Smart city merupakan produk dari masyarakat informasi, yaitu ketika masyarakat menjadikan informasi sebagai bentuk hubungan yang utama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui wawancara mendalam dengan pemangku kepentingan untuk mendapatkan data terkait komunitas warga di lokus Jakarta Smart City. Studi sebelumnya mempresentasikan debat teoretis tentang peran dan implikasi kota pintar dalam kepercayaan warga negara terhadap pemerintah melalui fasilitas teknologi.
Artikel ini menawarkan optimisme untuk kota pintar sebagai manifestasi dari bagaimana jaringan masyarakat berfungsi dalam hal komunitas melalui komunitas virtual. Kajian ini menunjukkan bagaimana kebijakan smart city yang difasilitasi oleh negara memberikan ruang bagi informasi yang dihasilkan warga sehingga mampu membangun komunitas di antara warga kota. Komunitas di kota sebenarnya dapat dibangun melalui mekanisme komunitas jaringan yang disediakan infrastruktur pemerintah berupa smart city.
Smart city is an information society's product through which society views that information as a main form of building relationships. This article aims to describe smart city's implication for the emergence of community in the city. This article offers an optimistic view regarding smart city as the way in which the network society manifests through a form of communities within virtual community.
City Communality could actually be built within network community mechanisms brought by government infrastructure within smart city form.
THE HOAXES OF ILLEGAL FOREIGN WORKERS FROM CHINA: MORAL PANICS AND CULTURE OF FEAR
COMMODIFICATION OF PRIVACY AND PSEUDO-DEMOCRACY IN DIGITAL CULTURE
RADIO JOURNALISM IN DIGITAL ERA: TRANSFORMATION AND CHALLANGE
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC INEQUALITY IN INDONESIA
BEYOND PROSUMPTION: PROSUMPTION PRACTICE OF CONTENT WRITERS IN NEWS AGGREGATOR PLATFORM UC NEWS
PROBLEMATIC OF FEMININITY CONSTRUCTION IN VIRTUAL PUBLIC SPHERE
Keywords: Radio, technology, new media, journalism, traditional media, public opinion, spiral of silence DDC: 390.9. The expression of femininity caught in the social media such as WA Group. Previously the state played a significant role, which eventually fell according to the position of power in the state, now there are others, such as by HTI. The growing "new" definition of women's participation from HTI, happening in the virtual public sphere, contests the definition of gender and women's position in society.
The virtual public sphere shows a new challenging scope of women's movement that needs to be thoroughly reconsidered.
RINGKASAN DISERTASI
REKOGNISI ADAT DALAM PENGEMBANGAN MERAUKE INTEGRATED FOOD AND ENERGY ESTATE DI PAPUA, INDONESIA
TINJAUAN BUKU
ISLAMISM AND THE POLITICS OF CITIZENSHIP IN INDONESIA
RECLAIMING INDONESIAN-NESS
ONLINE AND OFFLINE ENGAGEMENT OF INDONESIAN EXILES IN NETHERLANDS
INTRODUCTION
Furthermore, through their offline and online engagement, Indonesian exiles are enabled to grasp the sense of being Indonesian despite being separated from the country in the physical sense. First, the IPT 1965 (International People's Tribunal 1965) and its related events where Indonesian exiles fluidly employed online and offline activism to mobilize their cause. Second, the Diskusi Forum (forum discussion) event where information received from online and offline practices was re-articulated and re-interpreted through storytelling activities.
INTERNATIONAL PEOPLE TRIBUNAL (IPT) 1965 AND THE
Display of Mailing List Posting
Chalik's remark demonstrated the negotiation between his ideas about Indonesia in the past, where the government had violated human rights, with Indonesia today in which to pin his hopes. This kind of involvement with the homeland would be unthinkable without the use of the Internet. These engagements show that Indonesian exiles are not only concerned about things that happened in the past, but also about the current situation.
Unlike the younger migrants, they have no interest in the current situation in Russia. An example of this simultaneous engagement on these two platforms could be seen in the case of the publication of the judgment. On a cloudy morning on July 20, 2016, I attended the pronouncement of the judgment of the International People's Tribunal 1965 (IPT 1965) held at the UvA library in Amsterdam.
To this news he added his comment: “The government is starting to feel under siege.”23 With this post, this exile suggested that the verdict put considerable pressure on the government. In this post, Esti related the recent information about IPT 1965 to older knowledge and ideals about Indonesia in the past. In the last part of his speech, he made the connection between Indonesia's past and present when he claimed that the current regime reproduced similar deceptions.
Rather, it is something he was personally involved in, along with many other exiles in the Netherlands. He joined several organizations in the Netherlands to oppose Soeharto, and at the same time he was also active in Apakabar. When Ana, Asih24 and several other friends knew about the situation, it was believed that it was important to collect information from them to know the 'truth about the current situation' in Indonesia.25 Therefore, they started around a discussion group as a place for exchange of information.
As stated in the previous section, it was also a topic that became a significant discussion on the Internet. Knowing that I was interested in learning about Internet use among Indonesian expats, she suggested I contact Asih, a co-founder of this forum. We then interacted through emails, in which she also explained the general agenda of the meeting:.
Documentation of IPT 1965 Verdict Announcement by Chalik
Other events like the one I attended were organized because many exiles were interested in discussing the impact. There are also friends of the Forum who will present their impressions from their visit to Indonesia. Most of the participants were exiles, and there were approximately equal numbers of men and women at the venue.
At the end, he didn't really address Asih's question, but the topic he was discussing was relevant to the one proposed at the beginning of the meeting. As one of the participants, I was also asked to give my opinion on this. This fact was also raised by many other participants of this event, which is also one of the reasons why they asked me to speak, which is to represent the views of younger generations on these matters.
I mentioned that despite the strong resurgence of the anti-communist movement in Indonesia, the fact that more people are currently engaging with Marxism through publishing or activism shows that the situation in Indonesia is not entirely negative. At the end of the discussion, Asih stated that this forum was initiated so that they could hear each other's opinions. Continued interactions depend on how controversial the topic is or the response of mailing list members.
Asih clearly said that the Discussion Forum was initiated because of the need for Indonesian exiles to exchange ideas with each other. As Jackson (2013) pointed out, the form of the stories is important to be able to relate one's experience to others. Many parts of their stories, especially their evaluations of the government, were presented with information they learned from mailing lists.
For this matter, the clear separation between personal opinion and facts is no longer relevant, since most of the things discussed are part of - and also become - the common knowledge of other participants. They could not return to their homeland for fear of being captured and persecuted by their government. As Asih said, "Because, (I) can't escape from feeling like an Indonesian, although we are not accepted by the (Indonesian) government." Using the Internet in this regard allowed them to bridge the gap between those feelings and their current situation.
CONCLUSION
This was demonstrated, for example, at the beginning of his story when he said he circulated the live streaming link on several mailing lists. On the other hand, he presented himself as a subject of significance when he declared his institution's official support for IPT 1965. In doing so, Kartaprawira played the second role of storytelling, which is "a vital human strategy for maintaining a sense of freedom of action in the face of disempowering circumstances”.
For this community, a large part of their life was determined by external circumstances that they could not control. This led to them losing not only the connections with their homeland, but also the sense of freedom as a subject to determine their own life course. In this regard, storytelling has on occasion helped the Indonesian exiles regain their sense of agency.
By telling stories about the current situation in Indonesia and how they played a role in it, they felt that they were not really separated from Indonesia and yet they held on to their Indonesianness. Thus, participating in online activities is very important for Indonesian exiles, as many of them still consider themselves Indonesians. Nevertheless, as discussed in this chapter, offline interaction, such as participation in IPT 1965, or gatherings such as Diskusi Forum, is still considered very important because physical encounters reinforce the sense that individual exiles are part of a community of Indonesian exiles.
Among the questions that have not been properly addressed is how the use of technology will help the community sustain their cause in the future, especially if most of them are elderly. These kinds of questions can hopefully be useful to initiate further research on this topic.
