31/3/2020 Review Form Response
aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/979/1393 1/4
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Editor's Report >>>
1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct Comment
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
1. ENSO, UNIB please write the full text of the abbreviation for the first time and for the next sentence it is just writing the abbreviation
2. Please check the reviewer corrections
31/3/2020 Review Form Response
aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/979/1393 2/4
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[2] Partly Correct Comment
The English is alright * [2] Adequate Comment
1. References consist of 69% primary references and 56%
recent journal (<5 y)
2. Please revise the references
31/3/2020 Review Form Response
aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/979/1393 3/4
Final Comments To the Author *
Confidential Comments to the EIC
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
From the whole of the manuscript, it can be said that English is adequate however there is some note such as:
- Many mistyping (see reviewer comments)
- The author did not revise yet the manuscript according to the reviewer's suggestions.
Please revise the manuscript according to the reviewer's and editors suggestion
1. From the whole of the manuscript, it can be said that English is adequate however there is some note such as:
- Many mistyping (see reviewer comments)
- The author did not revise yet the manuscript according to the reviewer's suggestions.
2. It is much better if the proofreader take into attention on this mater
3. The conclusion is too long and in conclusion, there is no discussion anymore.
2. In conclusion, please write ONLY summaries of the results obtained 3. Remove the sentence which just repetition of the methodology, etc 4. Please see also the editor's correction in manuscript
31/3/2020 Review Form Response
aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/979/1393 4/4