IFRS 17
Understanding
Insurance Contracts Gap - Analysis
Asosiasi Asuransi Umum Indonesia (AAUI)
8 November 2021
Dr.Ludovicus Sensi W, CPA, CA
CTPRIMA
Agenda
1 Persiapan Implementasi IFRS17
Surat OJK – Persiapan Implementasi IFRS 17
2 Insurance Value Chain
Timeline
Implication to Management and Stakeholders
Operational Implications
Improve financial reporting
Key focus area of the standard
Critical IFRS 17 Components
Measurement Model
Building Block Approach 3 Complexity of IFRS 17
Overview General Model
Insurance Risk VS Non-Insurance Risk
Understanding Gap analysis
Agenda
Technical Requirement
IFRS Requirement
Changes In Fs Presentation And Disclosure 3 Complexity of IFRS 17
4 Actuarial Aspect
Measurement Models
Separated Component
Level Of Aggregation
Expected Cash Flows
Discount Rate
Risk Adjustment
Exercise
Actuarial Gap analysis
Agenda
IT Systems Requirements
IFRS 17 IT Gap Analysis 5 Impact of IFRS 17 for IT
6 Financial Accounting and Reporting Aspects
Business Process and Control
Accounting Policy Framework
Chart Of Account
How Does IFRS Impact?
Recognition
Measurement
Presentation
Disclosure
IFRS 17 Financial Accounting Gap Analysis
REFERENCE
Insurance Contracts Accounting Standard AASB 17- Issued by Actuary Institute September 2017
IFRS 17 Challenges, Seminar ISEA September 2021, Presented by Palti FTH Siahaan
IFRS 17 for life Insurers June 2018– issued by Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK Company limited.
IFRS 17 Audit Committee Training Great Eastern Holdings Limited and Subsidiaries July 2019 - issued by Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK Company limited
IFRS 17: The First Truly International IFRS July 2017– issued Sue Lloyd – IASB
IFRS 17: The First Truly International IFRS – issued Mehul Dave – Director of Actuarial & Insurance Solution, Deloitte Singapore.
KPMG Insurance Contract July 2020 – Illustrative Disclosure for Insurer Guide to annual financial statement IFRS 17 and IFRS 9, September 2020 Edition
KPMG Insurance Contract First Impression: 2020 Edition IFRS 17
Angie Ng - Head of Technology & Software Insurance Consulting And Technology Willis Towers Watson, Singapore
IFRS 17 Implementation by General Insurers in Singapore – Issued by Mehul Dave, Chair of IFRS 17 GI Working Party, 17 January 2020.
PwC Insurance Contract June 2021, An illustration Financial statements presentation and
disclosure.
CTPRIMA Section 1
Persiapan Implementasi IFRS 17
• Surat OJK – Persiapan Implementasi IFRS 17
• Understanding Gap analysis
■ Dalam rangka memastikan persiapan penerapan PSAK 74 berjalan dengan baik maka pada tahun 2021 diharapkan seluruh Perusahaan Asuransi dan Perusahaan Reasuransi telah melakukan kajian terhadap kebutuhan infrastruktur dan hal pendukung lainnya dibandingkan dengan ketersediaan/kesiapannya (Gap Analysis). Kajian tersebut juga dilengkapi dengan analisis dampak penerapan PSAK 74 berdasarkan karakteristik produk dan portofolio polis perusahaan serta rencana pemenuhan gap dimaksud.
PERSIAPAN IMPLEMENTASI IFRS 17 - SE OJK NO. S-893/NB.211/2021 - 9 SEP 2021 1
People Process Technology
■ Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, kami minta Saudara untuk menuangkan hasil analisis tersebut dalam Position Paper dan menyampaikannya kepada OJK. Penyampaikan position paper tersebut kami harapkan dapat diterima OJK sebelum tanggal 31 Desember 2021.
Perlu Strategi jangka Panjang:
1 PERSIAPAN IMPLEMENTASI IFRS 17 - SE OJK NO. S-893/NB.211/2021 - 9 SEP 2021
1 UNDERSTANDING GAP ANALYSIS
Define Future State
Review Current
State Identify Gap
Outline Resolutions &
Timeline
Pada umumnya pendekatan dan metodologi yang digunakan dalam Gap analysis adalah dengan (i) melakukan diskusi dan tanya jawab (define future state), (ii) review dokumentasi atas sistem yang berjalan (review current state), (iii) membandingkan dengan persyaratan (requirement) IFRS 17 dan IFRS 9 (pratical best practices), (iv) menganalisis kesenjangan (Gap Analysis) dan (v) memberikan saran dan rekomendasi .
Recomendation
1 2 3 4
5
CTPRIMA Section 2
Insurance Value Chain
INSURANCE VALUE CHAIN – PRODUCT SPECIFICATION
Reserve & Claims, 60%
Investment Profit 4%
Cost of Admin, 31%
Company's Margin, 5%
Global Insurance Industry Insight - McKinsey
2
INSURANCE VALUE CHAIN – COST OF INSURANCE
Global Insurance Industry Insight - McKinsey
2
CTPRIMA Section 3
Complexity of IFRS 17
2023 - 2025
TIMELINE
2021 - 2022 2020
2019 2018
2017
Implementation period Reporting
IFRS 17IFRS 9
IFRS 17 start of comparative period
IFRS 17 effective date 1 Jan 2023 and 1 Jan 2025 for Indonesia IFRS 9 Effective date
IFRS 17 standard issued
Predominant
insurance activities? Yes
Overlay approach?
No
Deferral Approach
First IFRS 9 annual financial statements
3
Actuarial
Accounting
IT Systems
&
Processes
KPIs Human
Resources
IMPLICATION TO MANAGEMENT AND STAKEHOLDERS
IFRS 17
/ IFRS 9
3
IMPROVE FINANCIAL REPORTING
Assumptions used in the valuation of insurance contact liabilities reflect the characteristics of the insurance contract
rather than the risk related to asset / investment activity
Single accounting
approach
Provides up-to-date market consistent
information of obligation includingvalue of options and guarantees
Underwriting revenue and expenses are
recognised over time in comparable wayto other non insurance business
Provides separate information about the
investment and underwriting performanceReflects time value of money
3
7. Technology
► Core systems, investment system, actuarial systems, pricing systems, etc.
► Posting logic/engines
► General Ledger, consolidation and reporting systems
► System interfaces
► Current system capacities &
capabilities (agile technology)
► New functionalities/features 3. People
► Training
► Cross functional collaboration (especially for Finance & Risk)
► Project resourcing & budget
► Managing change fatigue 1. Policy
► New accounting policies/procedures and control documentation
► IFRS 17 methodology guidance and reporting instructions
► GL Chart of Accounts changes and account mappings
► Assumptions setting (modelling)
► Investment policy changes (TFRS 9)
4. Organization
► Roles and responsibilities between Actuarial and Finance
departments
► Technical Provisions Assumptions/
Expert Judgement Committee
► Impact on outsourcing contracts 5. Data
► Refinement, upgrading, conversion and migration of (complex) actuarial
valuation models
► New financial reporting data requirements (input/output)
► Data reconciliations at different levels
► Data quality, storage and archiving
► Data security & controls
► Data governance and master data management
2. Performance Management
► Changes in MI reports and KPI‟s
► Planning, budgeting and forecasting processes need to be adjusted
► VBM, scorecards and incentive schemes
Policy Performance Management
Data Process Technology Organization
People
OPERATIONAL IMPLICATIONS The big picture
6. Processes
► Materiality concepts/guidelines
► Updating closing and reporting processes, planning processes, actuarial processes, risk management etc.
► Internal and external reporting templates including group reporting packages
► Internal controls and audit trail
3
KEY FOCUS AREAS OF THE STANDARD
(1-9)
(10-13)
(14-24)
(38-39)
(37) (36) (33-35)
(53-59)
(60-62)
(40-46) (47-52) (71) (80-92) (83-86)(87-92)
(29-32) (72)
(74-77)
(97-116)
(117-120)
3
OVERVIEW OF GENERAL MODEL 3
Change in estimates
Contractual service margin
Risk adjustment
Probability weighted discounted expected present value of cash
flows
Fulfilment cash flows
Time value of money and other assumptions related to financial risk
Experience adjustments
Release of contractual service margin
Release of risk adjustment Interest accretion at
inception rate Profit or loss (insurance
service result)
Profit or loss and/or other comprehensive income (insurance finance income
or expenses)
+ +
Insurance Contract Liability
3 INSURANCE RISK VERSUS NON-INSURANCE RISK
Insurance risk, as defined – „Risk, other than financial risk, transferred from the holder of a contract to the issuer. Insurance risk is deferent with financial risk.
Insurance Risk Financial Risk
Death or survival
•Interest rates
Injury
•Financial instrument prices
Illness
•Currency exchange rates
Disability
•Indices of prices or rates
Loss of property due to damage/theft
•Credit ratings/credit indices
Failure of a debtor to make a payment when it is due
•Commodity prices
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Definition of Insurance contracts
Combination / unbundling of insurance contracts Separating non-insurance components
Recognition of insurance contracts Insurance acquisition cash flows
Contract modifications and accounting for derecognition Level of Aggregation (LoA)
Onerous contracts Contract Boundaries
THE CRITICAL IFRS 17 COMPONENTS
THE CRITICAL IFRS 17 COMPONENTS
3
THE CRITICAL IFRS 17 COMPONENTS
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Discount Rate
Risk adjustments for non-financial risk Contractual Service Margin (CSM) Subsequent Measurement
Premium Allocation Approach (PAA)
Accounting for reinsurance contract held – recognition Accounting for reinsurance contract held - measurement Presentation and disclosures
Transition
THE CRITICAL IFRS 17 COMPONENTS
10 General Measurement Model (GMM)
3
MEASUREMENT MODELS
3
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH
18 18
Deferred profit absorbs assumption changes for future coverage (“Unlocking”)
Profit measured and reported based on the delivery of the “insurance coverage service”
The measurement of insurance contracts will consist of a number of explicitly reported balance which include BEL, RA, and CSM
Discount rates based on market interest rates (currency, duration, liquidity and asset – dependency)
Need to group contracts by portfolio, year of sale and one of the three possible profitability levels
Page 24
3
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS OF IFRS 17 3
Underwriting result and finance result will
have a new „feel‟ and presentation. New KPIs,
strategy, incentives and education are required
as well as system changes.
Current profit profiles will be impacted giving rise to
potential strategic or business decisions.
Longer tail and riskier business will be more affected by the IFRS
17 valuation model.
Presentation and disclosure
Level of aggregation/
onerous contract Best estimate
cash flow Greater rigour in
measuring and reporting onerous losses at inception.
The OCI solution provides a device to reclassify volatility out of
profit or loss (P&L) due to change in yield curve.
This comes at a potentially higher
operational cost.
Simplified approach (PAA) Discounting
PAA is expected to be the measurement basis for GI Companies, except in a small number
of possible cases, including reinsurance.
Reinsurance measurement Risk adjustment
The disclosure of the confidence interval for
risk adjustment will introduce a new level
of transparency and constrain how insurers
use margins in their reserves.
Contractual
service margin Transition
Ledger strategy, implementation
approach and Internal MI
transition will drive business
change –
with new balance sheet position needed from
31/12/19.
Acquired portfolios Unbundling
These IFRS 17 technical requirements will significantly increase the complexity and data volume
IFRS REQUIREMENTS - KEY CALCULATION COMPONENTS
Page 26
Effectively a balancing item that eliminates day one gain
Cannot be negative except for reinsurance
Released as services are provided
Adjusted to reflect impact of changes in best estimate assumptions in respect of future service thereby reducing profit variability
CSM discount rate “locked” at inception except for directly participating business
Modified “variable fee” approach for direct participation business Contractual Service Margin
Explicit
Unbiased
Entity perspective
Within contract boundary
Cash Flows
Reflect liquidity
characteristics of cash flows
Consistent with observable market prices
Exclude factors not relevant to the cash flows
Time Value of Money
Compensation the insurer requires for bearing uncertainty
May reflect diversification within and between
portfolios
Disclosure of confidence level
Risk Adjustment
Market- consistent value of cash
flows
Risk adjustment
CSM
Fulfilment cash flows
3
IFRS REQUIREMENTS - Contractual Service Margin Calculation Example
Page 27
3
IFRS REQUIREMENTS - GROUPING, DISCOUNT RATES, RISK ADJUSTMENT
Page 28
Grouping of contracts
Risk adjustment principle
Discount Rates
3
NEW STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Page 29
3
CHANGES IN FS PRESENTATION AND DISCLOSURE
Net earned premiums
Interest, dividend and other investment income Incurred claims and benefits
Change in provisions Profit or loss
Key Changes :
Two drivers of profit presented separately
Insurance revenue excludes deposits [written premiums disclosed in the notes]
Revenue and expense are recognized as earned or incurred
Insurance finance expenses are excluded from insurance service result and are presented (i) fully in P&L or (ii) in P&L and OCI, depending on accounting policy
IFRS 17
Total comprehensive income
Discount rate changes on insurance liability (optional)
Insurance revenue
Insurance services expense Incurred claims and expense Acquisition costs
Gain/loss from reinsurance Insurance service result
Investment income
Insurance finance expense Net financial result
Profit or loss
Statement of Comprehensive Income
IFRS 17
IFRS 4
3
Statement of Financial Position
Assets
Reinsurance contract assets Insurance contract assets
Liabilities
Insurance contracts liabilities Reinsurance contracts liabilities Assets
Reinsurance contract assets Deferred acquisition costs Premiums receivable
Policy loans
Liabilities
Insurance contracts liabilities Unearned premiums
Claims payable
IFRS 17 IFRS 4
CHANGES IN FS PRESENTATION AND DISCLOSURE
3
Section 4 - Actuarial Aspect
Separated components
Level of aggregation
Expected Cash Flows
Discount Rate
Risk Adjustment
Exercise
Gap analysis
Accounting under IFRS 17
Accounting under IFRS 17, disaggregation for presentation in income statement notes
Accounting under IFRS 9
Accounting under IFRS 15
Insurance components
Non-distinct
investment components Distinct investment components
Embedded
derivatives, which are not closely related
Distinct performance obligation to provide
goods and services
Separation
Disaggregation1
1 Disaggregation is the exclusion of an unseparated investment component from insurance contracts revenue
SEPARATED COMPONENTS
4
LEVEL OF AGGREGATION
Portfolio
Contracts not onerous at inception
Onerous contracts at
inception
No significant possibility of
becoming onerous Other profitable
contracts
Portfolio = A group of contracts (a) subject to similar risks (b) managed together
Assessment based on:
(a) Likelihood of changes in estimates which, if they occurred, would result in the contracts becoming onerous
(b) Using internal information about changes in estimates
At Contract Inception
CSM is recognized and released as insurance service is provided A loss is
recognized in the P&L at inception
Cohorts
1
2
3
Permitted to group only contracts issued no more than one year apart
Assessment is done at contract inception – no subsequent re-assessment
Page 34
4
LEVEL OF AGGREGATION GROUPING OBJECTIVES
Profitable
have no significant possibility of
recognised as part is released asare provided
Group B
information about the contracts’ resilience
Portfolio 1 Entity divides each portfolio into groups
Credit insurance contracts issued within the same year
consistent with internal reporting
exemption for regulatory pricing
group not reassessed after initial recognition
Group A Contracts that at initial recognition
Unearned profit iscontracts
becoming onerous subsequently, if any
of the liability and insurance services Other profitable contracts, if any
Onerous
Group C Contracts that are onerous at initial
A loss iscontracts
recognition, if any
recognised in P&L4
The estimates of CFs used to determine the fulfilment CFs shall include all cash inflows and outflows that relate directly to the fulfilment of the portfolio of contracts:
Current and explicit (separate from discount rate and risk adjustment)
Market variables as consistent as possible with observable market prices
Incorporate all available information in an unbiased manner (including trends)
Include all CFs within contract boundary
Coverage period
Premium
Acquisition costs
Other expenses/ taxes
Claims payments Cash outflowsCash inflows
Cash flows within contract boundary
Claims payments including claim
handling cost Premium
Time
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH - FULFILMENT CASH FLOWS
Contractual service
margin Risk adjustment
Time value of money
Future cash flows
Page 36
4
EXPECTED CASH FLOW - Expected Cash Flows of a Group of Insurance Contracts
Premiums and any other costs specifically chargeable to the Policyholder
• Premium adjustments
• Instalment premiums
• Any additional cash flows that result from those premiums
Payments to, or on behalf of policyholder
• Incurred claims that have not yet
been paid (IBNP)
• Incurred claims that have not yet been reported (IBNR)
• Future claims
• Payments that vary
depending on returns on underlying items
Costs of providing benefits in kind • Replacement of stolen articles
Payments in a fiduciary capacity to meet the
policyholder’s tax obligations
• Payment of death duties or inheritance tax
Potential cash inflows from recoveries on claims, as long as they have not been recognised as a separate asset
• Salvage and subrogation
Insurance acquisition cash flows attributable to the portfolio
• Acquisition Cost
Claim handling costs – investigating, processing and resolving claims
• Legal and loss adjusters’ fees
• Internal costs of investigating
• claims and processing claims payments Policy administration and
maintenance costs
• Costs of billing premiums
• Costs of handling policy changes (e.g. conversions)
• Recurring commissions expected to be paid to intermediaries if the
policyholder continues paying premiums within the
boundary.
Allocation of fixed and variable overheads directly
attributable to fulfilling insurance contracts
These are allocated to contracts or groups using methods that are systematic, rational and consistently applied to all costs with similar characteristics.
These include accounting, human resources, IT and support, building depreciation, rent, maintenance and utilities.
Cost of investment activity Costs of managing certain investments
Cash Flow Examples Cash Flow Examples
4
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH - TIME VALUE OF MONEY
Top-down approach
Current market rates of returns: either of own asset portfolio or a reference portfolio
Adjust for risks that are not relevant to the insurance contract, e.g., default risk, market risk
Adjust for duration differences if necessary (No need to adjust for the difference due to liquidity)
Adjust for other characteristics of the insurance contracts if necessary
Illiquidity premium: Adjust for liquidity characteristics of the insurance contracts
Bottom-up approach
Risk-free yield curve with similar characteristics (e.g., duration, currency)
4
DISCOUNT RATE - Discounting to Reflect the Time Value of Money
IFRS 17 does not prescribe a single estimation technique to derive discount rates. However, the standard does specify that a „top- down‟ or „bottom-up‟ approach may be used. In theory, for insurance contracts with cash flows that do not vary based on the performance of the underlying items, both approaches should result in the same discount rate, although differences may arise in practice. The rate shall reflect the time value of money and the financial risks related to those cash flows (ALMA).
Fulfilment cash flows Current discount rates
CSM interest accretion for contracts without direct participation features
Rates determined on initial recognition of the group
Adjustments to the CSM for changes in the fulfilment cash flows for contracts without direct participation features
Rates determined on initial recognition of the group
Adjustments to the CSM for changes in the fulfilment cash flows for direct participating contracts that do not vary based on the returns on underlying items, excluding the change in the effect of the time value of money and financial risks
Current discount rates
For groups applying the PAA, liability for remaining coverage adjustment for the time value of money
Rates determined on initial recognition of the group
Insurance finance income or expenses Discount rate used for disaggregation
Aspect of Measurement Discount Rate
4
Compensation that an entity requires for bearing the uncertainty about the amount and timing of the cash flows that arise as the entity fulfils the insurance contract
RA shall be included in the measurement in an explicit way (i.e. uncertainty should not be included in the future cash flows)
No prescribed technique so different companies may use different techniques
Disclosure on the confidence-level is required if the entity uses a technique other than the confidence level technique
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH - RISK ADJUSTMENT
Contractual service margin
Risk adjustment
Time value of money
Future cash flows
Risk Adjustment
Low frequency but high severity
Knowledge About current
estimate and trend
Duration of Contract
Width of Probability distribution Uncertainty
due to lack Of experience
4
RISK ADJUSTMENT - Risk Adjustment for Non-Financial Risk
Risk Adjustment corresponds to the compensation that an entity requires for bearing the uncertainty about the amounts of and timing cash flows related to non- financial risks inherent in insurance contracts The scope of risks associated with the calculation of the RA covers both insurance risks (e.g. mortality risk, P&C reserve risk, longevity, morbidity) and non-financial risks related to insurance contracts (e.g. lapse risk, surrender risk, and expense risk); operational risk is not included in the RA assessment because by nature it is considered more global.
the IASB proposed 3 approaches to measuring RA:
•the Cost of Capital method,
•the Value at Risk (VaR) - (confidence level)
•the Tail Value at Risk approach (TVaR).
Evaluation of non financial/insurance risks Integrated in the Risk
Adjustment
Evaluation of financial risks Integrated
in the Best Estimate
Risko Asuransi: Risiko, selain risiko keuangan, yang dialihkan dari pemegang kontrak kepada penerbit kontrak. Contoh: – death or survival, injury, illness, disability, loss of property due to damage or theft, and failure of a debtor to make a payment when it is due.
Risiko Keuangan: Risiko akibat kemungkinan perubahan masa depan atas factor”
berikut: interest rates, financial instrument prices, commodity prices, currency exchange rates, indices of prices or rates, and credit ratings or credit indices.
4
At initial recognition, the CSM is defined as the negative of fulfilment cash flow, floored by zero.
Purpose of recognizing a positive initial CSM:
To eliminate any day 1 gains (if initial CSM is positive)
To represents the unearned profit that the entity recognizes as it provides services under the insurance contract
If CSM is floored by zero at inception, the insurance contract is onerous. All loss should be recognized in P&L at inception
Objective of the standard is to:
Provide principles for the measurement of an individual insurance contract, but that in applying the standard an entity could aggregate insurance contracts provided that it meets that objective; and
Onerous contracts should not be aggregated with profit-making contracts
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH - CONTRACTUAL SERVICE MARGIN
Contractual service margin
Risk adjustment
Time value of money
Future cash flows
4
Subsequently, the roll-forward calculation of CSM is summarized as follows:
Locked-in rate at the inception of contract is used for accreting interest.
An entity should recognise the remaining contractual service margin in profit or loss over the coverage period in a systematic way that best reflects the remaining transfer of the services. For contracts with no
participating features, the service represented by the contractual service margin is insurance coverage that:
is provided on the basis of the passage of time; and
reflects the expected number of contracts in force.
CSM at the beginning of the reporting period + Accreted interest
– Amount recognised for services provided in the period +/– Changes in the estimates of future cash flows
+/– Changes in RA relating to future coverage
= CSM at the end of the reporting period Contractual
service margin
Risk adjustment
Time value of money
Future cash flows
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH - CONTRACTUAL SERVICE MARGIN
4
BASIC METHODS IN MEASUREMENT INSURANCE CONTRACT
4
CTPRIMA
Building block approach
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH - INITIAL MEASUREMENT
• Measured at inception as the expected contract profit to be earned as services are fulfilled. It is adjusted for changes in non-financial variables affecting future coverage cash flows. It accretes interest based on day 1 discount rate (locked-in rate)
– Block 4
• An entity-specific assessment of the uncertainty about the
amount and timing of future cash flows – Block 3
• An adjustment that converts future cash flows into current amounts. Discount rates based on market interest rates (currency, duration, liquidity). – Block 2
• Expected (probability-weighted) cash flows from premiums, claims, benefits, expenses and acquisition costs – Block 1
• Contracts are grouped by portfolio, year of sale and one of
the three possible profitability levels
• Profit measured and reported based on the delivery of the “insurance coverage service”
• CSM (“deferred profit”) absorbs assumption changes for future coverage (“unlocking”)
• Discount rates based on market interest rates (currency, duration, liquidity)
• CSM (expected profit) from participating contracts revalued
based on assets.
❶
❷
❸
❹
4
BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH - SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT
The fulfilment cash flows are remeasured at each reporting date to reflect estimates based on current assumptions, applying the same requirements that apply to initial measurement. Changes in estimates of the fulfilment cash flows are reflected in either profit or loss or OCI – or, in some cases, they adjust the CSM – depending on their nature.
Interest is accreted on the carrying amount of the CSM during the reporting period using the discount rate applied on initial recognition to reflect the time value of money. The balance is allocated to profit or loss each reporting period to reflect the provision of insurance contract services in the period
4
CTPRIMA
Exercise
Benefits
2-year term
Single premium of USD 1,000
Sum assured = USD 3,000
Assumption
100 policies sold, with deferrable expenses incurred of USD 10,000
Best estimate assumption: 10 claims each year
Risk adjustment (RA) = USD 2,000
No other cash flows
For simplicity, discount rate = 0%
By applying the building block approach
At issue: Total cash flows = 100 * 1,000 – 10,000 – (10+10) * 3,000 – RA 2,000 = 28,000
Therefore, CSM = 28,000
Under these settings, the total IFRS 17 insurance liability at issue is:
Fulfillment cash outflows = (10+10) * 3,000 + RA 2,000 = 62,000
CSM = 28,000
Total IFRS 17 insurance liability = 62,000 + 28,000 = 90,000
EXERCISE - BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH Case study
4
EXERCISE - BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH Case study
Start of Year 1
Accounting entries:
Dr Cr
1.0 Dr Est. future cashflow (Premium) 100,000
Cr Est Future Cash – Claim 60.000
Cr Est Future Cash - DAC 10.000
Cr CSM 28,000
Cr RA 2,000
(Recognition of est. future cashflow [P - Cl - Co], RA and CSM)
2.0 Dr Cash 100,000
Cr Est. future cashflow 100,000
(Premium received)
3.0 Dr Est. future cashflow - DAC 10,000
Cr Cash 10,000
(Payment of deferrable expenses)
Income statement:
Insurance contracts revenue -
Incurred claims and expenses -
Acquisition costs -
Operating result -
Investment income -
Profit -
Balance sheet:
Assets:
90,000 Cash
Liabilities:
Insurance contract liabilities:
Fulfillment cashflow:
Est. future cashflow 60,000
RA 2,000
CSM 28,000
90,000 Equity:
Profits -
90,000
4
EXERCISE - BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH
Case study
At the end of year 1,
There are 15 claims (as opposed to the 10 claims expected)
The Company re-estimates year 2 claims as 8 cases, down from 10 previously
The updated RA = 1,000
No other assumption changes
Profit driver assumed to be based on no. of policies in- force:
The amortization factor = 28,000 / (90 + 80) = 164.7
Based on the remaining policies at end of year 1 (100– 15), the CSM amortization = 85 * 164.7 = 14,000
However, there is also a favorable assumption
change, where claims are reduced by (10-8) * 3,000
= 6,000
Therefore ending year 1 CSM = 28,000 – 14,000 + 6,000 = 20,000
For end of year 1,
The updated future cash flows = 8 * 3,000 = 24,000
Therefore total IFRS 17 insurance liability
Fulfillment cash flows = 24,000 + RA 1,000 = 25,000
CSM = 20,000
Total IFRS 17 insurance liability = 45,000
4
Case study
End of Year 1
Accounting entries:
Dr Cr
1.0 Dr CSM 14,000
Dr RA 1,000
Dr Est. future cashflow (expected incurred claim)
30,000
Dr Acquisition costs 5,000
Cr Insurance contract revenue 50,000
(Revenue recognition)
2.0 Dr Claims incurred 45,000
Cr Cash 45,000
(Claims recognition)
3.0 Dr Est. future cashflow 6,000
Cr CSM 6,000
(Recognition of impact of favorable change in future claims)
Income statement:
Insurance contracts revenue 50,000
Incurred claims and expenses (45,000)
Acquisition costs (5,000)
Operating result 0
Investment income -
Profit 0
Balance sheet:
Assets:
45,000 Cash
Liabilities:
Insurance contract liabilities:
Fufillment cashflow:
Est. future cashflow 24,000
RA 1,000
CSM 20,000
45,000 Equity:
0 Profits
45,000
EXERCISE - BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH
4
EXERCISE - BUILDING BLOCK APPROACH Case study
End of Year 2
Accounting entries:
Dr Cr
1.0 Dr CSM 20,000
Dr RA 1,000
Dr Est. future cashflow (expected incurred claim)
24,000
Dr Acquisition costs 5,000
Cr Insurance contract revenue 50,000
(Revenue recognition)
2.0 Dr Claims incurred 24,000
Cr Cash 24,000
(Claims recognition)
Income statement:
Insurance contracts revenue 50,000
Incurred claims and expenses (24,000)
Acquisition costs (5,000)
Operating result 21,000
Investment income -
Profit 21,000
Balance sheet:
Assets:
21,000 Cash
Liabilities:
Insurance contract liabilities:
Fufillment cashflow:
Est. future cashflow -
RA -
CSM -
- Equity:
21,000 Profits
21,000
4
Premium allocation approach
CTPRIMA
Subsequent Measurement
• measures the liability for remaining coverage as the amount of premiums received net of acquisition cash flows paid, less the net amount of premiums and acquisition cash flows that have been recognised in profit or loss over the expired portion of the coverage period based on the passage of time.
• assumes that recognising the contract‟s premium over the coverage period provides similar information and profit patterns to those provided by recognising insurance contract revenue measured using the general measurement model.
PREMIUM ALLOCATION APPROACH
4
Reasonable approximation
of the group measurement using the core requirements?
Coverage period of each contract
in the group
<= 1 year?
NO NO
YES YES
Must apply core
requirements May apply premium
allocation approach
PREMIUM ALLOCATION APPROACH - ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
4
A B
IFRS 17 Liability
A. Simplified measurement
B. Measurement under the general model, but discounting of claims to be settled within 1 year not required
PV of future
cash flows Risk adjustment PV of future
cash flows
Risk adjustment
Contractual service margin
Split in three blocks not required
Liability for incurred claims Liability for
remaining coverage
PREMIUM ALLOCATION APPROACH - Simplifications for short-term contracts
4
UNDERSTANDING LEVEL OF AGGREGATION
4
UNDERSTANDING LEVEL OF AGGREGATION
4
UNDERSTANDING LEVEL OF AGGREGATION
4
UNDERSTANDING LEVEL OF AGGREGATION
4
EXERCISE PAA - 1Y PROTECTION GROUP CONTRACT
Contoh Kasus 1 Y Group Protection Contract
3/12 x 1000 6% CI
4
Mid year reporting ending Dec x1 Jun x2 Dec x2
Reporting Periode 1 2 3
Premium Received 1,200 - - Direct Acq Expense (50) - - Claims settled - - (900) Cash In 1,150 - (900) Cash Balance End 1,150 1,150 250 Claims Incurred 250 500 150 Risk Adjustment 15 20 30 40 (45) (60) Group of contracts Info
Issue 1 Oct x1
coverage 12 months
end 30 Sep x2
Report YE Dec
Interim 30 of June
Assumptions at initial
Receive premium 1200 (*)
pay direct Acq cost 50 (*)
Claim & risk even
Expected claim 1000
Risk on claim 8%
lapse none
Claims settled 900 in Nov x2
(*) immediate after initial recognition
6%
EXERCISE PAA - 1Y PROTECTION GROUP CONTRACT
Contoh Kasus 1 Y Group Protection Contract
Financial Statement
Dec x1 Jun x2 Dec x2
Insurance contract liability as of 1,165 1,095 -
LIC 265 795 -
LRC 900 300 -
BS
Cash 1,150 1,150 250
Insurance contract liability (1,165) (1,095) -
Equity (15) 55 250
P&L
Insurance revenue (par. B126) 300 600 300 Insurance expense (par. 59a) (315) (530) (105) Profit (loss) (15) 70 195
Reconciliation
Dec x1 Jun x2 Dec x2
Liability for remaining coverage
Opening balance - 900 300
Cash inflows 1,200 - -
Insurance revenue (300) (600) (300) Closing balance 900 300 - Liability for incurred claims
Opening balance - 265 795 Estimates of the present value of
future cash flows 250 500 150 Risk adjustment for
non-financial risk 15 30 (45)
Settlement - - (900)
Closing balance 265 795 - Insurance service expenses 315 530 105 Estimates of the present value
of future cash flows 265 530 105 Expense paid 50 - -
UPR + PDR PDR=0 Claim Reserve + risk adjustment
4
Gap analysis report
CTPRIMA
I. Latar belakang dan Tujuan
a. Latar Belakang – Mengapa Aspek Akuaria penting
b. Tujuan – Melihat kondisi saat ini dengan persyaratan IFRS 17 (By product, Portfolio ??) II. Pendekatan dan Metodologi – (i) Analisis product spect (ii) review asumsi dan
metodologi (iii) SAP-OJK
III. Analisis kesenjangan PSAK 74 VS PSAK 62 dan 28 – Aspek Aktuaria
a. Persyaratan Utama PSAK 74 : Definisi kontrak asuransi, Penggabungan/ pemisahan kontrak asuransi, Pemisahan komponen non-asuransi, Pengakuan kontrak asuransi, Arus kas akuisisi asuransi, Modifikasi kontrak dan akuntansi untuk penghentian pengakuan, Tingkat agregasi (LoA), Kontrak yang merugi (Onerous), Batasan kontrak, Model Pengukuran Umum (GMM), Tingkat diskonto, Penyesuaian risiko untuk risiko nonkeuangan, Marjin Jasa Kontraktual (CSM), Pengukuran selanjutnya, Pendekatan Alokasi Premi (PAA), Akuntansi untuk kontrak reasuransi milikan – pengukuran, Penyajian dan pengungkapan.
GAP ANALYSIS REPORT – ACTUARIAL ASPECT
4
GAP ANALYSIS REPORT – ACTUARIAL ASPECT
III. Analisis kesenjangan PSAK 74 – Aspek Aktuaria (lanjutan)
b. Penjelasan rinci Analisis Kesenjangan – (Persyaratan PSAK 74) C. Implikasi
IV. Saran dan Rekomendasi V. Lampiran
VI. Referensi
4
IFRS STANDARD CURRENT PRACTICES Paragraph 25: a group of insurance contracts:
i. The beginning of the coverage period of the group of contracts;
ii. The date on which the first payment from a policyholder in the group becomes due; and
iii. For a group of onerous contracts, when the group becomes onerous.
Paragraph 26: If there is no contractual due date, the first payment from the policyholder is deemed to be due when it is received.
Receive premiums before the start of the insurance coverage provided by a written contract
Some GI contracts, such as open marine contracts, have no coverage commencement date
IMPLICATION
IFRS 17 is a departure from current practice where only premiums from commenced contracts are accounted as revenue o Revenue recognition will have to be changed and premiums received for pre-commenced contracts will be excluded:
Some insurance contracts, such as open marine contracts, can lead to recognition difficulties as date of coverage commencement may not be immediately apparent
Contracts should not be recognized for advanced premiums and post-dated premiums in the profit and loss statement until the beginning of the coverage period
GAP ANALYSIS REPORT – ACTUARIAL ASPECT Contract Recognition
4
IFRS STANDARD CURRENT PRACTICES
• Paragraph 36: An entity shall adjust the estimates of future cash flows to reflect the time value of money and the financial risks related to those cash flows, to the extent that the financial risks are not included in the estimates of cash flows.
• Paragraph 56: The entity is not required to adjust the carrying amount of the liability for remaining coverage to reflect the time value of money and the effect of financial risk if, at initial recognition, the entity expects that the time between providing each part of the coverage and the related premium due date is no more than a year.
• Currently, many general insurers estimate the insurance liabilities on an undiscounted basis
IMPLICATION
• PAA Cohorts : If future cash flows are expected to be paid or received one year after the date the claims are incurred, discounting is required for the liability for incurred claims
• Materiality : (i) Develop methodology and processes to demonstrate the materiality of discounting, (ii) Develop threshold for materiality.
(iii) Communication with the external auditor
• Others :Decision on the accounting policy to present the effects of changes in discount rates either in (1) profit or loss, or (2) disaggregated between profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
GAP ANALYSIS REPORT – ACTUARIAL ASPECT Discount Rate
4
• IT Systems Requirements
• IFRS 17 IT Gap Analysis
Section 5 – Impact of IFRS for IT
IT Systems Requirements
CTPRIMA
NEW SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS
1. Master data management
Data preparation, data validation, posting and reporting capability. Facilitating significant volumes of data feeds and storage, integrate with general ledgers and actuarial models to load and post data.
Audit trail availability.
2. Process Organization
Ability to orchestrate end-to-end workflows with clear reporting processes, ability to perform
adjustments and audit data inputs, outputs and any manual interventions.
3. Calculation engine
Powerful enough to process a significant volume of information, with the ability to trace and document calculation inputs and outputs in detail. includes best estimate cashflows, the risk adjustment and the CSM at inception and subsequent measurements
4. Rules engine
Needs predefined rules that can integrate with data management to generate posting. The engine must be easy to deploy and able to accommodate your custom posting rules
5. Reporting
Ready for both predefined and ad hoc reports.
Page 71
5
DATA MANAGEMENT
Data Availability
Sufficient Granularity?
Cleansing?
Reference Data Ready for Enrichment?
Data Management Process in Place?
Page 72
5
DATA PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
Claim Exp Marketing
Underwriting
Premium
Reinsurance
Investment
Commission
Claim Core Processes
Expenses Investment
Cession Cash Flow
Policy
Legacy System?
Collection
Data Process
Cleansing
Validation Enrichment
Internal Data Semi-Private
Data Public Data
Claim Exp Expenses Investment
Cession Cash Flow
Policy Cleansed
Transformation Engine
Reference Data Management
Actuarial
Risk Valuation
Expected Cashflow Actual Cashflow
Expenses Insurance Acquisition Cashflow
Reserve DLL
CSM
Journal Entries
Report Feed back Prospective
Simulation
Page 73
5
PROCESS INTEGRATION
Marketing Underwriting Premium Collection
Reinsurance Investment
Claim
Financial / Accounting IFRS17
Actuarial
INSURANCE BUSINESS CYCLES What to Focus?
Actuarial Financial
Operational
Page 74
5
IFRS 17 PROGRAM
Page 75
5
CALCULATION SYSTEM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
Calculation System Quality
Requirements
Page 76
5
MORE THAN A COMPLIANCE EXERCISE
Key challenges faced by industry and actuaries
Implementation Challenges
Commercial Challenges
Page 77
5
INTEGRATION OF A MULTI – DISCIPLINARY TEAM
Page 78
5
IFRS 17 IT Gap Analysis
CTPRIMA
PROSES GAP ANALYSIS
Define Future State
Review Current
State Identify Gap
Outline Resolutions &
Timeline
Page 80
5
Target
Operating Model
Business Target Operating Model
Calculation procedures Level of Integration
Process outline
Planning
Data
Data Component Availability Reference Data Data Management
Granularity Data quality
System &
Procedure
Capability
Data & System Architecture
Operating Procedure Adjustment
Project Management
Infrastructure
Capability Infrastructure
Component Architecture Performance
Continuity management
GAP ANALYSIS POINTS
Page 81
5
1 2 3 4
TARGET OPERATING MODEL
Policy Grouping
Profitability Calculation: Full Retro? Modified?
Fair value?