daftar pustaka - Narotama University Repository

46

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

AFRIATI, S. &. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh Debt To Equity Ratio, Dan Total Asset Turnover Terhadap Return On Equity Pada Subsektor Farmasi Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008 - 2012.

ASHRAF, A. &. (2017). The Impact of Capital Structure on Firm’s Profitability: A Case of Cement Industry of Pakistan.

AYU SRI MAHATMA, A. W. (2013). PENGARUH STRUKTUR MODAL, PROFITABILITAS DAN UKURAN PERUSAHAAN PADA NILAI PERUSAHAAN INDUSTRI MANUFAKTUR YANG TERCATAT DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2009-2011.

AZZALIA FERONICHA, S. S. (2017). Pengaruh Debt To Equity Ratio (DER) Dan Debt To Asset Ratio (DAR) Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Di Sektor Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING.

BENEDICT, O. (2013). DETERMINANTS OF PRICE-EARNINGS RATIO: NIGERIAN EXPERIENCE (QUANTILE REGRESSION). International Journal Of Ecomomics, Business and Management Research Vol 1 No 05 2017.

EDY SUSANTO, M. (2018). PENGARUH CURRENT RATIO, DEBT EQUITY RATIO, DEVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, PRICE BOOK VALUE, EARNING PER SHARE, RETURN ON ASSET, DAN OPERATING PROFIT TERHADAP PRICE EARNING RATIO Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI tahun 2013 - 2016.

Endraswara, S. (2006). Metode, Teori, Teknik Penelitian Kebudayaan. Pustaka Widyatama.

Erlin Yulia Rahma, D. A. (2014). Analisis Variabel Fundamental yang Berpengaruh terhadap Price Earning Ratio (PER) sebagai Dasar Penilaian Saham pada Perusahaan Automotive and Allied yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2007 – 2011. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen (IAM) Vol 12 No 2, 2014 Terindeks dalam Google Scholar.

Fauziah, F. (2017). Kesehatan Bank, Kebijakan Dividen, dan Nilai Perusahaan Teori dan Kajian Empiris . Samarinda: RV Pustaka Horizon.

Hapsari, E. I. (2012). Kekuatan Rasio Keuangan Dalam Memprediksi Kondisi Financial Distress Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen . Hartarto, K. A. (2017, November 24). Industri Makanan dan Minuman Masih Jadi Andalan.

Retrieved from https://kemenperin.go.id/artikel/18465/Industri-Makanan-dan-Minuman- Masih-Jadi-Andalan.

Kamal, M. B. (2016). PENGARUH RECEIVALBEL TURN OVER DAN DEBT TO ASSET RATIO. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis Vol. 17, No. 02, 06.

Meirisa, F. (2018). PENGARUH CURRENT RATIO (CR), DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO (DER), RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) TERHADAP PRICE EARNING RATIO (PER)

47

PADA PERUSAHAAN CONSUMER GOODS YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2013-2017. Jurnal Ilmiah STIE MDP, 03.

MUHAMMAD HAJAR ASHARI, R. D. (2017). PENGARUH LEVERAGE KEUANGAN TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS PADA PERUSAHAAN PARIWISATA YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2011-2015.

MULYANI L, P. (2017). Pengaruh Return On Equity, Earning Per Share (EPS), Dan Debt To Equity Ratio Terhadap Price Earning Ratio (PER) Pada PT INDOFOOD SUKSES MAKMUR. Tbk periode 2012 - 2014.

POPPY DYAH SULISTYAWATI, M. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Return On Equity, Debt To Equity Ratio, Dan Current Ratio Terhadap Price Earning Ratio.

PUWANETHIREN, P. (2017). DETERMINANT OF PRICE EARNING MULTIPLE IN SRI LANKAN LISTED COMPANIES.

SAMSON, C. (2018). Effect of Short-term Debt to Total Assets Ratio on Financial Performance of Medium-sized and Large Enterprises in Kenya.

Sarwono, J. (2014). Path Analysis Dengan SPSS.

SETYAWAN, R. (2014). Pengaruh Return on Equity, Debt to Equity Ratio, Fixed Asset Turnover, Price to Book Value dan Interest Rate terhadap Price Earning Ratio pada Perusahaan Property & Real Estate di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2008 - 2012. JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI DAN PERPAJAKAN .

Slamet Riyanto, A. D. (2017). PENGARUH DEBT TO ASSET RATIO (DAR), DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO (DER), LONG TERM DEBT TO ASSET RATIO (LDAR) DAN LONG TERM DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO (LDER) TERHADAP PROFITABILITY (ROE) PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2012-2014.

Sudana, I. M. (2009). Manajemen Keuangan Teori Dan Praktik. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Sudaryanti, D. S. (2016). PENGARUH RETURN ON EQUITY (ROE) DAN DEBT TO EQUITY RATIO (DER) TERHADAP PRICE EARNING RATIO (PER) (STUDI EMPIRIS PADA PT. HOLCIM INDONESIA TBK.). Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen vol 2 nomer 1 (Me i 2016) 40-47, 04.

48 Lampiran 1 Biodata

Data Pribadi

Nama : Eda Nuarta

Tempat/Tanggal Lahir : Mojokerto, 05 Febuari 1998 Alamat : Tanggulangin Asri EE 2 Status : Belum Kawin

Agama : Kristen

Nomer Telepon : 081230920994

Email : edanuarta17@gmail.com

LATAR BELAKANG PENDIDIKAN

1. SD Negeri 3 Pucang 2004 – 2010 2. SMP Negeri 3 Porong 2010 – 2013 3. SMA Negeri 1 Waru 2013 – 2016 4. Universitas Narotama Surabaya 2016 - 2020

49 Lampiran 2 Berita Bimbingan Skripsi

50 Lampiran 3 Plagiasi

51 Lampiran 4 Rekapitulasi Data Penelitian

REKAPITULASI DATA PENELITIAN

NO DER DAR ROE PER

1 1,42 0,5 5,51 11,66

2 0,61 1,38 18,12 11

3 0,15 8,45 18,45 30,45

4 0,56 1,36 19,63 27,48

5 0,87 0,47 11 17,11

6 1,77 1,64 11,96 17,35

7 1,02 0,51 19,39 19,88

8 1,72 0,63 16,12 18,51

9 0,92 0,48 11 10,63

10 1 0,5 14,91 20,28

11 0,21 1,18 20,34 28,12

12 1,65 0,62 14,99 16,34

13 0,54 0,35 11,9 17,15

14 0,15 4,58 14,44 24,58

15 0,56 0,36 17,43 27,34

16 0,88 0,47 11 17,06

17 1,36 1,58 12,41 21,8

18 0,62 0,38 4,8 11,77

19 0,59 1,37 12,53 13,7

20 1,07 0,52 27,47 34,79

21 0,69 1,41 15,6 25,7

22 0,23 1,19 6,91 17,51

23 1,85 0,65 9,72 17,78

24 0,32 0,24 4,48 14,92

25 0,19 1,16 19,81 24,18

26 0,54 0,35 16,21 26,23

27 0,98 0,49 7,37 7,4

28 2,12 2,68 95,4 31,64

29 0,51 0,34 2,46 4,13

30 0,56 0,36 1,92 13,07

31 1,2 0,55 16,19 18,28

32 0,61 0,38 12,51 18,45

33 0,19 1,16 3,25 18,81

52 Lampiran 5 Pengujian Normalitas Data

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test debt

equity

debt asset

return on equity

price earning

N 33 33 33 33

Normal Parameters^a,b

Mean -,4169 -,2638 2,4574 2,8768

Std. Deviation ,75704 ,80808 ,74012 ,43911 Most Extreme

Differences

Absolute ,155 ,188 ,195 ,161

Positive ,100 ,188 ,166 ,064

Negative -,155 -,126 -,195 -,161

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,892 1,079 1,122 ,923

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,404 ,194 ,162 ,362

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

53 Lampiran 6 Hasil Output Statistik Deskriptif

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

debt equity 33 -1,90 ,75 -,4169 ,75704

debt asset 33 -1,43 2,13 -,2638 ,80808

return on equity 33 ,65 4,56 2,4574 ,74012

price earning 33 1,42 3,55 2,8768 ,43911

Valid N (listwise) 33

54 Lampiran 7 Hasil Output Path Analysis Struktur 1

Y1 = ßY1X1 + ßY1X2 + + e1

Y = Return On Equity X1 = Debt To Equity Ratio X2 = Debt To Asset Ratio e1 = error

Model Summary Mo

del

R R Squa

re

Adjuste d R Square

Std.

Error of the Estimat

e

Change Statistics R

Square Change

F Chan

ge df1 df2

Sig. F Change d

i m e n s i o n 0

1 ,570^a ,325 ,280 ,62800 ,325 7,223 2 30 ,003

a. Predictors: (Constant), debt asset, debt equity

ANOVA^b

Model Sum of

Squares df

Mean

Square F Sig.

1 Regression 5,697 2 2,849 7,223 ,003^a

Residual 11,832 30 ,394

Total 17,529 32

a. Predictors: (Constant), debt asset, debt equity b. Dependent Variable: return on equity

55

Model Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 2,753 ,138 19,920 ,000

debt equity

,390 ,154 ,399 2,523 ,017

debt asset ,505 ,145 ,552 3,492 ,002

a. Dependent Variable: return on equity

,399

e1 = 0,72

,552

Y1 = ßY1X1 + ßY1X2 + + e1

Y = Return On Equity X1 = Debt To Equity Ratio X2 = Debt To Asset Ratio e1 = error

Y1 = ,399X1 + ,552X2 + 0,72 Debt to Equity Ratio

(X

1

)

Debt to Assets Ratio

(X

2

)

Price Earning Ratio (Y2)

56 Lampiran 8 Struktur 2

Y2 = ßY2X1 + ßY2X2 + e1

Y2 = Price Earning Ratio X1 = Debt To Equity Ratio X2 = Debt To Asset Ratio e1 = error

Model Summary Mo

del

R R Squa

re

Adjuste d R Square

Std.

Error of the Estimat

e

Change Statistics R

Square Change

F Chan

ge df1 df2

Sig. F Change d

i m e n s i o n 0

1 ,743^a ,552 ,506 ,30866 ,552 11,92 2

3 29 ,000

a. Predictors: (Constant), return on equity, debt equity, debt asset

ANOVA^b

Model Sum of

Squares df

Mean

Square F Sig.

1 Regression 3,407 3 1,136 11,922 ,000^a

Residual 2,763 29 ,095

Total 6,170 32

a. Predictors: (Constant), return on equity, debt equity, debt asset b. Dependent Variable: price earning

57 Coefficients^a Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardize d Coefficients

t Sig.

B Std. Error Beta

1 (Constant) 1,732 ,256 6,761 ,000

debt equity -,172 ,084 -,296 -2,054 ,049

debt asset ,012 ,084 ,022 ,141 ,889

return on equity

,438 ,090 ,738 4,880 ,000

a. Dependent Variable: price earning

-,296

e1 = 0,494

,022

Y2 = ßY2X1 + ßY2X2 + e1

Y2 = Price Earning Ratio X1 = Debt To Equity Ratio X2 = Debt To Asset Ratio e1 = error

Y2 = -,296X1 + ,022X2 + 0,494 Debt to Equity Ratio

(X1)

Debt to Assets Ratio (X2)

Price Earning Ratio (Y2)

58

Lampiran 9 Hasil Pengaruh Langsung dan Tidak Langsung

Pengaruh Langsung (Direct Efect atau DE)

N0 Keterangan Hubungan Beta Sig

1

Pengaruh variabel Debt To Equity Ratio terhadap Return On Equity

X1 Y1

,399 ,017

2

Pengaruh variabel Debt To Asset Ratio terhadap Return On Equity

X2 Y1

,552 ,002

3

Pengaruh Debt To Equity Ratio terhadap Price Earning Ratio

X1 Y2

-,296 ,049

4

Pengaruh variabel Debt To Asset Ratio terhadap Price Earning Ratio

X2 Y2

,022 ,889

5

Pengaruh variabel Return On Equity terhadap Price Earning Ratio

Y1 Y2

,738 ,000

59

Pengaruh Tidak Langsung (Indirect Effect atau IE) N

o Keterangan Hubungan Perhitungan

1 Pengaruh variabel Debt To Equity Ratio terhadap Price Earning Ratio melalui Return On Equity

X1 Y1 Y2

(,399 x ,738) = 0,294

2 Pengaruh variabel Debt To Asset Ratio terhadap Price Earning Ratio melalui Return On Equity

X2 Y1 Y2

(,552 x ,738) = 0,407

Pengaruh Total (Total Effect)

No Keterangan Hubungan Perhitungan

1 Pengaruh variabel Debt To Equity Ratio terhadap Price Earning Ratio melalui Return On Equity

X1 Y1 Y2

(,399 + ,738) = 1,137

2 Pengaruh variabel Debt To Asset Ratio terhadap Price Earning Ratio melalui Return On Equity

X2 Y1 Y2

(,552 + ,738) = 1,29