• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Some observations concerning the American families of Oligomyodian Passeres

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Some observations concerning the American families of Oligomyodian Passeres"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Vol. XIX, pp. 7-16 January29, 1906

PROCEEDINGS

OFTHE

BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON

SOME OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING THE AMERICAN^^^_

'

FAMILIES OF OLIGOMYODIAN PASSERES.*

BY ROBERT RIDGWAY.

Bypermissionofthe Secretaryofthe SmithsonianInstitution.

This section of the Superfamily

Mesomyodif

comprises, ac- cording to Dr. Sclater, eight family groups,

namely,

the

"

Oxyrhamphidffi

"

(Oxyruneida^), Tyrannidse, Pipridae, Cotin- gida3, Phytotomidse, Philepittida?, Pittidae

and

Xenicidse, all of which, except the three last

named,

are peculiar to

America,

the families of

Mesomyodi

beingdistinguished in Dr, Sclater's

keys'' as follows:

OUGOMYOD^.J

a. Tarsus exaspidean.

a^. Toesnearlyfree (as intheOscines).

(Billincurved,hooked - - - 1. Tyrannidse.

tBill straight,pointed . - - 2. Oxyrhamphidee.

b^

Toesmoreorlessunited - - - 3. Pipridae.

h. Tarsuspycnaspidean.

{Billelongated, compressed,not serrated 4. Cotingidse. I

\Billshort, conical,serrated - - 5. Phytotomidae.

c. Tarsustaxaspidean 6. Philepittidee.

d. Tarsusocreate.

fRectrices 12 7. Pittidse.

\ Rectrices 10 8. Xenicidae.

*OUgomyodxHuxley,Proc. Zool. Soc.Lond.,1867, 471,part (includesEurylaimidae).—

Oligomyadi Garrod,Proc. Zool.Soc. Lond., 1876,517 (Eurylaimidae excluded).—ifaptoo- phonx Garrod, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.,1876, 517,518 (comprises Tyrannidse, Rupicolidse, and Pipridse); Forbes, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1880, 389-391 (adds Philepittidse and

"

Acanthisittidie" ==Xenicidse).—7VTOn"o*de« Stejneger, Standard Nat. Hist., iv, 1885, 460, 463.

tSeeBirds ofNorthandMiddle America,I,p.16.

XCat.BirdsBrit.Mus.,xiv,1888,2.

§TheCotingidseofDr. Sclaterincludes theRupicolidee.

3—Proc.Biol. Soc. Wash., Vol.XIX, 1906. (7)

(2)

8 Ridgivai/

American

Families of

OUgomyodian

Passeres.

Tracheophon^.*

A. Sternumwithonepair of posterior notches.

a. Tarsus endaspidean . - . . i. Dendrocolaptidae.f

b. Tarsustaxaspidean

---

2. Formicariidae.

B. Sternumwithtwopairsof posterior notches.

a. Tarsusexaspidean . - . . .j. Conopophagidae.

b. Tarsustaxaspidean

---

4. Pteroptochidse.

It is thus seen that the character ofthe tarsal envelopeis Dr.

Sclater's chief reliance in the discrimination of these groups.

This characteris

undouhtedly

one of considerable importance, probably the

most important

of

any

single external character;

but unfortunately

when

carefully tested it does not

work

out so beautifully as

would

appear

from

Dr. Sclater's presentation of the case. If it did, certain genera referred 1)3'

him

to the Tyrannida*

would

belongto tlieCotingid^e, while a considerable numl)er ofgenera referred Ijy

him

to the latter

group

could not be placedatall, since theirtarsal envelopeisneitherexaspidean, pycnaspidean, taxaspidean, nor ocreate. It is evident, there- fore, that a really

"

workaljle

"

key must

be based

on

other characters in addition to that ofthe tarsal envelope.

An

effort to devise a satisfactory one has engaged a considerable

amount

of

my

time; but, while I believe that

some improvement

has been

made,

I nnist confess that it does not wholly satisfy

me, and

theresultsareherewith presented onlyasaprovisional class- ification, with the observation that a really natural

one

is scarcely possible until the internal structure oiall the genera has

been

studied.

Provisional

Key

to the Famii,U':s of INIesomyodi.

a. Syrinxbroncho-tracheal (typically Passerine). {OUgomyodi.)

b. Syringeal muscles anachromyodous; tarsal envelope exaspidean;

middletoecoherent with outertoe fornotmore(usuallyless) than thewholelength ofitsbasal phalanx.

c. Billcuneate,itstipacuteand notatall uncinate.

1. Oxyruncidse.

cc. Billnotcuneate noracute,itstipmoreorlessuncinate.

2. Tyrannidse.

bb. Syringealmuscles catacromyodous; tarsal envelopenotexaspidean, or else (Pipridae) themiddletoecoherent with outertoe formore than its basal phalanx or (genus Plpreoln of Piprida;) coherent

with innertoe forwholeofitsbasalplialanx.

c. TemporalfosssenormallyPasserine.

d. Intrinsicmuscles normally catacromyodous; tonguenot penicil- late.

*Cat.BirdsBrit.Mus.,xv,1890,2.

j-TheDendrocolaptidseof Dr. Sclaterincludesthe verydistinctfamilyFurnariidse.

(3)

Ridgum/ — American

Families ofOligomyodian Passeres. 9

e. Rectrices 12; bill not subulate nor acute; tarsalenvelope not fused.

f. Heteromerous(themainartery of thethigh femoral).

g. Tarsal envelope exaspidean (as in Oxyruncidse and Ty- rannidre); second phalanxof middle toe partly (some- times wholly) coherent with outer toe or else (genus Piprites)thefirstphalanx wholly coherentwith innertoe.

3. Pipridse.

(j(/. Tarsal envelope not exaspidean (usually pyenaspidean,

holaspidean ormodifiedtaxaspidean); second phalanx ofmiddletoewhollyfreefromoutertoe (orelse,ingenus

Pliant Iclrcus, inner side of tarsus feathered), never whollycoherentwithinnertoe. - 4. Cotingidas.

f. Homoeomerous(themainartery ofthigh sciatic).

g. Billcompressed, withsmoothtomia; headwith aconspic- uous,compressed,semicircular, bilateral crest; outermost primary abruptly attenuated at tip; inner secondaries abnormallybroad, truncated. - - 5. Rupicolidse.

gg. Bill conical (finch-like),with serrated tomia; headwith- outcrest; outerprimaryandinner secondariesnormal.

6. Phytotomidae.

ee. Rectrices 10; bill subulate, acute; tarsal envelope fused

(ocreate). 7. Xenicidae.*

dd. Intrinsic nuiscles peculiarly expanded at lower insertion, not attachedto bronchial semirings,which are peculiarly modi- fied; tonguepenicillate. - - - 8. Philepittidse.

cc. Temporal fossteextendingacross occipital region ofskull, thetwo of oppositesidesnearlymeetingonmedianline. 9. Pittidae.

aa. Syrinxtracli€'al. {TracJifopJiorne.)

b.

One

pair of tracheo-bronchialmuscles; tarsalenvelopeexaspideanor taxaspidean; metasternum 4-notched (exceptinFormicariidte).

c. Metasternum4-notched; tensorpatagiibrevis quasi-picarian;nares holorhinal.

d. Tarsal envelope exaspidean; no intrinsic muscles; sterno-tra- chealis notattached to processus-vocal es; palate schizogna- thous;mesorhinium normal; nostrilsnot conspicuously oper-

culate. 10. Conopophagidae.

(/(/. Tarsal envelope taxaspidean; intrinsicmusclespresent;sterno- trachealis attached to processus vocales; palateaegithogna- thous (Oscine); mesorhinium compressed and arched, or expandedintoaflattenedoval shield; nostrilsconspicuously operculate. - - - - - 11. Pteroptochidae.

cc. Metasternum2-notched;tensorpatagiibrevisnormallyPasserine; nares schizorhinal. - - - - 12. Formicariidee.

bh.

Two

pairsof tracheo-bronchial muscles; tarsal envelope endaspid- ean; metasternum2-notched.

*See Pycraft,Ibis, Oct.,1905,603-621,pi.13,wherethepossibility ofnearerrelation- shiptoFurnariidteissuggested.

(4)

10

Ridgway — American

Families ofOligomi/odian Passeres.

c. Naresliolorhiiialormodifiedschizoiliinal; palate scliizognathous; outertoe

much

shorterthanmiddletoe (notconspicuously longer than inner toe),the three anterior toes coherent for

much

less

thanfulllength oftheirbasal phalanges. 13. Furnariidae.

cc. Naresholorhinal; palateaegithognathousorsenii-desmognathous; outertoenearly (sometimesquite) as longas middle toe, both conspicuously longer than inner toe, the three anterior toes coherent(fused) for entirelength oftheirbasalphalanges.

14. Dendrocolaptidae.

It should be stated here that the

Tracheophonae have

not yet been critically studied

by me and

that the above

scheme

is

purelyeclectic. It

may

1)6 that

when

these aretaken in

hand

a

similar

nonconformity

of the character ofthe tarsal envelope to Dr. Sclater's keys

may

be discovered as in the case of the Co- tingidse.

The same remarks

applyin part to the

Oligomyodian

familyPittidse.

So

few of the INIesomyodian forms

have

been studied as to their internal structure that I feel surea satisfactory increase of our

knowledge

in this respect will result in

more

or less funda- mental modification ofour presentviews as to their classifica- tion.

The anachromyodous

syrinx

and homoeomerous

thigh- artery of

many

generaof Tyrannidte as well as the catacromyo-

dous

syrinx

and

heteromerous thigh of

many

formsof PipridjB

and

Cotingidse are, for

example,

merely

assumed, and

there

may

be

many

exceptions to these supposedly diagnostic charac- tersof thegroups in question. Sofaras externalcharacters are concerned, certainly

some

genera

commonly

referred to the

Cotingidae can be separated

from

the Tyrannidae only by their non-cxaspidean tarsal envelope,

and

at the

same

time certain genera

commonly

referred totheTyrannidae also

have

thetarsal envelope non-exaspidean. In the

group

called Cotingidae the characterof the tarsal envelopeis exceedingly variable,

and

the

homogeneity

ofthe

group

is

open

tovery serious doubt.

Of

all external characters, to

which

present recourse is necessarily limited, the character of the tarsal envelope is

by

far the

most

nearly diagnostic, for the

Oligomyodi may

be sharply divided into

two major

groups, oneof which, comprising Oxyruncidae, Tyrannidae (as here defined)

and

Pipridae,

having

the tarsus exaspidean, the other, comprising Cotingidae, Rupicolidae,

and

Phytotomidae,

among American

forms, having the tarsus

(5)

Ridgway — American

FamiliesofOligomyodian Passeres. 11 non-exaspidean. I

am

led to attach great value to this character forthe reason that

no

matter

how

greatthe variations in general

form

or specialization of other characters within the Tyrannidae

and

Pipridae the character of the tarsal envelope is practically

uniform

throughout thesegroups.

Tyrannid^.

In ordertoget as clear

an

understandingas possibleoftheclass- ification of the Tyrannidse, all thegeneraavailable*

have

been carefully

examined and compared. Many

days were devoted to

an attempt

toconstructa

"

key "

toall thegenerain

hand,

but

it finally

became

evident that the undertaking

was much

too formidable forthe limited time

which

could be devoted toit,

and

tli^refore it

became

necessaryto restrict the

key

to those genera belonging to

North and Middle

America, togetherwith a few

South American

genera

which were

included for purposeof comparison.

Even

with this eliminationof halfthe genera the task has

proven

exceedinglydifficult

and

the results far

from

satisfactory, although it isbelieved that

some improvement

has been

made

over the

''

purely provisional

''

arrangement

in Vol.

XIV

of the ''Catalogue of Birds in the British

Museum

,

''

in

which

the so-called families are without question purely

artificial

and

the allocation ofcertain genera obviously wrong.f

The

subject has called forth a very pertinent

and

interesting paper

by

Dr.

von

Ihering,+ in

which

a partial reconstruction of Dr. Sclater's

"

subfamilies," based

on

biological facts (chiefly the character of nests

and

eggs), is

shown

to be necessary, the proposed changes being as follows :

(1)

The

Taeniopterinas restricted

by

eliminationof thegenera Sayornis, Sisopygisand, probably, Machetornis.

(2)

The

Platyrhynchinse divided into

two

groups, Euscarth-

minge and

Serpophaginae.

*Theonlygenera not seenbymeareOchthomisSclater, CemtotriccusCabanis, Pseudo- triccusTaczanovvski and Berlepsch, LeptotriecusCabanisandHeine, Pseudomyobius Sal- vador!andFesta, PlanchesiaBonaparte, TxniotriccusBerlepsch, Chxomyias Berlepsch, andAcrochordopus BerlepschandHellraayr.

tAsan examplemaybe cited thereferenceofonespecies ofSayornis(thanwhich there arefewifany morenatural genera)tothe"Tyranninse" andthe remainingspecies tothe"

Taeniopterinse,"almostat oppositeextremes of thearrangement!

ITheBiologyofthe Tyrannidse withrespect to theirsystematicarrangement. The Auk, XXI,July,1904,313-322.

(6)

12

Ridgway — American

Families of Oliyomyodian Passeres.

(3)

The

Elaininae restricted by elimination of the genera Rhi/nrhorych(S, Legatiis, Myiozetetes, Conopias, Pitangtis, Sirystes,

and

Myiodynastes, which, except the first (referred to the Eus- carthminae), sliould constitute a subfamily Pitanginse,

morpho-

logically intermediate ])etween the Elaininae

and

Tyranninae,

and

doubtfully separable

from

thelatter.

In

my

opinion these suggested modifications in the arrange-

ment

oftheTyrannidaeare,inthe

main,

entirelyjustifiable; but I

am

convinced that they are but a step

toward much more

radical changes

which

will be necessary before a satisfactory exposition of the

phylogeny

of the

group

can be

made;

and, while not prepared to forecast thesewith

any

degreeof certainty will express

my

beliefthat (1) the genera Agriornis

and

Musci-

saxicola are each quite sui generis

and

are not

by any means

as closely related to Tfeiiio2}tera as the latteris to

Tyrannus

;

and

(2) thata considerable

number

of genera

do

not belong tothe Tyrannidae at all but

must

be transferred toother groups, since in

none

of

them

is the tarsal envelope exaspidean, the onlyex- ternalcharacterexceptthatof slightsyndactylism (veryvariable within the group)

which

can be said to l)e really diagnostic of the family.

These

generaare (1) Lawrencia

which

has atypic- ally Oscine tarsus

and

is without

doubt

a

member

of the Vire- onidae. (2) Sh'yv7atura, (3) Hapalorerciis,

and

(4) Hfdirura,

which have

taxaspidean tarsi; (5) Miisrigralla, (6) Sirystes,

(7)

''

Myiarrlms^'' validus

and

(8) Kdnvphotrigon,

which have

essentially holaspidean tarsi; (1))

''

Pogonotriccus^^ zeledoni, (10)

''

Myiojxigis" gaimardi, (11) Tyrannidns elatvs, (12)

"

Tyranmdns^^

(i.e. Microtricciis) semifiavus

and

hrunneicapilhs,

and

(13) Ornithion inerme,

which

haveessentially pycnaspidean

tarsi,

and

(14) Cvlirirora,

which

has non-exaspidean tarsi

and

only ten rectrices.

These

genera,

which

I conclude

do

'not belong to the

Tyran-

nidae, unless

some new

definition of the family be

made, may

be again referred to in order to

show more

clearly

why

they should be excluded

from

the

group under

consideration, as at presentsusceptible ofdefinition.

1. Lawrencia Ridj^way.

(Type Empidonax luniuH Lawrence.)

This genus has atypicalOscine acutiplantartarsalenvelope. Itliasten obviousprimaries, ofwhichthe tenth (outermost) isabout halfaslong as

(7)

Ridgway — American

Families of Oligomyodian Passeres. 13 theninth; the basalphalanxofthemiddletoeiscompletely unitedtothe outertoeand almost wholly adherenttothemiddletoe,thus agreeing,as inthe wing-structure, with the Vireonidae. In fact,exceptforitsdepressed and broadlytriangular"flycatcher"-likebill,the birdis minutely similar to Vireo pusillus.

2. Stigmatura Sclater and Salvin.

(Type, Culidvora badytoides D'Orbigny and Lafresnaye.) Thisbirdresembles in general form and appearancethe Formicariine genus Forinicivora,andprobablybelongstothesamefamily.

3. Hapalocercus Cabanis.

(Type EiiscartJimus meloryphus Maximilian.)

Thisalsoispossibly Formicariine initsrelationships.

One

species has beenreferred toitwhichhasthetypicalTyrannine exaspideantarsusand thereforecannot becongeneric. ThisisAledrurusflavlventris D'Orbigny and Lafresnaye {Hapalocercusflaviventrh Cabanis, Sclater, and others), type of thegenusMyiosi/mpofesReichenbach (Av.Syst. Nat., 1850,pi.65),

and therefore to be

known

as Mylosympotesflaviventris. I havenotseen H. fulviceps {EuscartJmmsfulviceps Sclater) nor H.acutipennis Sclaterand

Salvin, and thereforecan not say whether they are congenericwith H.

melacoryphus or not; but theformerdoubtlessis,sincewhatissaid to be a very nearrelative, H.paulusBangs,isa true Hapalocercus.

4. Habrura Cabanis and Heine.

(Type, SylviapectoraUs Vieillot.)

Thetarsal envelopeofHabrura, while less typically taxaspidean than that of Hapalocercusisby no meansexaspidean. The inner side of the plantatarsi consistsofasinglecontinuousseriesof well-defined quadrate scutella; Initonthe outer side ofthetarsustheacrotarsiumextendsquite totheposterioredgeexceptfortheupperthird,wherethreeor four rather large and very distinct longitudinal scutella occupy approximately the posteriorhalf. Thelastcharacterisseenin

many

typicalTyrannidfe;but innone of the latteristhereeveranyindication ofthe well-defined and continuousseriesofscutellaalong the posterior half of the inner side of the tarsus. The nostrils in Habrura are quite different from those of Haprilocercus, being roundishand nonoperculate whilein the latter they are more longitudinal,relatively larger,and overhung by a rather large

membraneous operculum. The proper place for these two genera is a questionwhich I

am

notal)le to decide,but Habrura

may

not beout of

placeinthe Cotingidte while,assuggested above, Hapalocercus

may

belong tothe Formicariidfe.

5. Muscigralla D'Orbigny and Lefresnaye.

(Type, M. brevicatula D'Orbigny and Lafresnaye.)

Theappearanceofthisvery peculiar formdoes notinthe least suggest to

me

any relationship with the Tyrannidse,while its holaspideantarsi certainlyexcludeitfromthat family. Possiblyitisa Formicarian.

(8)

14 Ridguxiy

American Families of Oligomyodian Passeres.

6. Sirystes Cabanis and Heine.

(Type, Muscicapa sibilator Vieillot.)

This genus hasthearrangementofthetarsalenvelopeprecisely as inthe Cotinginegenera Lipaiigus and Casiornis,and ifthese belong to the Co- tingidsetherecanbenodoubtthatSirystesdoesalso.

7.

"Myiarchus"

validus Cabanis.

(Type ofgenus Hylonax Ridgway.)

The sameremarks applytothis as toSirystes,and IwouldplaceHylonax betweentheabove-namedgeneraandAttila.

8. "

Pogonotriccus"

zeledoni Lawrence.

(Type ofgenus Idiotriccus Ridgway.)

Inthiscuriousform thetarsus

may

becalledultra-pycnaspidean,fornot only the planta tarsi but also the lower portion of the acrotarsium is brokenupinto numeroussmallscutella,whichonthelowerportion of the tarsusare almost tuberculate. I have not seen the typespecies ofthe genus Pogonotriccus Cabanis and Heine {Muscicapa eximia Temminck) and therefore can not say whetherthe latteris Tyrannineor not.

The

onlyspeciescommonlyreferred tothegenusthat I have beenabletoex- amine,besides Idiotriccus zeledoni,is P. plumbeiceps Lawrence,which von Berlepsch placesinthegenus TyranniscusCabanisandHeine,anallocation in whichIentirely agree.

9.

"Elainea"

gaimardi (D'Orbigny).

{Muscicapa gaimardi D'Orbigny,

=

Elaineaelegans Pelzeln, typeof genus Elainopsis Ridgway.)

This bird,while superficially resembling very closely the Tyrannine genus Myiopagis Salvin and

Godman

hasessentially pycnaspideantarsi,

theacrotarsiumextending onlyalittlemorethanhalfwayacross the outer side of the tarsus and the planta tarsi coveredwith minute scutella. I thereforereferittotheCotingidse.

10. Tyrannulus Vieillot.

(Type, Sylvia elata Latham.)

Thisalsohasessentiallypycnaspideantarsi,andforthat reasonistrans- ferred from the Tyrannidse to the Cotingidse. T.semiflavus Sclater and Salvinwhileagreeinginpycnaspideantarsiisverydifferentotherwiseand

isthetype of

my

genusMicrotriccus.

11. Ornithion Hartlaub.

(Type. 0. inerme Hartlaub.)

This also has pycnaspideantarsiand is most nearly related to Micro- triccus.

The

bill in both these genera,butespecially in Ornithion,isde- cidedly Cotingine inform. Ornithionis,so far as known,monotypic,the otherspecies

commonly

referred toitbeingtrueTyrannidae (having exas- pideantarsi)andconstitutethegenus Camptostoma Sclater.

(9)

Ridgivay

American

Families

of Oligomyodian Passeres. 15

12. Culicivora Swainson.

(Type, Muscicapa stenura Temminck.)

Thetarsalenvelopeofthisgenus appears on firstsight tobe exaspidean; but, whiletheacrotarf^ium entirely crossesthe outersideofthetarsusand occupies the greater part of the innerside,thereisinterposedbetweenthe two edges a continuousseriesof verydistinctlozenge-shapedscutella. The

styleof coloration (conspicuously streaked above) is very different from that of any true Tyrannine form and recalls that ofsome Synallaxinee

(Furnariidae) orsomeofthe smaller Formicariidse.

PlPRID^.

The

diagnosis of this

group

as given l\v Dr. Sclater requires

no

modification, all possessing

an

exaspidean tarsal envelope, like the Tyrannidse, l)ut differing

from

the latter in

having

the second

phalanx

ofthe

middle

toe at least half (usually wholly) united to the outer toe orelse (in the genus Pijmtesonly) hav- ing the first

phalanx

ofthe

middle

toewholly coherent with the inner toe. Ntn^rthelessthe characters of the

group

necessitate theexclusionof one genus{Ptilochloris*

Swainson) and

itstrans-

fer to the Cotingidse,

and

the addition (a substraction

from

Cotingidse) of another (genus

AuUa

Bonaparte).

COTINGID.E.

The

Cotingidae are characterized

by

Dr. Sclater (Cat. Birds

Brit. Mus., xiv, 1888, 2) as

Oligomyodian

l)irds with pycnas- pidean tarsi

no

other character for the

group

l)eing given.

Nevertheless, as a matterof fact, aconsideraljle

number

of the genera belongingtothe

group

as limited

by

Dr. Sclater

have

not

pycnaspidean

tarsi,

though

it is equally true that

none

of

them have

the tarsal envelope exaspidean.

The group

is

an

exceed- ingly

complex

one,

and

I

have

very strong doubts as to its

homogeneity. Rvpicola Icertainly

would

excludeas a separate family, Rupicolidae;

and

I believe that

when more

is

known

of their internal structure disintegrationofthe

group

willgofarther.

So

far as external characters are concerned, I

am

able to diagnosethe Cotingidse, asaseparate

group from

the Tyrannidae

and

Pipridse, only

by

their different (non-exaspidean) tarsal envelope; butif the

group

were limitedto those formspossess- ing

pycnaspidean

tarsi it

would

be very

much more

restricted

*Iamusing thenamesadoptedbyDr. Sclater,it being unnecessaryto discuss here whether Laniimma Swainson andLanioceia Lesson should notdisplacePlilochlorisand AiiUarespectively.

(10)

16 Ridgwai/

American

Families

ofOligomyodian Passeres.

than the Cotingitlae of Dr. Sclater.

Those

generaofCotingidae possessing

non-pycnaspidean

tarsi present three recognizably different types of scutellation of the planta tarsi;

two

of these types

approach most

nearlytothe holaspidean

and

taxaspidean,

l)Ut for the third, in

which

the

whole

planta tarsi consists of

smooth

integument, I

am

unal)le to find a distinctive term.

Ifcertain genera (as Lipavgus, Casiornis, Lathria,

and

Attiki)

which

by nearly universal usage are placed in the Cotingidae really belong to that group, then

most

certainly

do

certain genera usually referred to the Tjn-annidae also belong there, for thecharacter of the tarsal scutellation is essentially if notpre- cisely similar.

These

genera, Sirgstes, Bamphotrigon,*

and Hylonax

(type, Mginrchus valichisGosse) I therefore

add

to the Cotingidae, as well as others

which

possess essentiall3" pycnas- pideanor atleastnon-exaspideantarsi,

namely,

^^

Pogonotriccus

''

zeledoni (type of genus Idiotriccus

Ridgway),

''

Elainea"

or

"

Mgiopagis

"

gaimardi (type of Elainopsis

Ridgway),

Tyrannv- lus elatus,

"

Tyrannidus'' semijiavus (type of Microtriccus Ridg-

way), and

Ornithion

possibly also Habrura.

There

should also be

added

a supposedly Piprine genus, Ptilochloris (or Lanii- soma),

which

has neither the exaspidean tarsus nor great syn- dactylism ofthe Pipridae.

At

the

same

time, the exclusion

from

Cotingidae

and

addition to Pipridae of the genus Aidia (or Laniocera) is

made

necessary, since its foot-structure

and

tarsal scutellation istypically Piprine.

*Equals Rhynchocydua.part,of Dr. Sclater. Ramphotri(/onGrfiy, Cat.Gen.andSubgen.

Birds,1855, 146,ex"Pr.B[onapartej 1854." (Type,Plalyrhynchusnificauda Spix.)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

These included: Nurse Rounding on each patient every hour - Resulting in: 6% Decrease in Pressure Ulcers and 4% Decrease in Patient Falls Patients using the Oneview solution to

Of these, 15,224 4,719 households from the DRC, 1,620 478 households from Zambia and 182 79 households from the Republic of Congo.9 In May 2013, following a Cabinet decision, the South