WASHINGTON.
Schwarz
statesthat in lifethelarvawas
coveredby
awhitewaxy
secretion
which
isnow
dissolvedby
the alcohol.The
secretion of the host has likewise disappeared, bothinthealcoholicandthe dry specimens, butMr. Schwarz
thinks that itwas
originally present.The
color of the larvais destroyed by the alcohol, butit
was
an obscure whitish. All these characters agree withEpipyrops anomala.
As
to the systematic position ofthis insect, I cannotagreewith any published opinion.That
of SirGeorge Hampson,
referringitto the Limacodidas is the
most
reasonable, but is negatived,among
other characters,by
the structure of vein S of the hindwings and by
theabdominal
feetof the larva. It is a Tineoid form, apparently not referable to the Tineidae proper.Mey-
rick's tables
seem
to place it inthe Zeuzeridaa,Hampson's
intheDalceridae; but it will probably prove deserving of separate family rank.
[Dr.
Howard
hassincecalledmy
attentiontoa note (Proc.Ent.Soc. Lond., p. xx, 1883) recording this genus
from
Central America, but the larvaBwere
apparently not bred.The
note isby
Mr. Champion and
states that Iarva3were
not infrequently found attached to and feedingon
the white cottony secretion soabundant
aboutsome
of the smaller Fulgoridae.As many
as three larvae had been seen attached to one imago.The
Fulgoridae
were
very sluggish in their habits.]Mr. Benton
called attention to a particular in which, hehad
observed, the Cyprian variety of bees differ in their habits from nativeand
Italian varieties. Instead of driving outand
killingall drones atthe endof the
honey
harvest, they kill about four- fifths ofthem and
permit the others togo back
into the hive, only gradually destroyingthese, and, insome
instances, permitting a few to live over the entire
w
rinter, even in colonies nor mally supplied with queens.Dr.
Dyar
then presented the following paper:NOTES ON MOSQUITOES ON LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK.
By HARRISON G. DYAR.
Tnese
observationswere made
at Bellport and Amagansett.The
villageof Bellportison thesouthshore ofLong
Island,about the middle of the length of the island on Great South Bay.The
land isflat
and
sandy, cutby
sluggish streams forming lakes and pools.The
bay isstrongly brackish but without salt marshesin this vicinity. Mosquitoeswere
abundant in the season of 1901.The woods and
grassswarmed
with Culex sollicitansand
C.cantans, while
Culex and Anopheles
entered the house insome numbers
in spite ofscreens. Larvaewere
foundin varioussitua tions, as will bedescribed in detail in the following notes.No
larvae
were
seen, however, in anybody
ofwater largeenough
to beroughened by
the wind, nor inany
water so shadedby
thewoods
as to be dark. Several suspicious looking pools hiddeninthe dark
woods were
barren of mosquito larvae, though the adultsswarmed
there as they didalmosteverywhere
else.Anopheles
cruciansWied.
This
was
thecommonest Anopheles
in the house, though not bred from collected larvae. Severalexamples were
taken in theactof biting.
Anopheles punctipennis
Say.Not common
as adult, though the larvae occurred innumbers
with the following species in nearly equal proportion. Dr.Howard
states in his publications on mosquitoes that the larva differsfrom thatofmaculipennis, "chieflyinthemarkings
of the head." Iwas
notable, however, to differentiatethem by
this or anyother very definite character.The Anopheles
larvae occurin
two
forms, one with theback
spottedwithwhite, the otherun
spotted.These were
separated, but gave both species in nearly equal proportion.A
puddleformed by
rain at theside of the road contained a pure colony of punctipennis,and
thesewere
almostentirely of thewhitespotted form. This particularcolonywas
entirely killedby
thedryingof the puddle shortlyafterIhad
collected from it.
A
similar puddle nearWashington, D.
C., contained this species,unmixed.
Anopheles maculipennis Meig.
The
larvaeoccurredmore
orlesscommonly
innearlyeverypooland
pond,and
evenintheblacksmith's rain-waterbarrel.A few
could be found along the stagnant margins of swiftly flowing
streams. A.
punctipennisusually occurred mixed,infact itwas
generallyslightlythe
more abundant
ofthe two.The Anopheles
imagoes did not flyaboutthe streamswhere
their larvae occurred, at least they did not attempt to bite, whereasswarms
ofCulex
occurredinsuch localities,especially C.sollicitans,whose
breed ing placeswere
milesaway. The
maculationof theAnopheles
larva varies fromnone
to afew
dots oracompleteband
of whitepigment down
the back.This pigment
isintheskin,and
isoften very white likeporcelain.The
larvaeseem
darkerasarulethan punctipennis,and
thewhite spots,when
present, aremore
contrasted.
The
headsseem
tome
tobe practically identical.Culexsollicitans
Walk.
Abundant everywhere;
themost common
mosquito.They were
very troublesome exceptatthe actualbreedingplaces,where
theywere
scarcelymore
fierce than house flies.Apparently
they are not prepared to bite immediatelyafteremergence.The
breedingplaces ofthis mosquito
were
not found tillnear theend ofmy
stay, sothat Ihad begun
to think I should not findthem
atall.
However
a placewas
found atAmagansett where
the speciesbred inswarms.The
land behindthebeach atthis pointis
low
and had been flooded atsome
time previouslyby
highwaves
; subsequent rains had diluted this water.The swampy
pool
which
itformed, full ofgrass,was examined on September
16th. It
was
at that time scarcely perceptibly brackish to the taste. Itcontainedmany
pupaeand
afew
well-grownlarvae;no young
ones.The
grass inand
about the pool fairlyswarmed
with freshlyemerged
sollicitans.A
heavyrainhad
occurredthe previous day sothat the poolwas
evidentlymore
diluted than ithad
beenand
itwas
too fresh fornormal
breeding.Of
the examples
carriedhome
those atfirstemerging were
all sollicitans, but the later oneswere
cantans. I did notat this time differ entiatethe larvae of these species.They must
be very similar.The
adultmust
flyconsiderable distances. Itwas
notedatYap-
hank,which
isthree milesfrom
the bayand
over six milesfrom
the ocean. Itwas
onlysomewhat
lesscommon
than cantans at thatplace,and
I should judge itcapable ofreaching themid
dle of the island (15 miles). Since writing the preceding re marks, Prof. J. B.
Smith
has loanedme some
larvae thathe issure are sollicitans.
They
are indeed very similar tomy
can-tans.
The
hairs are a little shorter,theairtubealso shorter, be ing scarcelymore
than twice aslong as wide,and
the lateralcomb
of the eighthabdominal segment
consistsof fewer, slightlymore
irregularly shaped spines; lout the characters are so slight that Iam
doubtful if they can be used in practical differentia tion.Culex cantans Meigen.
Nearlyas
common
as the preceding,and more
troublesome and persistent in thewoods,
though lesscommon
in the ho'use.The
larvae breed in fresh-waterswamps formed by
rain inlow
ly
m
g>g
rassvplaces.A low place near the beach at Bellport,
located much
as the one at Amagansett
above referred to, but
lyingbehinda higher bar of sand, was
not reached by
the high
waves. It was
dry on August
27thbutwas
filledwithfreshwater
by
subsequent rains. On September
I3th it contained many
larvae invarious stages ofdevelopment,
some
ofwhich
pupated the following day.They emerged
mostly cantans,though
oneexample
of sollicitanscame
outwith thewhite ringon
thepro boscisvery small and a larva of territanswas
seen with the others.The
larvae fedon
the flocculentbrown
sediment at the bottom of the pool.Some
transferred to jarsconvertedall of the sediment included withthem
into pellets of frass in afew
days.A
fresh-waterHydroid
occurred in thesame
pool and proved a seriousenemy
to the mosquitoes.A
singleexample
fastened itself tothe sideof the glass
and
devoured all of the larvae but one before itwas
noticedwhat was
goingon. It caught the larvae with its tentaclesand
digestedthem
bodily.Some
of the larvaewere
nearly covered with a little stalked Protozoon (Vorticella), but itseemed
to dothem no
obvious harm.Culcx
t&niorhynchus Wied.
Not common, though
severalwere
taken, both out of doorsand
in the house.The
larvawas
notmet
with.Culex pipiens Linn.
Thisspecies,bred
commonly
inevery rain-waterbarrel,bucket, or old tin can in the town,and
apparentlynowhere
else.The
larva
was
not seen inany
of the natural bodiesof water.The
fly entered the house to
some
extent, butwas
notmuch
trouble out of doors, excepton
the porch,and
eventheresollicitanswas
themore
persistent.The
larvae feedupon
bacteria.A
dish of waterwhich was
turbidand
foullysmellingwas
quickly clearedand
all odor destroyedby
these larvae.Some were
introduced into waterfrom which
anumber
of cantans larvaehad
just been removed, intendingthem
as food for theHydroid;
butthey all died in afew
hours without any obvious reason. Apparently they cannot live in water fit for cantans,which
lived in thissame
water forweeks
afterward.There
seems no reason to doubtbutthat thisspeciesisreallytheEuropean
C. pipiens Linn.Culex territans
Walk.
This
was
identified forme by Mr.
Coquillett, aswere
all the species. Itwas
previouslyknown
tohim
onlvbv Walker's de scription, and thereseem
to havebeen no specimensinAmerican
collections.
The
flywas
notcommon, and
looks verymuch
like pipiens, so that itwould
have been hard to identifyit in the field.The
larvae prefer cold water.A
cold spring, forming a pool about 20 feet in diameter, containednumbers
of these larvae, witha fewAnopheles
; arather cold lakeformed by
adam
ina small stream
overhung by
treescontainedsome
larvaewith anabundance
ofAnopheles
andavery fewUranotaenia.They were
not found in a
warm, scummy
pool,which
yielded the other speciesfreely.The
larva is distinctfrom
the other Culex here notedby
the peculiarly colored antennae, white in the middleand
blackish at thebaseand
tip.WASHINGTON. 49 The
larvae of theabove four species ofCulex
resemble each other in general structure.They
differ inseveralminor
characters.
Pip
lensand
territans agree in having a long, slender breathing tube, that of territans being especially long,and
in the position of the antennal tuft,welldeveloped at the outerthird of thejoint.They
differin thebroad head of territans with the antennaedistinctlybanded
with whiteand
thenarrower headof pi- piens withpale luteous orinfuscated,unbanded
antennae. Sollici- tansand cantans agree in the shorter conical or fusiform breath ingtube, the antennae blackish attheouter half, with the tuft at the middle of the joint, oftenweak
or invisible.They
do notsensibly differ; certainly not in anyreadily appreciable character that I have been able to find. All the larvae from the
Ama-
gansett
marsh had
veryshort anal finger-shaped processes, while those from Bellporthad them
moderately long, butboth colonieswere
mixed.Anyway,
the length of the anal fingers is not a specific character.The
habits appear to becorrectly expressed asfollows: Livingincoldsprings orlakes territans.Livinginsmallconfinedbodies ofrain water pipiens.
Livingin freshwatergrassy marshes cantans.
Livingin saltwater grassy marshes sollicitans.
Uranotccnia sapphirina O.-S.
The
larvae occurred rathercommonly
in awarm
pool filledwith green algae (Spirogyra) along with Anopheles.
A few were found in thecold lake, as above noted. The
little larvse
remain mostly atthesurface, not being easily disturbed. They
floatflatly,though
below
the surface film,and were
several times mistaken for theAnopheles
withwhich
they occurred.The
head iselongate
and
blackishbrown,
the hairs of the firsttwo abdominal
segments are long, the rest shortand
stellate. Alto gether the larva presents agood
generic type, quitedistinctfrom
both Culexand
Anopheles.The
little adults caused no troubleand were
not seen flying. I give amore
complete description ofthisform in anotherplace. (Jour.N. Y.
Ent. Soc., ix,179, 1902.)
Prof.
Smith
records this speciesashaving been bredfrom
the pitcher plant (Ent.News,
xii, 189, 1901), but he informsme by
letter thatthepublished statementis an error
and
thathe has not bred sapphirina.I exhibit, for comparison with the foregoing, drawings of
Psorophora
ciliata Fab.,made from
Dr.Howard's
specimenswhich were
loaned tome by Mr.
Kotinsky,Aedes
smithii Coq.,from
pitcher plant larvae obligingly sent tome by
Prof. Smith, afterwhom
the specieswas named, Stegomvia
fasciata Fab., from larvaewhich
Iowe
to the kindness of Dr.W.
C.Reed,
of theArmy
MedicalMuseum, and
Culex; confinisLynch, which
Icollected near
Washington, D.
C. Prof.Smith
has also letme
see larvae of Culex canadensis Theobald,
which
I cannotdistin guish from C. cantans very sharply.The
air tube is a littlelonger
and
slenderer,and
the anal fingers are longer than the segment, but these charactersseem
varietal rather than specific.These drawings
coverall themosquito larvaeknown
atthetime of writing. It appears from Dr.Howard's book
that Culex im-piger had
been bred; but I learnfrom Mr.
Coquillett that thisisan error,
and
that the flies bredby Mr.
Pratt as there described (page 79) really belongto C. pipiens. I have myselfexamined Mr.
Pratt's fliesand
agree withMr.
Coquillett.Finally, I
show
adrawing
of a very curious larva withoutmouth
brush, the antennas jointedontheupper
surface of thehead instead ofon the sides, arida lateral fringe on the widest part of the head.The
last thoracicsegment and
firsttwo abdominal
ones bear lateral conical prolongations.The
air tube isshort, uniform; analsegment
withfour short, often invisible, fingers, a paired dorsaland
single ventral tuft;no
lateralcomb
on the eighth abdominal segment. Hairsof last thoracicand
firsttwo abdominal
segmentslong, the rest shorter,butthoseof the eighthabdominal segment
longer thanthe preceding ones.Mr.
Coquillett hasnamed
this species Corcthra brakeleyi (Ent.News,
xiii,85, 1902).The
following table presents the differences between ourmos
quito larvae in synoptic form. I have not included Corethra or
Mochlonyx,
genera belonging tothe Culicidae, asthe adultshave no proboscisand
are, therefore, not ''mosquitoes."Mochlonyx
culiciformis is roughly figuredby DeGeer
withoutmouth
brush,and
with the curious bent antennas arising from the side of the head, notfrom the uppersurface, as in ourCorethra.The
larvais said to float horizontally in the water, but it has a distinct breathing tube, notsessileas in Anopheles.
Mouthhairs diffusely tufted, foldedinward in retraction.
Air tube short, sessile; larvae floating atthe surface of water.
Eyeslongitudinal.
Abdominalhairs unequal; ventralbrush normal,large.
Bodypaler,theheadcontrasting darker. ..Anopheles punctipennis.
Bodydarker, theheadnot contrasting Anophelesmaculipennis.
Airtube longer than wide; larvae floatingbelowthe surface of water.
Eyes transverse.
Airtube elongate, four timesaslongaswide.
Lateral
comb
of eighth abdominal segment a patch of simple spines.Antennaewithtuftbeyondmiddleofjoint, large.
Headsquare; airtube verylong Culexterritans.
Headrounded; airtube moderate Culex pipiens.
Airtubeshort,less than four timesas longaswide.
Anal processes slender or reduced.
Lateral
comb
a patch ofsimplespines. Culex canadensis.Culexcantans.
Culexsollicitans.
Lateral
comb
a row of few large spines, withtoothed basal plates Culexcoiijinis.
Analprocesses dilated.
Lateral
comb
arowofseveral spines, withelongate basal plates Stegomyiafasciata.
Eyes roundedor longitudinal.
Abdominalhairs equal, ventralbrush absent.
Anal processesdilated (2); head withoutconspicu
ous hairs Aedessmithii.
Abdominalhairsunequal; ventral brush normal.
Analprocesses slender,normal (4); head
with fourlargecoarseblack hairs Uranotcenia sapphirina.
Mouthhairs in a pairofremotepencils, foldedoutward, in retraction.
Eyeslongitudinal; airtube longerthanwide.
Analprocessesvery long, taperingattip; ventral
brush present Psorophoraciliata.
This
communication
occasionedmuch
interestand was
dis cussed atlengthby
several of themembers and
others present.Mr.
Kotinskysaidhehad
rearedlarvaeofAnopheles punctipennis from
poolson Mount
Pleasant,D.
C.Some
of thelarvaewere
of a greenish color. Prof.Smith
said that, in his experience,Anopheles
bred everywhere.A. punctipennis was
thecommon
speciesin