• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

links.lww.com/JPHMP/A146

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "links.lww.com/JPHMP/A146"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Online Table 1: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Sociodemographics by Community Partnership*

Community

Partnership State % African

American

% American Indian/

Native Alaskan % Asian % Native Hawaiian/

Pacific Islander

% White

% Other Race

% Hispanic or Latino

% Non- English Speaking

% Below Poverty

Baldwin Park California 1.2 0.9 14.2 0.1 43.9 35.9 80.1 82.9 16.0

Benton County Oregon 0.9 0.7 5.2 0.2 87.1 2.3 6.4 11.2 21.0

Boone/Newton

Counties Arkansas 0.2 0.8 0.4 0.1 96.4 0.3 1.8 2.3 16.9

Buffalo New York 38.6 0.8 3.2 0.0 50.4 3.9 10.5 14.2 29.9

Caguas Puerto Rico 11.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 76.1 8.5 99.1 89.6 37.1

Central Valley California 5.0 1.5 7.4 0.3 57.8 23.2 48.6 42.7 20.8

Charleston West Virginia 15.5 0.2 2.3 0.0 78.4 0.1 1.4 4.0 16.4

Chattanooga Tennessee 34.9 0.4 2.0 0.1 58.0 2.8 5.5 7.7 22.9

Chicago Illinois 32.9 0.5 5.5 0.0 45.0 13.4 28.9 35.5 21.4

Columbia Missouri 11.3 0.3 5.2 0.1 79.0 1.1 3.4 10.6 22.9

Cook County Georgia 27.3 0.2 0.7 0.0 67.0 3.4 5.9 7.3 23.0

Cuba New Mexico 0.5 24.6 0.8 0.0 48.6 19.3 45.8 61.0 28.7

Denver Colorado 10.2 1.4 3.4 0.1 68.9 11.9 31.8 27.6 18.8

Desoto/Marshall

/Tate Counties Mississippi 27.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 67.9 2.4 4.3 5.0 13.0

El Paso Texas 3.4 0.7 1.2 0.1 80.8 11.0 80.7 72.2 23.3

Fitchburg Massachusetts 5.1 0.3 3.6 0.0 78.2 9.1 21.6 24.0 19.0

Flint Michigan 56.6 0.5 0.5 0.0 37.4 1.1 10.5 3.2 38.2

Grant County New Mexico 0.9 1.4 0.1 0.1 84.9 9.6 48.3 33.8 16.6

Greenville South Carolina 30.0 0.3 1.4 0.1 64.0 2.5 5.9 8.0 18.6

Hamilton County Ohio 25.7 0.2 2.0 0.1 68.8 1.1 2.6 6.6 15.9

(2)

*Sociodemographic data obtained from the U.S. Census

Online Table 1: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Sociodemographics by Community Partnership* (continued) Community

Partnership State % African

American

% American Indian/

Native Alaskan % Asian % Native Hawaiian/

Pacific Islander

%

White % Other

Race % Hispanic or Latino

% Non- English Speaking

% Below Poverty Houghton

County Michigan 0.5 0.6 2.9 0.0 94.5 0.2 1.1 7.2 22.8

Houston Texas 23.7 0.7 6.0 0.1 50.5 15.7 43.8 45.8 21.5

Jackson Mississippi 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.0 18.4 0.8 1.6 79.4 0.1

Jacksonville Florida 30.7 0.4 4.3 0.1 59.4 2.2 7.7 13.1 15.2

Jefferson County Alabama 42.0 0.3 1.4 0.0 53.0 2.2 3.9 5.8 16.2

Kane County Illinois 5.7 0.6 3.5 0.0 74.8 13.0 30.7 30.7 10.1

Kansas City Missouri 29.4 0.6 2.5 0.2 57.5 6.7 14.3 15.0 19.4

Kingston New York 14.6 0.5 1.8 0.0 73.2 4.9 13.4 17.1 16.5

Knox County Tennessee 8.8 0.3 1.9 0.1 85.6 1.5 3.5 5.6 13.7

Lake

Worth/Greenacre

s/Palm Springs Florida 17.1 2.5 2.0 0.1 65.5 9.0 41.3 50.1 21.9

Louisville Kentucky 22.9 0.3 2.2 0.1 70.6 1.8 4.5 7.8 17.5

Milledgeville Georgia 42.2 0.1 1.7 0.1 53.4 0.9 2.3 5.1 43.3

Milwaukee Wisconsin 40.0 0.8 3.5 0.0 44.8 7.5 17.3 19.1 27.0

Moore/Montgom

ery Counties North Carolina 14.7 0.7 1.1 0.1 77.6 4.2 7.9 9.1 16.1

Nash/Edgecombe

Counties Oregon 44.7 0.6 0.6 0.0 49.6 3.2 5.3 6.1 18.4

New Orleans North Carolina 60.2 0.3 2.9 0.0 33.0 1.9 5.2 9.7 25.7

Oakland Louisiana 28.0 0.8 16.8 0.6 64.5 13.7 25.4 39.6 19.6

Omaha California 13.7 0.8 2.4 0.1 73.1 6.9 13.1 13.9 15.5

Philadelphia Nebraska 43.4 0.5 6.3 0.0 41.0 5.9 12.3 21.0 25.6

(3)

*Sociodemographic data obtained from the U.S. Census

Online Table 1: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Sociodemographics by Community Partnership* (continued) Community

Partnership State % African

American

% American Indian/

Native Alaskan % Asian % Native Hawaiian/

Pacific Islander

%

White % Other

Race % Hispanic or Latino

% Non- English Speaking

% Below Poverty

Phoenix Pennsylvania 6.5 2.2 3.2 0.2 65.9 18.5 40.8 36.8 20.3

Portland/Multno

mah County Arizona 5.6 1.1 6.5 0.5 76.5 5.1 10.9 19.5 16.5

Rancho

Cucamonga California 9.2 0.7 10.4 0.3 62.0 12.0 34.9 32.5 5.5

Rochester New York 41.7 0.5 3.1 0.0 43.7 6.5 16.4 18.0 31.1

San Antonio Texas 6.9 0.9 2.4 0.1 72.6 13.7 63.2 46.1 19.2

Seattle/King

County Washington 6.2 0.8 14.6 0.8 68.7 3.9 8.9 24.8 10.5

Somerville Massachusetts 6.8 0.3 8.7 0.0 73.9 6.7 10.6 32.3 14.9

Spartanburg

County South Carolina 20.6 0.3 2.0 0.0 72.3 3.1 5.9 8.6 16.2

Washington DC District of

Columbia 50.7 0.3 3.5 0.1 38.5 4.1 9.1 14.5 18.9

Watsonville/

Pajaro Valley California 0.4 0.6 3.8 0.1 70.2 21.0 81.4 59.5 14.8

*Sociodemographic data obtained from the U.S. Census.

(4)

Online Table 2: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Partners, Assessments, Resources, and Media by Community Partnership Community

Partnership # of Partners # of Healthy Eating Assessments

# of Active Living

Assessments HKHC Funds* Matching Funds* Media Generated

Baldwin Park 15 5 3 $402,199.00 $903,594.00 6

Benton County 29 9 9 $317,116.00 $452,811.00 15

Boone/ Newton

Counties 13 4 3 $317,978.86 $910,208.28 106

Buffalo 15 7 6 $359,999.00 $456,084.00 74

Caguas 34 4 6 $260,378.20 $289,373.00 51

Central Valley 37 7 7 $402,961.00 $1,798,000.00 2

Charleston 52 1 5 $359,000.00 $563,152.00 85

Chattanooga 35 4 8 $352,024.90 $1,316,533.80 32

Chicago 38 3 4 $404,492.00 $1,036,933.00 4

Columbia 46 6 5 $387,273.72 $993,978.00 213

Cook County 27 6 6 $359,999.28 $250,360.00 32

Cuba 22 2 3 $359,852.40 $199,793.59 12

Denver 50 1 5 $358,342.00 $2,960,533.00 19

Desoto/

Marshall/ Tate Counties

36 8 7 $294,966.00 $605,002.00

134

El Paso 22 4 8 $269,309.00 $336,680.00 7

Fitchburg 24 12 17 $360,000.00 $431,942.00 52

Flint 26 6 $377,738.77 $326,755.00 6

(5)

*Note: These are funds reported as of January 31, 2014.

Online Table 2: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Partners, Assessments, Resources, and Media by Community Partnership Community

Partnership # of Partners # of Healthy Eating Assessments

# of Active Living

Assessments HKHC Funds* Matching Funds* Media Generated

Grant County 29 7 5 $358,793.00 $343,260.05 33

Greenville 37 24 23 $359,481.00 $1,051,677.16 55

Hamilton County 15 6 11 $347,935.11 $1,020,794.70 9

Houghton

County 18 3 5 $399,032.00 $567,620.30 27

Houston 29 9 7 $359,998.00 $434,103.00 7

Jackson 15 9 8 $360,000.00 $253,579.09 7

Jacksonville 25 5 8 $358,124.00 $291,200.00 6

Jefferson County 29 3 5 $360,001.00 $495,302.00 24

Kane County 27 4 4 $383,400.00 $1,003,081.00 143

Kansas City 36 4 4 $359,799.00 $1,337,704.00 29

Kingston 43 13 7 $335,261.16 $713,849.00 77

Knox County 23 8 10 $354,523.51 $464,544.00 91

Lake Worth/

Greenacres/

Palm Springs

38 1 4 $348,229.46 $635,155.00

7

Louisville 34 5 5 $307,187.80 $1,204,864.00 10

Milledgeville 22 6 6 $363,739.58 $1,045,233.00 55

Milwaukee 34 10 6 $372,742.48 $250,345.36 7

Moore/

Montgomery Counties

26 5 7 $356,244.00 $1,075,240.00

9

(6)

*Note: These are funds reported as of January 31, 2014.

Online Table 2: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Partners, Assessments, Resources, and Media by Community Partnership Community

Partnership # of Partners # of Healthy Eating Assessments

# of Active Living

Assessments HKHC Funds* Matching Funds* Media Generated Nash/

Edgecombe Counties

35 6 4 $360,001.00 $1,315,160.00

14

New Orleans 28 3 $383,364.32 $228,650.00 7

Oakland 13 1 1 $401,508.00 $6,034,936.00 3

Omaha 26 8 6 $369,460.35 $420,878.72 4

Philadelphia 14 11 10 $380,000.00 $254,688.00 0

K or

360kPhoenix 27 2 3 $360,001.00 $1,062,846.00 7

Portland/

Multnomah County

30 7 7 $360,000.00 $533,280.00

11 Rancho

Cucamonga 26 6 6 $274,774.31 $7,394,251.00 101

Rochester 40 2 8 $365,130.00 $244,155.00 5

San Antonio 33 8 9 $358,567.33 $216,327.00 0

Seattle/King

County 37 12 12 $390,849.69 $3,272,645.72 12

Somerville 46 5 4 $341,018.00 $88,033,172.00 0

Spartanburg

County 17 5 5 $385,401.75 $721,303.00 7

Washington DC 13 7 6 $361,012.62 $268,370.00 4

Watsonville/

Pajaro Valley 29 11 3 $360,000.00 $642,937.00 21

*Note: These are funds reported as of January 31, 2014.

(7)

Online Table 3: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Intervention Settings and Policy, Practice, and Environmental Changes by Community Partnership Community

Partnership

Total Active

Transportation Parks and

Play Spaces Child Care

Physical Activity Child Care

Nutrition Corner Stores Farmers’ Markets Settings

* Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes

Baldwin Park 19 48 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 39 0 0

Benton

County 9 10 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Boone/Newto

n Counties 5 14 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4

Buffalo 9 53 4 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Caguas 8 10 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Central

Valley 27 42 0 0 5 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12

Charleston 71 291 3 9 4 5 16 62 18 183 3 3 1 2

Chattanooga 13 63 4 22 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Chicago 6 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Columbia 17 30 7 14 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8

Cook County 19 22 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8

Cuba 8 22 2 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7

Denver 15 23 5 7 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Desoto/

Marshall /Tate Counties

41 48 9 9 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7

El Paso 20 21 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Fitchburg 56 83 29 51 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3

(8)

*Note: A setting is counted for each strategy that may occur in that setting; therefore, there is some duplication in the total number of settings (e.g., a child care nutrition standard and a child care physical activity standard in the same child care agency).

Online Table 3: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Intervention Settings and Policy, Practice, and Environmental Changes by Community Partnership Community

Partnership

Total Active

Transportation

Parks and Play Spaces

Child Care Physical Activity

Child Care

Nutrition Corner Stores Farmers’ Markets Settings

* Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes

Flint 3 10 1 2 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grant County 16 26 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10

Greenville 99 183 5 8 0 0 76 76 77 77 0 0 3 4

Hamilton

County 164 180 3 3 0 0 75 75 79 79 0 0 0 0

Houghton

County 4 29 3 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Houston 15 23 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9

Jackson 4 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2

Jacksonville 5 9 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0

Jefferson

County 20 36 10 15 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 3 9

Kane County 41 55 14 19 5 5 0 0 2 2 0 0 7 13

Kansas City 43 77 5 11 6 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12

Kingston 29 37 3 5 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 1 3

Knox County 9 24 4 19 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lake Worth/

Greenacres/

Palm Springs

40 42 2 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Louisville 22 32 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 15 5 8

Milledgeville 15 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3

Milwaukee 34 59 1 1 1 1 8 14 10 18 0 0 0 0

(9)

*Note: A setting is counted for each strategy that may occur in that setting; therefore, there is some duplication in the total number of settings (e.g., a child care nutrition standard and a child care physical activity standard in the same child care agency).

Online Table 3: Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities’ Intervention Settings and Policy, Practice, and Environmental Changes by Community Partnership Community

Partnership

Total Active

Transportation Parks and

Play Spaces Child Care

Physical Activity Child Care

Nutrition Corner Stores Farmers’ Markets Settings

* Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Settings Changes Moore/

Montgomery Counties

22 28 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 8

Nash/

Edgecombe Counties

46 67 1 1 3 3 6 8 13 24 0 0 7 17

New Orleans 9 202 9 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Oakland 24 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 56

Omaha 21 33 10 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 14

Philadelphia 360 1800 0 0 0 0 180 720 180 1080 0 0 0 0

Phoenix 15 24 3 9 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Portland/

Multnomah County

6 10 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0

Rancho

Cucamonga 15 23 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4

Rochester 19 25 6 10 4 8 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0

San Antonio 25 42 4 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 0

Seattle/ King

County 20 37 1 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 2 9 1 3

Somerville 20 231 2 141 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15

Spartanburg

County 16 31 4 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 17

Washington

DC 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Watsonville/

Pajaro Valley 8 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0

*Note: A setting is counted for each strategy that may occur in that setting; therefore, there is some duplication in the total number of settings (e.g., a child care nutrition standard and a child care physical activity standard in the same child care agency).

Referensi

Dokumen terkait