LAO REFUGEE WOMEN
TAKE CONTROL
by Ruth
KrulfeldHow do
refugeecommunities
mobilize, organize,and
negotiatepower
within theirnew dominant
societies?The answer
is especially important in this timeof widespread xenophobia;
funding cuts;and
legislationagainstlegal
and undocumented
refugees, immigrants, migrant workers,and
their children.Refugees
losepower through
forcible uprooting, interim resettlement,and
eventual resettling innew
societies.
Under
these circumstances, refugeescome
withlimited abilitiestocope and
oftenend up
inthelowest social
and economic
strataof
society.When self-empowerment
occurs, it hasfar-reachingconsequences
for self-esteem, self-determination,and
accessto statusand
resources.This article focuses
on
refugeewomen and
theirself-empowerment through
the formationof
anew
organization for
women, The Lao-American Women's
Association(LAW
A).My
research with theLao community began
in 1981.Understanding
the constructionof
organizations for self-empowerment
has implications not only foracademic
research but also for public policy, provisionof
service,and human
rights.LAWA
LAW A began
asan
ideaaround
1993; in1995
the associationwas
granted non-profit status.LAWA
is crucial to self-protection as well as self- actualization.
Lao women,
although influential within thehome,
are disadvantaged in the public sphere,where any power
theymay have
is usually covert.One of
the officersof
thewomen's
organization explained thatwomen had
to raise men's self-esteemby
publiclyshowing
deferencetothem, and even performing
public ritualsof
self-deprecationrelative to
men. Another
officer listednumerous
casesof
deferentialtreatmentof men
hereand
in Laos,such
as themonthly
offeringsof
flowersand
incensewomen
traditionallymade
inLaos
in supplication—or, as she put it, "worship,"-- to their husbands. In Laos, thehusband
attendedPTA
meetings,always
representing the family outsidethehome. According
togender cosmology
in
Lao Buddhism, women must be
rebornasmen
inorder
tobecome monks,
thusmaximizing
theirchances
to attainboth
great social statusand
enlightenment.In mobilizing
women
toform LAWA
after resettlement, thewomen
challenged thesegender
restrictions—and confronted opposition. Since the plannersand workers
in thisnew
organization allholdatleast
one— and sometimes two
ormore—full- timejobs,have
familiesand
great socialdemands on
their time, their
involvement
in thisnew
organization represents
both
daringand commitment. Such involvement
iseven more
significant
because
challengingtraditional status isvery
uncomfortable
in a society inwhich non-
confrontation is so highlyvalued— more
so forwomen.
Focus of Research
My
research focusedon
several questions: 1)Why
did these
Lao women
decide to organizeand continue
inthe faceof
strong opposition; 2)What was
the oppositionand why
did itoccur; 3)Which
influences
promoted
this organization; 4)Were
there
any
precedents for it; 5)Why
did itoccur
when
it did; 6)What problems
aroseboth
internallyand
externally;and
7)What was
theimpact of
the organizationon both women who
joinedand
theLao community?
New
organizationssuch
asLAWA
are likely tobegin
only after refugeeshave
acquiredsuch
necessities as learning anew
language, job skills, housing,and
financial security, permittingthem
to concentrateon
lessimmediatelydemanding
matters.LAWA was
started 16 to20
years after initialresettlement
by most Lao
refugees.Addressing Community Problems
Who
beginssuch an
organizationand why? The
organizersof LAWA were
interested in attaining public prestigeand self-empowerment and
alleviating certain
community
problems. Prior toLAWA
the organizations in this enclave refugeesociety
were male-run~most of them
highly politicizedand
in conflict.There had been twelve opposed
political parties in this relatively small population, all with theagenda of
reclaiming theLao government and each with
a different ideaof what
todo
with itwhen
they got it back.Mobilization forthese men's politicalorganizations
began
early on.They were
recentlyformed
intoone
largeassociation, with aboard and membership comprised of men, under which
allLao
organizations
were
tobe subsumed. Even
thePTA
was
male-run.The
political conflictsbetween such
organizationsand
the battles for personalpower between men
limitedmost
other activity forcommunity
causes, except that already in-place,such
as traditional cooperation to organize celebrationsand
rituals.The women
felt that thecommunity was now
established
enough
thatmajor problems
shouldbe
addressed.The
existingmale-run Lao
organizationswere doing no more
thantalkingabout
problems.The women
feltmotivated
to take actionon
such issues as isolationand
alienationamong
theLao
elderly, the threat
of
lossof Lao
culture, the generationgap between
childrenwho spoke
only Englishand numerous Lao
parentsand
grandparentswho
eitherspoke no
English orbarelyunderstood
itand who
did notunderstand
the culture inwhich
their children
were growing
up.Health
issueswere
also aconcern, as
was domestic
abuse, alcoholism, gangs,and
childreninprison.As
social servicesand
outsidefundinghave become
increasingly restricted, thewomen
felt thecommunity had
tobreak
the patternof dependency
thathad become
established formany
Lao. So,community
concernsand
lackof
actionby
male-run organizationsprovided theinitialimpetus
forLao women
to mobilize.Women Take Action
The LAWA board members
turnedtheirattention to the following:1)
Running
theLao language and
culture school for thepurposes of
preservingLao
culture, reducing inter-generational conflict, givingLao
children a senseof
ethnic identityand
self-esteem,and
reducing involvement of youth
ingangs and
other dysfunctionalbehavior.2) Publishing
and
circulating a newsletter, with informationon
immigration, citizenship, health, resources for the elderly, schools,SAT exams, advanced placement
courses,and women's
conferences.Also
includedwas
recognitionof
studentswho make
honors, stay in schooland
graduate;women who
obtaindegrees;and Lao who
achieve
honors
inthewider
society.3)
As
farastimeand
resourcespermit, visitingand cooking
for the elderly, the ill,and
providing transportationto doctors.4)
At
theirgeneralmeeting
inNovember
1996, thewomen
plannedto enlargetheirmandate
to include organizingmonthly meals and meetings
forLao
elderly
and
arranging transportation for them.Because of
increasingproblems
foraliens obtaining welfareand
health benefits, thewomen
decided to provideclassestopreparepeople
forthe citizenshipexam. They
will also coordinate transportationto classand
to theImmigrant and
Naturalization Services(INS)
forthosewho need
it.They voted
to setup
a telephone hotline toremind women
inthe
community
todo monthly
breast examinationsand have
annualpap
smears.They
also decided to teachLao
cooking,taking turnsin holding classesinmembers' homes.
Running
theLao language and
culture school constitutes amajor
drainon
timeand
resources, especially since the fivemost
highlycommitted
women, who now
constitute theLAWA
board,do
allthe coordinating
and most of
thework,
with only sporadic helpfrom
the other32 women
in theassociation.
Precedents
Sincethe
women
maintain contactwith familyand
friends inLaos, influences
from
thatcountryand
the Laotian diasporaalso help explainwhy
thesewomen
mobilized for
power. The
traditionof women
in social action, although restricted in the public sphere,was
not altogether lacking inLaos
before refugee resettlement.Although
afew women had
thecombination of
boldness, education,and
elite status tohave
their ideas heardand
accepted,such gender power was
highly restricted.A women's
organization in Laos,begun
as an auxiliary in the 1930s,cooked
forLao
soldiers duringthewar
forLao independence from
France. This organization only gained independent statusand government
recognition as theWomen's Union
after thecommunist
revolution. Itsmembers now work
inwhat Lao women
heretermed
"the quietway
thatLao women
have" tocampaign
againstpolygyny
in Laos.They
alsohave
submitted agrant proposalto the InternationalVoluntary
Service for training volunteers to educate the public inLaos about AIDS. One of
the leadersof
thewomen's
organization here,who
is aboard member of IVS,
translated their proposal.American and world concern over women's
statusand
access to publicpower
probably hashad
aneven
greater affecton
these refugeewomen. One
recently received her
B.A.
with a certificate inwomen's
studiesfrom an American
university.Although
initially shewas
reluctant tobecome
involvedwith
LAW
A,because of
time pressuresof
studyand
family, she eventually decided shewanted
to contributeto her
community and took
apositionof
leadership in the organization.She produces
LAWA's
newsletter,which
shesends not only to theLao community
but toLao
allover
theworld.Two
olderelitewomen have
exercisedsome degree of
overtpower and
continue towork
individually forcommunity
action.However, LAWA was
established
and
is ledby women
withoutsuch
eliteconnections. Their lack
of
high social status intheenclave
community slowed
the progressof
thecommunity
inacceptingthenew
organization,and
did little to protectthem from
theiropposition's criticismsand
accusations.However,
theboard members
believe that the olderelite feministshave too
little contactwith thecurrent situation hereto act as leadersof
thisnew
refugeeorganization.Obstacles
Obstacles
have come from
within thecommunity.
On numerous
occasions hate mailwas
sent to thewhole Lao community
accusing theboard members of
thewomen's
associationof
beingcommunists and working
fortheembassy. Thisattackwas
carefully constructed to turn a refugeecommunity
thathad
suffered greatlyat thehands of communists
against theorganizationand
itsorganizers, despitethelackof
basis forthese accusations.These
letters,which named names and sometimes
includedcrude
caricatures,were always
sent out to theLao community
at the time thewomen's
organization publicizedmajor
initiatives.For
example, thewomen
mailed flyers to thecommunity on
theregistrationdatesforthe
Lao
school, oron
a fund- raising party they hosted, orwhen
they sent invitationsto thewomen of
thecommunity
to attend thefirstgeneralmeeting
sincetheirinitial mobiliza- tion. Inone
hate mailing, theLAWA
insigniawithits
drawing of
a traditionally cladLao woman
encircled
by
thename of
the organizationwas
replaced
with
thecommunist
symbol.Another
mailing callingthem "communist
bitches"was
circulated before the
second
registration period at the school.In
my
interviewswith Lao men,
Iwas
told that thesewomen were working
againstthe established organizations,and
that theyought
towork
within organizationsthatwere
already in place insteadof
duplicating effort.Some men
said that theyhad heard
awful thingsabout
thesewomen and
their organization.Two men
toldme
thatLAWA was
really a
pawn of
theembassy and
that theboard members were communist,
explaininghow
awful thatisforpeoplewho
sufferedsomuch
atthehands of
thecommunists. The women
toldme
that themen "want us
towork
forthem
silently in thebackground and
they'lltakecredit foreverythingwe
do,justastheyusually do.
We
refusedtobe
partof
that, although
we
did itby
sayingwe would be
glad to helpthem
inany way
possible."Two
leadersof
thewomen's
organizationfeltthatthe officialsof
themale-run Lao
organizationwere
continually trying to co-opt them, sinceboth women— one of whom
is likelytobe
votedthenextpresidentof
thewoman's
organization—were
offered anofficial position inthe male-runorganization.Both
refused, feeling that itwas done
to sabotageLAWA. Many of
themen
forbadetheir
wives
togo
toLAWA
meetings orjoinLAWA. Given
theLao
valueon avoidance of
confrontation, the tacticsemployed by
thesemen
have
been somewhat
effectiveinkeeping some Lao away from
thewomen's
organizationand
its projects.The Lao
school initiallybecame
divided withLAWA
in chargeof one day of
classesand
amale- run organization takingover
thesecond
day.Conflicts
between them caused one
leader to resignand
declare thathe was
voting to give thewhole
schoolover
to thewomen
to run, so thattheotherman would have
towork under
femalejurisdiction.Basically, the
women
already controlledthe school.The power
playhis action involvedwas obvious
to thewomen who
continuetosponsor
the school. It is interesting to note thatwhen
themale
leader resigned,he took with him
themany
childrenof
his friendsand
relativeswho had
previouslybeen
enrolled.His
resignation coincided with acommunity-wide rumor
that the entire schoolhad
closed. This precipitated a crisisof
declining enrollment,which
thewomen
creatively handledthrough
anew way of
attracting children to the school. Enrollmentrosefrom
alow of
5 students in1996
to26 by
theend of
thelastacademic
year.Perserverence and Results
Despite
problems such
assome
interpersonal conflictamong members, discouragement
at lackof more immediate community-wide acceptance and
appreciation fortheir efforts, thescarcityof
fundingand
otherresources, attempts to co-opt them,and
the debasing criticism theyhave
suffered, thewomen's commitment
has continued.They keep
trying towiden
theirmandate
to alleviate other seriousproblems
thatplague
theLao community.
The women gave
severalreasonsforpersevering in the faceof
great opposition.One
important factorwas
thatLao women
areaccustomed
toworking
together cooperativelywithlittlepublic orindividual recognition fortheir efforts. Typically, thisis
done
in traditional areas
such
ascooking
forthemonks,
ceremonies,and
social events forwhich women go about
getting thingsdone and men
takepublicand
official credit.
Much of
thewomen's
dedicationresultsfrom
their success inaccomplishing
resultsno
other organization orgroup
in thecommunity
has achieved. Thiswas
helpedby
their ability towork
together despite conflicts that
have
arisen. Theirempowerment
is evident in the strengthof
theircommitment, and
theirroles arenow
public. Their newsletter circulatesthroughout
the Laotiandiaspora
with itsnews of
the activitiesof
thesewomen. The Lao
school continues despiteitsups and downs and
plans are beingmade
to address additionalcommunity
problems.Some of
thewomen have
represented theircommunity and
organization atwomen
's conferencesand meetings
in the
wider
societyand even
internationally.They
areproud of
theirachievements and speak
with prideof
theirown empowerment.
Further Reading
Baxter,
Diane and
Krulfeld, Ruth, eds. 1997.Beyond Boundaries:
SelectedPapers on
Refugee and Immigrant
Issues.American
Anthropological Association SpecialVolume.
Ruth
Krulfeldisprofessorof anthropology
atThe George Washington
University.