Appendix: Top 30 articles with the most authors
1. Burgers, P.T.P.W.M.D., et al., Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for Elderly Patients with a
Femoral Neck Fracture. Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2015. 97(9):
p. 751-757.
2. Sprague, S., et al., Factors associated with health-related quality of life, hip function, and health utility after operative management of femoral neck fractures. The bone & joint journal, 2018. 100B(3): p. 361-369.
3. Mathew, G., et al., Radiographic prevalence of CAM-type femoroacetabular
impingement after open reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. 22(4): p.
793-800.
4. Sprague, S., et al., Wound irrigation does not affect health-related quality of life after open fractures: results of a randomized controlled trial. The bone & joint journal, 2018.
100-B(1): p. 88-94.
5. Schemitsch, E.H.M.D.F., et al., Prognostic Factors for Predicting Outcomes After
Intramedullary Nailing of the Tibia. Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2012. 94(19): p. 1786-1793.
6. Bhandari, M., et al., Randomized Trial of Reamed and Unreamed Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2008.
90(12): p. 2567-2578.
7. Janssen, S.J., et al., Do Surgeons Treat Their Patients Like They Would Treat Themselves?
Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. 473: p. 3564-3572.
8. Breeman, S., et al., Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. The bone & joint journal, 2013. 95B(4): p.
486-492.
9. Bruinsma, W.E., et al., Radiographic loss of contact between radial head fracture fragments is moderately reliable. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2014.
472(7): p. 2113-2119.
10. Sims, A.L., et al., A randomized controlled trial comparing the Thompson
hemiarthroplasty with the Exeter polished tapered stem and Unitrax modular head in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: the WHiTE 3: HEMI Trial.
Bone Joint J, 2018. 100-b(3): p. 352-360.
11. Bruinsma, W.E., et al., Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013. 95(17): p. 1600-4.
12. Matava, M.J., et al., Multirater agreement of the causes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure: a radiographic and video analysis of the MARS cohort. Am J Sports Med, 2015. 43(2): p. 310-9.
13. Wright, R.W., et al., Descriptive epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) cohort. Am J Sports Med, 2010. 38(10): p. 1979-86.
14. Wright, R.W. and M. Group, Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: Interobserver Reliability and Arthroscopic Correlation. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2014. 96(14): p. 1145-1151.
15. Brophy, R.H., et al., Association of Meniscal Status, Lower Extremity Alignment, and Body Mass Index With Chondrosis at Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 2015. 43(7): p. 1616-22.
16. Borchers, J.R., et al., Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups.
Am J Sports Med, 2011. 39(9): p. 1889-93.
17. Magnussen, R.A., et al., Risk Factors and Predictors of Significant Chondral Surface Change From Primary to Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON and MARS Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med, 2018. 46(3): p. 557-564.
18. Ding, D.Y., et al., Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort. Am J Sports Med, 2017. 45(9): p. 2068-2076.
19. Chen, J.L., et al., Differences in mechanisms of failure, intraoperative findings, and surgical characteristics between single- and multiple-revision ACL reconstructions: a MARS cohort study. Am J Sports Med, 2013. 41(7): p. 1571-8.
20. Allen, C.R., et al., Surgical Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 2017. 45(11): p. 2586-2594.
21. Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Predictors of Clinical Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 2016. 44(7): p. 1671-9.
22. Cooper, D.E., et al., Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group. Am J Sports Med, 2018. 46(12): p. 2836-2841.
23. Effect of graft choice on the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament
reconstruction in the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. Am J Sports Med, 2014. 42(10): p. 2301-10.
24. Brophy, R.H., et al., Association between previous meniscal surgery and the incidence of chondral lesions at revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The American journal of sports medicine, 2012. 40(4): p. 808-814.
25. Guitton, T.G. and D. Ring, Interobserver reliability of radial head fracture classification:
two-dimensional compared with three-dimensional CT. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011.
93(21): p. 2015-21.
26. Arana, E., et al., Spine Instability Neoplastic Score: agreement across different medical and surgical specialties. Spine J, 2016. 16(5): p. 591-9.
27. Doornberg, J.N., T.G. Guitton, and D. Ring, Diagnosis of elbow fracture patterns on radiographs: interobserver reliability and diagnostic accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013. 471(4): p. 1373-8.
28. McGregor, A.H., et al., An evaluation of a postoperative rehabilitation program after spinal surgery and its impact on outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012. 37(7): p. E417-22.
29. Kovacs, F.M., et al., Prevalence and factors associated with low back pain and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: a multicenter study conducted in the Spanish National Health Service. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012. 37(17): p. 1516-33.
30. Rhyne, A.L., et al., Oxiplex reduces leg pain, back pain, and associated symptoms after lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012. 37(8): p. 631-41.
