Procedure for Insulation Coordination in Four Steps
[IEC 60071-1]
Flow chart acc. to IEC 60071-1 (Figure 1)
Procedure for Insulation Coordination in Four Steps
Determination of the coordination withstand voltages U
cw
• The coordination withstand voltages are the lowest values of withstand voltages of each overvoltage class, for which the expected low failure rate of the equipment is not exceeded over its full lifetime.
• Derived from the representative overvoltages Urp by the coordination factor Kc.
[IEC 60071-1]
Typical for Germany:
0.1% per year 1 failure in 1000 years
Insulation Strength Characteristics
Factors influencing the dielectric strength of the insulation:
• magnitude, shape, duration and polarity of the applied voltage
• electric field distribution in the insulation
• homogeneous or non-homogeneous electric field
• electrodes adjacent to the considered gap and their potential
• type of insulation
• gaseous
• liquid
• solid
• combination of two or all of them
• impurity content and the presence of local inhomogeneities
• physical state of the insulation
• temperature
• pressure
• other ambient conditions
• mechanical stress
• history of the insulation (aging, damage)
• chemical effects
• conductor surface effects
Factors influencing the dielectric strength of the insulation:
• magnitude, shape, duration and polarity of the applied voltage
• electric field distribution in the insulation
• homogeneous or non-homogeneous electric field
• electrodes adjacent to the considered gap and their potential
• type of insulation
• gaseous
• liquid
• solid
• combination of two or all of them
• impurity content and the presence of local inhomogeneities
• physical state of the insulation
• temperature
• pressure
• other ambient conditions
• mechanical stress
• history of the insulation (aging, damage)
• chemical effects
• conductor surface effects
Insulation Strength Characteristics
Standard atmospheric conditions acc. to IEC 60060-1
Temperature: 20 °C
Pressure: 1013 hPa Absolute humidity: 11 g/m
3Temperature: 20 °C
Pressure: 1013 hPa
Absolute humidity: 11 g/m
3Insulation Strength Characteristics
Topics to be covered in the following:
• Insulators under polluted conditions
• Probability of flashover (Normal and Weibull distributions)
• Behavior of parallel insulation
• Coordination procedure: deterministic and statistical approach
• Correction with altitude of installation
• Clearances in air; "gap factors"
Pre-conditions Pre-conditions
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
• Surface layers
• dust
• carbon black
• salt (coastal areas)
• chemicals (industry, rural areas: fertilizers)
• dust
• carbon black
• salt (coastal areas)
• chemicals (industry, rural areas: fertilizers)
• no problem in dry condition
• after long rain periods: only moderate effect on flashover performance
• most critical:
Humidification after a long dry period Humidification after a long dry period
“typical“ time of the day for insulator flashovers: morning hours (dew!)
Development of pollution flashover Development of pollution flashover
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
dry zone by inhomogeneity of the layer
enlargement of the dry zone by heating of the zone edges (increased current density)
dry band
flashover of the dry band
enlargement of the dry band by arc heating
(max. temperature at foot points)
Development of pollution flashover Development of pollution flashover
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Voltage distribution a) with dry bands b) dry bands bridged
by partial arcs
voltage bridged
voltage drop increased
for further details see HVT 2!
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Layer conductivity K is the most important parameter!
Layer conductivity K is the most important parameter!
K = κ ·ds κ ... specific layer conductivity ds ... thickness of layer
K = 5 µS "light to medium pollution"
K = 10 µS "medium to heavy pollution"
K = 40 µS "very heavy pollution"
Influence of layer conductivity
Influence of layer conductivity for details see IEC 60507
Determination of layer conductivity from
measured conductance and insulator geometry Determination of layer conductivity from
measured conductance and insulator geometry
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
2 d
d d d / 2
r s K
G
l l r
π κ
π
⋅ ⋅
= =
Measurement of conductance G of the full insulator
shed core creepage
distance l
k
insulator length l
G V
l κ
general: =
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
k
0
d 2
l
G K
l r π
=
∫
k
0
d 2
l
l
F
π r
= ∫
G ... conductance of total insulator surface
“form factor"
“form factor"
K = F·G K = F·G
(IEC 60507
*))
form factor to be determined by graphical procedure, described in IEC 60507
Determination of layer conductivity from
measured conductance and insulator geometry Determination of layer conductivity from
measured conductance and insulator geometry
*) IEC 60507, 2ndEd. 1991-04: "Artificial pollution tests on high-voltage insulators to be used on a.c. systems"
Decrease in flashover voltage by conductive layers Decrease in flashover voltage by conductive layers
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
û
fo, rain≈ 0.7 ... 0.9 · û
fo, dryU
fo, polluted≈ 0.2 ... 0.3 · U
fo,dryAn overhead line insulator must be desigend about five times as long as required to withstand operating stresses under dry conditions!
An overhead line insulator must be desigend about five times as long as required to withstand operating stresses under dry conditions!
U
m= 123 kV û
L-E= 100 kV
û
d= 5 kV/cm l = 20 cm would be sufficient (dry!)
Actual length: ca. 1100 mm
Countermeasures
pCountermeasures
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Sheds Sheds
s ... flashover or arcing distance l
k... creepage distance
l
i... insulator length
p ... shed overhang
t ... shed spacing
Terms ...
p
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
l
iderived from required standard lightning impulse voltage strength (u
d, LIca. 5.5 kV/cm)
l
kfrom requirement on specific creepage distance (IEC 60815
*))
31 mm/kV for „very heavy" pollution severity (IV) 25 mm/kV for „heavy" pollution severity (III)
20 mm/kV for "medium" pollution severity (II) 16 mm/kV for "light" pollution severity (I)
31 mm/kV for „very heavy" pollution severity (IV) 25 mm/kV for „heavy" pollution severity (III)
20 mm/kV for "medium" pollution severity (II) 16 mm/kV for "light" pollution severity (I)
∆ = 20%
Reference value is U
m, i.e.
the phase to-phase-voltage!
Reference value is U
m, i.e.
the phase to-phase-voltage!
Countermeasures Countermeasures
Note: IEC 60815 applicable to porcelain insulators; so far no standard on polymeric insulators available
*) IEC 60815, 1st Ed. 1986: "Guide for the selection of insulators in respect of polluted conditions"
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
31 mm/kV for „very heavy" pollution severity (IV) 25 mm/kV for „heavy" pollution severity (III)
20 mm/kV for "medium" pollution severity (II) 16 mm/kV for "light" pollution severity (I)
31 mm/kV for „very heavy" pollution severity (IV) 25 mm/kV for „heavy" pollution severity (III)
20 mm/kV for "medium" pollution severity (II) 16 mm/kV for "light" pollution severity (I)
Countermeasures Countermeasures
Correction of these values necessary depending on insulator's average diameter Dm *) Correction factor kD (derived from service experience):
*) for definition of Dm see IEC 60815
D
m(mm) k
D< 300 1
300 - 500 1.1
> 500 1.2
Pollution performance gets worse
with increasing diameter!
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Pollution level Examples of typical environments
I - Light
- Areas without industries and with low density of houses equipped with heating plants - Areas with low density of industries or houses but subjected to frequent winds and/or rainfall
- Agricultural areas 1) - Mountainous areas
All these areas shall be situated at least 10 km to 20 km from the sea and shall not be exposed to winds directly from the sea 2)
II - Medium
- Areas with industries not producing particularly polluting smoke and/or with average density of houses equipped with heating plants
- Areas with high density of houses and/or industries but subjected to frequent winds and/or rainfall
- Areas exposed to wind from the sea but not too close to the coast (at least several kilometres distant) 2)
III - Heavy
- Areas with high density of industries and suburbs of large cities with high density of heating plants producing pollution
- Areas close to the sea or in any case exposed to relatively strong winds from the sea 2)
IV - Very heavy
- Areas generally of moderate extent, subjected to conductive dusts and to industrial smoke producing particularly thick conductive deposits
- Areas generally of moderate extent, very close to the coast and exposed to sea-spray or to very strong and polluting winds from the sea
- Desert areas, characterized by no rain for long periods, exposed to strong winds carrying sand and salt, and subjected to regular condensation
1) Use of fertilizers by spraying, or the burning of crop residues, can lead to a higher pollution level due to dispersal by wind.
2) Distances from sea coast depend on the topography of the coastal area and on the extreme wind conditions.
IEC 60815, Table 1
IEC 60815, Table 1
Shed profiles Shed profiles
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Some typical shed profiles (from IEC 60815; explanation of the parameters see there).
From left to right: normal shed profile, alternating shed profile, underrib sheds (fog profile), cap-and-pin insulators
Some typical shed profiles (from IEC 60815; explanation of the parameters see there).
From left to right: normal shed profile, alternating shed profile, underrib sheds (fog profile), cap-and-pin insulators
IEC 60815
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Recommendations of IEC 60815 - Example
Shed profiles Shed profiles
c ≥ 30 mm p1 – p2 ≥ 15 mm
s/p1 ≥ 0.65 (in case of plain, non-underripped sheds) lx/dx < 5
C.F. ≤ 3.5 (pollution classes I + II)
≤ 4 (pollution classes III + IV) C.F.= creepage factor = lt/st
lt = total creepage distance
st= arcing distance (arcing horns not considered)
IEC 60815
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Recommendations of IEC 60815 - Example
Shed profiles Shed profiles
α ≥ 5 °specified
IEC 60815
No specification for bottom side angle;
however, ≥ 2 °"advisable" in case of sheds without underribs
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Shed profiles
Shed profiles
Example of user'sexperience
From:
Raouf Znaidi: "Service Experience and Maintenance Requirements for Different Types of Insulators in Tunisia", World Congress on Insulators, Arresters and Bushings, Hong Kong, Nov.
27-30, 2005
Cleaning, greasing, coating of insulators Cleaning, greasing, coating of insulators
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Some particular sites require regular cleaning of the insulators.
Extreme situation:
„Maritime desert climate with industrial pollution“
(e.g.: petrochemical facilities in Saudi-Arabia) Extreme situation:
„Maritime desert climate with industrial pollution“
(e.g.: petrochemical facilities in Saudi-Arabia)
But also in Middle Europe in the vicinity of industrial facilities (steel works, petrochemistry)
for further details see HVT 2!
Semi-conducting glazing Semi-conducting glazing
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Idea: to avoid dry-band arcing by resistive bypass
No flashover due to bypass current
surface current
Drawback: stable semiconducting glazing difficult to produce
Semi-conducting glazing Semi-conducting glazing
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Under development: for composite insulators by coating filled with micro-varistors
µ-varistors
Composite insulators Composite insulators
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
• introduced in the beginning of the 1970s
• today „virtually" state of the art
• „problems": long time performance not yet clear,
"brittle fracture", animal attacks
Shed material:
• EPDM (Ethylene-Propylene- Diene-Monomer)
only in distribution
• Silicone rubber (SIR)
FRP core extruded SIR sheath
push-over SIR sheds
crimped-on metal end fitting
From an EPRI Questionnaire in North America (publ. in 2003)
From an EPRI Questionnaire in North America (publ. in 2003)
From an EPRI Questionnaire in North America (publ. in 2003)
compare this with the
"bathtub curve"of failure
no evidence for aging
From an EPRI Questionnaire in North America (publ. in 2003)
From an EPRI Questionnaire in North America (publ. in 2003)
Hydrophobicity Hydrophobicity
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
One of the most important properties of composite insulators
with regard to pollution performance is Hydrophobicity Hydrophobicity
Hydrophobicity Hydrophobicity
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Advancing angle
Receding angle
= most important for characterization of hydrophobicity
Receding angle
= most important for characterization of hydrophobicity
Properties change under the influence of electrical field actual research!
Hydrophobicity Hydrophobicity
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Draft IEC 62073
Hydrophobicity classes
*)*) Based on the "STRI Guide" (of STRI, Ludvika/Sweden)
Silicone rubber as insulator material Silicone rubber as insulator material
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Hydrophobicity transfer to pollution layers Hydrophobicity transfer to pollution layers
Hydrophobicity only with silicone rubber Hydrophobicity only with silicone rubber
Dynamics of hydrophobicity Dynamics of hydrophobicity
Excellent service record so far (only few exceptions where silicone rubber is not optimal, e.g. under extreme coastal conditions, i.e. heavy salt layers)
Excellent service record so far (only few exceptions where silicone rubber is not optimal, e.g. under extreme coastal conditions, i.e. heavy salt layers)
Excellent tracking resistance
Excellent tracking resistance
Natural Test Sites Natural Test Sites
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
*)Example: Koeburg, RSA Realistic test conditions, but no acceleration
factors
long test times necessary (several years)
"(In)famous" test sites:
• Koeburg, RSA (Atlantic Ocean)
• Dungeness, UK (The Channel)
• Martiguez, F (Mediterranean Sea)
*) NOTE: often the term NCI = non ceramic insulators is being used
Natural Test Sites Natural Test Sites
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
Example: Dungeness, UK (Excursion 2002)
The "Tracking and Erosion Test" acc. to IEC 61109 The "Tracking and Erosion Test" acc. to IEC 61109
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
Similar test procedures specified e.g. for surge arresters (IEC 60099-4) and for polymeric insulators (IEC document 36/213/CDV: Project IEC 62217)
The "Tracking and Erosion Test" acc. to IEC 61109 The "Tracking and Erosion Test" acc. to IEC 61109
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
Examples of test chambers
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
Tracking
Erosion
The "Tracking and Erosion Test" acc. to IEC 61109
The "Tracking and Erosion Test" acc. to IEC 61109
Cyclic Tests Cyclic Tests
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
Cyclic tests usually consist in applying, in addition to voltage stress, various stresses in a cyclic manner:
- solar radiation simulation;
- artificial rain;
- dry heat;
- damp heat (near saturation);
- high dampness at room temperature (saturation has to be obtained);
- salt fog at low concentration.
Furthermore, temperature variations may cause some degree of mechanical stress, especially at the level of insulator interfaces and also give rise to condensation phenomena, which are repeated several times in the course of a cycle.
For power frequency test voltage, a test transformer shall be used. The test circuit when loaded with a resistive current of 250 mA (r.m.s.) on the high voltage side shall experience a maximum voltage drop of 5 %. The protection level shall be set at 1 A (r.m.s.).
Problem: no general agreement on one particular test!
Problem: no general agreement on one particular test! Examples next slides:
Cyclic Tests Cyclic Tests
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
Practical test problem: rain and solar
radiation at the same time!
Cyclic Tests Cyclic Tests
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
Cyclic Tests Cyclic Tests
Weather Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
"EPRI" cycle: a year in service is considered to be represented by 10 days of summer cycle and 11 days of winter cycle. A duration of 5040 h is required for the whole test, 10 summer/winter cycles of 21 days each.
Wheel Test acc. to IEC 62217 Wheel Test acc. to IEC 62217
Other Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
The test specimens shall be cleaned with de-ionized water before starting the test. The test specimens are mounted on the wheel as shown in Figure A.1 below. They go through four positions in one cycle. Each test specimen remains stationary for about 40 s in each of the four positions. The 90° rotation from one position to the next takes about 8 s. In the first part of the cycle the insulator is dipped into a saline solution. The second part of the test cycle permits the excess saline solution to drip off the specimen ensuring that the light wetting of the surface gives rise to sparking across dry bands that will form during the third part of the cycle. In that part the specimen is submitted to a power frequency voltage. In the last part of the cycle the surface of the specimen that had been heated by the dry band sparking is
allowed to cool.
Electrical stress: The power frequency test voltage in kV is determined by dividing the actual creepage distance in millimetres by 28,6.
NaCl content of de-ionized water: 1,40 kg/m³ ± 0,06 kg/m³ Ambient temperature: 20 °C ± 5 K
Test duration: 30 000 cycles
The test is regarded as passed, if on both test specimens:
• no tracking occurs
• for composite insulators: erosion depth is less than 3 mm and does not reach the core; if applicable
• for resin insulators: erosion depth is less than 3 mm;
• no shed, housing or interface is punctured.
Extremely severe test!
Wheel Test Wheel Test
Other Aging Tests for Polymeric Insulators
"Silicone Bonus"
"Silicone Bonus"
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
For NCIs with permanent (recovering) hydrophobic characteristics a "silicone bonus" may be applied as a reduction factor of creepage distance (C.D.) compared with ceramic insulators:
Class 1 : 70 % … 75 % of C.D. of ceramic insulators
Class 2 : 80 % of C.D. of ceramic insulators (not applicable in coastal areas!) Class 3 : same C.D. as for ceramic insulators
Class 4 : in general, application of NCI should be carefully checked for each individual application
Class 1 : 70 % … 75 % of C.D. of ceramic insulators
Class 2 : 80 % of C.D. of ceramic insulators (not applicable in coastal areas!) Class 3 : same C.D. as for ceramic insulators
Class 4 : in general, application of NCI should be carefully checked for each
individual application
Silicone rubber as insulator material Silicone rubber as insulator material
Performance of Polymeric Insulators
Other problems ....
Moss, algea
Silicone rubber as insulator material Silicone rubber as insulator material
Other problems ....
Animal attack (parrots, cockattoos, termites) Example: Australia
Example: Australia
Performance of Polymeric Insulators
Silicone rubber as insulator material Silicone rubber as insulator material
Other problems ....
Animal attack (parrots, cockattoos, termites) Example: Australia
Example: Australia
Performance of Polymeric Insulators
Brittle fracture Brittle fracture
Performance of Polymeric Insulators
From:
M. Kuhl: "FRP Rods for Brittle Fracture Resistant Composite Insulators",
http://www.lappinsulator.com/downloadcenter/technical.asp
Countermeasures:
• ECR glass (electro-chemical resistant)
• quality of sealing at triple point
• field stress reduction by grading rings
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
2 different methods:
Salt fog method Salt fog method
Solid layer method Solid layer method
Artificial pollution tests Artificial pollution tests
IEC standard 60507
IEC standard 60507
Salt fog method Salt fog method
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Test specimen energized at operating voltage under conductive salt fog exposure Test specimen energized at operating voltage under conductive salt fog exposure
Salt mass concentration between 2.5 kg/m
3und 224 kg/m
3Salt mass concentration between 2.5 kg/m
3und 224 kg/m
3(1 kg/m
3corresponds to 1 g/l)
Classification by withstand salt mass concentration Classification by withstand salt mass concentration
Test specimen must not flash over within a specified time of exposure
Test specimen must not flash over within a specified time of exposure
Solid layer method Solid layer method
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Test specimen is energized in a cold fog chamber and then exposed to humidity
Test specimen is energized in a cold fog chamber and then exposed to humidity
Layer conductivity between 3 µS and 80 µS Layer conductivity between 3 µS and 80 µS
Classification by withstand layer conductivity or withstand salt deposit density Classification by withstand layer conductivity or withstand salt deposit density
Solid layer of specified conductivity is applied in wet condition and dried Solid layer of specified conductivity is applied in wet condition and dried
Test specimen is exposed to humidity in a cold fog chamber and then energized
Test specimen is exposed to humidity in a cold fog chamber and then energized
Test specimen must not flash over within a specified time of exposure Test specimen must not flash over within a specified time of exposure
Salt Deposit Density (SDD) between 0.03 mg/cm
2and 0.60 mg/cm
2Salt Deposit Density (SDD) between 0.03 mg/cm
2and 0.60 mg/cm
2Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Artificial pollution tests Artificial pollution tests
Correlation between pollution level, recommended creepage distance and artificial pollution test parameters:
Radial Field Stress under Pollution Radial Field Stress under Pollution
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
MO column
Conductive layer
Gas or solid Solid
U
axial, intU
radialArises if there is an internal active part with a given, constant axial voltage distribution; risk of
• internal PD in case of internal gas volume
• puncture in case of pure solid insulation MO-Scheiben
Porzellangehäuse-Innenwand MO discs
porcelain housing, inner wall
Photo: PD in a porcelain housed surge arrester
Dielectric and Thermal Effects Dielectric and Thermal Effects
Performance of Insulators under Pollution
Internal partial discharges
⇒ changes in internal atmosphere
⇒ risk of deterioration of all internal parts Internal partial
discharges
⇒ changes in internal atmosphere
⇒ risk of deterioration of all internal parts
Risk of partial heating of internal active elements Risk of partial heating of internal active elements
Risk of external flashovers Risk of external flashovers
Outer surface discharges
⇒ Risk of partial heating of internal active elements Outer surface discharges
⇒ Risk of partial heating of internal active elements
Example: 800-kV surge arrester
Emerging Insulator Standards
From:
Claude de Tourreil: "New IEC standards: their Impact on future Selection of Composite
Insulators", World Congress on Insulators, Arresters and Bushings, Hong Kong, Nov. 27- 30, 2005