• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

2015-03-26 Question

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "2015-03-26 Question"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Author(s): VS/AT Date: 2015-03-26

Question: Should sweet-tasting solutions (sucrose, glucose) and breastfeeding together before vaccine injections vs sweet-tasting solutions or breastfeeding alone be used for reducing vaccine injection pain in children 0-2 years?

Settings: clinics

Bibliography: Sahebihagh 2011 (3,4)

Quality assessment No of patients Effect

Quality Importance No of

studies Design Risk of

bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations

Breastfeeding and sweet-tasting solution

(sucrose, glucose) together before vaccine injections

Breastfeeding or sweet-tasting solution alone

Relative (95%

CI)

Absolute

Distress Acute (measured with: validated tool (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale 0-7) by researcher; Better indicated by lower values)

1 randomised trials

serious1 no serious inconsistency

no serious indirectness

serious2 none 30 60 - SMD 0.28

higher (0.34 lower to 0.90

higher)



LOW

CRITICAL

Distress Recovery (measured with: validated tool (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale 0-7) by researcher; Better indicated by lower values)

1 randomised trials

serious1 no serious inconsistency

no serious indirectness

serious2 none 30 60 - SMD 0.06

higher (0.37 lower to 0.5

higher)



LOW

CRITICAL

Safety, Procedure Outcomes, Use of Intervention, Parent Fear, Vaccine Compliance, Preference, Satisfaction (assessed with: no data were identified for these important outcomes)

0 No evidence available

none - - - - IMPORTANT

0% -

1 Unclear risk of bias for several design features including; randomization, blinding of parents and selective outcome reporting

2 Confidence interval crosses line of nonsignificance and sample size was below the recommended optimum information size (OIS) of 400 for an effect size of 0.2

 

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty Number of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Balanced

Settings: Different anesthesia technique Bibliography: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance No of studies Design Risk

Settings: clinics hospital and outpatient Bibliography: Gonzalez 1993 2, Manimala 2000 2 Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance No of studies Design Risk

Prymula 2009 Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance No of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations

Settings: clinic Bibliography: Hallstrom 1968, Ipp 2004, Taavoni 2010 Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance No of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency

Settings: dental clinic, MS clinic Bibliography: Heaton 2013, Mohr 2005 Quality assessment No of patients Effect Quality Importance No of studies Design Risk of bias

Quality assessment № of patients Effect Quality Importance № of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations NE

Quality assessment for BMI-stratified dosing regimens using GRADE methodology Number of Studies Study design Limitations Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations