Sharing Sessions with Colleagues
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis - Universitas Sumatera Utara
28 Juni 2024
Muhammad Dharma Tuah Putra Nasution
Scopus Author ID 57200301231 (H-Index:13) WoS Researcher ID AAJ-3789-2021 (H-Index: 3)
Sinta ID 6005856
Google Scholar H-Index: 26
Orchid ID 0000-0002-4671-0230
Strata 1 FEB Universitas Trisakti (1992-1998) Strata 2 Magister Manajemen USU (2002-2004) Strata 3 Doktor Ilmu Manajemen (in progress)
Ad Hoc Reviewer
Journal of Asia Business Studies (Emerald)
Journal of Science & Technology Policy Management (Emerald)
Journal of Islamic Marketing (Emerald) SAGE Open (SAGE)
Cogent Business and Management (Taylor & Francis) Transnational Corporations Review (Elsevier)
Heliyon (Elsevier)
Menyusun Naskah
SLR (Systematic Literature Review)?
Kenapa memilih
SLR (Systematic Literature Review)?
Beberapa alasan utama mengapa SLR penting:
1. Comprehensive Overview: Tinjauan sistematis memberikan ringkasan yang jelas dan rinci tentang semua
bukti yang relevan pada topik tertentu, memastikan bahwa semua penelitian yang tersedia dipertimbangkan dan diperhitungkan.
2. Research Gaps Identification: Tinjauan ini membantu mengidentifikasi kesenjangan dalam pengetahuan saat ini, menyoroti area di mana penelitian lebih lanjut diperlukan untuk mengisi kesenjangan tersebut.
3. Methodological Improvement: Tinjauan sistematis dapat mengidentifikasi masalah metodologis dalam penelitian yang ada, yang kemudian dapat menginformasikan perbaikan dalam studi mendatang
4. Answering Clear Questions: Tinjauan sistematis dapat menentukan apakah bukti yang tersedia memberikan jawaban yang jelas untuk pertanyaan penelitian tertentu, sehingga menunjukkan apakah penelitian lebih lanjut diperlukan atau tidak.
5. Development of New Research Ideas: Melakukan tinjauan sistematis membantu penulis mengembangkan ide penelitian baru, dan memperoleh keterampilan kritis dalam mensintesis literatur yang ada.
Kenapa memilih
SLR (Systematic Literature Review)?
6. Best Form of Evidence: Tinjauan sistematis, bersama dengan meta-analisis, dianggap sebagai bentuk bukti terbaik yang tersedia bagi para akademisi, karena memberikan penilaian yang tidak bias dari studi literatur
7. Critical Thinking and Mindset: SLR mendorong pemikiran kritis dan sistematis, yang sangat penting dalam memastikan bahwa penelitian tetap relevan dan efektif.
8. Knowledge Contribution: SLR memberikan kontribusi yang signifikan bagi komunitas ilmiah dengan mengisi kesenjangan dalam pengetahuan yang ada dan memberikan pemahaman yang komprehensif tentang topik tersebut.
9. Practical Application: SLR dapat diterapkan dalam berbagai bidang, ilmu, yang menjadikannya metode yang serbaguna dan penting untuk sintesis penelitian.
Tahapan umum menulis naskah SLR
Step 1 - define the research question Step 2 - develop the review protocol Step 3 - conduct the search
Step 4 - scan for eligibility Step 5 - analyze quality
Step 6 - extract and synthesize data
Step 7 - write the report
Define the research question
The RQ should be specific, relevant, and answerable. Using a framework to define the RQ will help guide towards identifying the most important components. The PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research Type) frameworks help to ensure that the RQ is focused and structured in a way that allows for a comprehensive search and synthesis of the available evidence.
The acronym PICO stands for:
Population: The group or population being studied.
Intervention: The specific action or treatment being applied.
Comparison: The alternative or control group being compared.
Outcome: The desired outcome or result being measured.
Use PICO framework (customer participation in social media community co-creation) to formulate research questions
Step 1. Define the research question
The acronym PICO stands for:
Population: The group or population being studied.
Intervention: The specific action or treatment being applied.
Comparison: The alternative or control group being compared.
Outcome: The desired outcome or result being measured.
Use the PICO framework (customer co-created value in social media community) to formulate research questions and find novelty.
Step 2 - Develop the review protocol
Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) checklist (27 items).
chrome-
extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://static1.squarespace.com/static/65b880e13b6c a75573dfe217/t/65d81881d8a48075f1fa7a3a/1708660865607/PRISMA_2020_checklist.pdf
Step 2 - Develop the review protocol
Step 3 - Conduct the search (Scopus database)
Once you have collated your key terms and have thought about the search limits, your search process begins. There are three main approaches to a systematic search
1) Line-by-line (each search term on its own line)
2) Block-by-block (each search concept on its own line)
3) Single line (all search terms and concepts combined into one line)
For instance: country brand OR nation brand OR nation branding OR country branding).
Step 3 - Conduct the search (Scopus
database)
Step 3 - Conduct the search (AI)
Step 3 - Conduct the search (AI)
Step 4 - Scan for eligibility
PRISMA flow diagram
Step 5 - Analyze quality
A brief description of the final 8 indicators of research quality is given below:
a) Citations: References to a book, paper, or author, especially in scholarly work.
b) Journal Impact Factor: Measures the frequency with which the average article in a journal is cited in a particular year (Journal Citation Reports-JCR).
c) Peer Review: Evaluation of work by other researchers in the same field.
d) Criteria for Selecting Expert Referees: Criteria used by the editorial board to select expert referees.
e) Standardised Research Reporting Framework: Essential research information regarding sample techniques, statistics, randomization, analysis, and interpretation.
f) Journal Ranking: A measure of the scientific influence of journals, accounting for citations received and the prestige of citing journals.
g) Dialogue and Discourse: Exchange of ideas or opinions on published research among scholars, critiquing and developing new propositions.
h) Journal in First Quartile of its Area: Refers to the top 25 percent of journals in a subject category with the highest impact.
