A COLLECTION OF STONE IMPLEMENTS FROM THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
BY
S. V. Proudfit, Department oftheInterior.
(With plates x-xiv.)
The
collection of stone implements from the DistrictofColumbia and
its environs, which is herewith presented to the Smithsonian Institution as anaddition to the donationofDecember
22,1887,isthe resultof personalwork
inthe field. Itwas
notmade
with apremedi- tateddonativeintent, buthasgrown by
degrees until thecollector no longerfeelsjustified inclaiming or exercising the right of soleowner- ship therein. In the hands of the Institution it will not onlybeac- cessibletootherswho
are interested in such matters,but willprobablydraw
toitfurther contributions fromthesame
area,and
thus serve a betterpurpose thanit possibly could inprivate possession.The
collectionisfairlytypicalofthe aboriginalwork
asitisnow
found inthe |ields of the District.The
greater part of the large stone imple- mentshad
founditsway
into publicand
privatecollections long before thisone began, hencethenumber
of polished implementsnow
offerediscomparativelysmall. Yet, while this is true, asufficient
number
of these implementshave been found to fairlyexhibitthe degree of skill attainedby
thePotomac
Indian in this class of work.A
tribute here to the handicraft of this people is not misplaced.The
material with which theywrought was
the most obdurateand
refractory of all substancesfound availableto
any
considerable degreeamong
theAmerican
Indians. Quartz, quartzite,and
argillite for the greaterpart were used from necessity, no better material being withinreach.The
firsttwo
areveryhard,and
inthehand
ofthework-man
fullof unpleasantsurprises.A
long, slenderflake,such asmight
beeasily driven offfrom amass
of flintor obsidian,could be but with greatdifficultyproduced fromthebowlderorpebble of thePotomac
grav-els.
The
argillite,thoughsofter,isnot susceptibleofreceiving orretain- ingany
high degree of finish. Notwithstanding these obstacles the materialwas
treated with such patience, care,and
skill,that thework
of this region,not only in matters of utility but in points of finish comparesfavorably with that ofany
other.Proceedings"United StatesNationalMuseum,Vol.XIII—No.810.
187
188 STONE IMPLEMENTS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA — PROUDFIT.
In gatlieriug theserelics specialcare has been taken to preservean accurate record ofeach addition to the collection, so that, if it were desired,everypiece
might
be reidaced in the veryfieldfromwhich
itwas
obtained;and
inorder that the recordand
cataloguemay
bebetter understoodand
perpetuated, as against the ultimate result of the growthof thecityand
continued cultivation of the fields, amap
has been preparedand
is submitted herewith, whereon aremarked
the variousfields from which thecollectionwas
made.The map
willalso serve toshow
the locationof all Indian village sitesand
aboriginal workshopsinthe District,and
fromwhat
part of each contributing villagesite thecollectionwas
gathered.Thus
it will be seenby
con- sulting themap
(Plate x,) that the eastern shore of the Anacostia, or EasternBranch
of thePotomac, isdotted with wigwam-likemarks
to indicate a village site, while but three fields on the stream are
marked
from which relics have been taken; one at Anacostiamarked
A,and two
at Benniugsmarked B
and C.The
village is old Na- cotchtanke, which stretched along the whole eastern shore from themouth
ofthestreamup
to Bladensburg.While many
places alongthe eastern shore of the Anacostia, are equallyrich in relicsas the three indicated, the ease with which the latter are reachedfrom thecity ac«counts for their
marked
prominencein this collection.Again,it will be noticed thata village site is laid
down
along the easternbank
of the Potomac, froma short distance aboveGeorgetown
totheLittle Falls, whilebut
two
fields,D and
E, are theremarked
as having contributed to the collection. In this case the other fieldswere not available to thecollector, being either covered with a
heavy
sod, or socloselycultivated that
no room was
leftfor the antiquarian.A
small village ismarked on
the Virginia shore of the Potomac, over- lookingOhain Bridgeand
LittleFalls; another atthefoot of Analos- tan Island, on thesame
side of the stream;and
still another a little farther down, at the southernend
of theLong
Bridge(Namaraugh
quena) ; oneatthemouth
ofFour
MileRun
;and
one atFalls Church, on thesame
stream.It should not be understood thatany oneofthesesites or fieldshas beenexhausted
by
thecollector.The ground
coveredby
thevillage siteshas been butpartiallyunder search,and
thesearch evenwhere
ithasextended has not been prosecuted closely
enough
to ajipreciably diminish theamount
of relics, exceptin the matter of large stone im- plements, suchaswould
strike the attention of those cultivating thefields,
and
so find theirown way
into publicand
private collections.In fact, the
amount
of material thatmay
yet be gathered from these village sites is only emphasizedby
the present collection, which in effect is substantiallyconfined to thefields atBennings.With
eachplowingof thefields afreshsupply of relicsis turnedup
for thecollector,
and how
long this will holdgood may
be indicatedin the following observation :The new
bridge across theAnacostiaattheU. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM
PROCEEDINGS, VOL. XIII PL. X
Map ofthe District of Columbia, showing anc ent Village Sites, etc.
'"iBOo'"]
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM. 189
eastern endof Pennsylvaniaavenueleads directly into one of the oldcamps
of Nacotcbtauke. In preparing the grade for the eastern ap- proachto the bridge, the sarface soilwas removed
from at leasttwo
acres of this camp.
The
field, a level sandyplain,was
first plowed, theloosesoil takenup and
deposited on the grade,and
the process repeated.Each
time the shovel followed theplow
nearly everything turnedup by
the latterwas removed
from the field.On
one side of thefield, however, thework was
notcarriedoutto include thefullareafirstlaidbare, but
was
confined within lesserlimits,and, thesame
thing occurringagain, two low terraces were formed, each but a littlemore
than thedepthof oneplowing.Thus
: theupperterraceis theoriginal surface of thefield, thenext lowertheresult of the first plowing,and
the foot of this terrace the result of the last i^lowing.The
whole depth of the excavation at this pointwas
a littleovertwo
feet.An
examination
showed
that theupperterracecarrieda largenumber
of relicscommon
to the locality,bits ofworked
quartz, quartzite,arrow- heads, etc, the second an equal quantity of thesame
material, while the bottom,thoughinlessdegree, still furnished a considerablenum-
ber of implements, fragments,and
chips.To
illustratetheamount
of material on the surface of the ground, attentionis directedto ExhibitKo. 140,503, a tray of 107 pieces picked upin two hours' work, April 20,188S,fromthefieldmarked A
:A
pol-ished ax,arrowheads, knives, scraps of pottery, etc.; all the odds
and
ends of theold villagelife.In studying the distribution of stone implements inthe District it
shouldbe
remembered
thatan Indian villageof thePotomac was
nota compact assemblageofhouses,butscattereddwellings along a water- course,with the intervening spaces usuallyundercultivation. Insome
instances, however, aclusterof houses might be found at such points as afforded
more
than the ordinary riparian advantages, but usually thedwellingswere comparatively isolated. Again,the establishment of temporary huntingand
fishing stationsis to be taken into consid- eration.An
examination ofany
cultivated field that lies alongthePotomac
orAnacostia will furnishmore
orless evidence of temporary occupation.The
difterence between these placesand
village sitesis readily discernible in the character of the remains, as well as in the quantity.The
formershow
flakes,and
chips of stone, with hereand
therean implementof the knife
and
arrowhead type, while the latter, with its ever-present pottery, seems to have left itsmark on
every stone inthe field.The
wreck of an old village can never be mistakenforthecamp-ground of asingle season.
In additionto theimplements found in the vicinity of villages
and
hunting camps, the occasional arrowhead lost in the chase,and
the greaternumber
spent in battle, should notbeoverlooked.After an
engagement
with theMannahocks,
it isrelated bj- Capt.John
Smiththat "we
contentedMosco
(afriendlyMoraughtacund)
in190 STONE IMPLEMENTS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PROUDFIT.
helpiog
him
togatherup
theirarrowes,which werean
armefull,whereof hegloried not alittle.'"*In passingover thefields of the district, thefrequent occurrence of a few chips of quartz, or quartzite, at places which do not otherwise
show
anysigns of occupation,callstomind
anotherstatementby Smith
concerning the readiness with whichthePotomac
Indian preparedan
arrowhead for use.His arrowhead hequickly miketh withalittle bone, which heeverweareth at hisbracer,ofanysplint ofa stone orjjlasseiutheformeof a hart; and thesethey glewtotheendof theirarrows.*
The
term'^arrowhead," asgenerally used, is appliedto animplement witha rangeof usefulnessmuch
wider thanis suggestedby
theword
itself. It isa conventionalism, descriptive as toform,but not as to use.
Wherever
a sharp, cuttingedgeorpointis required, eitherasthe tipof an arrow or the blade of a knife, the generalform is the same.By
itswedge-shaped butt,orbarbed shank, the point is easilysecured inplace to serve thepurpose of the hour.Inthe evolution of the arrowhead, invention confineditself mainly to
metaods
ofhafting,and
inthisdirectionmuch
ingenuityisdisplayed in the variationsofshank and
base. Itmay
be said with truth that thearr)whead, considered in itsuse as a projectile,reached itsperfec- tion inthe handsof primitiveman,
so faras form goes, and that only in the matterof materialwas
the point of theEnglish archer's arrow superiorto that of theAmerican
Indian.That
itwas
onlyafter protracteduse of the simpler forms that the perfected arrowpointwas
secured, goes without argument, but thatwe
canshow
the stages of thisevolution is anotherand more
doubtful matter.The
reason for this lies in the fact that the most highly finished arrowheadmust
of necessity pass through theruderformsin the proc- essof manufacture, so that ifwork
onthemodern
arrowhead is sus-pended
beforetheimplementis finished,we have
an archaictypeof thesame
implement.The
remains of an old village sitewillillustrate this statement.From
the chipped pebble without definite form, to the rudely ovatepoint,and
fromthat stage to thethin blade,allmay
be found mingled together.Here
rudenessin form is noevidence of an- tiquity, itbeing but a necessary incident in the production of the im- plement inany
age. Catalogue No. 146G51, U. S. NationalMuseum,
a tray of eighteen quartz pieces,with flakesand
chips,from thefields at Bennings, will serve asan
illustration.The
course ofany
chipped implement, whether arrowhead or knife, from the rock inmass
to completionis the same.At
each stage of successive chippings the stone assumes thefamiliarforms whichhave
often been mistaken forcom[)leted implementsofarudetypeand
great*Smith'sWorks,vol.2, p. 427,Arber'sed.
Mbid.,vol.1,p. G8.
^°i89o!"']
PKOCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM. 191
antiquity.
To
secure a knifeof the larger variety theemployment
of astone of considerablesize isnecessarytoallowfor thewastein work- ing,and
this fact should not be overlooked in determining the true character of certainforms of primitivework
foundin the districtand
elsewhere.In confirmation of these conclusions, attention is asked to Nos.
146589 to146616, forty-fivepiecesfrom various fields ofthedistrict
and
vicinity. Also Catalogue Nos. 146572-146604,U.S.National
Museum,
atray of thirty-fourpiecesfrom thesame
fields.Thesethreeexhibits comprise the various materials
commonly
em- ployedforchipped implements,and
in each substance themethods
of treatment, asdiscovered fromthe unfinished implements, serveto em- phasize the primal forms of theknife or arrowhead asitemerges from the pebble or rockin mass. Inmany
cases theuntouched crust ofthe pebbleshows
hereand
there on the face of the unfinished piece; in.
some
thework
is only begun ; in othersit is nearly finished; in most casesabandonment
oftheoriginalintentionissuggested,ifnot actually apparent.But
onthe other hand,many
oftheseapparently unfinished pieces are as well calculated in their present form, if not better, to servecertainpurposes thanifmore
finelywrought; so thatthe separa- tionofthefinished from the unfinishedimplements can not beeffected withany
great degreeof exactness,a roughand
jaggedpoint ofstone, set in theknotted end of a clubaddsmore
to thesavageeffectiveness of theweapon
thana polished stonewould,though formedfor thesame
purpose.But
thesame
jagged point with afew well-directed touches can be reducedtoa cuttingtool,capable ofmany
uses,yetit isquite asmuch
afinishedpiece in thefirst form as in the last. Thisagainsug- geststhe futilityof accepting form as indicative of antiquity in the line of chipped stone implements, especiallywhen
itis seen that the ruder formsare constantly repeatedand
perpetuatedinthelatestefforts of the stone worker.The
persistentsurvival ofessentiallyprimitivetypes,underthe press- ure ofchanged
conditions, also addsan
element of confusion to the labor ofclassification.In the
Ray
collection from theHupa
Reservation,* jasper knives areshown
thatwere foundinactual usein 1885.The
formofthebladeisidentical with the leaf-shaped knife of the Potomac.
The
hafting is effectedby
settingthe butt of the bladein theslit endof a shortpine stickand
the liberal use of pitch. Insome
instances the handle isformedof
two
pieceslashed together, andinonespecimenofthis kind thelashingusedisordinary cotton twine.The
aboriginalconception of theimplement remains unchanged, thoughthebitof cottonstringunitesit to the presentwith startlingeffect.
A
suggestion the reverse of thisis foundin a curious thing setdown
in Smith'saccountofthe relations existing between the
Jamestown
col-*Prof. OtisT.Masou, Siuithsouian Report,1885, Part1,pages205-239.
192 STONE IMPLEMENTS,
DISTRICTOF COLUMBIA PROUDFIT.
ony and
the people ofPowbatau. Inquirybeingmade
astoSmith's in.tended
movements
he answered:
We
seuthim wordweintendedno such thing(an invasion)butonlytogoetoPow- hatan(thecountry) to seek stones tomake hatchets; excepthismenshotatus, as Paspaheghhadtoldustheywould;whichiftheydid shootebut onearrowe,wewould destroyethem,etc.Now
did Smith tell the truth ?Did
the colony in factmake
stone implementsinexchangefortheproducts of the Indian fields, ordidhe merelyassign acause forhisintended trip which would appearreason- able tothe Indians'?Whatever
the truthmay
have been,it is to behoped
thatthe statement provedmore
satisfactory to theIndian then than itdoesto the archieologist now.This
much however
of valuable suggestion isfound in the Smithin- cident.The
Indians of thePowhatan
Confederacywere accustomedto frequentcertain places for the purpose of obtaining suitable material for their toolsand
weapons,and
the factwas
wellknown
to thecolo- nists. Inshort,the place thus indefinitely designatedby Smith may
be accepted as&historic "workshop,"forthepracticeofreducing therough material to at least primary formsat the placewhereitwas
found seems to have beengenerallyfollowed.Workshops
were establishedwhere abundance
of materialwas
foundin conjunction with special conveniences for working it, such asnear- nesstowater,etc.
The
materialsmostavailablewerequartzand
quartz-ite,
and
thesewereto behad
fromthe gravel beds ofthevalley.That
the pebble, or small bowlder,was
used instead of the rockinmass
is easily tobo seenfrom anyseries of chippedimplementsmade
of these materials. Itdoes notfollow, however,that surfacepebbles were used.The
Indian wellknew
that the stone freshfrom thegroundworked
bet- terthan thesun-bakedstone,and
it isquiteprobable that he took pains to secure the former, though absolute proof ofsuch practice in theDis- trictis yet wanting.*A
placepossessingallthe requisites foran Indianworkshop
isfound on Piney Branch, a small stream that entersRock
Creek on theout- skirtsofMount
Pleasant.On
the north sideofthe branch,and
justbe- lowwhereit is crossedby
Fourteenth street road,Blagden'shill rises abruptly from thebedofthe stream, a steep gravelly hill,with itssidesand summit
well coveredby
nativeforest trees. Here,over aspace of severalacres,lie scatteredthe chips, flakes,and
chipped stonesleftby
the nativeworkman
as the arrow-headand
knifegrew
under the deft touch of a practiced hand.The
groundin places is literallycovered withthis work.Some
stonesshow
but a single fracture, while others are fashioned intothe rude subovate forms, so familiaron the village site.One
of themost common
forms is the splitpebble withitsouter faceworked
at the edgesand
the center untouched;and
another not*Thispaperwaswritten before Mr.Holmes'scxplora<'ion ofthePiney Branch work- shop. (See "The Anthropologist,"Vol,3,No. 1, p. 1; also,Vol. 2,July, 1889,pp.
241-246.)
^°l89o"'']
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM. 193
infrequently found isthe"domestichand-ax,"* a pebble withoneend
roughly chippedto an ax-likeedge. These rude forms,togetherwithtliechips
and
flakes,make up
for themost])artthe greatmass
of re- mains,buthereand
tliere occur the buttsand
tips,and
occasionallya
perfect specimenof the leaf-shaped knife. (See Figs. Plates ix-xiv.)
No
pottery isfound,and
butthreearrow-headshave thusfarrewarded the search of -the writer. (Cat. No. 146571, U. S. Nat. Mus.) These were found atthefoot of thehilland
aremade
of argillite, while the otherwork
is inquartzite,thepebbles of whichinmain
constitute the gravel bedsof thehill.On
thelevel atthetop of thehillmay
beseen smallpatches ofground
littered with the smallerchips,
among
which have been found quiteanumber
of the tipsand
butts of knives.A
deep ravinewith a small stream atthebottomcuts thehillaboutmidway, and
in thebed of this stream, as well as that of the branch, thedebris occurs in abundance.The
sides of the ravine furnish an exposurein placesof several feet,and
from theface of thisexposure thewriter has takenchipped stones thatwere underfourfeetofsoiland
gravel.The same
thingand
underlike conditions
may
be observed along thebank
of the branchwhere
it hasbeen cut
away by
the action of the water.At
thefootofmany
ofthetrees standing on thehill-side areconsid- erableaccumulationsof chips, withworked and un worked
stones, that have drifteddown
thehilltill interceptedby
thebase of thetree.These observations have been confined to theremains
and
the con- ditions under which they are found on thenorthbank
of PineyBranch and
belowtheFourteenth-street road; but similarwork,though in less quantity,is found on thatpart of the hill abovetheroad, as well as on thesouth sideof thebranchand
opposite Blagden's hill.Along
the banksofRock
Creek,below Piney Branch,otherworkshops have been located, though not covering so large an area or showing an equalamount
ofwork
in thesame
space.One
ofthese,however,onthe west sideofthe creekand
justaboveOak
Hill Cemetery,willdoubtlessmake
as good returns underthe
same
exploration as the largershop on the Piney Branch.The
grading on the eastsideof the creek during the pastyearhassomodifiedthe originaltopographyof thatbank and
the adjacenthillsthatbut littleremainsnow
tobeseen of places thatonce furnished considerableevidence of aboriginalwork
in stone.The
collection from PineyBranch
ismade up
of unfinished imple- ments, forty pieces; buttsand
tips of knives, thirty-one pieces; rude implements, cores, etc., twenty-seven pieces;and
abox
of flakesand
chips. (Seecatalogue.)
The work
from thisi)lace shouldbecompared
with that from thevillage sites.The
wonderful similarityof corre- sponding series (a similarity whichrenders the substitutionof onefor"See Abbott'sStoneAgeiu
New
Jersey.Prpc, N.
M, 9()—
13194 STONE IMPLEMENTS,
DISTKICTOF COLUMBIA PKOUDFIT.
the other amatter nottobedetected
by
the expert) cannot failtosug- gesthow
smalla placemere
form has in settlingthe antiquity ofa
chippedstone implement.ARROW-HEADS.
An
efforttoward the classificatioQ of the arrow-heads foundon the village siteshas been made,and
though itisonly tentativeand
basedupon
arbitraryconventionalities inform, itmay
be useful in callingat- tention to themany
variations possible in so small a matter as themethod
of attaching the pointto theshaft, orthe bladetothe handle.The
classification ismade upon
the baselineofthearrow-headand
the form ofthe butt or shank.The
forms, however, frequently blend,and
vary from one shape to another, with such slight shadesof difference thatan attemptto classifythem
on any basis of formwould be
worse thanidle.Some
beautiful pieces inquartzand
quartziteareshown.Long
slen-dertips, with symmetricaledges,
and
carefullywrought
shank.Importedmaterial,flint,jasper,
and
chalcedony, occasionallyappears in thecollection.AXES, CELTS, ETC.
A
few fine specimens are submittedj themost
are, however, not worthyof special mention,though the whole collection in this classisperhaps a fair illustration of the handicraft of the
Potomac
Indian.Special attentionis askedtothe descriptive catalogue herewith.
POTTERY.
One box
of sherdsfrom thefields atBenning'scomprises the exhibit ofpottery.The
long continued cultivation of theground
has grad- uallyreducedthe pottery to such small fragmentsthat the shapeand
sizeof theoriginal vesselcanbut rarelybe determined.