• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Evaluasi sediaan farmasi - UHAMKA

N/A
N/A
Nguyễn Gia Hào

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Evaluasi sediaan farmasi - UHAMKA"

Copied!
38
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

FORMULASI DAN EVALUASI SEDIAAN

FARMASI

PSPA 35 FFS-UHAMKA 2021

(2)

Pharmaceutical Formulation

(3)

◦ The objective of drug formulation

◦ Factors considered during pharmaceutical formulation

Physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of drug substances

Polymofphism, solubility, pH, particle size of drug

In-active ingredients or excipients to be added

Effectiveness of the drug in phase I clinical-trials

Result of drug stability studies

(4)

◦ Type of formulation

➢Enteral >> solid, liquid → oral

➢Parenteral >> liquid → intravascular

➢Topical >> solid, semisolid, liquid, aerosol →skin application

◦ Container/Packaging

(5)

Formulator/Formulation Scientist :

• Pre-formulation studies

✓Analyze the result

• Formulation development

• Evaluation the final product

(6)

PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORMS

SOLID DOSAGE FORMS

• Tablets

• Effervescent tablets

• Buccal tablets

• Orally desintegrating tablets

• Sustained controlled release

• Capsules

• Granules

• Powder

SEMI SOLID DOSAGE FORMS

• Ointments

• Creams

• Gel

(7)

NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

NON-STERIL

◦ Syrups

◦ Elixirs

◦ Supensions

◦ Emulsions

STERIL

◦ Parenterals

◦ Eye drop

AEROSOLS NASAL SPRAY COSMETICS

LIQUID DOSAGE FORMS

(8)

• Monitor product quality

• Quantitative evaluation

• Check chemical breakdown

• Check interactions between physical components

evaluation

(9)

Evaluations of tablets

◦ General appearance

◦ Weight variation

◦ Content uniformity

(10)

◦ Mechanical strength

Friability

Hardness

Oral tablets: 4-10 kg hardness

Chewable tablets: 3 kg (softer)

Sustained release tablets:

10-20 kg (much harder)

(11)

◦ Tensile strength

◦ Disintegration

(12)

◦ Dissolution

Bioavailability of drugs

Two objectives in development of In-vitro

dissolution test Rate of dissolution proportional

to :

- efficacy of product - bioavailability

(13)
(14)

Evaluation of effervescent tablets

◦ Effervescent time

◦ Water content and moisture uptake studies

humidity conditions, RH

check by Karl Fisher method

3 tablets were exposed to three different humidity

condition (23°C) → controlled by humidity chambers ( 31%. 45%.

73% RH) →constructed using various saturated salt solutions (in desiccator)

(15)

Evaluation of Buccal tablets

Parameters:

(16)

◦ Residence time :

In vitro

In-vivo

Using dissolution tes (USP); 800 mLisotonic

Buffer PO4

(17)

Evaluations of orally disintegrating tablets (ODT)

ODT →

Parameters:

◦ Wetting time

◦ Disintegration time

less than one minute and actual dis.time that patient can experience ranges from 5-30 seconds

(18)

Evaluations of capsules

◦ Stability test

Shell integrity test → performed of integrity of capsule sheel

Determination of shelf life → expire date of packaged capsules (unde normal storage conditions)

oInvariability test

✓Weight variation

✓Content uniformity oDisintegration test

(19)

Dissolution test; using dissolution apparatus:

✓Rotating basket

✓Rotating paddle

Moisture permeation test

to assure the suitability of containers for packaging of capsules

Evaluation of granules

◦ Flow properties → 1. Frictional force

2. Surface tension force

3. Mechanical forced,caused by interlocking of irregular shape particles

4. Electrostatic forces

5. Cohesive/Van der Waals forces

(20)

Evaluation of

powders Classification of powders :

Bulk Dusting Divided Insufflation

Parameters: Particle size analysis Angle of repose

Bulk density

Tapped density

Flowability

(21)

SEMISOLID DOSAGE FORMS

Evaluation of ointments

(22)

◦ Evaluation of creams

1. Rheology 2. Sensitivity 3. Stability

4. Physical appearance

(23)

Liquid Dosage Forms

Evaluation of syrups

• Visual inspection

➢Good looking

➢Elegance in appearance

pH measurement

Physical stability

(24)

Evaluation of elixirs

• Determination of alcohol content

• 5-40 %

• Viskosity measurement

• Stability

Evaluation of suspensions

• Sedimentation

• Rheological

• Electrokinetic; zeta potential → stability of disperse system

• Micromeritic → particle size of dispersed phase (for stability)

• Freeze thaw test →determine the tendency to crystallize or color

• pH measurement

• Visual inspection → good looking, elegance appearance

(25)

Evaluation of emulsions

particle size and particle count

Viscocity

Phase separation

Electroporetic properties

Electrical conductivity

Including

Determination of:

(26)
(27)

Evaluation of parenterals

• Leaker test

• Pyrogen test

• Sterility test

• Particulate evaluation

• Uniformity of content

(28)

Evaluation of eye drops

• Sterility

• Ocular toxicity and irritation

• Preservative efficacy

• Clarity

• pH

• In-vitro diffusion studies

• Determination of viscosity

(29)

Evaluation of Aerosol

• Flammability and combustibility

Flash point

Flame projection

Physicochemical characteristic

Performance

Spray patterns

Dosage with meter valves

Net content

Foam stability

Particle size determination

Biological testing

Therapeutic activity

Toxicity

(30)

Physicochemical characteristic

(31)

Evaluation of nasal spray

• Appearance, clearance and clarity

• Drug content

• Impurities and degradation products

• Preservatives and stabilizing excipients assay

• Pump delivery

• Spray content uniformity

• Droplet size distribution

• Foreign particulate

• Microbial limit

• Preservative effectiveness

• Net content andweigth loss

• Leakage testing

• pH

(32)

Evaluation Cosmetic

Lipstick :

➢Surface anomalies

➢Thixotropic characteristics

➢Breaking point

➢Melting point

Evaluation of suppositoria

◦ Appearance

◦ Physical strength

◦ Melting range

◦ Uniformity of drug content

◦ Softening time

(33)

Evaluation of Novel DDS

→ Patch transdermal

◦ Physicochemical evaluation

◦ In-vitro evaluation

◦ In-vivo evauation

(34)

Physicochemical evaluation:

◦ Thickness

◦ Uniformity of weight

◦ Drug content

◦ Content uniformity test

◦ Moisture content

◦ Moisture uptake

◦ Flatness

◦ Tensile strength

◦ Peel adhesion

◦ Tack properties

◦ Thumb tack test

◦ Rolling ball test

◦ Quick stick

(35)

USP 35

EVALUATION OF DOSAGE FORMS

IN VIVO IN VITRO

IVIVC Methodology of characterizing the

physicochemical properties of a drug

substances as well as its associated drug product and discuss the relationship of these methods and properties to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drug product

purposes

(36)

The ultimate goals:

• Understanding of relationship between the physicochemical and pharmacological properties of the drug substances to the pharmacokinetic and in-vitro performance of the drug product

• Development of the body of data that informs decision making relating to the formulation, manufacturing, and related regulatory activities necessary for the development, regulatory approval and marketing any of product

Bioavailability,

Bioequivalence, Dissolution

(37)

In-vitro evaluation:

• Physicochemical properties drug substances

• Physicochemical properties drug product

• Dissolution test

➢Immediated release DF

➢Extended release DF

In-vivo evaluation

• Characterization of drug substance

➢BCS

➢Pharmacokinetic

➢Pharmacodinamic

➢Drug disposition

• Characterization of the dosage form

(38)

WASSALAMMUALAIKUM WARAHMATULLAHI WABARAKATUH..

#THE END#

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Otherwise, on the polluted epoxy resin insulator, the relative humidity did not influence to the leakage current amplitude and phase difference between leakage

Optimization of andrographolide SNEDDS formulation was based on their characteristics including emulsification time, droplet size, and drug content.. The optimized SNEDDS formulation