Associate Editor's Report - Atom Indonesia

(1)

ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL Associate Editor's Report

Article No. : 491

Title of Paper : Dynamic Analysis on the Safety Criteria of the Conceptual Core Design in MTR Type Research Reactor

Associate Editor Name : Comment on Descriptions

Criteria Evaluation

Associate editor's evaluation

Yes No Comments

1. Originality of the article

 Free of plagiarism/similarity

(max 20 %) v

 New article/not yet published (presented/in proceeding max 30

%)

and technology v

3. Reference

 The number of references 10-20 for non-review articles, 25+ for review articles

v

 The use of recent references 80 %

(maximum 5 years ago) x

Only nine of the 17 references (53 %) are from 2011 or later. Please add recent references or reduce older references.

 Type of the references (primarily,

secondary etc.) 85 % from journal v 15 of the 17 references (88 %) are from journals

 DOI (digital object identifier)

reference (traceable) x

No DOIs are provided. Please provide DOIs whenever available. For instance, for Ref. [6], its DOI is

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.11.089

 Reference style standard: Elsevier

numeric without title x

The writing of the author's name (some of which are written in full, such as “ Anis Bousbia-Salah”

instead of “A. Bousbia-Salah) should be corrected/standardized.

 When reference has more than 4

authors, write only 3 name, et al. x For [1], all authors' names are given, even though there are five of them. Please correct.

 Article follows the Atom Indonesia

template and guidelines x

Please use last names in the list of the article's authors.

Please follow SI convention in writing quantities and units, including percentages. SI brochures are available from

http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/

among others, at least

http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/si_broch ure_8_en.pdf in particular.

 Table (clear, without vertical line) x

All tables in this article still use vertical lines.

Please remove those lines, by redesigning the tables if necessary.

(2)

 Figure (clear, min 300 dpi) v Not applicable: no photographs are used Final recommendation:

1. Continue review process [ ] 2. Return to the author [ v ] 3. Reject [ ]

The article should be returned to the authors to allow for the necessary improvements to be made.