Assessment of Teaching and Learning
3r
dAsia Pacific Pharmacy Education Workshop
Nabishah Mohamad 20th November 2012
The Task
“...for this 3rd PharmED Workshop we focus on students assessment : course learning
outcome in the area of Domains-Knowledge,
Skills and Attitude/Behaviour”
Outline
1. Assessment in Outcome-based education Learning outcome and competencies
2. Assessment of Learning
Basic Principles in assessment Who, where, how…….
3. Validity and Reliability
INTRODUCTION
Outcome-Based Education
An education approach that focuses on the graduate attributes or outcomes after
completing an academic programme (Barr et
al., 2006)
Programme outcomes
Course learning outcomes Teaching-learning activities
Assessment
The seven broad areas of competency - New Zealand
3. Provide Primary Health Care 4. Apply Management and
Organisation Skills
5. Research and Provide Information 6. Dispense Medicines
7. Prepare Pharmaceutical Products
1. Practise Pharmacy in a Professional and Culturally Competent Manner
2. Contribute to the Quality Use of Medicines
Systematic Approach in Student Assessment
1. Define the purpose
2. Determine what is to be assessed 3. Decide on appropriate methods
of assessment
4. Set standards of acceptable performance
5. Make a judgment with reference to the purpose
Purpose of Student Assessment
FORMATIVE: The scores are used to provide information on students learning.
SUMMATIVE: scores are used in making decisions on student standing (e.g.
pass or fail)
Determines progression
Certify competence
When?
FORMATIVE: The scores are used to provide information on students learning.
SUMMATIVE: scores are used in making
decisions on student standing (e.g. pass or fail)
Determines progression
Certify competence
In training
Mid sem,/ End sem, End of course
What is to be assessed?
Programme/ Module/ posting/
course Learning Outcomes
Domains- Knowledge, Skills and Attitude/behaviour
Bloom’s Taxonomy
Original
Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation Perception Set Guided responses Mechanism Complex overt responses Adaptation Origination Receive Respond evaluate Organisation Characterization
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
The seven broad areas of competency - New Zealand
1. Practise Pharmacy in a Professional and Culturally Competent Manner
2. Contribute to the Quality Use of Medicines 3. Provide Primary Health Care
4. Apply Management and Organisation Skills 5. Research and Provide Information
6. Dispense Medicines
7. Prepare Pharmaceutical Products
The seven broad areas of competency
1. Practise Pharmacy in a Professional and Culturally Competent Manner (K
3, S
5,A
4)
2. Contribute to the Quality Use of Medicines (K, S) 3. Provide Primary Health Care (K, S, A)
4. Apply Management and Organisation Skills (K, S) 5. Research and Provide Information (S, K)
6. Dispense Medicines (K, S)
7. Prepare Pharmaceutical Products (K, S)
Does
Shows how Knows how
Knows
Levels of clinical competence
Miller’s Pyramid
HOW?
• Must match outcomes
• Valid
• Reliable
Levels of Clinical Competence
Knows 16
Know how Show how
Does
Real environment Portfolio, supervisor’s
report, logbook, 360o
Context-based tests
MCQ, EMQ, KFQ, Oral.
Simulated environment
OSCE, OSPE Practical Exam
Factual tests
MCQ T/F, Essay
Outcomes AssessmentMethod of
Simulation SP
P-MEX, SBL
Written/oral tests Moral reasoning
Attitudes
Workplace assessments Critical incidents Routine performance
Action
Decision Making
Reasoning/
Attitude
Knowledge Knows How
Knows Shows How
Does
Written tests Traditional measures
Attitude/ Behaviour
Shows How-Decision Making
Real patients
Professionalism mini-evaluation
exercise or P-MEX (Cruess et al., 2005)
• Trainee is observed in a patient encounter
• Performance judged along the
dimensions of professionalism (eg- listen carefully, knows own limitation)
• Opportunity for feedback
Portfolio
Collection of a student’s works, that exhibits the student’s efforts progress and achievements in one or more areas.
Link to Learning Outcomes of the course or programme
WHO?
• Self
• Peer
• Teacher
• Supervisor
• Other health professionals
• Patients
Peer and self-assessment
The learner’s peers and the learners themselves
assess what they are able to do and how comfortably they are performing a task.
Nabishah/UKM 21
Self-assessment
1. Important element in adult learning:
Learner should be able to self-evaluate and take the appropriate action from that assessment.
2. An important attribute of lifelong learning
Nabishah/UKM 22
Self Assessment
Nabishah/UKM 23
Strengths Weaknesses
Improvement Personal
Growth
Helper
Self Assessment
Nabishah/UKM 24
Strengths Weaknesses
Improvement Evidence of
Personal Growth
Self Reflection
Helper
Self evaluation skill improve with time
Nabishah et al 2010
Key considerations for selecting assessment methods
How does the assessment method impact learning?
Is it relevant and authentic to clinical practice?
Is it valid and reliable?
Is it fair and transparent to students?
Does it provide valuable information that can facilitate teaching and learning?
Is it feasible in terms of implementation?
Why assessment is as the theme of this workshop?
• To signal its importance
• To identify/remediate problem pharmacists (students)
- Improves patient safety - Establishes accountability
“Students respect what you inspect.”
• To improve quality
- Assessment is the first step in QI cycle
Summary: Assessment of Students Learning
1. Reflect on the course learning outcomes 2. Design teaching-learning activities
3. Clear on the purpose of assessment
4. Use formative and summative assessments 5. Use a variety of assessment methods
6. Assessment tools- Valid and reliable
Source: R. Harden
References
• Accreditation Standards And Guidelines For The Professional Program In Pharmacy Leading To The Doctor Of Pharmacy
Degree. Accreditation Council For Pharmacy Education. 2011.
https://www.acpe-accredit.org/standards/
• Lambert W T Schuwirth, Cees P M van der Vleuten. 2003. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine- Written assessment.
BMJ , 326: 643-5.
• Nabishah, Kwang KC, Jiuan CS, Sue Ann L, Syazwina M, Phei KZ, Norhayati R and Mohd Nasri AB. 2010. Self-evaluation in Problem-based Learning. Asian Journal of Teaching and
Learning in Higher Education -AJTLHE Vol. 3, No.1, 50-57