• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Introduction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Introduction"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Hendrickson 2012

Methods Study design : Controlled before after study Duration: December 2008 – 15 months either side Follow up : Duration of hospital admission Participants Country : US

Setting : Paediatric level 2 trauma centre

Inclusion criteria : Pre MTP - ‘Trauma stat’ patients who received blood within 24 hours. MTP – ‘Trauma stat’ patients who received blood.

Number: 49 Pre MTP ; 53 MTP Mean age : 6.3 Pre MTP ; 6.1 MTP Sex : 17/49 F Pre MTP ; 16/53 MTP ISS : 22 Pre MTP ; 22 MTP

Other Rx : Average 13 ml/kg crystalloid Pre MTP ; 16 ml/kg MTP InterventionsPre MTP : Blood products at physician discretion (not described)

MTP : MTP designed for 5 different weight ranges

Outcomes Primary outcome Mortality :Pre MTP 23% (11/49) ; MTP 38% (20/53) Ventilator days : Pre MTP 6 days ; MTP 2 days

ICU days : Pre MTP 9 days ; MTP 7 days

Notes Small study. Shorter time to transfuse with higher FFP:PRBC ratio in MTP group. Only 50% had 70ml/kg and therefore massive

transfusion. Most deaths from head injury. Missing data fields.

Risk of bias

Random sequence generation Author’s judgement Support

(Selection bias) High risk Unrandomised

Allocation concealment High risk No concealment

Blinding of participants High risk Unblinded

Blinding of outcome High risk Unblinded

Incomplete outcome data Low risk All patients accounted for

Others None

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)  very low

1

(2)

Chidester

Methods Study design : Prospective chart review Duration : 1st Jan 2009 to 1st Jan 2011 Follow up : Hospital discharge Participants Country : US

Setting : Paediatric level 1 trauma centre

Inclusion criteria : Patients requiring blood transfusion. Trauma or surgical.

Number: 55 (22 MTP ; 33 non MTP)

Mean age : 9.6 years (both groups) – explicit data not included Sex : 78% Male (both groups) – explicit data not included ISS : 42 MTP ; 25 non MTP

Other Rx : Factor VIIa at physician discretion

InterventionsProspective chart review of patients given uncrossmatched blood either via an MTP or at physician discretion.

Outcomes Primary outcome Mortality : No significant difference in mortality (46%) between all groups.

Notes Small study. Underpowered. Very high mortality. Thromboembolic complications higher in non MTP group. Coagulopathy predictive of MTP activation. FVIIa no effect on mortality and correlated with higher product use. Used t-test on thromboembolic complications – not normal data.

Risk of bias

Random sequence generation Author Support

(Selection bias) High risk MTP discretionary

Allocation concealment High risk As above

Blinding of participants N/A

Blinding of outcome High risk Unblinded

Incomplete outcome data Medium 1 lost to follow up Others None

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)  very low

2

(3)

Edwards

Methods Study design : Retrospective analysis of trauma registry database Duration : 2002-2012

Follow up : Not indicated Participants Country : Iraq and Afghanistan

Setting : US military hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan

Inclusion criteria : Injured children (<14 yrs) requiring transfusion Number: 224 high volume (>40ml/kg); 77 massive transfusion (>70ml/kg)

Mean age : Not documented

Sex : 70% Male (high volume) ; 71% Male (massive transfusion) ISS : Higher ISS for massive transfusions

Other Rx : Looked at effect of crystalloid use

InterventionsRetrospectively examined effects of crystalloid and blood component resuscitation in first 24 hours

Outcomes Primary outcome Mortality : 18% crystalloid >150ml/kg ; 10% < 150 ml/kg. Non significant trend towards increased mortality with higher FFP/PRBC ratios.

Secondary outcome: ICU stay, ventilator days ;Increased crystalloid administration associated with increased LOS and ventilator days.

Notes Larger study. Good discussion of massive transfusion definitions.

Risk of bias

Random sequence generation Author Support

(Selection bias) High risk Acknowledged in paper

Allocation concealment High risk Unblinded

Blinding of participants N/A

Blinding of outcome High risk Unblinded

Incomplete outcome data High risk Multiple lost due to transfer Others None

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)  very low

3

(4)

Nosanov

Methods Study design : Retrospective analysis using logistic regression Duration: January 1 2003 to December 31 2010

Follow up : N/A (retrospective) Participants Country : US

Setting : Level 1 Trauma Centre

Inclusion criteria : Age < 18. Trauma requiring transfusion > 50%

total blood volume.

Number: 105 Mean age : 12.4 Sex : 23 (25%) ISS : 25.8 Other Rx : nil

InterventionsRetrospective review comparing blood product ratios to outcomes.

Based on low, medium and high ratios of both plasma and platelets to PRBC.

Outcomes Primary outcome Mortality : No significant difference in mortality (18%) between all groups.

Notes Small study. Underpowered. Very complex with multiple subgroups analysed. Deaths within 24 hours excluded to mitigate survivor bias (when haemorrhagic deaths presumably occur).

Risk of bias

Random sequence generation Author Support

(Selection bias) High risk Retrospective

Allocation concealment High risk No concealment

Blinding of participants High risk Retrospective

Blinding of outcome High risk Unblinded

Incomplete outcome data Low risk All patients accounted for Others None

Quality of the evidence (GRADE)  very low

4

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

These controversial findings may have many explanations: selection bias by mortal- ity in retrospective analysis; bias against studies with small samples; the different role played by

Incomplete outcome data attrition bias All outcomes - loss to fol- low-up High risk At 4 months follow-up only 78% of the included participants were assessed.. Incomplete outcome data

Keywords: Multivariate regression model; Student-t errors; unrestricted, re- stricted, preliminary test, shrinkage and positive-rule shrinkage estimators; bias, quadratic risk, mean

This section discusses the experiences of participants in the selection processes of school leaders under the following sub-headings: bias and inconsistences in the selection processes

Table 2 Result of the quality assessment of the studies included in the present systematic review Study Domains of bias Bias due to confounding Bias in selection of participants

7b When applicable, explanation of any interim analyses and stopping guidelines - Randomisation: Sequence generation 8a Method used to generate the random allocation sequence 7 8b

The methodological assessment of the included studies in meta-analysis Domain assessment Selection bias caused by the inadequate selection of participants Selection bias

Risk of bias judgements of included studies Study reference: Andresen 2016 Risk of bias Judgement Comment Random sequence generation Low risk “assignment to treatment was