PROGRAM PENILAIAN
PERINGKAT KINERJA
PERUSAHAAN
DALAM
PENGEDALIAN PENCEMARAN
LINGKUNGAN HIDUP
Pasal 33 ayat (1)
Perkonomian disusun sebagai usaha bersama berdasar atas
azas kekeluargaan .
Pasal 33 ayat (4)
Perkonomian nasional diselenggarakan berdasarkan
atas demokrasi ekonomi dengan prinsip kebersamaan,
efisiensi-berkeadilan, berkelanjutan, berwawasan lingkungan, kemandirian, serta dengan menjaga keseimbangan
kemanjuan dan kesatuan ekonomi nasional.
Pasal 33 ayat (3)
Bumi dan air dan kekayaan alam yang terkandung didalamnya
dikuasai oleh negara dan dipergunakan untuk
sebesar-besar kemakmuran rakyat .
Pasal 28H ayat (1)
Setiap orang berhak hidup sejahtera lahir batin, bertempat tinggal dan mendapatkan lingkungan hidup yang baik dan sehat
serta berhak memperoleh pelayanan kesehatan
KETAHANAN LINGKUNGAN
–
AIR, KETAHANAN ENERGI, DAN KETAHANAN PANGAN
PENGELOLAAN KUALITAS AIR
BERPRINSIP PADA:
1.
EFISIENSI SUMBERDAYA
AIR
2.
MEMINIMALKAN
PENGGUNAAN FRESH
WATER
3.
MENINGKATKAN
PENGGUNAAN
RECLAIMED WATER =>
WASTE TO RESOURCES
4.
WASTE TO ENERGY
RESIKO KEGAGALAN ATAS PENGELOLAAN AIR
VALUES
•
PENINGKATAN DAYA SAING
•
PENGURANGAN RESIKO
•
PROFIT
MARKET DRIVE
• CON“UMEN’s AWARNE““
•
PENINGKATAN JUMLAH
PRODUK RAMAH LINGKUNGAN
ENVIRON-MENTAL DRIVE
•
PENURUNAN KETERSEDIAAN SDA
SEBAGAI BAHAN BAKU ATAU
PENOLONG DALAM JUMLAH DAN
KUALITAS
SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS
–
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
–
BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
KEY BENEFITS FROM GREENING INPUTS
Reduces waste disposal
requirement
Reduce expenditure on materials
Reduce cost related to handling:
storage and treating
Carries lower regulatory
compliance burden
Reduce the use of materialsMinimize harmful substance
Substitute harmful materials with less damaging alternative
Increase use of renewable and recyclable materials
ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE
–
BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
=FACTS OF BENEFIT=
Reference: UN WATER: Apost-2015 Global Goal Water
Definisi PROPER
PROPER merupakan
instrumen penaatan
alternatif yang dikembangkan untuk
bersinergi dengan instrumen penaatan
Dikembangkan sejak 1995
Tahun 1996 menerima Zero Emission Award dari University of United
Nations Tokyo
Sebagai model public disclosure program di beberapa negara Asia and
Latin Amerika
Diadopsi Oleh China, Ghana, India and Philippine
LATAR BELAKANG PROPER
Penyebaran Informasi menyebabkan
reaksi dan interaksi antara
pihak-pihak yang terkait
Penyebaran informasi kinerja
penaatan perusahaan ke publik
menciptakan insentif dan
disinsentif reputasi
Tekanan kepada perusahan dengan
kinerja jelek,
dan
penghargaan
bagi yang berkinerja baik
.
Penyebaran tingkat penaatan
berskala
nasional lebih efektif dibandingkan
pada skala lokal
JENIS PERUSAHAAN PESERTA PROPER
Jasa Pengolah
Limbah, Kawasan
Industri
Hotel
Rumah Sakit
Pertambangan, Energi,
Migas
Manufaktur Agroindustri
PROSEDUR PELAKSANAAN PROPER
Review Tahap I (Tim Teknis KLH & Pemda)
Review Tahap II (Dewan Pertimbangan)
Pemberitahuan Peringkat Sementara ke Perusahaan Tanggapan Terhadap
Masukan Perusahaan Review Hasil Klarifikasi oleh
Dewan Pertimbangan
Penyusunan SK MENLH
Penyampaian SK MENLH ke Perusahaan
Penyusunan Bahan
Pengumuman PENGUMUMAN PROPER
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) lapangan (bila diperlukan)
Sanggahan Perusahaan Verifikasi
lapangan (bila diperlukan)
BEYOND COMPLIANCE AREA
COMPLIANCE TO REGULATIONS
BASIC PRINCIPLE OF PROPER
–
RATING
–
CRITERIA
BLUE
RED
BLACK
SEA POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATION
HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION
AIR POLLUTION REGULATION
WATER POLLUTION REGULATION
EIA REGULATION
Best Practices ; Best Available Technology;
Best Corporate Social Responsibility
PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN AIR
PARAMETER
MONITORING
COMPLIANCE POINT
(Discharge Outlet)
DISCHARGE PERMIT
PRIMER DATA TAKEN
DURING INSPECTION
WASTE WATER STANDARD
REPORTING
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENT
Government
Regulation
No..82 / 2001
Ministerial
Decree No.
05/2014
Ministerial
Decree
No. 08/2007
Ministerial
Decree
No. 09/2007
Ministerial
Decree
No. 10/2007
PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN UDARA
PARAMETER
MONITORING
COMPLIANCE POINT
(Discharge Outlet)
EMISSION STANDARD
REPORTING
Manual / CEM
TECHNICAL
REQUIREMENT
Government
Regulation
No.41 / 99
Technical
Guidance for Air
Pollution Head of
Environmental
Impact
Management
Agency Decree
No. 205/1996
Ministerial Decree
No. 13 / 1995
Ministerial Decree
No. 7 / 2007
PRIMER DATA TAKEN
DURING INSPECTION
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
(Government
Regulation
No. 101/2014)
PRODUCER
STORAGE
COLLECTING
TRANSPORTA TION
USER
PROCESSOR (TREAT
MENT)
FINAL
DISPOSAL
(DUMPING)
EVALUASI PENGELOLAAN LIMBAH B3
www.themegallery.com
Permit
Requirement
Performance
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
1. Own and Implement Environmental
Document (EIA/Environmental
Management Plan and Monitoring) /
Permits
2. Implementation of the Environmental
Document and/or Permits’
Requirement:
a. Comply to the area and/or
production capacity as stated in
the document.
b. All environmental impacts related
to the activities are stated in the
document and implemented.
3. Comply to the Reporting System for
the implementation of the documents’
requirements.
BLUE
1. Not Comply with the
environmental document/
permits’ requirements:
a. Area and/or production
capacity;
b. If new issues/concerns
arise /found related to the
companies’ environmental
impact not yet established
in the documents.
2.Not comply to the
Reporting System for the
implementation of the
documents’ requirements.
RED
HITAM
NOTE:
RED = for company established after 23 Feb 2012 having Environmental Document but have not
submitted permits application .
BLACK = for company established after 3 October 2009 have not had environmental document.
BLACK = for company established after 23 Feb 2012 have not had environmental document and permit
The Company does not have
Environmental Document
(EIA/Environmental
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACK
1.
Comply with
the water
pollution
permit.
1. Own waste water discharge permit
to the water body or sea and/or
waste water land application
permit. For palm oil industries, or
2. The waste water discharge permit
to the water body or sea and/or
waste water land application
permit for palm oil industries is in
final process to be approved.
The company does not have waste
water discharge permit to the water
body or sea and/or waste water land
application permit.
2.
Comply with
the compliance
points
Monitor all compliance points and/or
waste water discharged which has to
be managed as required in the
regulation.
a. If company did not monitor the
compliance point (one or more)
during the rating period.
b. For Hotels, Hospitals, and Industrial
domestic waste using waste water
for garden watering.
Note:
1. Industry treating the entire waste water to the industrial estate will be stated as 100% comply ( completed
with the cooperation agreement between the industries and the industrial estate)
2. Oil and gas industry injecting its produced water into formation level for pressure maintenance will be
stated as 100% comply.
3. Industry implementing 100% of waste water for reuse and/or recycle and equipped with Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP) and operational logbook will be stated as 100% comply.
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACK
3.
Comply with
the
parameter
for
monitoring.
a. Monitor 100% parameter as required
in the:
1. Waste water discharge permit
2. National or province Effluent
Standard.
Specifically for Palm Oil Industry
implementing land application,
parameter for monitoring for waste
water land application, ground water,
and soil >90% ( pH and BOD have to
be monitored)
b. Monitor parameter pH, TSS, COD and
daily debit for industries required to
do daily monitoring.
c. Calculate pollution load (effluent
load)
a. Monitor less then 100% parameter as
required in the:
1. Waste water discharge permit
2. National or province Effluent
Standard.
Specifically for Palm Oil Industry
implementing land application,
parameter for monitoring for waste
water land application, ground water,
and soil <90% ( pH and BOD have to
be monitored)
b. Does not Monitor parameter pH, TSS,
COD and daily debit for industry
required to do daily monitoring.
c. Does not Calculate pollution load
(effluent load)
Note:
1. Specifically for Manufacture, Infrastructure and Service Industry, Total Dissolved Solid (TDS) for water body for waste
water discharge to the sea not considered in the rating process.
2. Manganese Mining refer to waste water standard for Nickel Mining
3. Compliance to the parameter for monitoring refer to effluent standard hierarchy:
a. Effluent Standard as mentioned in the Waste water discharge permit,
b. Province waste water standard (specific)
c. National waste water standard (specific)
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACK
4.
Comply with
the number
of data
reported for
each
parameter
a.
Repo ti g ≥ 9 % data as e ui ed fo :
1) Waste water quality monitoring
2) Monthly production (riel) or raw
material, and
3) Debit for waste water discharge.
b. Providing >90% daily average monitoring
data in every month as required in the
regulation:
1) Parameter COD and pH for
Petrochemical industry, industrial
estate, rayon, basic oleo chemical.
2) Parameter pH for Ceramic industry.
3) Parameter pH and TSS for Manganese
Mining
4) Parameter pH for Coal, Tin, and Gold
Mining
5) Parameter pH for Agro industry.
a. Reporting less then 90% data
as required for :
1) Waste water quality
monitoring
2) Monthly production (riel)
or raw material, and
3) Debit for waste water
discharge.
b. Providing less then 90% daily
average monitoring data in
every month as required in
the regulation for parameter
daily pH and/or daily debit
and/or daily TSS and/or daily
COD.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
5. Comply with effluent standard
a. Self Monitoring Data (secondary data): 1) ≥ 9 % o ito i g data du i g ati g
period meet the effluent standard for each parameter in each
compliance point.
Monitoring data for daily pH and/or daily debit and/or daily TSS and/or
daily COD eet ≥ 95% o plia e
from average daily data reported every month in a year during rating period.
2) For off shore mining, compliance point for sea water monitoring refer to EIA document. Monitoring data
fo T““ a d Tu idity eet ≥ 95%
compliance.
3) Dis ha ge Load Data eet ≥ 9 % compliance.
b. Primer data from PROPER Team Inspection meet 100% compliance
a. Self Monitoring Data (secondary data): 1) Less then 90 % monitoring data during
rating period meet the effluent standard for each parameter in each compliance point.
Monitoring data for daily pH and/or daily debit and/or daily TSS and/or daily COD meet less then 95% compliance from average daily data reported every month in a year during rating period.
2) For off shore mining, compliance point for sea water monitoring refer to EIA document. Monitoring data for TSS and Turbidity meet less then 95% compliance.
3) Discharge load Data meet less then 90% compliance.
b. Primer data from PROPER Team
Inspection exceed the effluent standard.
Exceed the effluent and have been penalized with administrative sanction
Note
1. Waste water effluent sample can be taken by PROPER Tim Inspector not in rating period and, base on the regulation, the industry can not exceed waste water effluent standard at any time.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
6. Comply with technical requirement
a. Using external or internal accredited laboratory or governor designated laboratory.
b. Separating sewage with storm water runoff. c. Sewerage made water impermeable.
d. Installing discharge gauge (flow meter) in the waste water discharge outlet.
e. Not doing dilution.
f. Not disposing of waste water directly into the environment without treatment (by-pass).
g. Meet all the provisions required in administrative sanctions.
h. Additional technical requirements for the oil palm industry implementing land application:
1) Conducted land application on land other than peat land.
2) Conducted land application on land other than land with permeability greater than 15 cm / hour.
3) Conducted land application on land other than land with permeability less than 1.5 cm / hour.
4) Land application should not be implemented on land with ground water level less than 2 meters.
5) Eliminate water runoff (run off)to the river. 6) Does not dilute waste water used.
7) Does not dispose waste water on the land outside the location specified in the permit.
8) Does not discharge wastewater into the river when exceeding permit requirement.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
1.
Comply with
emission source
a. Monitor all emission source
100%
Does not monitor all emission source
100%.
NOTE:
1. Specific for manufacture, infrastructure, and service and agro industry:
a. Emission source from non combustion process, emissions source monitoring represented by the one chimney for
each production unit alternately so that all emission sources can be monitored;
b. Emission source from chemical process must be monitored
c. Chimney which only to flow incoming and exit air may not be monitored
d. Chimney which only to flow water vapor may not be monitored
2. Dryer in agro industry must be monitored
3. Incinerator for empty fruit bunch in palm oil industry must be monitored and meet the emission standard in the
Ministerial Decree No. 13 year 1995 Attachment V-B .
4. Emission source shall not be monitored:
a. Combustion units (generators, transfer pump
(transfer pump engine):
1)capacity <100 HP (76.5 KVA);
2)operates <1000 hours / year;
3)which is used for the benefit of emergency, repair activities, maintenance activities <200 hours / year; or
4)which is used to drive the crane and welding equipment.
b. Chimney flue gases in the laboratory
(laboratory exhaust fire assay).
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
2
Comply with
monitoring
parameter
a. Monitor 100% of the required parameters:
1) for industry having specific emission standard refer to this
specific emission standard, and
2) For industry not having specific emission standard refer to
the environmental document, if the emission standard not
yet established in the environmental document the
emission standard refer to the Ministerial Decree No. 13
year 1995 Attachment V-B except for electrical generator
set (gen-set) which refer to the Ministerial Decree No. 13
Year 2009 Attachment I character a.
b. For emission source from combustion process with capacity <
25 MW or other unit measures equivalent to gas fuel not
required to monitor S02 and Total Particulate if the total sulfur
content in the fuel is less than or equal to 0.5% by weight.
Monitor less
then 100%
parameters as
required in
the
Specific for agro industry:
1. emission source from dryer and smoking room for latex or crumb rubber industries, and direct combustion must
monitor SO2, NO2, Particulate, NH3, and for not direct combustion must monitor particulate and NH3 referring to
emission standard stated in Ministerial Decree No. 13 Year 1995 attachment VB.
2. Emission standard for dryer in industry beside latex or crumb rubber and having direct combustion must monitor
SO2, NO2, particulate. For not having direct combustion must monitor particulate referring to the Ministerial Decree
No. 13 Year 1995 attachment VB.
NO. ASPECTs RATING
BLUE RED BLACK
3. Comply with
a. Reports periodically:
1) CEMS: having at less > 75% data from all everage daily data in every 3 months (data considered valid if only the industry has at less 18 hours monitoring data every day)
2) Manual Monitoring: conduct monitoring at less once in 6 (six) months, except combution porcess with:
3) Design Capacity < 570 KW: conduct monitoring at less once in 3 (three) years;
4) Design Capacity in between 570 Kw and 3MW: conduct monitoring at less one in every year.
5) Design capacity > 3MW: conduct monitoring at less once in evry 6(six) months;
Boiler in operation less then 6 (six) months: conduct monitoring at less once in every year.
b. Calculate pollution load as required in the regulation.
a. Reports < 75% data in every 3 monthes from CEMS
b. Reports < 100% data during rating period from manual
monitoring.
c. Does not calculate pollution load as required in the regulation.
Reports fake data and cause
a. Manual Monitoring: 100% data for every emission
source meet the standard.
b.
CEMs Mo ito i g: ≥ 95% data fo a e age daily
data reported in 3 (three) months of operation period
meet the standard.
c. Meet the Pollution Load standard..
a. Manual Monitoring: <100% data for every emission source meet the standard.
b. CEMs Monitoring: < 95% data form average daily data reported in 3 (three) months of operation period meet the standard.
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACK5. Comply with technical requirements
a. Comply with all technical requirement for chimney. b. Install and operate CEMS for Industries as follow:
1) Catalyst regeneration unit 2) Sulfur neutralization unit
3) Combustion process > 25 MW if content sulfur > 2% from all capacity
4) Steel Smelter 5) Pulp and paper 6) Fertilizer
7) Cement 8) Carbon black
c. CEMs equipment in normal operation.
d. All fugitive emission source must be managed and using chimney to discharge
e. Using accredited laboratory or governor designated laboratory.
f. Fulfill the administrative sanction in time.
g. If any problem with CEMS (out of order), industries must conduct manual monitoring once in three moths within one year rating period.
a. Does not meet one of the technical
requirements.
b. Does not install CEMs as required.
NOTE:
1. Specific for emission source not required to monitor particulate, not necessary to meet the position of sampling hole
at 2D and 8D.
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACK1. Inventory the type and volume of waste generated: a. Identify types of
hazardous waste; b. Recording type
hazardous waste
generated; and collecting data for advanced
management of hazardous waste generated.
Identify and record the management of the entire hazardous waste generated and /or potential generated.
a. Does not identify the management of the entire hazardous waste generated or potential generated
b. Does not record the type of hazardous waste produced regularly.
c. Does not collect data for the
advanced management of hazardous waste
d. Recurrent (repeated) violation (from last year or previous rating period violation)
---* 1)
2. Reporting B3 waste management activities.
a. Reporting hazardous waste
management activities regularly as required in the permit;
b. Deliver the hazardous waste management reporting to Ministry of environment, Environmental Agency at Provincial Level, Environmental Agencies at district/city level (include with Center of Eco region Management ) as required in the permit.
c. Reporting hazardous waste documents (manifest) as required for hazardous waste managed by third parties.
a. Reporting with frequency less then required for hazardous waste management.
b. Does not report Hazardous waste document for hazardous waste managed by third parties as required . (copy #2 for original hazardous waste document for producer).
c. Deliver report only to one of environmental agency (ministry of Environment , provincial level, or district/city level)
d. Recurrent (repeated) violation (from last year or previous rating period violation)
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACK3. Hazardous waste management permit
a. Own valid hazardous waste management permit as required.
b. Applied or submitted permits application for hazardous waste
management and have met the technical requirement (-in f(-inal status to be
approved-)
c. Submitted permit renewal and have met the technical requirement as stated in the previous permit.
a. Applied or submitted permits application for hazardous waste management but have not met the technical requirement and / or found violation in the implementation. b. Submitted permit renewal and during
inspection found violation (not implement the technical requirement stated in the previous permit).
Does not have permit for hazardous waste management.
4. Implementation of the requirement stated in the permit, Comply with the technical requirement in the hazardous waste
management permit, not only for environmental standard, effluent standard, emission standard., and quality standard.
Comply with > 90%
requirement in the permit and not indicate potential
environmental pollution.
Comply with < 90% requirement in the permit and not indicate potential environmental pollution and/or human health problem.
Does not comply with requirement in the permit and indicate
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACKEmission from treatment
and/or calorie utilization
of hazardous waste:
1. Comply with the
emission standard; and
2. Comply with number of
parameter to
monitor-analyst.
a. Monitor all parameter
required in the permit
b. All parameter meet the
emission standard as
required in the permit.
c. Comply with the
frequency of monitoring
as required in the
permit or regulation.
a. Only monitor partial
parameter (not all) as
required in the permit or
regulation.
b. Does not comply with the
frequency of monitoring as
required in the permit or
regulation.
c. Never conduct emission
monitoring and have not
been penalized with
administrative sanction.
Does not comply
with all requirement
in the permit and
indicate
environmental
pollution and human
health problem.
Waste water (effluent)
from hazardous waste
landfill and/or other
hazardous waste
management:
Comply with waste water
(effluent) standard
include with monitoring
well,
Comply with number of
parameter monitoring or
analyzed as required in
the permit.
a. Monitor all parameter
required in the permit
b. All parameter meet the
emission standard as
required in the permit.
c. Comply with the
frequency of monitoring
as required in the
permit or regulation.
a. Only monitor partial
parameter (not all) as
required in the permit or
regulation.
b. Does not comply with the
frequency of monitoring
as required in the permit
or regulation.
Does not comply
with all
requirement in the
permit and
indicate
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACKQuality standard for product and/or Hazardous quality for utilization: 1) Compliance with standard (for
example compressive strength, tolerance levels of pollutants in the utilized hazardous waste, and others);
2) Compliance with frequency of monitoring and analysis.
1) Comply with all quality standard and/or quality of utilized hazardous waste as required in the permit. 2) Comply with frequency of
monitoring as required in the permit.
1) Only comply with partial quality standard and/or quality of utilized hazardous waste as required in the permit.
2) Does not Comply with frequency of monitoring as required in the permit.
Does not comply with all
requirement in the permit and
indicate environmental pollution and human health problem. 5. a. Open dumping, spill
management, and handling of land contaminated with hazardous waste:
1) management plans; 2) management of spills; and 3) Number (-Amount-) of
hazardous waste spills
1) Own management plan for land contaminated with hazardous waste or hazardous waste spills as required in the regulation. 2) Implementing of hazardous
waste contaminated land recovery and handling of hazardous waste spills as stated in the planning.
3) Number (amount) or volume of hazardous waste and contaminated land and hazardous spills are properly recorded.
4) Implement all requirement as stated in the Letter of
Contaminated Soil
Completion Status (SSPLT).
1) Own management plan for land contaminated with hazardous waste or hazardous spills but not in accordance with the regulation
2) Implementing of hazardous waste contaminated land recovery and handling
hazardous waste spill but not conform with the plan.
3) Number (amount) or volume of hazardous waste and
contaminated soil with hazardous waste hazardous waste spill are not well recorded .
4) Does not implement all or partial requirement as stated in the SSPLT.
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACKb. Open burning
1. Does not conduct open burning
activities.
2. Has stopped open burning activities
and further manage hazardous waste
as stated in the planning (conform with
the planning ) and regulation
Has stopped and further
manage the hazardous waste
waste, but not conform with
the planning and regulation.
Indicated that
intentional
conduct
hazardous waste
open burning
activities.
6. Total percentage of hazardous waste managed confirm with the regulation.
1) 100% of hazardous waste have been
managed as required.
2) all type of hazardous waste have
been managed as required
3) Material (Hazardous Waste) Balance
have been recorded during the rating
period.
1) <100% of hazardous waste
have been managed as
required.
2) Not all (partially) type of
hazardous waste have been
managed as required
3) Material (Hazardous
Waste) Balance have been
recorded but not conform
with the rating period.
Indicated that
there is
hazardous
waste which
have not been
managed and
found indication
of
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RE
BLACK7. Hazardous waste management (treatment) involving third parties:
a. Hazardous waste management involving hazardous waste collector
b. Hazardous waste management without involving collectors but directly send to hazardous waste processor.
c. Hazardous waste transportation
d. Use of B3 waste document (manifest)
a. Third parties designated as hazardous waste collectors: 1) have valid permit
2) Type of hazardous waste collected conform with the permit.
3) Own service contact agreement between producers and collector. 4) Own service contract
agreement between the collector with processor. 5) Does not have environmental
pollution problems .
a. Third parties designated as hazardous waste collectors: 1) have expired permit 2) Type of hazardous waste
collected does not conform with the permit.
3) Does not have service contact agreement between
producers and collector. 4) Does not have service
contract agreement between collector and processor. 5) In environmental pollution
litigation (problems)
Third parties does not have permit.
b. Third parties designated as hazardous waste advance treatment or process (user/ processor/final disposal facilities):
1) has valid permit
2) Type of hazardous waste collected conform with the permit.
3) Own service contract agreement between producer and processor. 4) Does not have
environmental pollution problems .
b. Third parties designated as hazardous waste advance treatment or process (user/ processor/final disposal facilities):
1) has expired permit 2) Type of hazardous waste
collected does not conform with the permit.
3) Does not have service
contract agreement between producers and processor. 4) In environmental pollution
litigation (problems)
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RE
BLACKc. Third parties designated as hazardous waste transporter :
1) Own hazardous waste transporter recommendation from Ministry of Environment and permit from Ministry of Transportation
2) Hazardous waste transported conform with the recommendation and permit. 3) transportation equipment used
conform with the recommendation and permit.
4) Transportation area conform with the recommendation and permit.
5) Use proper hazardous waste document (manifest)
c. Third parties designated as hazardous waste transporter :
1) Hazardous waste transportation permit is expired, but in process for renewal. 2) hazardous waste transporter does not
have recommendation from Ministry of Environment
3) Hazardous waste transported not conform with the recommendation and permit. 4) Transportation equipment used does not
conform with the recommendation and permit.
5) Transportation area does not conform with the recommendation and permit. 6) Use not proper hazardous waste
document (manifest)
c. Third parties designated as hazardous
d. Hazardous waste document (manifest ) : Using and filling hazardous waste document (manifest) as stated in the Head Of Environmental Impact
Management Agency Decree No. Kep-02/BAPEDAL/09/1995
d. Hazardous waste document (manifest ) : 1) Using and filling hazardous waste
document (manifest) which is not conform with the Head Of
Environmental Impact Management Agency Decree No.
Kep-02/BAPEDAL/09/1995.
2) the final location of hazardous waste management (dumping/disposal/ etc) can not be accounted.
3) Still conduct not proper hazardous waste document usage procedure as required (repeat previous violation).
--NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RE
BLACK8. Final disposal (dumping) and hazardous waste process with special treatment:
a. Permit for final disposal (dumping) b. Permit for hazardous
waste process with special treatment c. Amount/Number/Vol
ume of hazardous waste final disposed (dumping).
a. Own final hazardous waste disposal (dumping) permits b. Own permit for hazardous
waste process with special treatment.
Applied or submitted permit for final disposal (dumping) but have not met the technical requirement and indicated violation during implementation.
NO.
ASPECTs
RATING
BLUE
RED
BLACKEnvironmental
degradation
Control.
a. All stages / mine site (100%) with a total value
(score) of potential environmental degradation
assessment aspects is greater than or equal to
80 (no potential degradation)
Not all stages / mine
site (<100%) with a
total value (score) of
potential
environmental
degradation
assessment aspects
is greater than or
equal to 80 (no
potential
degradation)
More than 50%
of all stages /
mine get total
value (score)
less then 55
(potential
damaged).
Status of activity:
Land clearing / Top Soil Removal / Overburden Removal / Mining / Hoarding / Reclamation
NO.
COMPONENT FOR EVALUATION
SCORE
1
Summary Document for Environmental Management Performance
150
2
Environmental Management System
100
3
Resources Utilization
a. Energy efficiency
100
b. Emission reduction and mitigation of green house gas
100
c. Water Efficiency
100
d. Reduction and Utilization of Hazardous waste
100
e. Reduction and Utilization of Non Hazardous waste
100
f. Biodiversity
100
4
Community Development
Rating for GREEN
100
Rating for GOLD
Qualitative
PROPER CRITERIA
–
GREEN
ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Internal company
management
External (suplyer)
To ensure: sustainability, adequacy
and effectiveness of SML program
developed
Consideration form Program Characterization, scale of activities, impact, commitment to comply, commitment to continual improvement, determine target of achievement and its indicator supported by all level management.
Environmental Aspect
Compliance Aspect
Program, Goal Target,
Achievement Indicator
Organizational
Structure &
Responsible Person
Training awareness
and Competency
Communication
Documentation
Document Control
Operational Control
Emergency Response
System
Monitoring and Measurement
Conformity Identification,
improvement effort and protection
Recording and Documentation
ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR WATER CONSERVATION AND EFFICIENCY
Written Policy known and
understanandable for all level
management
Having Unit Structure
and competent staff
which is responsible
for water efficiency
and conservation
Strategic Planning,
completed with
determination of
Goal, Target, Strategy,
Indicator of
Achievement, Agenda
of Implementation,
etc.
Provide Training and
competent staff
–
having
certification of Water pollution
Control Manager (EPCM)
–
responsible to water efficiency
and conservation.
Conservation data at less for last 3 years
normalize into water usage intensification
data ( amount water usage per unit product
or raw material used
–
with common unit for
every sector industry and verified by other
competent parties)
Benchmarking for
similar type of
industries in national or
international
Conduct benchmarking
in internal or external
company management.
Achievement of water
conservation: 25% of the best ,
25-75% of the best, >25-75% of the best.
Award and recognition at least at
national level.
Written responsible for energy
management.
Having Team responsible for energy management
Company has had strategic planning: goal, strategic target and indicator of achievement
Determine Program: distribution of responsibility to meet the goal and target
Conduct energy audit within last 3 years.
Conduct energy audit covering goal, audited facilities, potency for
efficiency, energy efficiency activities plan.
Conduct Benchmarking with similar industries, national or international
ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Having competent personal in the energy management team which having qualification:
Energy auditor
Training in Energy Audit
Education background related to energy auditor
Energy effiiciency Data for last 3 years,
Calculate normalization with production data.
Written Policy and known and understood by all level management
Having Team with proper authorization, responsibility, accountability to implement emission reduction.
Provide proper resources, competency, and budgeting
Company has strategic planning: goal, target for emission reduction which is relevant to the
environmental policy.
Determine clear program to achieve the target and goal with proper indicators
Conduct inventory, identification, description, recording method , documentation , discretion of sampling method and analyst , calculation of
emission load. Provide competent staff to conduct
emission inventory base on training and education record.
Conduct Benchmarking with the similar industries national or international
ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR AIR EMISSION REDUCTION
Achievement of emiison reduction
Joint or recognize in CDM
Inovation in reduce emission
In line with ComDev
ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR EFFICIENCY OF
HAZARDOUS & NON HAZARDOUS WASTE
Written Policy and known and
understood by all level management
Provide adequate resources to
implement reduction and utilization of hazardous waste and non hazardous waste:
Competent personnel and
availability of budgeting
conducted hazardous
and non hazardous waste inventory for at least 2 years in row
Develop and implement
programs of reduction and utilization of hazardous and non hazardous waste with methods, time schedules and indicators to
achieved goals and objectives.
Submit the reported B3 waste balance data for at least the last 3 years
Submit the successfully of reduction and utilization of hazardous and
non hazardous waste data for at least the last 3 years.
reduction and utilization of hazardous and non hazardous waste data has
been verified by external third parties who have competencies
Conducted reduction on one of the
dominant hazardous or non hazardous waste generated.
Time based calculation from the
previous year. Calculated with the ratio of amount of hazardous waste reduction with hazardous waste generated
General Practices, evaluation of relevancy or connectivity to the compliance , infestation, and problem of implementation
Conduct benchmarking with similar industries, nasional, Asia,
Internationa;
Competent personnel to handle reduction and utilization of hazardous and non hazardous waste: having relevant training in last 3 years
ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR BIODIVERSITY PROTECTION
Have written policy on protection of
biodiversity
and known and understood by
all level management
Provide adequate structure,
personnel and budget to conduct bio diversity protection
(conservation)
Having a partnership with
institutions or organizations that deal with the protection of biodiversity
The company establishes
a formal, nature conservation areas, or the biodiversity protection areas.
Have basic information
data (baseline data) of
biodiversity status
Has set a clear course to
achieve environmental objectives and targets
Have data for status and trends of managed biodiversity resources
and biological resources for at least the last 2 years
ave publications submitted to the public or the relevant
government agencies about the status and trends of managed biodiversity resources and biological resources, at least published by the last 2 years
There is an increase in the
status of biodiversity in the defined area of nature conservation or biodiversity protection.
Protection of biodiversity has a
measurable positive impact on other components of the ecosystem, such as the improvement of hydrological conditions with the advent of spring or the protection of springs.
General Practices, evaluation of relevancy or connectivity to the compliance , infestation, and problem of implementation
Conduct benchmarking
with similar industries, nasional, Asia,
International;
ASSESSMENT ASPECT
FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (COMDEV)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Allocation fund for community development (internal and
external)
Publications and Awards
Having Team with proper authorization, responsibility, accountability to implement emission reduction.
Provide proper resources, competency, and budgeting
Written policy on community development in the business unit being assessed
Have governance system of community development programs.
Realization of fund for the implementation of
community development for the last 3 consecutive years.
Submit Data of Comparison for community
development funding with the last year business unit profit
Have governance system of community development monitoring and evaluation
Participation of stakeholders in the monitoring and evaluation
Having evaluation document approved by the top management in the unit that being assessed
Working Relationship (cooperation)
Dispute/Confllict management System
Application of knowledge management to encourage
innovation in the field of community development in the last two years
Received an award in the field of community development
(award rewarded by (minimal) the government district / municipality level or non-government institutions .
Conformity of implementation with the work
plan
Implementation of programs and activities as
stated in the planning document Conformity of implementation with the work plan
Implementation of programs and activities that are planned
NO. ASPECTs RATING
GOLD
1. Innovation In Aspects of Resource Utilization
The company showed a significant innovation in:
1) Environmental Management System. 2) Energy Efficiency.
3) Efficiency Air and Water Pollution Load Reduction. 4) Pollutant Reduction.
5) Reduction and Utilization B3. 6) Solid Waste 3R Non-B3. 7) Biodiversity protection. 8) Community Empowerment. 2. Implementation of Community
Development Program
a. The approach used in community development (CD)
1) The company is committed in solving critical impact caused by the company and has an obvious attempt to mitigate the impact as reflected in policies, organizational structure, and corporate finance.
2) The company has written strategy and communicated to all stakeholders to develop sustainable community livelihoods. 3) Companies can show that in terms of funding, community development activities is greater than the charitable activities.
b. Planning 1) Occurring of Organizational community development planning process.
2) The involvement of stakeholders in
the
planning of community development includes quality of engagement and actor. 3) Occurring of consolidation of the community development programs planning and the planning area.4) Occurring of consolidation of the community development program and the potential sustainable livelihood program.
c. Implementation: 1) The success in achieving the goals set in its plan
2) Participation of the actor-stakeholders- in the implementation of the program are being review from the number participants involved and quality of involvement.
3) Participation of weak groups in the implementation of the program.
NO. ASPECTs GOLD RATING
d. Monitoring and Evaluation
1) Programs modifications to meets the dynamic needs of the community. 2) Community Satisfaction Level
3) Inclusiveness of program beneficiaries.
4) Changes in behavior or mindset (mindset) before and after the program.
5) The quality of relations between community development staff / community development officer (or other name) with the community and government.
e. Planning 1) Occurring of Organizational community development planning process.
2) The involvement of stakeholders in the planning of community development includes quality of engagement and actor. 3) Occurring of consolidation of the community development programs planning and the planning area.
4) Occurring of consolidation of the community development program and the potential sustainable livelihood program.
f. Sustainability 1) Economic Sustainability
a. Succeed in community independent, showed an increase in incomes.
b. Establishment of new local economy Institute because of community development program (birth of the institutions, sustainable institutions, development of institution).
c. Be efi ia ies of p og a / ta get g oups a e a le to de elop the apa ity of the p og a hi h p o ided y the o pa y. d. The target group was able to develop capacity to other group.
2) Social Sustainability
a. The existence of social institutions (the birth of a new social institutions and/or revitalization of existing ones). a. function of social institutions.
b. The company have a category degree of dependency on the program.
g.Social Relations 1) There is institutionalized mechanism of communication between the company and the community. 2) The ability of the beneficiaries to develop a network (external).
3) Community development program raise the social solidarity of society. 4) Conflicts in the community related with the company in the last 1 year.
5) Conflicts between companies (including associates) with the community in the last 1 year. 6) Conflicts between the company and local government in the last 1 year.
