• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

ACCA F1 with Answers 2004

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "ACCA F1 with Answers 2004"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)
(3)

Part 1 Examination – Paper 1.1 (INT)

Preparing Financial Statements (International Stream) December 2004 Answers

Section A

Balance 614,000 Cash 311,000

Sales 301,000 Discounts 3,400

Interest 1,600 Contras 8,650

Bad Debts 32,000

(4)

Section B

1 (a) Bob

Income statement for the year ended 30 September 2004

Reference $ $

to workings

Sales 1 604,200

Less: Cost of sales

Less: Opening inventory 138,000

Less: Purchases 2 410,800

–––––––– 448,800

Less: less: Closing inventory 146,000 402,800

–––––––– ––––––––

Gross profit 201,400

Expenses 3 194,000

––––––––

Net profit 107,400

–––––––– (b) Calculation of goods taken by Bob:

Purchases as above 410,800

Purchases per information in question:

408,100 – 68,100 + 77,100 + 14,200 431,300

––––––––

Goods taken by Bob therefore total 20,500

–––––––– Workings

1 Sales $

Credit sales $519,400 – $119,200 + $125,000 525,200

Cash sales 79,000

––––––––

Sales for income statement 604,200

–––––––– 2 Purchases and cost of sales

Cost of sales $604,200 x 2/3 402,800

Details

Opening inventory 38,000

Purchases (balancing figure) 410,800 –––––––– 448,800

less: closing stock 46,000 402,800

–––––––– ––––––––

3 Expenses $89,400 + $4,100 – $3,900 + $4,600 + $2,400 – $2,600 94,000 –––––––– Alternative workings for (b)

Purchases and cost of sales (before deducting goods taken by Bob) Purchases

$408,100 – $68,100 + $77,100 + $14,200 431,300

Cost of sales

$431,300 + $38,000 – $46,000 423,300

Calculation of goods taken by Bob

Cost of sales allowing for 50% mark-up $604,200 x 2/3 402,800

Cost of sales as above 423,300

––––––––

Goods taken by Bob therefore total 20,500

––––––––

Purchases total becomes $431,300 – $20,500 410,800

––––––––

(5)

2 (a) Cougar

Statement of changes in equity Year ended 30 June 2004

Share Share premium Revaluation Accumulated Total

capital account reserve profits

$m $m $m $m $m

At 1 July 2003 100 140 60 120 420

Prior year adjustment 11 1((6) 1(6)

––– ––– ––– ––– –––

100 140 60 114 414

Arising on issue of shares 100 180 280

Surplus on land

revaluation, now realised (60) 160 –

Net profit for year (40 + 6) 1 146 146

Dividends paid 1((8) 1((8)

––– ––– ––– ––– ––––

200 320 – 212 732

––– ––– ––– ––– ––––

3 Leo Group

Consolidated balance sheet as at 30 June 2004

$

Sundry net assets 3,100,000

––––––––––– $3,100,000 –––––––––––

Share capital 500,000

Revaluation reserve 800,000

Accumulated profits 1,470,000

––––––––––– 2,770,000

Minority interest 330,000

––––––––––– $3,100,000 ––––––––––– Workings

Cost of control

$ $

Shares in Pard 700,000 Share capital 70% 1,140,000

Accumulated profits:

70% pre-acq 1,420,000

Accumulated profits:

goodwill written off 1,140,000

–––––––– 1,––––––––

700,000 1,700,000

–––––––– 1,––––––––

Minority interest

$ $

Share capital 30% 1, 60,000

Balance for CBS 330,000 Accumulated profits 30% 1,270,000

–––––––– 1,––––––––

330,000 1,330,000

–––––––– 1,––––––––

Accumulated profits

$ $

Leo 1,400,000

Cost of control Pard 1,900,000

70% x 600,000 1,420,000

Minority interest

30% x 900,000 1,270,000

Cost of control

goodwill written off 1,140,000

Balance for CBS 1,470,000

––––––––– –––––––––

2,300,000 2,300,000

––––––––– –––––––––

(6)

4 (a) Research and development

Balance at New Income statement Balance sheet

1 Oct 2003 expenditure Amortisation Research 30 Sept 2004

$ $ $ $ $

Project Q 1,000,000

1)(200,000) (100,000) 1,700,000

R )))400,000 250,000 1,650,000

S (140,000)

–––––––––– –––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––––

1,200,000 250,000 (100,000) (140,000) 1,350,000

–––––––––– –––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––––

Equipment Balance at New Depreciation Balance sheet

1 Oct 2003 expenditure 30 Sept 2004

$ $ $ $

1500,000 180,000 1,680,000

((200,000) (136,000) 1,(336,000)

–––––––––– –––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––––

300,000 180,000 (136,000) 1,344,000

–––––––––– –––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––––

Headings

The amortisation of deferred development expenditure ($100,000) and the research expenditure ($140,000) and the depreciation of the research equipment ($136,000) will appear in the income statement under cost of sales.

The total deferred development expenditure ($1,350,000) will appear in the balance sheet under intangible non-current assets.

(b) Disclosure notes Income statement

The aggregate amount of research and development expenditure recognised as an expense during the period was $376,000, all charged in cost of sales.

Balance sheet

Movements on deferred development expenditure during the year were:

Cost Amortisation Net book value

$ $ $

Balance at 1 October 2003 1,400,000 (200,000) 1,200,000

Year ended 30 September 2004

Amortisation (100,000) (100,000)

New expenditure 250,000 250,000

–––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––––

1,650,000 (300,000) 1,350,000

–––––––––– ––––––––– ––––––––––

5 The use of historical cost accounting can mislead users when prices are rising in the following ways:

(i) Depreciation is based on the original cost of non-current assets and thus understates the true value obtained by the business from the use of these assets. The result is that profit is overstated.

(ii) Inventory is often valued at cost, using FIFO or average costs. If prices are rising, sales in current terms are matched with cost of sales in historical cost terms. Profit is again overstated.

(iii) Balance sheet values of assets may become seriously below their current value.

(iv) The combined effects of the above three factors mean that return on capital employed is overstated.

(v) Year on year comparison of results is likely to be misleading as figures will show an automatic increase as prices rise, when in real terms sales and profits may have risen far less, or even have fallen.

Any four points needed for full marks.

(7)

Part 1 Examination – Paper 1.1 (INT)

Preparing Financial Statements (International Stream) December 2004 Marking Scheme

Section B

Marks

1 (a) Calculations sales 4 x 1/2 2

cost of sales 1

purchases as balancing figure 1

expenses 6 x 1/2 3

Correct method (subtraction of net purchases) 2

––– 4 –––

12 –––

2 Opening balances 1

Prior year adjustment 1

Share issue 2 x 1 2

Surplus on revaluation transferred 2

Net profit for year 1

Dividends paid 1

––– 8 –––

3 Goodwill 4 x 1/2 2

Minority interest 2 x 1/2 1

Accumulated profits 5 x 1/2 21/2

Balance sheet

Share capital 1

Sundry net assets 1

Revaluation reserve 1

B/S layout 1

heading 1/2

–––

Equipment Cost 1/2

Depreciation 1

Headings

Accumulated profits 1

Balance sheet 1/2

––– 6 –––

(b) Income statement Total 2

(b) Income statement heading used 1

Balance sheet 3

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Josep Situmorang (1996) seperti dikutip oleh Mohammad Adib, MA, menyatakan bahwa bebas nilai artinya tuntutan terhadap setiap kegiatan ilmiah agar didasarkan pada hakikat

[r]

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui ada tidaknya perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar keterampilan membaca Bahasa Prancis antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi

yang berhubungan tentang stres serta menjadi bagian referensi untuk yang.

PENGGUNAAN MBI 2 D ALAM PEMBELAJARAN PERPIND AHAN KALOR UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN KETERAMPILAN BERKOMUNIKASI SISWA SMP.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |

Apabila sanggahan yang diberikan rekanan ternyata benar, pada paket pekerjaan yang bersangkutan dinyatakan lelang gagal. Surat Keputusan Penunjukan akan segera diterbitkan,

Pada hari ini, rabu tanggal dua puluh lima bulan juni tahun dua ribu empat belas, Kelompok Kerja I Unit Layanan Pengadaan pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Mandailing Natal, sesuai dengan

Berdasarkan Hasil Evaluasi Penawaran dan sesuai dengan Perpres Nomor : 70 Tahun 2012, terhadap penyedia jasa yang akan diusulkan sebagai pemenang lelang dilakukan