74 Lampiran 1
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Aeni, et al., Year: 2019 Record Number: 01
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 7 (87,5%) dan tidak sebanyak 1
75 Lampiran 2
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Akhriansyah, M. Year: 2018 Record Number: 02
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 7 (87,5%) dan tidak sebanyak 1
76 Lampiran 3
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Siswanti, D. Year: 2018 Record Number: 03
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 7 (87,5%) dan tidak sebanyak 1
77 Lampiran 4
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Siswanti, H., & Sukesih, S. Year: 2017 Record Number: 04
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 8 (100%)
78 Lampiran 5
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Maria, L., & Maulidia, R. Year: 2020 Record Number: 05
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 6 (75%) dan tidak sebanyak 2
79 Lampiran 6
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Yustiari, et al., Year: 2021 Record Number: 06
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 5 (62,5%) dan tidak sebanyak 3
80 Lampiran 7
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Lase, et al., Year: 2020 Record Number: 07
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?
□ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 6 (75%) dan tidak sebanyak 2
81 Lampiran 8
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Wati, et al., Year: 2019 Record Number: 08
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 7 (87,5%) dan tidak sebanyak 1
82 Lampiran 9
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL STUDIES
Reviewer: Charisma Aprillia Damayanti Date: Desember 2021 Author: Pratiwi, et al., Year: 2020 Record Number: 09
Yes No Unclear Not applicable 1. Were the criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined? □ □ □
2. Were the study subjects and the
setting described in detail? □ □ □
3. Was the exposure measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
□ □ □
5. Were confounding factors
identified? □ □ □
6. Were strategies to deal with
confounding factors stated? □ □ □
7. Were the outcomes measured in a
valid and reliable way? □ □ □
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis
used? □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include Exclude □ Seek further info □ Comments (Including reason for exclusion) :
Dari 8 pertanyaan memperoleh jawaban ya sebanyak 6 (75%) dan tidak sebanyak 2
83 Lampiran 10
84
85
86
