallidayd
Hrkn
(l97rj) dantcoristilisrika oleh Peter Verdonk (2002) sena didtrkuis dcngin rcori pcrg.Plikosi0n stilislika analisis oleh plul Sinpson (2004). Daa analisk disajiko seara dcsknptif
J
didukun! dengrn t bely
g digundkrn unluk menggrnrMrkan koh.si leksikalt$e
nunctrl dalam cerira Gscbur.ii$il
anrlisis dcnunjukkan bahR. kohc5i Leksikal)rng
puling bmy k munrrl,d.l.h
penlu angdn G.pelnlon) yaf8 mefekank.n pada scvr0lu hal ylng rcrjadids
kolokdi (collocation) yang melekat pdatal!
boda dtn klrxsirlds
metrgganbdkb subyckdlu
oblekddm
cerih.Dri
kenu.culm kohesi leksikaldih&apkd memudahk pemb.cadalam m.mahanri
n.kn.
d.ri .erit, i.6eb!i.D'ri
pcneeu.sn kohesi leksikaldallm
karyany,penb!$
dsl)rr merasrn
Jm menbu.ngkartarahelndusia
yan8 kcms, pcnuh dcncM enosi, bcbas da. liCEAPTER
I
INTRODUCTION1.1
D.ckFutd
of rh. SrudYThe@ de sone Pavs 10 expE$ our feeling as
hd@
ltcd
b€ feelingsol
Dgry, happy. sad,
jo'
or *h.re!er vefe'l
TheBt
se dpEss itc
be in thefom
or painrins, drawins'!.€nsi
sho!1 $ones, noveher'
Painrs or dBwe6exprcss {En leelinss via pictues or painls pod or novclisl e4iess dleir feelings
By usina
le8ugc,
dvone cm comhunicare his or her feelinS'rhoudl'
md wiat he or sh.wor
loshm
sir!
orhes Pcoplecd
Ee ltuiguag'ir
Lwoloms, spoken md Mitten. The winen
'orn
cd
be Eprq'nted in thelbft
ol
reyr such as snon slotv. Aeordins lo H3llidav aod
Has
(19?6:t):fhe
*ord
t€xr is used in lincuislics torfer
mv pdqsases spokcn or wilren' of vhatcvcrlened!thaldoesformauific.lwhole
-shon $ory
s
the olhe. kindsol trinen
Gxr is 3 kindol
lilc6'v
worls Nhicht
defincds
repEsenlation of hnmmlife
lt pEser* ihe social condilion fiat happe. 10hmo
being Shon slo.v is one of lnetuv wo*s tha! explain aborl scnsesdd
messages &od rhe aurhox 10 express rhcir feelinSs or thousnb$onl
emerhins lhlt comecled to socilllife
shon $ory like olher liletuvworkl
use a combinarion of votds or sentences rhaL hosill
oM
stvle ro na]re the story moreTo
6dc^rrnd
a story. the rcad.am
bopefirlly pay denrions tody
se
of laglage, b€cause one of theinporL
thi4
in a srory is{€
ldBU.Se dEi sed by tbe author. As stlt€d hy Paul Sinpson in his book.Sr/ltrti.]:'1telonce
hook
lot
staleds (2@4:2): slylislicsn
a nelhodol
texruali.l..P€lation
in which primary of laceh
6sisled to/d,8,zg?
Thc reson whyl
suse
is ro inpolt@r ro styListicids is beause the vdjous loms. pallems,dd
lweh
rhalco.sti$e linguistis
shctr
m
o
inponMl i.dexofllc fddion
ollhe lext ' H@cq stylisrics. which is concem wilh the sludy oasLtle id le8uase, willbe appropliat€ to rn lyze rhe l&guagc slyle
shicl
is used by llle anhor. As saled by Pcter Verdonk in hisbook.tllti.r
(2002:4): "So slylisrics, Ute sludy ol slyle,ce
be defined as rhe malysisol
disnncive exprBsiorin
laDsasernd lh.
desoipuon of i1l purpose
dd
€fet."
so. stylislics is th. sludy of explorins the ld8rrage ol the authoB
ud tr
s*
the orealivity of thealtloi
ir
usins |ne la.slase lo creale a eood psem in thestory tluoush 11€
l
snageln
otncr wdds, slylislicsh
usedio
idenrill md cldsiay 1le elemen&ol
l
guge
&al being 6€d. Tne ebnentsol
langDge which is used by$e
aurhor cm be claled to lhe study of texl, bequse rhe lmsuas€thlt
uscd byde
allhor inwitte.
lext, in lhis cde j6 a shorl siory. isCohcsion is one olthc elenents thal buijt a textwe
ol!
Gxr. s shted by Hallidayud
H6d
(19?6:8): Cohesionis a
scmmtic Elalion benven&
CHAPTER 4
Cohesion devices
dc
the inporrant element in a lext lhat buill lhe texl lexrurc. wirhorr cohesion there is no relaled neanins mons rhe scdenes, Thecr€
sone coiesive devices *hichm
doninmlly occm in litcBry worLs Thc5scohesile dcvices
re
used by the du6or ro nate the conlenr oaihework
mor
bcaulitul md inleEsted lo rcad, Throush the deyices, the aulhor tries lo delivc! rhe meani.glia
lmEuaae md the delic€s,i.
thiscse
lhe devices is lexical cohesion.Ir is hopelullt the @ders could convey the nemins md givc theelectro the eadcr which is comnonly c5l1cd by forcsroundine or psychological efect, Faulkn$ uses loi€ties ol *ords io deliv*ing hn id€d in the sbon story Faulk.ff rcnds ro Mire
mo)
long enlmc.s to descnbe his idea\ Tne choice.l
*ods
lhlt
hd bem choscnpc
ops lends 10 m0ke thc Eadcr involvc in thc storywhcrc rhcy could fe€l @d inagine the smc siiMtion shich is descnb.d by rhc
rulnor
in
dE story. Alierutyzing
ilc
lcxicalcoheio;
&on l,!c dahh,n
h
lound rhlt lerical concsior ielps lhe reldem
b
convey lhe literaryneuir8
in the shon sory. aaulkner dominatly uscs rcpctilioned collo.arion in expEssingsd
slJessing thc ideas. Tbrough Lhe nalysis. repetition is thedonin
t
tlpesol
lcxical lhat occur wirh 57.6% followed by collocarion (17.92%), nemnyn
a!.lrry.zoo{Ie.to.i
u
t.kh*t'l-t.\rt l
Chapnm, Raynold. (1913)
LinEu;lic:
andLit*atue:
Anlturoductid
tottel,{r,St/tsticr.
Illinoisr whi|ehall Conpmy, wheelins.Frcnrrin.
vicbna
d Rob€nRada6
(1993).A
lntadtctian
10 Lanstase. Fihn Lidition. Harcoul Brlce Jovaovich Coll*e Publisbe6.H.llid.y, M.A.K
hd
RuqaiyaH6
. (1976). Coheljon atul English. ]..ntJon:Lonsne
croDp Ltd.---'.
. (r93s). tu,8aate, coht.r1, .naki:
.4:pe.t ollunsuaqe in usoc ial-se nir, i. pers pect ivc. D.akia U niresit! .
Hrllida', M.A.K. (1985).,,1 /,//o.tuction la I'unttioml
AtMnu.
Second Edilion.I.nd.n:
EdBrrd Amold LtdHatch. E. 1t992). Discowse anti Lansuaae tulucation
N.w
York
Canbrids. Udivenity Presslloey.U.(1991) Pultet8
ofLd,r
D lelr. Oxford: OUPLink,Alcr.(2004)',t/,&nsEverythksDnit:AStylhticsAnatsisofLi"s,istics
Pattems
ih
Hilh
likc White Etephdnts (CtitiLalEsat
. F.en]evelon
A!.il
ll,
20C9
li.n
h otttulaticle!
ennp/ttittelni
67it/is 2
23/ai n28l9J2/-i/?tap..,1|,1..11
BTBLTOCRAPIIY
Ruilkiene. Janina. (2001).
variou
oI Cohesfie Deticet inlrillqdt
ttesiters.20. 2009
Renkena Jan (l 993).
Di!,,^!
91r/t: ,'1n tnttu.tucbry Tert Baak Philadelphi : Jobn Benimrin !ublisninA comFsySerden,
Rmd
md
Peter Wi{ldowson.l.1tt3).
A
ReaAet\
G"ide Conlenp.tury Lnerurt: meot!. I hnd Edilion. Ihe Mivereity Presss\cms.
i\.er- (lodr'
,.t'rof
and
SDliiL' r' r..?
SrLd\,