• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Analysis and Optimization of Stress Wave Propagation in Two-Dimensional Granular Crystals with Defects

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Analysis and Optimization of Stress Wave Propagation in Two-Dimensional Granular Crystals with Defects"

Copied!
163
0
0

Teks penuh

The top panel shows the acceleration in the x direction for one of the two affected particles. The middle panel shows the y-acceleration of the four particles in the top half of the target region.

Motivation

In this introduction, we describe the motivation for this work, our goals and achievements, provide a general description of granular crystals, followed by a brief historical overview of previous work in the field, and finally present the organization of this dissertation. Some of the most common methods currently used to dampen shock and vibration include damping (including but not limited to the use of polymer foams) [1], harmonic absorbers [2] and viscous dampers (such as in a typical door closer) between other examples.

Goals and achievements

Here, we performed systematic numerical simulations and experiments to investigate the effect of the material properties (elastic modulus and mass) of an interstitial spherical intruder placed at the center of a 2D square packing subjected to impact. The advantages and disadvantages of gradient methods over heuristics are discussed in [20].

Granular Crystals

Hertzian Contact and Nonlinearity

The nonlinearity in this case arises from the geometry of the contact and the dramatic increase of the contact area with the compression force. It is this intrinsic nonlinearity of the contact interaction that explains the nonlinearity of the granular crystals described in this thesis.

Dynamical Regimes and Example of the 1D Homogeneous Chain 7

MacKay published a rigorous mathematical proof of the existence of the predicted solitary wave [39] based on the existence theorem of Friesecke and Wattis for localized traveling waves in 1D lattices with nearest neighbor interactions [40]. Job and collaborators studied various aspects of the propagation of highly nonlinear solitary waves in 1D granular crystals.

Figure 1.1: 1D homogeneous chain of spherical particles statically precompressed.
Figure 1.1: 1D homogeneous chain of spherical particles statically precompressed.

Conceptual Organization of This Thesis

Square Packings, Equipartition Experiment and Hexagonal Pack-

  • Experimental Setup 1: Square Packing
  • Experimental Setup 2: Equipartition
  • Experimental Setup 3: Hexagonal Packing

A first experimental setup was designed to investigate the propagation of stress waves in a 2D square packing of defect particles. Finally, a third experimental structure was designed and printed to assemble the hexagonal packings studied in Chapters 5 and 6.

Custom-Made Accelerometer Sensors

A stiff epoxy was used to glue the accelerometer into the drilled particle to maintain the bulk stiffness of the sensor particle. Photo of the accelerometer. right) Photograph of a steel sensor particle (accelerometer embedded in a drilled steel sphere).

Figure 2.3: Experimental setup designed for the equipartition experiment (chapter 4).
Figure 2.3: Experimental setup designed for the equipartition experiment (chapter 4).

Data Acquisition and Post-Processing Apparatus

In 2D experiments, we can access the acceleration at four locations simultaneously (each channel corresponds to the x or y component of the acceleration of the sensor particle). Accessing wave propagation data at more than four locations simultaneously (see for example Chapter 4) requires multiple runs to be performed with the same time reference.

Figure 2.6: Block diagram of the organization of the data acquisition devices.
Figure 2.6: Block diagram of the organization of the data acquisition devices.

Numerical Setups

Numerical Modeling and Integration Schemes

A spherical interstitial intruder is placed in the center of the packing and the system is impacted from the left by an impact particle.

Integration Schemes

R(u,u) =¨ Mu¨+S(u)−Fex= 0, (2.2) where R is the residual vector, M is the positive definite symmetric mass matrix, u and ¨u are the displacement and acceleration nodal vectors, Fext is the external nodal force vector and S(u) represents the internal nodal force vector. A time step of 1×10−6 s is sufficient to ensure conservation of the total energy with a similar accuracy to the Runge-Kutta solver.

Effect of Dissipation

As disorder increases, the system's propagation capacity becomes saturated and the wave becomes completely delocalized. It turns out that the stiffer the defect, the more it promotes the redistribution of energy in the system.

Experimental and Numerical Setups

After the interaction of the incoming solitary wave with the fault, transmitted, reflected and scattered solitary waves are visible. In both cases, the solid blue curve represents the displacement of the defect particle in the x direction, while the dashed green curve represents the displacement of the same particle in the y direction.

Figure 3.1: Schematic diagrams of the different system configurations studied. 3.1(a) Single defect case: a spherical intruder (black particle) is included in the center of a 20 by 20 square packing composed of stainless steel spheres confined by four delr
Figure 3.1: Schematic diagrams of the different system configurations studied. 3.1(a) Single defect case: a spherical intruder (black particle) is included in the center of a 20 by 20 square packing composed of stainless steel spheres confined by four delr

Single Defect

  • Single Steel Defect
  • Single PTFE Defect
  • Relative Displacements
  • Effect of Density
  • Rigid Body Collision Model

The relative displacements of the defective particle with its neighbors are shown in detail in Fig. This translation is followed by small oscillations of the fault between its upper left and.

Figure 3.4: Single stainless steel defect configuration, impacted by a stainless steel sphere of diameter 19.05 mm, with initial velocity 0.19 m/s
Figure 3.4: Single stainless steel defect configuration, impacted by a stainless steel sphere of diameter 19.05 mm, with initial velocity 0.19 m/s

Two Defects

Two Defects in Contact with the Same Particle

This can be seen by comparing the displacement of the first indenter in the x-direction with the displacement of a single defect occupying the same spacing (see Figure 3.9). We calculate numerically how the input energy is redistributed across the different chains of the system.

Rigid Body Collision Model

We find that the corresponding analysis is instructive as a lower bound of the corresponding energy partition that satisfies the transmitted fraction of 87.17%. The colors and labels of the particles correspond to the colors and labels of the acceleration curves in panels 3.11(c) and 3.11(b).

Figure 3.11: Comparison of the output accelerations observed experimentally 3.11(c) and numerically 3.11(b) for the configuration 3.11(a) when two tungsten carbide  in-truders are located eight interstitial sites apart in a steel square packing impacted by
Figure 3.11: Comparison of the output accelerations observed experimentally 3.11(c) and numerically 3.11(b) for the configuration 3.11(a) when two tungsten carbide in-truders are located eight interstitial sites apart in a steel square packing impacted by

Two Defects in a Line

An example is given in Fig.3.10 where we compare the waveforms of the acceleration signal in the "sticky" chain five particles after the intruder (solid red curve) and nine particles after the defect (black square markers). We notice that the shapes of the two signals (numerical solution and analytical solution) are very close.

Summmary

When placed closer to each other, the two defects begin to interact and the behavior of the second defect becomes more complicated, as its interaction with the transmitted (fast) wave and the scattered (slow) wave in the adjacent chain overlap. A soft defect particle spatially localizes a small percentage of the energy input to the crystal as it oscillates between its nearest neighbors.

Figure 3.12: Comparison of the output accelerations observed experimentally 3.12(c) and numerically 3.12(b) for the configuration 3.12(a) when two tungsten carbide intruders are located ten interstitial sites apart in a steel square packing impacted by a s
Figure 3.12: Comparison of the output accelerations observed experimentally 3.12(c) and numerically 3.12(b) for the configuration 3.12(a) when two tungsten carbide intruders are located ten interstitial sites apart in a steel square packing impacted by a s

Experimental Setups

This phenomenon is of interest in the creation of new acoustic waveguides, delay lines and strain-relieving materials. In the case of coupled Toda lattices, it was shown numerically that solitonic excitations applied to each of the coupled chains can result in the two different dynamical regimes (attractors) [127].

Numerical Setup

In both experiments, the system was impacted on one side by a steel impactor particle identical to those that made up the square packing, and custom-fabricated sensor particles were used to access the acceleration at each site of interest in the crystal (particles of red in Fig. 4.1). The sensor particles and data acquisition devices are described in detail in Sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3 respectively.

Results and Discussion

Monomer Configuration

This corresponds to ≈4% of the kinetic energy, neglecting energy leakage in the transverse direction. Conversely, the amplitude of the wave propagating in the absorbing circuit increases from zero to the same level as the signal in the excited circuit.

Figure 4.1: Schematic diagram of the experimental setups for 4.1(a) the monomer configuration and 4.1(b) the dimer configuration
Figure 4.1: Schematic diagram of the experimental setups for 4.1(a) the monomer configuration and 4.1(b) the dimer configuration

Dimer Configuration

The black horizontal lines show the stabilized amplitude of the main acceleration pulse (≈ 800 m/s2 in numerical simulations and 400 m/s2 in experiments).

Figure 4.3: Acceleration-time diagrams showing the evolution of the transmitted signal in the two chains of particles adjacent to the line of intruders for the dimer configuration, along the x direction
Figure 4.3: Acceleration-time diagrams showing the evolution of the transmitted signal in the two chains of particles adjacent to the line of intruders for the dimer configuration, along the x direction

Simplified 1.5D Modelization and Comparison with Full 2D System . 67

In both graphs, the curves are obtained from the 2D model, while the (purple) stars indicate the peak amplitudes of the corresponding signals obtained from the 1.5D model. The second part of the work presented in this chapter consists of implementing a similar optimization scheme that optimally selects the material properties of each particle in the hexagonal packing.

Figure 4.4: x-velocity vs time signals obtained for the 1.5D model with linear damping coefficient λ equal to 0.006
Figure 4.4: x-velocity vs time signals obtained for the 1.5D model with linear damping coefficient λ equal to 0.006

Model

Optimization Problem

  • General Formulation of the Optimization Problem
  • Design Variable and Regularization Techniques
  • Constraints
  • Sensitivity Analysis

The evaluation of the response derivative terms Du(n), Dv(n) and Da(n) is more complicated due to the implicit dependence of the response variables on the design vector. In 5.2(b) we maximize the average energy reaching the two middle parts of the side walls.

Fig. 5.1 summarizes the organization of the numerical setup. After selecting an arbitrary initial design vector, we enter the optimization loop
Fig. 5.1 summarizes the organization of the numerical setup. After selecting an arbitrary initial design vector, we enter the optimization loop

Numerical Results

Topology Optimizations (Intruder Problem)

  • Test Cases: Dispersion and Deflection Problems
  • Other Examples: Layered Design, “3-Phase” Material

We plot the total peak energy (ie the maximum over the number of elements in the target area) as a function of time. The labeling and coloring of each curve correspond to the labeling and coloring of the box of the different configurations around the plot.

Figure 5.3: Numerical study for the dispersion problem. We plot the peak total energy (i.e
Figure 5.3: Numerical study for the dispersion problem. We plot the peak total energy (i.e

Material Problem

On the other hand, part of the incoming energy will be reflected at a light/heavy interface. We noticed that the optimizer performs better for low values ​​of the initial design vector.

Figure 5.6: Schematic diagrams of the three material optimization problems inves- inves-tigated
Figure 5.6: Schematic diagrams of the three material optimization problems inves- inves-tigated

Experimental Results

Experimental Setups

The next section describes the experimental setups and presents experimental reproduction of some of the optimized designs. The top panel shows the acceleration in both the x and y directions for one of the two affected particles.

Figure 5.10: Comparison of the experimental acceleration vs time signals with the numerically obtained ones for the constrained dispersion problem 5.10(a)
Figure 5.10: Comparison of the experimental acceleration vs time signals with the numerically obtained ones for the constrained dispersion problem 5.10(a)

Comparison and Discussion

  • Topology Optimizations (Intruder Problem)
  • Material Problem

The upper panel shows the acceleration in the x direction for one of the two affected particles. The bottom panels show the acceleration in the y direction for the four particles in the upper half of the target area.

Figure 5.11: Comparison of the experimental acceleration vs time signals with the numerically obtained ones for the constrained deflection problem 5.11(a)
Figure 5.11: Comparison of the experimental acceleration vs time signals with the numerically obtained ones for the constrained deflection problem 5.11(a)

Conclusion

In both 5.14(b) and 5.14(c), each panel shows the acceleration of the corresponding labeled and colored particle in 5.14(a). In both 5.15(b) and 5.15(c), each panel shows the acceleration of the corresponding labeled and colored particle in 5.15(a).

Figure 5.14: Comparison of the experimental acceleration vs time signals with the numerical ones for the second sample problem (minimization of the peak energy at the center) 5.14(a)
Figure 5.14: Comparison of the experimental acceleration vs time signals with the numerical ones for the second sample problem (minimization of the peak energy at the center) 5.14(a)

Introduction

A Comparative Study of Material Optimization of Grain Crystals Using the Gradient Method and the Breeder Genetic Algorithm. Non-gradient-based (or heuristic) methods (see, among other examples, evolutionary computation of simulated annealing genetic algorithms) are well suited to problems where the solution space is multidimensional, multimodal, discontinuous, and noisy [159].

Model at Hand and Optimization Techniques

Numerical Modeling

In this chapter, we compare two approaches (BGA and gradient-based method), both used in previous studies for the optimal design of granular crystals [9]. More specifically, we compare the design and suitability obtained by performing material optimizations on 2D hexagonal gaskets.

Optimization Problem and Approaches

  • Gradient-Based Method
  • Breeder Genetic Algorithm

We are looking for discrete designs and xi is bound to take one of the two values ​​xmin or xmax. To create the other λ−1 individuals of the new generation, parents are selected among the best µ individuals according to a uniform probability distribution, and recombined by means of an Extended Intermediate Recombination (EIT) scheme.

Optimized Designs and Dynamic Responses

Interpretation of the Optimized Designs

In each version, the black particles are made of steel and the white particles are made of PTFE. When maximizing the energy on the sides (see Figure 6.4), both solutions are very similar and place two lines of steel particles that directly connect the point of impact with the centers of the target areas where the energy is expected to be maximum.

Figure 6.4: Comparison of the designs (top) and evolution of the fitness (bottom) obtained using the penalized gradient-based method (left) and the breeder genetic algorithm (right) when maximizing the energy at the sides (v striker = 0.155 m/s)
Figure 6.4: Comparison of the designs (top) and evolution of the fitness (bottom) obtained using the penalized gradient-based method (left) and the breeder genetic algorithm (right) when maximizing the energy at the sides (v striker = 0.155 m/s)

Comparison and Discussion

Performance

This seems to indicate that most local optima of the design space have comparable performance to the global solution. The solid blue curve shows the response of the solution obtained via the BGA approach and the dotted green curve shows the response of the solution obtained via the gradient-based approach.

Computational Time

This should be compared to the number of transient and sensitivity analyzes performed in the gradient-based approach Niteration×(1 +M)T, where M is the number of design variables and constraints and in our study is typically equal to 0.004. The number of design variables N is equal to 33 for the material optimization problems we consider.

Figure 6.7: Evolution of the peak energy over the target area (approximated by the p-norm of the total energy) as a function of time for the material optimization problem consisting in maximizing the peak total energy at the side walls
Figure 6.7: Evolution of the peak energy over the target area (approximated by the p-norm of the total energy) as a function of time for the material optimization problem consisting in maximizing the peak total energy at the side walls

Summary

Daraio, “Internal energy localization through discrete gap breathing in one-dimensional diatomic granular crystals,” Phys. Vakakis, “Traveling waves and localized modes in one-dimensional homogeneous grain chains without precompression,” Phys.

Gambar

Figure 2.1: Particles used in the various experiments. From left to right: PTFE cylindrical stand, tungsten carbide 3.943 mm radius spherical intruder, steel 3.943 mm radius spherical intruder, brass 3.943 mm radius spherical intruder, PTFE 3.943 mm radius
Figure 2.2: Experimental setup designed for 2D granular crystals (chapters 3, 4 and 5).
Figure 2.6: Block diagram of the organization of the data acquisition devices.
Figure 3.3: Numerical results showing the displacement of the defect particle as a function of time when it is made of 3.3(a) PTFE and 3.3(b) stainless steel
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The results of this study are expected to add insight into knowledge and experience which is very important in describing the implementation of Project-based Learning using Instagram