• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Minutes of Alfred University Library Faculty Meeting

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Minutes of Alfred University Library Faculty Meeting"

Copied!
1
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Minutes  of  Alfred  University  Library  Faculty  Meeting  

February  3,  2011  @  3pm.  –  Scholes  Library  Conference  Room  

Present:  Stephen  Crandall,  Mark  Smith,  Ellen  Bahr,  Beverly  Crowell,  Laurie  McFadden   Excused:  Pat  LaCourse    

 

1. Personal  librarian  –  discussion  of  readiness  to  adopt  the  “personal  librarian”  concept  similar  to  that  

developed  at  Drexel  U.      There  was  consensus  on  value  of  the  concept.    However,  there  was  also  agreement   that  more  detail  would  be  necessary  on  the  libraries  responsibilities  to  such  a  project,  the  anticipated   impact  on  workload  and  details  of  a  successful  implementation  process.    Brian  agreed  to  research  the   practical  aspects  of  implementation.  

 

2. Program  Review  -­‐  Steve  reviewed  the  Provost  request  for  "program  review”  for  AU  libraries.  After  some   discussion  it  became  obvious  that  it  was  not  clear  what  steps  such  a  review  would  entail  or  what  format  is   desired  for  presentation.    Steve  will  investigate.  

 

3. Strategic  Plan  2010-­‐201  Review:  Steve  announced  commencement  of  strategic  plan  review  and  update   process  for  AU  Libraries.    While  considering  how  to  proceed,  questions  arose  as  to  the  desired  format  and   objectives  of  this  planning  review.    Discussion  also  uncovered  a  general  dissatisfaction  with  the  current  ’09-­‐

‘14  plan.    A  primary  concern  with  the  current  plan  is  its  focus  on  current  practice  rather  than  on  issues  of   future  growth  and  development  of  library  service.    Steve  will  try  to  find  out  what  other  administrators  are   doing  in  way  of  plan  review.    Others  will  share  ideas  for  goals  and  process  toward  a  review  of  the  current   plan.    Some  considerations  for  an  updated  plan  include:  formatting,  length,  readability,  shifting  priorities,   and  connections  to  other  academic  plans  including  the  overarching  AU  Strategic  Plan.  

 

4. Branding  -­‐  Steve  and  Laurie  briefed  the  group  on  plans  for  a  Library  “Branding”  Retreat.    The  event  is   designed  to  help  implement  strategies  presented  at  the  Library  Branding  workshop  series  that  Laurie  has   been  attending.    The  workshop  is  for  both  libraries  will  be  led  by  members  of  the  Rochester  Ad  Council.    

Potential  dates  were  discussed  as  well  as  the  need  to  collect  library  survey  data  to  inform  the  development   of  a  survey  tailored  to  inform  the  workshop  discussion.  

 

5. Reports:    Faculty  Senate:  Laurie  briefed  on  2  proposals  before  the  Senate  including  handbook  language  for  

“AU  Incomplete  Policy”  and  a  proposal  to  delay  “Tenure  Forecast”  determinations  from  Fall  until  Spring  of   the  3rd  year  of  P&T  cycle.    

 

6. Scholes  Library  Search  Status:  Mark  offered  an  update  on  the  Scholes  librarian  search.    Seven  Skype   interviews  were  conducted.    Finalist  Candidates  were  identified  and  campus  visits  were  being  scheduled  for   the  week  of  February  14th.  

 

7. Color  Printing  Status:  Steve  reported  on  legwork  he  has  done  to  investigate  cost  effective  color  print   solutions.    The  result  was  without  much  success.  Mark  reiterated  that  Scholes  library  simply  cannot  afford   to  absorb  the  costs  of  color  printing  without  sacrificing  limited  funds  for  research  materials.      The  discussion   also  included  a  brief  sharing  of  “woes”  and  “hiccups”  related  to  recent  implementation  of  printing  to  from   laser  printers  to  Toshiba  copiers.  

 

8. SAILS  Results  Discussion:    Brian  briefed  on  his  methodology  for  comparing  2010  vs.  2007  SAILS  results.  

Steve  led  a  discussion  of  how  we  might  disseminate  SAILS  results  to  the  greater  University  community  as   per  President  Edmondson’s  suggestion.    As  time  and  scheduling  makes  a  Bergren  Forum  impractical  this   semester,  it  was  decided  to  draft  an  executive  summary  suitable  for  distribution  to  campus  constituents.  

Brian  agreed  to  develop  a  draft  summary.  

 

Respectfully  Submitted,   Mark  A.  Smith  

Referensi

Dokumen terkait