A NEW FOSSIL ALLIGATOR FROM THE HELL CREEK BEDS OF I^IONTANA.
By Charles W. Gilmore,
Assistant Curator ofFossil Reptiles, U. S. National Museum.
The
specimen described below belongs to the vertebrate paleon- tological collection of theAmerican Museum
of Natural History,New
York,and
it is through the generosity of Dr.H.
F.Osborn and
'Mr.
Barnum Brown,
of thatinstitution,that Inow have
theprivilege of describingit.Tliis specimen represents a true
though
primitivemember
of the AlUgatoridse, as is abundantlyshown by
the general proportion of the skull, especially in the shortnessand
flatness of the broadlyrounded
muzzleand
the nonconstriction at the maxillo-premaxillary union, the reception of the anterior teeth in pits of the upper jaw, the lower teeth biting witliin the upper,and
the divergent lateral borders of the anterior ends of the palatines.In
North America
three genera, Diplocynodon, Alligator,and
Bottosaurus,have
been included under the family Alligatoridse.From
Diplocynodon the presentform
is to be separated at onceby
the nonconstriction of the snout at the maxillo-premaxillary sutureand
the uniform size of the premaxillary teeth.The
abbreviated facial region, the posterior extension of the nasal bones,and
differences in the dentition distinguish itfrom
Alligator.On
account of the lack ofhomologous
parts for comparison, the separation of this specimenfrom
Bottosaurus issomewhat more
diflicult,
though
their distinctness appears to be incUcated.In Leidy's description^ of thetype specimenof Bottosaurusliarlani
he says:
"The
fragment of the dentalbone
is about 15 inches in length,and
in this extent contains the remains of 11 alveoU, wliich, perhaps, comprise the wholenumber
except three or four." In the ]\Iontana skull the total length of the dental series is 8 inchesand
contains alveoli for 19 teeth. Still further Leidy says the alveoh"appear
to indicate a succession of teeth related to one another in size nearly as in the Crocodileand
Alligator."The
succession of1SmithsonianContributionstoKnowledge,vol. 14, 1865,p.13.
Proceedings U.S. National Museum,Vol.
41—
No.1860.297
298 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM.
vol.41.teeth in the present form, as will be
shown
later, is notHke
that of the Crocodileand
Alligator, and,when
considered with the great disparity in the proportional extent of the dental series, appears to justify their generic separation.On
that account thenew
genericname
Bracliychampsa is proposed for its reception.Under
this genus Iwould
include the species Bottosaurus perrugosusCope from
theArapahoe
beds of eastern Colorado,which Cope
provisionally assigned^ to theNew
Jersey genus Bottosaurus.The
type of thisspecies cannotnow
belocated, but in the original description is said to consist of a"fragmentary
dentary, vertebrae,and
pieces of the skull."Cope
says:"There
is a slight difference in the sizes of the alveoli,but not such as is usual in Tertiary croco- diles." In view of the character of the dentitionshown by
thisnewly
discovered specimen,"the
slight differences, etc.," noted above appear especially significantwhen
taken into consideration with thesimilarity of their geological occurrence.The
classification of thisform may
be best expressedby
the following:
Order.
—
Crocodilia.Suhorder.
—
Eusuchia.Family.-
—
Alligatoridse.Genus
.
—
Brachycliampsa.Species.
—
Brachycliampsamontana.The
genus Brachycliampsawillnow
include thetwo
speciesB. mon-
tana, B. {Bottosaurus) perrugosa (Cope)
.
BRACHYCHAMPSA, new genus.
The
characters of this genus are included in the description that follows of Brachycliampsa montana, the type-species.BRACHYCHAMPSA
MONTANA,newspecies.Plates 26and27.
Type.
— The anterior two-thirds of the skull, accompanied by
detached fragments of the posterior portion. Cat. No. 5032,Amer.
Mus.
Nat. Hist. Collectedby Barnum Brown.
Type-locality
.
—
Twenty-five miles southeast of Lismas,Dawson
County,Mont.
Horizon.
— Upper sandstone, "Hell Creek Beds," Lance
forma-
tion,
Upper
Cretaceous.Description.
— The type-specimen is a short, broad-snouted skull,
the length from
the level ofthe front border of the orbitsbeing only
7 mm.
greater than the width at the same
point. Excepting a few
detached fragments, the posterior portion of the skull behind the
orbits is missing (PL 26). The
remaining part is fairly complete
'Bull. Geol.andGeog.SurveyofTerr., vol.1,1874-5,p.27.
NO.1860.
A NEW FOSSIL ALLIGATOR FROM MONTANA— GILMORE. 299 and
undistorted.The
upper surface of the preorbital region is flatand
wdthout crests or ridges; the muzzle is evenly but broadly rounded; the nasal aperture is largeand
pear-shaped in outline. In the absence of a roof-like coveringformed by
the premaxillaries over the anterior part of the external nares,Brachychampsa
differsfrom
allknown
alligators, both recentand
extinct.On
account of thedamaged
condition of the anterior extremitiesof the nasal bonesit can not be determined
whether
they extended foward into the narial opening.The
facial processes of the premaxillaries extend posteriorly to the level of the aveolus for the fifth maxillary tooth.The
nasal bones are comparatively slenderand
extend posteriorly tothelevel ofthe anterior borders ofthe orbits. Inrecent alligators these bones terminate well in front of the orbital line.The
maxil- laries are broad, flattened above,and much
compressed vertically.The
jugals are heavy,with roughlysculptured surfaces.The
inter- orbital surface is flatand
not concave as inmany
crocodilesand
alligators.
The
orbital openings are everted as in the alligatorsand some
crocodilesand
areconfluentwith thelateralvacuities.The
sculpturing of thefacialsurfaceofthe bonesis
more
stronglymarked
in the neighborhood of the orbits than it is anteriorly.
In the palatal
view
(PI. 27),where
the boneshave
not sufl'ered mutilation, all of the sutures are plainly indicated. Latero-infe- riorly the maxillo-premaxillary suture passes obliquelybackward and
inwardon
the palate.The damaged
condition of the palate justback
of the anterior palatine vacuity renders uncertain the posterior extent of the premaxillaries. In the recent alligators this suture extends nearly straight acrosson
a level with thesecond maxillary tooth, while in thisform
it extends posteriorly at least as far asthe level of the fourth maxillary tooth.Each
of the broad maxillaries has alveoli for 14 teeth,and
each of the premaxillaries for 5.The
palatmes, ofwhich
only the anterior portions are present,unitewiththe maxillaeby an
almost straight transverse sutureon
a level with the eleventh maxillary tooth.The
lateral borders of the anterior ends of the palatines are divergent, as in all alligators, instead of parallel or convergent as in all true crocodiles.On
the left side of the palateenough
of theboundary
of the posterior palatine vacuity remains to indicate thatit
was subround
insteadofelongate asinmost members
of thisgroup.The
preserved borders of the anterior palatine vacuityshow
it tohave
beenoflargesizeand
probably pear-shapedin outline.The
pitson
the palatal surface of the premaxillary for the recep- tion of the anterior teeth of thelowerjaw
are broadand
exceedingly shallow.A
detached fragment of the pterygoidshows
the processes tohave
been bluntand
stout.300 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM.
vol.41.Measurements ofskullofBracychampsa montana. Type-specimen.
mm.
Distancefromanteriorangleof orbits to tipofsnout 164 Widthofskull at anteriorangleoftheorbits 157 Widthof skull atmaxillo-premaxillary suture 105
Greatestwidthofnasalopening 44
G»eatest longitudinal lengthofpremaxillary 80
Leastwidthof interorbitalbar 26
Greatestwidthof nasals 32
Greatestwidthof anteriorpalatine processes 45
Greatestwidthof anteriorpalatinevacuity 33
Distancefromanteriorendofpalatinevacuityto tipofsnout 24
Lengthof alveolarborderofmaxillary 135
Lengthofalveolarborder ofpremaxillary 65
Teeth.
— The dental formula of the upper jaw
consists of 5 pre-
maxillary and
14 maxillary teeth, the total number
(38) being the
same
as found in theupper mandible
ofmany modern
alligators.Judging
from
the size of the alveoli, all of the premaxillary teeth appear tohave
been of approximately thesame
size.The
teethstill present in the skull are: the bases of three premaxillary teeth,
and
the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, ninth, eleventh,and
twelfth maxillaryteethon
the rightside; the roots ofthethird,fifth, sixth,and
seventh, with the tenthand
eleventh teeth intact, in the left maxillary.The
first three maxillary teethwere
relatively smalland
evidentlyof aboutequalsize.The
fourthis slightly largerthan the third; the fifth is larger than the fourthand
is themost
robust tooth of the anterior dentalseries; the sixth tooth isslightly smaller than the fifth; the seventh, eighth, ninth,and
tenthwere
quite small, being the weakest of those in theupper
mandible; the elev- enthand
twelfth were robust, and, judgingfrom
the size of the alveoli for the thirteenthand
fourteenth, all of these teethwere
of approximatelythe
same
size.The
anterior teeth of the maxillary series althoughsomewhat
compressed transversely are acutely pointed,and
while the fifth isas long as the eleventh
and
twelfth the anterior posterior extentof the tooth is only a little over half that of the latter.The
relative dimensions are wellshown
in the table ofmeasurements
ofthe teeth given below.The
posterior teeth ofBrachychampsa montana
resemblemost
nearly those figuredby
Leidy^ as BottosaurusJiarlanifrom
the Cre- taceous ofNew
Jersey.^The
crowns of the posterior teeth aresomewhat
compressed later- ally,mammihform,
with outerand
inner surfaces separatedby
asomewhat
obscure carinaswhich
extendsfrom
the subacuteapex
to the base ofthe corrugated surface asshown
in figure 1.The
upperISmithsonianContributions toKnowledge,vol. 18, pi.18, figs.11-14.
NO.1860.
A NEW FOSSIL ALLIGATOR FROM MONTANA— OILMORE. 301
surface is corrugated with depressions radiatingfrom
theapex
but the base of theenameled
surface is smooth.The upper
part of the toothis separatedfrom
thegibbousrootby
aslightconstriction at thebaseof theenamel.
In the collection of the U. S. National
Museum
thereis a large
number
of detached teethfrom
the ''Ceratopsbeds"
of Converse County,Wyoming, which
can not be distinguishedfrom
those in the specimen under discussion.With them
are other teeth whichfrom
theirminute
sizeand
other differ- ences appear to indicate the presence in thosebeds ofoneormore
undescribedspecies,but the materialistoo
meager upon
which to base a determination.Many
ofthese scattered teethshowed wear on
theirinternal surfaces, thussubstantiating theevidence oftheAlligatoroidnatureofthebite asshown by
the wo^-n posterior teeth of the type-specimen.FigL—Twelfthmax- illary TOOTH OF
Brachychampsa
Montana. Natural
SIZE, a, Lateral view; 6, POSTERIOR VIEW. Type-speci- men.
Principalmeasurements of mamillaryteethofBrachychampsa montana. Type-specimen.
Numberoftooth...
Length
Extentantero-pos- teriorly
Third.
EXPLANATION OF
PLATES.Plate 26.
Skullof BrachycJiampsamontana. Cat. No. 5032. Amer. Mus. Nat.Hist. Type- specimen. Superiorviewof theanteriorpartof theskull. Naturalsize.
e.na., externalnares;/r.,frontal; ju., jugal; vix., maxillary; n., nasal; o.,orbit;
f.mx., premaxillary.
Plate 27.
Skull of Bracychampsa montana. Cat. No. 5032. Amer.Mus. Nat.Hist. Type- specimen. Inferiorviewof theanteriorpartof theskull. Naturalsize.
a.p.v.,anteriorpalatinevacuity; ju.,jugal; mx., maxillary; p., palatines; p.mx., premaxillary; t. p., transpalatines.
302
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL.41 PL. 26
p.mx.
mx.
Anterior PartofSkullof Brachychampsa Montana.
For explanation of platesee page302.
U. S. NATIONALMUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 41 PL. 27
P-
mx.
I/?.--
Anterior Partof Skull of Brachychampsa Montana. PalateView.
For explanation of plateseepage302