• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change

N/A
N/A
BEM FISIP WIRARAJA

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Journal of Innovation

& Knowledge

https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-innovation-and-knowledge

Conceptual paper

Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change

Syed Talib Hussain

, Shen Lei, Tayyaba Akram, Muhammad Jamal Haider, Syed Hadi Hussain, Muhammad Ali

GloriousSunSchoolofBusinessandManagement,DonghuaUniversity,Shanghai,China

a r t i c l e i n f o

Articlehistory:

Received22June2016 Accepted14July2016

Availableonline11October2016

Keywords:

Organizationalchange Unfreezing

Changeprocess Refreezing

Employeeinvolvement Knowledgesharing Leadershipstyle Changeimplementation

a b s t r a c t

Changeiscrucialfororganizationsingrowing,highlycompetitivebusinessenvironments.Theoriesof changedescribetheeffectivenesswithwhichorganizationsareabletomodifytheirstrategies,processes, andstructures.Theactionresearchmodel,thepositivemodel,andLewin’schangemodelindicatethe stagesoforganizationalchange.ThisstudyexaminedthethreestagesofLewin’smodel:unfreezing, movement,andrefreezing.Althoughthismodelestablishesgeneralsteps,additionalinformationmust beconsideredtoadaptthesestepstospecificsituations.Thisarticlepresentsacriticalreviewofchange theoriesfordifferentstagesoforganizationalchange.Inthiscriticalreview,changemanagementoffersa constructiveframeworkformanagingorganizationalchangethroughoutdifferentstagesoftheprocess.

Thisreviewhastheoreticalandpracticalimplications,whicharediscussedinthisarticle.Immunityto changeisalsodiscussed.

©2016JournalofInnovation&Knowledge.PublishedbyElsevierEspa ˜na,S.L.U.Thisisanopenaccess articleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introductionandresearchquestions

Thepurposeofthestudyistocrafttherelationbetweenprocess modelandchange,thisrelationdescribesthewaysofimplement- ingchangeprocessbyleader’sknowledgesharing,andthissharing identifies thestages of changeprocess, and thesestages delin- eatethefunctionalsignificancebetweenorganizationalchangeand changeimplementation. Theorganizational lifehas beenmade inevitablefeaturebyglobal,technologicalandeconomicpace,and many modelsof organizational change have acknowledgedthe influenceofimplicitdimensionsatonestageormorestagesoforga- nizationalchangeprocess(Burke,2008;Wilkins&Dyer,1988),and thesemodelsimitatedifferentgranularlevelsaffectingthepro- cessoforganizational change,and each levelofthem identifies distinctivechangeimplementationstages(By,2005).Amodelof organizationalchangeinKurtLewin’sthreestepschangeprocess contextwasintroducedinthisstudy;whichreflectsmomentous stagesinchangeimplementationprocess.KurtLewin’smodelis theearlyfundamentalplannedchangemodelsexplainingthestriv- ing forces to maintainthe status quo and pushing for change (Lewin,1947).Tochangethe“quasi-stationaryequilibrium”stage,

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:talib[email protected](S.T.Hussain).

onemayincreasethestrivingforcesforchange,ordecreasethe forcesmaintainingthestatusquo,orthecombinationofbothforces forproactiveandreactiveorganizationalchangethroughknowl- edgesharingofindividualwillingnesswiththehelpofstimulating changeleadershipstyle.

The Lewin’s model was used from an ethnographic study assumed for the investigationof theLewin’s model for change development,mediatesimplementationandleadershipinitiatives forchangeincomplexorganizations.Thefocusofthisresearchon (i)howLewin’schangemodelgranulateschange,(ii)howknowl- edgesharingaffectsthechangeimplementationprocess,(iii)how employeesinvolveinchangeandwillingnesstochange,and(iv) howleadershipstyleaffectstheorganizationalchangeprocessin organization.

Modeloforganizationalchange Processmodel

Theorganizationalchangeexplainsthemovementofanorga- nization fromthe known(current state) state tothe unknown (Desiredfuturestate)state.Thisisbecausethefutureofthischange is uncertainand mayconcernthe people’sworth, copingabili- ties, and competency,sothepeopleof theorganizationdo not supportchangeunlesstheyareconvincedagainstthestatusquo

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002

2444-569X/©2016JournalofInnovation&Knowledge.PublishedbyElsevierEspa ˜na,S.L.U.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://

creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

(Cummings&Worley,2003).Theorganizationmayhaveinvested heavilyforstatusquo;subsequentlyresistingchangewilltakeplace toavoiduncertainfutureoforganization.Consequently,thenec- essaryactions are tobe takento motivate employees.For this purpose,thestudyexplorestheloopoforganizationalchangepro- cessthroughaseriesofevents,whichfocusesonfundamentalsteps takenforimplementationofchange.Themodelhasbeencatego- rizedintoloopsofleadership,managementandorganization.This processisbeinginitiatedthroughLewin’s(1947)threestepschange modeldenotingthestepbystepphasesofunfreezing,changing andrefreezing,soemployeesarebeinginvolved andinstructed byleadersregardingtheissuesrelatedtochangeprocess(Porras

&Robertson,1992).Thissubsequenceprocessof changeelabo- ratesthevarying outlinesequenceupon theessential stages of change(Bate,Khan,&Pye,2000).ThereprisalintheprocessBurke (2008)andWhelan-Berry,Gordon,andHinings(2003)underlined theimportanceofleadershipbeforelaunchingeachphaseateach stageofchange.The leader’sethicalitymaybeoneofthemost importantsourcesforchangefromemployeesasDurandandCalori (2006)statedtheethicsofleadershipinchangeprocess.Yet,this studydoesnotexamineexplicitlytheroleofleadershipethicsor importanceinspontaneousundergoingchangeprocess(Armenakis

&Harris,2009).

In this study the organizational change will be referred as plannedchange.Incontextofprocessmodelofchange,theculture hasbeenrecognizedbytheoristsasmoderatorfororganizational change.AsBurke(2008)identifiedtheBurke-Litwinmodelfrom differentprocesstheoristsforthecultureoforganizationalchange.

OrganizationalchangeandLewin’smodel“unfreezing”

ChangemanagementdefinedbyMoranandBrightman(2001) as‘theprocessofcontinuallyrenewinganorganization’sdirection, structure,andcapabilitiestoservetheeverchangingneedsofexter- nalandinternalcustomers’.Changingdoesnotdependonsizeand agebutoccursthoroughlyin allbusinesses.Theworld changes veryfast,sotheorganizationsmusthavetobechangedquickly forthedevelopmentandsurvivingoftheorganization(Alvesson

&Sveningsson,2008).The Modelsand theorieshavebeenpro- posedfordrivingchangesinorganizationformanagersandleaders tomonitor,evaluateandplanchangesusingstructurefor quick responsetotheinternalorexternalenvironmentandforeseethe patternofchangebyindividuals,products,technologyandmarket (VanOssten,2006).AsstatedbyGlieck(1987)thatorganizational changeisakindofchaos,sonumberofvariablesarechanging,the environmentchanging,frequentchangeandresistanttochange createconfluenceofchangeprocessatthesametime,thatnotonly stimulatesdifficultiesinpredictionbutalsomakecontrolimpossi- ble.However,therepeatedlyresearchliterature,consistentlylink differentclassesofeventsinorganizationsforchange.Anewmodel hastobebuilttodescribe thecausesof organizationalchange, exploringhow doesorganizationfunctions(i.e.,a leadsb), and causationofmodelchangedeliberately.Theinternalandexternal environmentpersuadesorganizationsforchange.Pierce,Gardner, andDunham(2002)statedtwokindofchangeinorganization,reac- tiveandproactivechange.Thereactivechangetakesplacewhen internalorexternalforcespressurizetheorganizationforchange whileproactivechangetakesplacewhentheorganizationitself concludesaboutchangetobedesirableandPetersandWaterman (1982)developedculturalexcellencemodelforchange;Pettigrew (1973)developedprocessualapproachasholisticviewfororgani- zationandenvironment,whichemphasizethatchangeisheavily influencebypower,cultureandpolitics.Manytheorieshavebeen proposeforchangeprocessbuthereinthisstudytheLewin’sthree stepsmodelforchangehavetobeusedforchangeprocess.Asthe organizationisinstageofchange,theKurtLewin’stheoryhasbeen

appliedforchangeprocess.AccordingtothestudyofLewin,that successfulorganizationalchangemaybeplannedandthisrequires thesystemtobeunfreezed.Asexplainedinliteraturereview,there aredifferentreasonsforchangeoforganizationandthiswilldivert fromitscurrentpositionor statusquotoa newdirection.This stagewillincreasethegroupbehaviorsforchangeortoincrease theleader’s pressureforchangeathigherlevel, andLewinsug- geststhattheforcesinvolvingforstatusquowillcreateminimum resistanceandtensionthantheforcesapplyingforchangeandthis strategywillbemoreeffectivestrategyforchange.

EmployeeinvolvementinchangeandLewin’smodel“change process”

Employeeinvolvement(EI)hasbeendefinedbyGlew,Leary- Kelly,Griffin,andVanFleet(1995)as“Employeeinvolvementseeks toincreasemembers’inputintodecisionsthataffectorganization performanceandemployeewellbeing”.Thiscanbeexplainedin four(power,information,knowledgeandskill,andrewards)ele- mentswhichpromotetheworkeroremployeeinvolvement.For overcomingtheresistanceinorganizationalchange,theemployee involvementisthemostoldestandeffectivestrategyinformulat- ingtheplanningandimplementingchange.Theparticipationwill leadhighqualitychangeandprevailovertheresistanceinimple- mentingstage(Vroom&Yetton,1973).Bydoingthisavarietyof informationandideasmaybegenerated,which maycontribute theinnovationseffectiveandsuitableinthesituation,raiselike- lihood,createmembercommitmentinimplementingchange,and employeemotivatingandleadingchangeeffortinwork(Cummings

&Molloy,1977).Aftergettingoutofthestatusquo,theleaders are required to support employee’s involvement for accelerat- ingthechangeinorganization.ThestudyofPierceetal.(2002) statesthat;tostimulateprocess,theemployeesmusthavetobe addressedaboutchange.Theleadersshouldeducate,communi- cate,participate,involve,tasksupport,provideemotionalsupport andincentives,manipulate,co-optateandcoercetheemployees aboutchange.

The study of Morgan and Zeffane (2003) states that during changeprocesstheleader’stransparency,reaffirmsandenhance thetrustofemployee’sinvolvementinorganizationalchangepro- cessregardingthediscussionandmeetingswheneverdiscussedin organization,thisallowsemployeesfortheiropinionsandachieve bettersenseofcontrol(Morgan&Zeffane,2003).Theleadershav- ingencouragingbehaviorwillprovidethesupportorsuggestions intheprocessofchangewillreapadvantagesoftaskcommitment andeffectiveness(Higgins,Judge,&Ferris,2003).Theactiveroleof employeesinorganizationalchangetendsemployeestowardpos- itivefeelings(Furst&Cable,2008).Thiswillenhancetheemployee acceptanceforchangeprocess(Oreg,2006)andalsoselectchanges duringchangeprocessforencouragingtheorganizationalsupport (Armenakis&Harris,2009).ThischangeprocessofLewinsecond stepwillshiftthebehaviororattitudeofdepartment,organization, orindividualtothenextnewlevel.

Theemployee’sinvolvementwillbemoreeffectiveifemployees areempoweredinauthorityandresponsibility(Mathieu,Gilson,&

Rubby,2006).HereineverystepofLewin,theroleofleadership involvesaschangeagentforbehavioralintegrationintasksand socialdimensions.ThestudyofSrivastava,Bartol,andLocke(2006) statesthat,knowledgesharingmeansinteamissharinginforma- tion,taskrelevantideasandsuggestionsbetweendifferentlevels ofmanagement.

KnowledgesharingandLewin’smodel“changeprocess”

Theemployeesmakesharingofknowledgeabouttaskassign- ments, customer service, performance outcomes and decisions

(3)

making, information flow from multilevel, making business plans,competitiveconditions,newtechnologyequipments,work methods,ideas fororganizational improvement, share skilland expertise,sharedevelopmentprograms,contributeinsolvingprob- lems and business operation (Cummings &Worley, 2003).The studyofWenger,McDermott,andSnyder(2002)states,thatknowl- edge sharing is crucial among individuals of an organization.

Knowledgesharinginorganizationalresourcesiscriticalforcom- petition,sustainability anddynamic economy (Hakanson,1993;

Foss&Pedersen,2002).Sotheorganizationsdonotrelyontrain- ing,staffingandmanagingsystemonlybutalsotheknowledgeable individuals share beliefs, experiences, skills, competencies and abilities (Ambrosini &Bowman,2001; Brown& Duguid,1991).

Onethingshouldbenotedthat howtotransfertheknowledge andexpertisefromtheknowledgeableexpertstonoviceswhoare inneedtoknow(Hind,Patterson,&Pfeffer,2001).Bordia,Irmer, andAbusah(2006)concludedthatknowledgesharingatindividual levelwasstudiedinorganizationbehavior,psychology(Lin,2007), information systems (Wasko &Faraj, 2005) and strategic man- agement(Reagans&McEvily,2003).Knowledgesharingisdone inindividual,groupandorganizationalleveloftheorganization, startingatindividuallevel;simultaneouslyexpandtogrouplevel andendsattheorganizationallevel(Bock&Kim,2002)andthisis explainedbyUriarte(2008)astheframeworkofknowledgesharing consistingofthreelevelsasenablers,leversandfoundation.

Inthechangeprocesswhenemployeescontribute,theknowl- edgesharingstageidentifiesthekindofknowledgethatgenerates thevalueoforganizationafterthatgeneratingthemechanismfor that knowledge.Therequired knowledge isidentified for orga- nizational need which is getting from two sources of external asrentingorconsultancyfromothercompaniesorshareknowl- edgebyinternalsourceininformalnetworksamongemployees whohaveexpertise(Wenger,1999).Sharingknowledgeisactu- allytheorganizationallearningprocess,whichconcludes,whatthe membersoremployeesknowabouttheorganizationalproducts, processes,customers,andcompetitiveenvironmentsoforganiza- tion.Thisknowledgemaybetheexplicitknowledge whichcan beeasilytransferredindocuments,databasesand manualsand thetacitknowledgeisthemember’sinternalskills,intuitionsand memories(Polanyi,1995).InthechangeprocessofLewin’sthree stepmodel,theknowledgeiscodifiedandpersonalized.Incodi- ficationphasetheknowledgeisstoredwhichwouldbeusedby appropriatemembersbutinpersonalizationphasetheknowledge isbeingfocusedthathowtotransferitfrompersontoperson.The codificationofknowledgeiscalledexplicitknowledgewhichcanbe easilytransferredandpersonalizationiscalledthetacitknowledge whichisnoteasilytransferable.Thegivenbelowmodelexplains thewholecycleorprocessoforganizationalchangebyapplying theKurtLewin’sthreestepsmodel(Fig.1).

LeadershipandLewin’smodel“changeprocess”

LeadershiphasbeendefinedbyNorthouse(2004)as“aprocess bywhichanindividualinfluencesagroupofindividualstoachieve commongoals”.ThestudyofCummingsandWorley(2003)has presentedfiveactivitiesofkeyleadershipinchangeprocess.The activitiesareofmotivatingchange,creatingavision,developing politicalsupport,managingthetransitionandsustainingmomen- tum.The motivatingchangeand creating a vision showtothe unfreezingorcurrentstateoforganizationisbeingconsideredfor change,developingpoliticalsupportandmanagingthetransition showthemovingstageofchangeandsustainingmomentumshows theimplementationandrefreezingstateofthechange.Inchange processtwofactorsplayimportantrole,theemployee’sresistance (Stanley,Meyer,&Topolnytsky,2005)andtheopennesstochange (Wanberg&Banas,2000).Resistancetochangeprobablyeffectsthe

changeprocesswhichwillleadtothenegativeoutcomes(Bordia, Hunt,Paulsen,Tourish,&DiFonzo,2004)whiletheopennessof changeofemployeeshavetobefocusedduringchangeprocess.

Theleadershipinchangecontextcanbedefinedas“theprocess ofdiagnosingwheretheworkgroupisnow,andwhereitneeds tobeinthefuture,andformulatingastrategyforgettingthere.

Leadershipalsoinvolvesimplementingchangethroughdevelop- ingabaseofinfluencewithfollowers,motivatingthemtocommit toandworkhardinpursuitofchangegoals,andworkingwiththem toovercomeobstacletochange”(Laura&Stephen,2002).

Leadership type is vital in change process of organizational change.Transactionalleadersareinvolvedinrewardsandpunish- mentswithworkerstoencouragetheperformanceoforganization (Bass,1985)andtransformationalleadersarecharismatic,inspira- tional,intellectualandindividualizedconsideration(Bass,1985).

Thiskindofleadershipidentifiesthestakeholdersforchangepro- cess.Thestakeholders(departmentalmanagers,staffgroups,and toplevelexecutives)cansupportchangeandmakebroadbased supporttomaximizetheriskofsuccessandminimizetheriskof resistanceinchangeprocessbyasking“whostandstogainortolose fromthechange?”andthiswillbuildarelationshipforcreating theusefulinfluence(Cummings&Worley,2003).Thestakehold- ersusethreemethodsformotivationinchangeprocess,playingit straight,goingaroundtheformalsystemandusingsocialnetworks (Greiner &Schein,1988).The “playingit straight”explains the needofchangesbygivinginformationandhowthesechangescan makebenefittheparticularstakeholders.Thesecondpart“social network”formsalliancesandcoalitionswithkeydecisionmak- ers,powerfulindividuals, groups,andwithinformalandformal contactsforgaininginformation.Thethirdpart“goingaroundthe formalsystem”isprobablyleastusedmethodinvolvingcircum- ventingorganizationalproceduresandstructures.

Implementationphaseand“refreezing”ofLewin’smodel

TheKurtLewin’smodel(unfreezing,changingandrefreezing) iswidelyacceptedin psychologyfor implementingchange.The implementationofchangeinvolvesthecurrentstateoforganiza- tionhavetobechangedintoadesiredstate,butthiswillnotoccur quicklybutsimultaneously.BeckhardandHarris(1987)identified three activitiesfor implementingthechange; activityplanning, commitmentplanningand changemanagement structures.The activity planningmakes a road map or path for organizational change,eventsandspecificactivitiesmustbeoccurredforsuc- cessfulchange.Thespecificactivitiesinvolvetheintegratedchange tasks, temporal orient and explicitly tie the tasks according to theorganization’schangeprioritiesandgoals. Thecommitment planningidentifiesthepersonsandgroupswhosecommitmentis requiredorneededfororganizationalchangeforthepurposetofor- mulateandgaintheirsupport.Thepeopleorgroupsare,political support,thestakeholder’splansandtheircommitmentforchange inprocessof change.Thechangemanagementstructure identi- fiestheambiguous,direction,andstructureformanagingchange process.Whichincludesresourcestopromotechange,thecurrent leadershipstructure,changeconsultants,interpersonalandpoliti- calskillstoinitiatethechangeprocess(Beckhard&Harris,1987).

ThestudyofKanter(1983)describesthethreestagesasinformation (expertise,technicalknowledge,andpoliticalsupport);resources (personnel,materialsandfunds),andsupport(legalissues,backing ofsupport,andendorsement).

Conclusion

Manytheorieshave beengiven bydifferentresearchers,like action research model (French, 1969); the positive model by

(4)

Change Process Unfreezing

Change process Refreezing

Organizational change

Implementation of change Leadership

Employee Involvement in

change Knowledge sharing

Organizational change process showing different stages

Change process

Fig.1.ModeloforganizationalchangeshowstheKurtLewin’sthreestepsmodel:Note:ThearrowsshowdifferentstagesofKurtLewin’sthreestepsmodelandnotthe relationshipbetweenvariables.

Cameron,Dutton,and Quinn (2003)and Lewin’s changemodel (Lewin,1947).TheLewin’schangemodelwasusedinthisstudy fororganizationalchangeprocess.AsBurnes(2004)identifiedthe organizationalchangeasafeatureoforganizationallifeforstrate- gicandoperationallevel,sothereisnodoubtabouttheimportance ofchangeinorganization,andittobeexecutedbecause,organiza- tionneedschange.ThestudyofPodsakoff,Mackenzie,andBommer (1996)explorestheactiveroleofleadershipstyleinorganizational outcomes,employeesatisfaction,andperformance.Ineverystep ofthestudy;theleadershipplaysaroleofachangeagentinthe KurtLewin’smodeltounfreezetheorganization.Thetransforma- tionalleadershipstyleaffectstheorganizationalchangeprocess.In thistypeofleadershipstyle,theleadercoordinatewithemploy- ees,sharetheirknowledge,giveopportunityinmakingdecisions inorganizationallevel.

Theoreticalimplications

The findings of this study show that leadership style and employeeinvolvementinchangeisencouragingstepforchange processoforganization.However,theeffectofKurtLewin’smodel isindirectthroughseparatephasesintheprocess.Thetransfor- mationalleadershipstylehasbeenstudiesasthemostimportant factorforchangeprocessin priorstudies(Gong,Huang,&Farh, 2009).Thispaperassociatespositiveimpactofleadershipstyleon changeprocess.Thisstudyillustratestheeffectofleadershipstyle intermsofemployeeinvolvementinchange,motivatingemployee forchange,sharetheknowledgeatindividualandorganizational leveltomaketheloopofthechangeprocess.Ateachphaseofthe processmodel,theleadersandemployeesareconsideredtobeone unit,andeachphasewillbeshiftedtothenextstepoftheKurt model.

Managerialimplications

Different organizations use different organizational change modelforstayincompetitioninthemarket.Likepositivemodel, action research model, Lewin’s model, Kanter, Stein, and Jick (1992),Kotter’smodel(1996)andLueckemodel(2003)fororgani- zationalchange.Allofthesestudiesshowedthatleadershipisthe keyfactorforchangeprocess.Thestudyindicatesthedominant roleofleadership,employeeinvolvementandsharingknowledge inchangeprocessofLewin’smodel.Thestudyrecommendsfor organizationtoelevate theawareness ofchangeand phasesfor organization.Asweseetheknowledgesharingis animportant

catalyst forunfreezingstage and moving stagefor theprocess.

Onthesametime employeeinvolvementis themain factorfor shiftingoforganizationfromonephase toanother,soallthese factorareinterrelatedforthecurrentchangeprocess.

Socialimplications

Thisstudyhassignificantsocialimplications.Thekeyfactors thatcanencouragechangeinorganizationwithswapofrewards andrecognitionsbringsignificantsocialimplicationsforenhancing theorganizationalchangeprocess.Thisstudyhasexamined(1)the dominantroleofleadershipandemployeeinvolvementinchange processnecessaryforbringingeffectivechangeinmanagement,(2) thestudyexploredasignificantconnectionofknowledgesharing inchangeprocesswithemployeesandleadersinimplementingthe changeprocess,(3)themanagementshouldfocusontheleadership styleinchangeprocess,andfinally(4)thereviewshowsaframe- workoflinksamongleadershiptoemployeesinvolvement,sharing knowledgeandprovidesaninsighttopractitionersthathowleader behaviorrelatestoinvolvementandsharingknowledgeinLewin’s changemodelcontext.

References

Alvesson,M.,&Sveningsson,S.(2008).Changingorganizationalculture:Culture change.Workinprogress.London,NewYork:Routledge.

Ambrosini,V.,&Bowman,C.(2001).Tacitknowledge:Somesuggestionsforopera- tionalization.JournalofManagementStudies,38(6),811–829.

Armenakis,A.A.,&Harris,S.G.(2009).Reflections:Ourjourneyinorganizational changeresearchandpractice.JournalofChangeManagement,9(2),127–142.

Bass,B.M.(1985).Leadershipandperformancebeyondexpectation.NewYork:Free Press.

Bate,P.,Khan,R.,&Pye,A.(2000).Towardsaculturallysensitiveapproachtoorga- nizationstructuring.OrganizationScience,11,197–211.

Beckhard,R.,& Harris,R. (1987).Organizationaltransitions: Managingcomplex change.Reading,MA:AddisonWesleyPublishingCompany.

Bock,G.W.,&Kim,Y.G.(2002).Breakingthemythsofrewards:Anexploratory studyofattitudesaboutknowledgesharing.InformationResourceManagement Journal,15(2),14–21.

Bordia,P.,Hunt,E.,Paulsen,N.,Tourish,D.,&DiFonzo,N.(2004).Uncertaintydur- ingorganizationalchange:Isitallaboutcontrol?EuropeanJournalofWorkand OrganizationalPsychology,13,345–365.

Bordia,P.,Irmer,B.E.,&Abusah,D.(2006).Differencesinsharingknowledgeinter- personallyandviadatabases:Theroleofevaluationapprehensionandperceived benefits.EuropeanJournalofWorkandOrganizationalPsychology,15(3),262–280.

Brown,J.S.,&Duguid,P.(1991).Organizationallearningandcommunitiesofprac- tice:Towardaunifiedviewofworking,learning,andinnovation.Organization Science,2(1),40–57.

Burke,W.W.(2008).Organizationchange:Theoryandpractice.ThousandOaks,CA:

Sage.

Burnes,B.(2004).Managingchange:Astrategicapproachtoorganizationaldynamics (4thed.).Harlow:PrenticeHall.

(5)

By,R.T.(2005).Organizationalchangemanagement:Acriticalreview.Journalof ChangeManagement,5,369–380.

Cameron,K.,Dutton,J.,&Quinn,R.(2003).Positiveorganizationalscholarship:Foun- dationsofanewdiscipline.NewYork:BerrettKohier.

Cummings,T.,&Molloy,E.(1977).Improvingproductivityandthequalityofworklife.

NewYork:Praeger.

Cummings,T.G.,&Worley,C.G.(2003).Organizationdevelopmentandchange(8th ed.,pp.1–694).California:MelissaS.Acuna.

Durand,R.,&Calori, R.(2006).Sameness,otherness?Enrichingorganizational changetheorieswithphilosophicalconsiderationsonthesameandtheother.

AcademyofManagementReview,31(1),93–114.

Foss,N.J.,&Pedersen,T.(2002).TransferringknowledgeinMNCs:Theroleofsources ofsubsidiaryknowledgeandorganizational.JournalofInternationalManage- ment,8,49–67.

French,W.(1969).Organizationdevelopment:Objectives,assumptions,andstrate- gies.CaliforniaManagementReview,12,23–34.

Furst,S.A.,&Cable,D.M.(2008).Employeeresistancetoorganizationalchange:

Managerialinfluencetacticsandleadermemberexchange.JournalofApplied Psychology,93,453–463.

Glew,D.,Leary-Kelly,A.,Griffin,R.,&VanFleet,D.(1995).Participationinorgani- zations:Apreviewoftheissuesandproposedframeworkforfutureanalysis.

JournalofManagement,21(3),395–421.

Glieck,J.(1987).Chaos:Makinganewscience.NewYork:Viking.

Gong,Y.,Huang,J.,&Farh,J.(2009).Employeelearningorientation,transformational leadership,andemployeecreativity:Themediatingroleofemployeecreative self-efficacy.AcademyofManagementJournal,51,1–15.

Greiner,&Schein.(1988).Powerandorganizationdevelopment.

Hakanson,H.(1993).InP.Beije,J.Groeneppen,&O.Nuys(Eds.),Networksasamech- anismtodevelopresourcesinnetworkinginDutchIndustries.LevenApeldorn:

Granat.

Higgins,C.,Judge,T.A.,&Ferris,G.R.(2003).Influencetacticsandworkoutcomes:

Ameta-analysis.JournalofOrganizationalBehavior,24,89–106.

Hind,P.J.,Patterson,M.,&Pfeffer,J.(2001).Botheredbyabstraction:Theeffectof expertiseonknowledgetransferandsubsequentnoviceperformance.Journalof AppliedPsychology,86,1232–1243.

Kanter,R.M.(1983).Thechangemasters.NewYork:SimonandSchuster.

Kanter,R.M.,Stein,B.A.,&Jick,T.D.(1992).Thechallengeoforganizationalchange.

NewYork:TheFreePress.

Kotter,J.P.(1996).Leadingchange.Boston,MA:HarvardBusinessSchoolPress.

Laura,L.P.,&Stephen,G.G.(2002).Leadershipselfefficacyandmanagers’motivation forleadingchange.JournalofOrganizationalBehavior,23(2),215–235.

Lewin,K.(1947).Fieldtheoryinsocialscience.NewYork:Harper&Row.

Lewin’s change management model. (1947). Understanding the three stages of change.. Available at: http://www.mindtools.

com/pages/article/newPPM94.htm.(Accessedon14April,2016)

Lin,C.P.(2007).Toshareornottoshare:Modeling knowledgesharingusing exchangeideologyasamoderator.PersonnelReview,36(3),457–475.

Luecke,R.(2003).Managingchangeandtransition.Boston,MA:HarvardBusiness SchoolPress.

Mathieu,J.E.,Gilson,L.L.,&Rubby,T.M.(2006).Empowermentandteameffective- ness:Anempiricaltestofanintegratedmodel.JournalofAppliedPsychology,91, 97–108.

Moran,J.W.,&Brightman,B.K.(2001).Leadingorganizationalchange.CareerDevel- opmentInternational,6(2),111–118.

Morgan,D.E.,&Zeffane,R.(2003).Employeeinvolvement,organizationalchange andtrustinmanagement.InternationalJournalofHumanResourceManagement, 14(1),55–75.

Northouse,P.(2004).Leadership:Theoryandpractice(3rded.).ThousandOaks,CA:

Sage.

Oreg,S.(2006).Personalitycontextandresistancetoorganizationalchange.Euro- peanJournalofWorkandOrganizationalPsychology,15,73–103.

Peters,T.,&Waterman,R.H.(1982).Insearchofexcellence:LessonsfromAmerica’s bestruncompanies.London:Harper&Row.

Pettigrew,A.M.(1973).Thepoliticsoforganizationaldecisionmaking.London:Tavis- took.

Pierce, J. L., Gardner,D. G., &Dunham, R. B. (2002). Management organiza- tionalchangeanddevelopment.InManagementandorganizationalbehavior:

Anintegratedperspective.pp.627–657.Cincinnati,OH:South-WesternCollege Publishing(Chapter18).

Podsakoff,G.R.,Mackenzie,S.B.,&Bommer,W.H.(1996).Transformationalleader behaviorsandsubstitutesforleadershipasdeterminantsofemployeesatisfac- tion,commitment,trust,sandorganizationalcitizenshipbehaviors.Journalof Management,22,259–298.

Polanyi,M.(1995).Thetacitdimension(NewYork:Doubleday,1966).InI.Nonaka,

&H.Takeuchi(Eds.),Theknowledgecreatingcompany:HowJapanesefostercre- ativityandinnovationforcompetitiveadvantage.NewYork:OxfordUniversity Press.

Porras,J.I.,&Robertson,P.J.(1992).Organizationaldevelopmenttheory,practice, andresearch(2nded.,pp.719–822).HandbookofIndustrialandorganizational Psychology(Vol.3)PaloAlto,CA:ConsultingPsychologistsPress.

Reagans,R.,&McEvily,B.(2003).Networkstructureandknowledgetransfer:The effectsofcohesionandrange.AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,48(2),240–267.

Srivastava,A.,Bartol,K.M.,&Locke,E.A.(2006).Empoweringleadershipinmanage- mentteams:Effectsonknowledgesharing,efficacy,andperformance.Academy ofManagementJournal,49,1239–1251.

Stanley,D.J.,Meyer,J.P.,&Topolnytsky,L.(2005).Employeecynicismandresistance toorganizationalchange.JournalofBusinessandPsychology,19,429–459.

Uriarte,f.A.J.(2008).Introductiontoknowledgemanagement.Jakarta,Indonesia:

ASEAN,Foundation.

VanOssten,E.B.(2006).Internationalchangetheoryattheorganizationallevel:A casestudy.JournalofManagementDevelopment,25,707–717.

Vroom,V.,&Yetton,P.(1973).Leadershipanddecisionmaking.UniversityofPitts- burghPress.

Wanberg,R.R.,&Banas,J.T.(2000).Predictorsandoutcomesofopennesstochange inareorganizingworkplace.JournalofAppliedPsychology,85,132–142.

Wasko,M.M.,&Faraj,S.(2005).WhyshouldIshare?Examiningsocialcapitaland knowledgecontributioninelectronicnetworksofpractice.MISQuarterly,29(1), 35–57.

Wenger,E.(1999).Communitiesofpractice:Learning,meaningandidentity.InJ.

Brown,&P.Duguid(Eds.),Towardsaunifiedviewofworking,learning,andinno- vation.OrganizationScience(Vol.2)(pp.40–57).Cambridge,Eng.,Cambridge UniversityPress.

Wenger,E.,McDermott,R.,&Snyder,W.(2002).Cultivatingcommunitiesofpractice:

Aguidetomanagingknowledge.Boston,MA:HarvardBusinessSchoolPress.

Whelan-Berry, K. S., Gordon, J. R., & Hinings, C. R. (2003). Strengthen- ing organizational change processes: Recommendations and implications from a multi-level analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 186–207.

Wilkins,A.L.,&Dyer,W.G.,Jr.(1988).Towardculturallysensitivetheoriesofculture change.AcademyofManagementReview,13,522–533.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

This study examines to what extent different change approaches and transformational leadership of direct supervisors contribute to the effective implementation of organizational

File name: TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, TRAINING, DAN EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MEDIASI ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR DAN JOB SATISFACTION.pdf (455.58K). Word count: 8565

Al 2020 innovation capability: the mediating role of employees’ psychological capital Transformational leadership is an important determinant of many organizational outcomes

The Effects of Organizational Culture and Leadership Style toward Employee Engagement and Their Impacts toward Employee Loyalty.. World Review of Business Research,

An atmosphere where workers are appreciated, motivated, and actively participate to the change process is created via open and timely communication, employee engagement and

The current study investigates precisely the possible impact of one style of leadership, which is transformational leadership on intra-organizational knowledge transfer process in

Conclusion From the results of the study, it can be concluded that transformational leadership style affects employee reactions and performance, there is an influence of

and employee readiness can also be a mediator in the relationship between leadership style and commitment to change Walker et al., 2007; Santhhidran, 2013, so this study will look at