Appendix Fig. E-1 CONSORT flow diagram.

(1)

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF MOBILIZATION PROTOCOLS FOLLOWING LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION AND TENDON INTERPOSITION

http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01157 Page 1

Appendix

Fig. E-1

CONSORT flow diagram.

(2)

Fig. E-2

Graph showing data for VAS pain score. Data are shown as the mean and the standard error of the mean. * = p < 0.05 when compared with the respective preoperative value, and # = p < 0.05 when compared with the prior time point, as determined with use of Tukey multiple

comparisons.

(3)

Fig. E-3

Graph showing data for VAS satisfaction score. Data are shown as the mean and standard error of the mean. * = p < 0.05 when compared with the respective preoperative value, and # = p <

0.05 when compared with the prior time point, as determined with use of Tukey multiple comparisons.

(4)

Fig. E-4

Graph showing data for the 9-hole peg test (NHP). Data are shown as the mean and standard error of the mean. Bar = p < 0.05 for the difference between groups at the given time point, * = p

< 0.05 when compared with the respective preoperative value, and # = p < 0.05 when compared with the prior time point, as determined with use of Tukey multiple comparisons.

(5)

Fig. E-5

Graph showing data for thumb opposition. Data are shown as the mean and standard error of the mean. Bar = p < 0.05 for the difference between groups at the given time point, * = p < 0.05 when compared with the respective preoperative value, and # = p < 0.05 when compared with the prior time point, as determined with use of Tukey multiple comparisons.

(6)

Fig. E-6

Graph showing data for wrist ROM (Fig. E-6A) and grip strength (Fig. E-6B). Data are shown as the mean and standard error of the mean. Bar = p < 0.05 for the difference between groups at the given time point, * = p < 0.05 when compared with the respective preoperative value, and #

= p < 0.05 when compared with the prior time point, as determined with Tukey multiple comparisons.