32 PEOCEEDINGS
ENTOMOLOGICAL
SOCIETYPerdita punctiferan. sp.
Female. Runs in
my
table inProc. Phila. Acad., 1896, toP. mentzelice Ckll.,towhichitisnearlyrelated, differingbythewhitelateralfacemarks being longer, and sharply pointed above, though notched on inner side (they are like those of P. pallidior Ckll.); the clypeus with a smallwhite spot,moreorlessdistinctly triangular, onitsupper margin;thelightcolor of the antennae creamy-white instead ofyellow. From P. pallidior it iseasilyknown by the heavily banded abdomen and largely darkened legs, bothcharacters beingasin mentzelice.
Type: Cat. No. 16844, U. S. N.
M.
Three specimens collected on August 27.Certainly this insect is very close to P. mentzelice,
and
from itscombination of characters one might suppose it to be a hybrid, mentzelice
X
pallidior, were those species present. Further in- vestigation of the series of species to which this belongs will, I believe, elicitsome
facts of great interest.The
differential char- actersmay
behaveinaMendelianmanner
inhybrids,and some
of theapparentlydistinct speciesmay
represent the results of earlier crosses.The
Thurberia bees certainly do notshow any
great degree of modification or specialization.The
impression gained is that Thurberiamay
have entered the region within comparatively recent times, its bee-fauna being apparentlyinthe earlieststages of differentiation. It is singular thatwe
do not find the bees which habitually occur onother Malvaceaein the southwest.-In connection with the papers onthe Thurberia weevil
Mr.
Barber spoke of
two
of his breeding experimentsand
has fur- nished thefollowing abstract of his remarks.ON INTERSPECIFIC MATING
INPHENGODES AND INBREEDING IN EROS.
(COLEOPTERA.)
BY HERBERT S. BARBER, BureauofEntomology.
The
resultsofanexperimentstartedin1912show some
contrast totheresults ofMessrs.Goad
andPierce in interbreedingtheThur- beria and Cotton Boll Weevils, but the writer does not believe that the mere interbreedingofforms provestheirspecificidentity.A
few females of a species ofPhengodeswerereceivedthrough Mr.CharlesSchaefferfrom
Long
Island,andtherebeingno males ofthesame
species athand
were confined withmalesof our local species P. laticollis.The two
species appear to live in different types ofOF \VASIII.\<;T<>\, VOLC.MI: \\i, ion
country, and to be easily distinguished in the male, female and larval stages. Several males were confined, one after theother, with each female. Usually,
when
a male Uid'collix is introduced intoajarwith a femaleofitsown
species,matin"-occursvery quick-ly, but with the females of this other species most of the male.- failed to recognize the female, and only in a few instances dis- played sexual excitement, which
was
of short duration except in two cases.One
of thesemales attempted copulation a few times without success, while the other succeeded aftermany
fruitleattempts, but displayed great difficulty in disengaging himself afterward. This female that had been fertilized laid eggs in due time.
The
otherwas
restlessand
abnormal in actions, but laid three infertile eggs,and
finally died. All the other females died without laying eggs. Ofthe48 eggs laid by the fertilized female,many
were infertile. In others theembryo
developed but failed to issue, and only ten larvae hatched. Of these most were very badly deformed and unable to feed.Two
of them, however, fed and have lived fifteenmonths
in confinement.They
display the specific characters of the male parent. It appears from tin- abovethat inaddition totheisolation ofthetwospeciesbyhabital the species are separatedby
(l).lack of sexual attraction, (2)mechanical difficulty in copulation, and (3) in
some manner
the fertilizationisfaultyandresults ingross abnormalities.The
writer believes that these two forms are very distinct species, but that chance migration of the malesmay. veryrarely, result ininterspe-cific unions,witha slight chanceof the survivalofhybrid offspring which wouldnaturallybereabsorbedinthelocalspecie-;it' ii should prove to be fertile.
The
question of sexual attraction even within a single specieis in itself a very interesting and important question.
We
are.ofcourse, utterly unableto detect the difference in odors or other factors by which one sex recognizes the opposite sex of its
own
kind, and is stimulted to sexual excitement while with another species thestimulus
may
be absentor repulsive.Some
groups aresexuallymature assoonastheyhave hardenedafter issuancefrom the pupa, and
mate
with theirown
brothers or sisters, but most appear to have some obstacle (hat prevents breeding.The
firstgroup are usually somewhat degraded and are inclined to form numerous local races or color forms.
An
example of this groupis /-;/v>x hnnn-rnlix of which the following brief observation is sig-
nificant:
From
a colonyof larva'found last spring (1913) in arotten syca- more log, the individuals were isolated in plaster cells where they pupated and matured.The
adults showed no desire for migra- tion but lay quiet in thecells.A
male was introduced into a cell34 PEOCEEDINGS
ENTOMOLOGICAL
SOCIETYwith a female
and
immediately mated.Next
day hewas
placed with another female and immediately mated. Both females de- positedeggs, andtheyoung
beganfeeding inthewood, butthefe- male parents at no time displayed a desire for a migrationflight.It is believed the colony
was
originally from a single set of eggsand
thatmore
thantwo
generations would have been passed within the log in nature.In the secondgroup the "provisions" against, or obstacles to in- breedingassumevariedforms. Usually theratiochanceofunions between brothers
and
sisters to unions between unrelatedindivid- uals, is so low that the offspring would be quicklyreabsorbecl intothe normalform, but the details ofhabit that controlthislow percentagemay
be varied. Chief of these is the instinct for mi- gration, whichappearsto precede sexual maturity inmany
socialinsects, but there appears to be also a remarkable difference in time of development of the opposite sexes
among
the progeny of a singleparentofsome
species.The
writer believesfromprelimi- nary experiments, that in Phengodes the males develop after two years in the larval stage, while their sistersmust
spend three ormore
years aslarvaB. In this genus themalesarestrongmigrants while the femalesmust
laytheir eggswheretheyhavetransformed.The
writer hasshown
that inMicromalthus themales issue abouttwo
weeks after their sisters are out, butsubsequent observations indicate thatmales issue abnormally or irregularljr at times. At- tempts tomate
specimens from different coloniesin the breedingcells all failed, and as both males and females manifested only a desire to migrate from the time of their issuance almost until death, itis believed sexual maturity will develop only after such migratory flight.