• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

links.lww.com/SLA/B284

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "links.lww.com/SLA/B284"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Supplementary Table 1 Relationship between baseline anthropometry and body composition among all patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with multimodal therapy

All patients n = 252

No Visceral Obesity n = 135

Visceral Obesity

n = 102 P-value

No Sarcopenia n = 190

Sarcopenia

n = 36 P-value

Body weight, kg, mean (SD) 77.2 (16.9) 70.8 (12.8) 86.4 (14.5) <0.001 78.9 (15.6) 69.4 (11.0) <0.001 BMI, mean (SD) 26.8 (5.0) 24.7 (3.7) 29.6 (4.1) <0.001 27.5 (4.5) 23.1 (3.1) <0.001 BMI category, N (%)

Underweight Normal weight Overweight Obese Not recorded

17 (6.7) 72 (28.6) 86 (34.1) 61 (24.2) 16 (6.3)

11 (8.1) 58 (42.9) 46 (34.1) 11 (8.1)

9 (6.7)

1 (1.0) 13 (12.7) 36 (35.3) 47 (46.1) 5 (4.9)

<0.001 6 (3.2) 50 (26.3) 73 (38.4) 55 (28.9) 6 (3.2)

6 (16.7) 17 (47.2)

9 (25.0) 0 (0.0) 4 (11.1)

<0.001

Morbid obesity, N (%) 7 (3.2) 1 (0.8) 6 (6.2) 0.02 7 (3.8) 0 (0.0) 0.26

Sarcopenia, N (%) 36 (15.9)

Visceral obesity, N (%) 102 (43.0) Sarcopenic obesity

[BMI]

, N (%) 0 (0.0) Sarcopenic obesity

[CT]

, N (%) 14 (6.3)

BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); obesity, BMI >30kg/m2; morbid obesity, BMI >40kg/m2 or >35kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbidity; Sarcopenic obesity[BMI],

sarcopenia + BMI >30kg/m2;Sarcopenic obesity[CT], sarcopenia + visceral obesity

(2)

Supplementary Table 2 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors predictive of specific postoperative morbidity after neoadjuvant therapy

≥IIIb PPC Pneumonia Prolonged intubation

P-value OR

(95% CI) P-value OR

(95% CI) P-value OR

(95% CI) P-value OR

(95% CI) Clinical characteristics

Age, years 0.85 0.10 0.36 0.80

Sex, male vs. female 0.67 0.22 0.58 0.29

Ever smoker 0.36 0.56 0.41 0.45

Current smoker 0.51 0.66 0.47 0.53

Diabetes 0.79 0.49 0.93 0.89

Cardiovascular

comorbidity 0.59 0.30 0.22 0.19

Respiratory comorbidity 0.17 0.32 0.36 0.31

ASA grade

ASA II-III vs. ASA I 0.008 3.66 (1.41 –

9.49) 0.16 0.095 0.001 7.38 (2.25 –

23.15) Neoadjuvant therapy

CRT vs. CT 0.64 0.24 0.59 0.27

Operation type 0.40 0.29 0.66 0.07

Pathologic characteristics Histologic type

SCC vs. ADC 0.98 0.18 0.15

0.60 Clinical Stage 0.001 0.20 (0.07 –

0.57)

0.13 0.18 0.003 0.18 (0.06 –

0.56)

Pathologic T stage 0.12 0.88 0.89 0.20

Pathologic N stage 0.68 0.27 0.39 0.82

pCR 0.008 4.47 (1.48 –

13.54)

0.09 0.051 0.02 4.45 (1.24 –

15.95) Body composition

Body weight, kg 0.80 0.27 0.80 0.73

BMI, kg/m2 0.69 0.39 0.72 0.92

BMI category 0.52 0.68 0.80 0.85

Sarcopenia 0.001 5.30 (1.94 –

14.45)

0.023 2.17 (1.12 – 4.23)

0.015 2.33 (1.18 – 4.61)

0.019 3.83 (1.24 – 11.79)

Visceral obesity 0.63 0.11 0.08 0.35

Lean body mass 0.58 0.26 0.80 0.95

Fat mass 0.99 0.50 0.74 0.60

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); obesity, BMI >30kg/m2; morbid obesity, BMI >40kg/m2 or >35kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbidity; ASA, American Society for Anesthesiologists; CCI, comprehensive complications index; CT, chemotherapy;

CRT, chemoradiation

Analysed as a categorical variable, category P-values and Hazard Ratios not significant.

(3)

Supplementary Table 3 Multiple linear regression analysis of factors predictive of comprehensive complications index among patients undergoing esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy

P-value β-Coefficient (SE) 95% CI Clinical characteristics

Age, years 0.025 0.33 (0.15) 0.04 – 0.61

Sex, male vs. female 0.55

Ever smoker 0.69

Current smoker 0.38

Diabetes 0.33

Cardiovascular comorbidity 0.26

Respiratory comorbidity 0.43

ASA grade

ASA II-III vs. ASA I 0.006 7.65 (2.77) 2.18 – 13.12

Neoadjuvant therapy

CRT vs. CT 0.54

Operation type 0.13

Pathologic characteristics Histologic type

SCC vs. adenocarcinoma 0.31

Clinical Stage 0.007 -7.65 (2.82) -13.22 – -2.08

Pathologic T stage 0.56

Pathologic N stage 0.96

pCR 0.004 10.72 (3.66) 3.49 – 17.94

Body composition

Body weight, kg 0.16

Body mass index, kg/m2 0.26

BMI category 0.37

Sarcopenia 0.004 9.08 (3.11) 2.94 – 15.21

Visceral obesity 0.45

Lean body mass 0.61

Fat mass 0.43

BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); ASA, American Society for Anesthesiologists; CT, chemotherapy; CRT, chemoradiation; SE, standard error; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval

Analysed as a categorical variable, category P-values and Hazard Ratios not significant.

(4)

Supplementary Table 4 Multivariate analysis of factors associated with survival outcome in resected multimodal population

Disease-free survival Disease-specific survival P-value HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI)

Clinical characteristics

Age, years 0.45 0.63

Sex, male vs. female 0.21 0.52

Ever smoker 0.72 0.98

Current smoker 0.98 0.41

Diabetes 0.67 0.99

Cardiovascular comorbidity 0.53 0.88

Respiratory comorbidity 0.82 0.82

ASA grade

ASA II-III vs. ASA I 0.53 0.67

Neoadjuvant therapy

CRT vs. CT 0.14 0.24

Operation type 0.47 0.46

Comprehensive complications index 0.90 0.93

Major complication (≥IIIb) 0.060 0.26

Pathologic characteristics Histologic type

SCC vs. adenocarcinoma 0.68 0.66

Clinical T stage

T3-4 vs. T1-2 0.43 0.013 6.10 (1.47 – 25.35)

Clinical N stage 0.57 0.25

Pathologic T stage 0.47 0.39

Pathologic N stage N1 vs. N0 N2 vs. N0 N3 vs. N0

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

2.91 (1.67 – 5.08) 5.42 (2.61 – 11.21) 5.07 (2.61 – 9.87)

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

3.66 (1.78 – 7.53) 9.65 (3.86 – 24.10) 9.33 (4.28 – 20.34)

Tumor regression grade 0.17 0.070

pCR 0.15 0.29

R0 resection 0.15 0.18

Body composition

Body weight, kg 0.46 0.38

BMI, kg/m2 0.41 0.41

Baseline

Sarcopenia 0.44 0.98

Visceral obesity 0.43 0.31

Lean body mass 0.42 0.50

Fat mass 0.83 0.73

Preoperative

Sarcopenia 0.85 0.86

Visceral obesity 0.14 0.22

Lean body mass 0.28 0.42

Fat mass 0.69 0.49

Loss of lean body mass 0.58 0.53

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); obesity, BMI >30kg/m2; morbid obesity, BMI >40kg/m2 or >35kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbidity; ASA, American Society for Anesthesiologists; CCI, comprehensive complications index; CT, chemotherapy;

CRT, chemoradiation

Analysed as a categorical variable, category P-values and Hazard Ratios not significant.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Two representative arcs of the electri- cal heterogeneity manifested in impedance complex planes of poly- crystalline ceramics suggest that, as one possibility, semiconducting grains