LINN^US AS A ZOOLOGIST.
By Dr. William H. Dall.
I
HAVE been asked
tomake
afew remarks on
the relations of Linnaeus to zoology. After thecomprehensive
addresses towhich we have
listened,you would be
well withinyour
rights ifyou complained
that a review of the systemsand
conceptions for zoology, entertainedby
Linnaeus, was,on
the present occa- sion, inopportune.I shall attempt nothing so ambitious, or I
might
almost say, for a public address, so tedious.Viewed
in a broadway,
the services of Linnaeus to zoologywere
of several kinds.The
firstand
greatest,though
at the time of its conceptionregarded
as relatively unimportant,was
the invention ofwhat
has longbeen known
as the binomial orLinnaean system
of nomenclature.The
conception of apermanent name
foreach
type of organized beings, tliereby giving to the naturalist a con- cisemethod
of indicatingeach
unit of the S3'stem,was
so greatan advance
onany
previousmethod
of handling zoological species that itamounted
to acomplete
revolution inmethods
;comparable
to that for the arithmetical sciences,which
followed the adoption of the decimalArabic symbols
in place of theclumsy Roman
notation of numerals.That
previous zoologists, likeRumphius, had more
orless in- advertentlyapproximated
to thissystem
at times, while givingnames
to animals, does not diminish the creditdue
to Linnajus for erecting themethod
into a definitesystem emphasizing
the principles ofpermanency and
priority,and
elaborating itsdetails.
The second
servicewas
that of holdingup
theanimated
cre- ation as an interrelatedwhole.This
grasp of the subjectwould
be impossible to a naturalist of the present day,were
the multi- tudinous units of theanimal kingdom now known,
presented tohim
in the chaoticstate inwhich
Linnajusfound
the little micro-272
I.INN/EUS AS
A ZOOLOGIST
273cosm which
hehad
to deal with. Tlie prof]jress,by
the L,in-nxan
methods, since his time, hasbeen
so great; anatomical, ecologicaland
embryological discoverieshave
so illuminated the subject; thatwe
areprone
to look withamusement on
the crude classificationwhich
alone in his timewas
possible, with- out appreciating the instances it contains of really astonishing insight into the true relation of organized beings.It is only
when we compare
the Linnajan classification with thecontemporaneous
absurdities of such antagonists asJacobus Theodorus
Klein,who
inbewigged pomposity
stares at usfrom
the frontispiece of his ridiculous*'Tentamen,"
thatwe
can ap- preciate the quality of the genius of the immortalSwede.
A
thirdmanner, and by no means
the least important, inwhich
Linngeus influenced zoological science,was through
his friends, associatesand
pupils.We
allknow what
the personal influence ofLouis Agassiz
did for science inAmerica. Some-
thing of the
same
sortemanated from
thepersonality of Linnaeus in his time.In the
days
of his early struggles itmust have been
evident, orwe
should not read ofhow
suchmen
asRothmann,
Stobasus, Celsius,Rudbeck and Reuterholm
exerted themselves to pro-mote
the fortunesand
facilitate the studies of the poor country parson's son.A
little later, as hebegan
towin
a footing,we
find the greater scientists with
whom he was brought
in contact givinghim
a cordiaiwelcome
; and,from men
like Gronovius,Boerhaave, Burmann, van Royer and
Cliffort inHolland
;
Artedi in
Sweden;
Jussieu inFrance;
Haller inGermany and
Dillenius inEngland
;such
recognitionwas no
feeble testimonyto his influence
and
worth. Stillmore
conclusive are the rela- tions to Linnaeus of suchornaments
of the nobility asCounts
Tessinand
Gyllenborg,and
herMajesty Queen
Ulrica,worthy
precursors of the liberal-minded nobles of tO-day,and
their leader,His Majesty
ofSweden, always
foremost inpromoting
science, explorationand
the arts, to the true glory of hiskingdom.
From
every other civilized nation as well asfrom Sweden,
Linnaeusdrew
pupils.Those
conversant with thedawn
of science in themodern
sense, will find familiar thenames upon
the roll.
274
DALL
First, as true martyrs of science,
who gave
their lives,by
pestilence or accident in foreign lands for thepromotion
of dis- covery, areTernstrom who
died inChina
; Hasselquist inSmyrna
; Forskal inArabia
; Loefling inSouth America
;and Falk
in Tartary.Those, more
fortunate but not less daringwho
adventured in foreign landsand by
a safe returnwere
enabled to reap, in their lifetimes, areward
of merit,were
PeterKalm
inNorth America
;Rolander
inSurinam
;Toren
inMalabar
;Osbeck
in
China
;Sparrman
inSouth
Africa;Thunberg
in easternAsia and Japan
;Niebuhr
inEgypt
;Gmelin
in Siberia; and, in various parts ofEurope,
Koehler, Alstroemer,Von
Troil, Fabricius,and
Solander.I
have mentioned
but aprominent few among many. A
little leaven leaveneth the
whole lump. That
influencewhich drew and
held students,which
inspiredthem
to their utmost efforts, faithful in the quest ofknowledge even
unto death;