Assistant Chancellor for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion; and Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity. IMIR staff worked with members of the Chancellor's Diversity Cabinet to review performance indicators for IUPUI diversity initiatives. http://www.iport.iupui.edu/pr/di/details.aspx). Johnson served as vice chair of the 2007 IUPUI Campus Campaign and will chair the 2008 campaign (campaign. http://www.campuscampaign.iupui.edu/default.htm).
Kahn developed a new, shorter format for the print version of the 2007 IUPUI Achievement Report (http://www.iport.iupui.edu/pr/details.aspx).
3b. Faculty/staff understanding of campus plans increased (higher percentages on questionnaires)
3c. Participation in PAII national conference maintained at 1,000
3d. Number of national and international invitations for PAII staff maintained at 100
3e. Number of external information requests maintained at 210
3f. Improved PAII website – increased Google Page Rank for home page and main section pages
Planned Activities: • Redesign of the main web pages to follow the revised campus identity guidelines established by the visual image team. Develop new websites/web applications using the latest web technologies such as ASP.NET, jQuery and Yahoo User Interface.
Enable all academic and administrative units to develop mission, vision, and goals statements aligned with those of the
- 1a. At least 25 units assisted with planning annually
- 1b. At least 50 planning consultations/projects conducted annually
- 2b. Expanded use of online enrollment trend database by deans and directors
- 2c. 1/4 (about 5) of the deans report using IMIR survey or database information in their annual reports
Planned Activities: • PAII will continue to brief new deans on the planning process and assist in other planning activities. Completion of the analysis of the School of Nursing's Dedicated Education Unit concept for clinical nursing. Planned Activities: • PAII staff will continue to respond to identified needs for planning assistance, maintain or increase the number of units served.
1/4 (about 5) of deans report using the IMIR survey or database information in their annual reports. database information in their annual reports.
Provide leadership, consultation, and resources to support the evaluation of campus and unit goals and implementation
- 1a. Inventory of information resources available to support assessment
- 1c. Increased use (to 5) of peer group analysis by discipline
- 2a. Program review introduced to new deans and the 8- year schedule for review of units completed
- 1b. Redesigned Civic Engagement Inventory to support and campus assessment process
- 2b. Reviewers’ ratings monitored for suggested improvements
- 2c. Program review guidelines used to address
- 3a. Number of units assisted with assessment remains steady at 30
- 3b. Number of assessment consultants/projects remains steady at 150
- 3c. Cadre of campus assessment professionals developed and supported
- 3e. Information derived from the placement testing and validation processes enhanced
- 3f. At least 8 units assisted annually in creating Web-based assessment tools for course evaluations
- 3h. Faculty users of ePort provided with consultation and training, including assistance with development and
- 3i. Improvements in course placement services accomplished through use of outreach testing
- 3j. Satisfaction with Testing Center services maintained at 95% satisfied rate on exit surveys
- 4a. Survey items aligned with campus priorities
- 4b. Response rates on student surveys increased by 10%
- 5b. At least 6 schools continuing to use economic models
- 6a. Institutional portfolio and annual campus report based on an increasingly stable list of key performance
- 7a. At least 1 evaluation study funded and conducted for campus constituents and 1 evaluation study funded and
- 7c. At least 225 units using Testing Center services annually (especially placement testing and national
- 7d. Ongoing collaboration accomplished through
Planned activities: • Continue to work with Michele Hansen and the PRAC Advanced Practice Group on assessment and evaluation issues. Planned Activities: • Mzumara will continue to serve as a member of the ePort evaluation team and provide evaluation consulting services to faculty working on integrated development grants. Planned Activities: • Mzumara will continue to serve as a member of the ePort evaluation team and provide evaluation consulting services to faculty working on Integrative Department Grants in the Department of Computer &.
Planned activities: • The Test Center will continue to expand outreach services and improve existing partnerships with.
Provide analysis, interpretation, and reports to internal and external constituents
2a. Performance Report completed on schedule
Results from the Delaware Study were presented at the IUPUI Executive Vice Chancellor's meeting of the deans. Feedback from Deans of Science and Liberal Arts indicates that information from the Delaware Study on tuition costs and productivity was helpful. Feedback from Deans of Science and Liberal Arts indicates that information from the Delaware Study on tuition costs and productivity was helpful.
93% of users who attended the Information Gateway workshop indicated that the workshop and the information presented were useful.
2b. At least 1500 Performance Reports distributed
2d. Campus diversity initiatives evaluated and documented Actions taken to
Derive, prioritize, recommend, and assist in implementing improvements based on evaluative findings
- At least one workshop on peer group analysis conducted for school personnel
- 2a. List of significant improvements furthered by PAII information and evaluation resources extended and
- 2b. Shortened Continuing Student Survey and pre-survey announcement letter added to increase response rate
- 2d. Deans’ annual reports placed on the Web by IMIR staff
- 3a. Continued participation by 5 PAII staff on committees assigning campus performance indicators
- 3b. At least 3 Accelerated Improvement Processes completed annually and instances of improvements
IMIR, along with other campus units, provided Derrick Price with data to conduct an extensive study of the factors associated with retention at IUPUI. A Physical Education faculty member used the AIP rater (What would cause me to fail as an instructor? Do you fail as a student?) in classes at the beginning of the semester. The results of the IUPUI Graduate and Professional Graduate Student Survey will be released.
PAII staff participated in two (International Affairs and a joint project with Admissions, University College and Enrollment Center) of the 5 AIP campus projects (Financial Aid; Housing; Center on Philanthropy; and a joint project with Admissions, University College and Enrollment Center).
Continuously improve effectiveness of PAII personnel and services
- 1a. Increasingly useful set of indicators for monitoring PAII performance in use
- 2a. All PAII staff oriented and trained to use project management tools and techniques
- 2b. At least 5 projects executed using project management tools
- 3a. Professional development plans designed and deployed Actions taken to
- 4a. Diversity plan and implementation strategy developed
- 5b. At least 2 presentations and 1 publication produced annually related to IUPUI’s institutional portfolio and
Maintain flexibility in work schedules to allow staff members to pursue professional development or training opportunities as needed. Staff participated in PAII staff retreats, enrolled in formal classes and attended various workshops/professional development opportunities as part of ongoing staff development activities at PAII. At least 300 consultations for planning, evaluation and improvement purposes provided annually by PAII staff provided annually by PAII staff (internal and external).
A minimum of 2 presentations and 1 publication are produced annually related to IUPUI's institutional portfolio and annually related to IUPUI's institutional portfolio and student ePort.
IUPUI Priorities for 2008-09
Develop a campus master plan that emphasizes flexible space, solves chronic problems for the campus, and provides a clear guide for the future (4).
President’s Priorities
Antolovic reported that of the $100M UITS budget, $10M comes from state, federal and private grants and contracts awarded to UITS staff. Unit costs, usage and user satisfaction have driven many of the changes UITS staff have made to their operations over the past ten years. Banta distributed another component of the IUPUI priorities for 2007-08 and beyond, which was developed in late June and early July and sent to.
Following the meeting, these two sets of priorities were emailed to all members of the Resource Planning Committee.
Resource Planning Committee
Changes to the questionnaire were also suggested to make it clear that the purpose of the exercise is to find areas where costs can be cut. Bob White asked the purpose of the hearings since they no longer provide a 74. Sherry Queener presented evidence in support of her request for an increase in the percentage of the graduate application fee awarded to the Graduate Office.
As we observe the development of the new research office at Indiana University, we should take a close look at the research-related services offered at the schools to see if they are still needed.
IUPUI 2007-08 Accomplishments/2008-09 Initiatives
More funding has been provided to support expanded recruitment efforts and scholarship offerings to attract well-qualified foreign and international students. Non-residents increased their share of all freshman admissions from 8.1% in fall 2007 to 8.6% this year. A task force appointed to survey peer institutions and conduct visits to 5 Honors Colleges.
Develop new programs to reduce health disparities (eg School of Public Health) and to contribute to economic development (eg motor sports engineering) (PP #5 and 6). In the fall of 2008, Motor Sports Engineering will become the first BS degree in motor sports offered in the US. This is expected to be 21 students over the first year and will increase to 106 students. by the fourth year.
Expand graduate programs in the life sciences and other strategic areas to support the hiring of additional strong faculty researchers and to support the research goals of the campus (PP #1, 5, and 6). IUPUI has become a center for the advancement of education in the STEM disciplines, with the formation of the Urban Center for the Advancement of STEM Education and the collection of external grants, including the Woodrow Wilson Indiana Teaching Fellowship, the Teach Science Noyce grant (funded by NSF) , and the $2.9M GK-12 Science Education Program, which is a partnership between the Schools of Science and Medicine at IUPUI and is funded by the NIH. Develop an Honors College to complement the programs that currently bring high-achieving students to IUPUI and to increase enrollment in graduate and professional programs.
Develop a campus master plan that emphasizes flexible space, addresses chronic issues for the campus, and provides a clear guide for the future (PP #4). Development of a new master plan to guide an aggressive construction program focused on providing new buildings and facilities for the arts, humanities, social sciences, international studies, life sciences and economic development, as well as improved student housing in Bloomington.
The 2007 Assessment Institute
The 2007
Assessment Institute
Please rate the overall process of the program review. (Please circle one) poor (0 responses) fair (0 responses) good (1 responses) excellent ( 6 responses)
The learning expectations are set out in the ePort learning matrix and the sample tasks provide well-structured opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning of the PULs in the ePort. At the end of the first year, students and faculty provide an assessment of disposition along 30 dimensions. Each instructor has been asked to review the importance of the PULs and ABET scores with the students at the beginning of each semester.
Each of the major's program outcomes is mapped to the principles of undergraduate learning and to the BOOV student's learning outcome requirements. Syllabus for all courses include objectives that address one or more of the IUPUI principles of. Increased coordination of skills and learning outcomes between upper-level courses and the Senior Project that prepares students for successful completion of the final requirement in the major.
Economics Evaluation of curriculum in light of the department's focus on health economics at postgraduate level. English Assessment of the effectiveness of the electronic portfolio in the details of students' learning outcomes in the capstone course. Evaluation of the balance between the main components of the capstone course (skills, knowledge and career planning).
Administration majors in the BS Public Health degree advanced with approval of the BS in Health Services Management. The BSPA faculty conducted a self-study of the program that led to the internal program review in the spring semester. As part of the self-study, the faculty has reviewed/revised learning outcomes for courses and degrees and mapped the curriculum to the degree's learning outcomes and the PULs.
The next step in course redesign is to adjust the exams to more accurately assess the goals of the redesigned course.
Admissions Reports
Enrollment Reports
Performance and Outcomes Reports
Engaging students, through the curriculum and co-curriculum, in learning about their own and other cultures and belief systems.
2008 NCCI Leveraging Excellence Award
Students aim to develop increasing skills with PULs as they progress through My IUPUI Experience. The PULs also provide the basis for the reflective activities that inform the creation of the PPD and will shape the assessment of learning outcomes from the PPD. The key to the success of the PDP as a compass for the student experience at IUPUI is its continuous use and review throughout the student's enrollment. At this stage, the PDP will be piloted in several sections of UCOL U110, as well as in some of the school's First Year Seminars and Thematic Learning Communities.
Comment [LA3]: Should we be specific about where these reflections fit into the PDP? Two primary groups should be charged with the continued development and industrialization of the PDP. A subcommittee of the Retention and Graduation Council should be established to oversee the PDP and determine the implementation plan.
It is recommended that the initial use of the PDP as part of the ePortfolio be piloted in programs that currently use the ePortfolio. Professional development for first-year seminar teaching team members will be provided to ensure that the POP is a meaningful learning experience for students. Ongoing assessment of the POP will continue to refine the content and teaching strategies to maximize learning outcomes.
In Phase III, the use of the PDP with new students not enrolled in first-year seminars (currently approximately 13 percent of beginning students enrolled in seven or more credit hours) will be implemented. As the foundation of a student's plan for learning and development, the POP must be continuously assessed to ensure the achievement of the intended learning outcomes for the initiative. Students will use the POP to take control of their education and empower their decisions.
Using the PDP will result in better prepared students and more effective use of advising resources in the long run.
