KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG
Gedung H, Kampus Sekaran, Gunungpati, Semarang 50229 Telepon: (024) 8508081, Fax. (024) 8508082; Email: unnes@unnes.ac.id
Website http://www.unnes.ac.id
Data skripsi mahasiswa Universitas Negeri SemarangNAMA : AJENG DESY HIDAYATI
NIM : 2201405080
PRODI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni
EMAIL :
PEMBIMBING 1 : Drs. Amir Sisbiyanto, M.Hum.
PEMBIMBING 2 : Frimadhona S, S.S., M.Hum.
TGL UJIAN : 2009-08-19
THE ANALYSIS OF VALIDITY, RELIABILITY, DISCRIMINATION POWER AND LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY OF FIRST MID-TERM TEST IN THE CASE OF EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP 33 SEMARANG (IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2008/2009)
ABSTRAK
A good English test will help students to learn the language by requiring them to study hard, emphasizing the objectives of the course and also showing them in which parts of the course they need improvement. A test, which is intended to measure the students’ achievement, has to fulfill the requirements of good test such as validity and reliability. There are several factors that influenced in
building good test. There are relevance, balance, efficiency, specificity, difficulty, discrimination, variability and reliability.
In this study, the writer would like to focus her research on the English midterm test which is administered to eighth grade students of SMP 33 Semarang in the academic year of 2008/2009. In this study, the writer would like to find the
answer of the following question: “how good is the English mid-term test for eight grade of SMP 33 Semarang in the academic year 2008/2009.― The general
objective of the study is obtaining an objective description of the structure of a good test item. The method that the writer used in analyzing the data this study is quantitative approach. In writing this final project, the writer conducts to
activities. The first is library activities, the writer select some books which give information, or supporting data for reference. Then the second is field activity, it is used to collect the data.
From the result of the analysis the test there are 33 valid items and 17 invalid items. The reliability of the test is 0.39, so this test is still reliable. From the point of view of discrimination power, it can be concluded as poor because the mean of the discrimination power is 0.17. There are 8 good items, 13 marginal items and 29 poor items. In the term of difficulty level this item categorized as moderate item because the mean is 0.41. There are 11 difficult items, 34 moderate items, and 5 easy items. Based on the result above, the writer would like to offer some suggestions.
First, the constructor of the test should be aware the characteristic of good test, especially in determine difficulty levels and discrimination power. Second,
items that still can be used should be revised and save, while items which have negative value should be discarded, because it means that the students in the lower group performing better than the students in the upper group. Finally, the writer suggest that the test should not be used in the English final test, it can still be used unless it has makes some revisions. The writer hopes that the result of this item analysis could be used as an example in analyzing other test item and encourages teacher to make good English test.
KATA KUNCI
validity, reliability, discrimination power, level of difficulty, test item.
REFERENSI
Arikunto, S. 1995: Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Brink, T.D.T. 1974. Evaluation a Practical Guide for Teacher. University of Missouri: Mc. Graw Hill.
Brown, J.D. 2005. Testing in Language Programs: A Comprehensive Giude to English Language Assesment International Edition 2005. New York: Mc.
Graw Hill.
Brown, J.D. 1988. Understanding Research in Second Language Learning.
Cambridge: CUP.
Ebel, Robert l. 1979. Essentials of Education Measurement. Third edition.
Englewood Cliff. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Gronlud, Norman E. 1981. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. Fourth edition, New York: Macmillan.
Gronlund, N.E. 1982. Constructing Achievement Test: Third edition. USA:
Prentice Hall, Inc.
Harris, David P. 1969. Testing English as Second Language. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Madsen, Horald S. 1983. Technique in Testing. Hongkong: Oxford University.
Mc, Namara. 2000. Language Testing: Oxford University Press.
Nitko, A.J. 1983. Educational Test and Measurement an Introduction. London:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Phompham, J. W. 1981. Modern Educational Measurement. London : Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs.
Vallette, Rebeca M. 1977. Modern Language Testing. Second edition. New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
http: //www.uab.edu/ uasomume/cdm/test. Htm. Downloaded on January 3rd 2009.
http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/measval.php. Downloaded on June 3rd 2009.
