• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PDF PSEUDONYMITY. TERRY WILDER - Vanderbilt University

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "PDF PSEUDONYMITY. TERRY WILDER - Vanderbilt University"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

D. Patte, Editor, Vanderbilt University PSEUDONYMITY. TERRY L.WILDER

Aland, Kurt. “The Problem of Anonymity and Pseudonymity in Christian Literature of the First Two Centuries.” Pp. 1-13 in The Authority and Integrity of the New Testament. Ed. K. Aland.

London: SPCK, 1965.

Bauckham, Richard. “Pseudo-Apostolic Letters.” Journal of Biblical Literature 1988 (107): 469- 94.

Baum, Armin D. Pseudepigraphie und literarische Fälschung im frühen Christentum: mit

ausgewählten Quellentexten samt deutscher Übersetzung. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.138. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.

Brox, Norbert. Falsche Verfasserangaben zur Erklärung der frühchristlichen Pseudepigraphie.

Stuttgart: KBW, 1975.

Brox, Norbert. ed. Pseudepigraphie in der heidnischen und jüdischen-christlichen Antike.

Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1977.

Carson, Donald A. “Pseudonymity and Pseudepigraphy.” Pages 857-64 in Dictionary of New Testament Background. Eds. Craig A. Evans and Stanley S. Porter. Downer’s Grove, IL: IVP, 2000.

Donelson, Lewis R. Pseudepigraphy and Ethical Argument in the Pastoral Epistles. Tübingen:

Mohr Siebeck, 1986.

Duff, Jeremy. “A Reconsideration of Pseudepigraphy in Early Christianity.” Unpublished D.Phil.

diss., Oxford University, 1998.

Ellis, E. Earle. “Pseudonymity and Canonicity of New Testament Documents.” Pages 212-24 in Worship, Theology and Ministry in the Early Church. Essays in Honour of Ralph P. Martin.

Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement. Eds. Michael J. Wilkins and Terence Paige. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993.

Guthrie, Donald. “Epistolary Pseudepigraphy.” Pages 1011-28 in New Testament Introduction.

4th ed. Downer’s Grove, IL: IVP, 1990.

Meade, David G. Pseudonymity and Canon: An Investigation into the Relationship of Authorship and Authority in Jewish and Earliest Christian Tradition. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.39. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1986.

Metzger, Bruce M. “Literary Forgeries and Canonical Pseudepigrapha.” Journal of Biblical Literature (1972): 91:3-24.

(2)

Speyer, Wolfgang. Die literarische Fälschung im heidnischen und christlichen Altertum: Ein Versuch ihrer Deutung. Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft 1.2. München: Beck, 1971.

Wilder, Terry L. “Pseudonymity and the New Testament.” Pages 296-335 in Interpreting the New Testament: Essays on Methods and Issues. Eds. David A. Black and David S. Dockery. Nashville:

B&H Academic, 2001.

Wilder, Terry L. Pseudonymity, the New Testament, and Deception: An Inquiry into Intention and Reception. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2004.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

For example, their argument that interpretive rules play little role in the drafting process has been cited as fatal to hopes of any interpretive dialogue between courts and Congress-a

In more recent decades, the Oklahoma Supreme Court declared unconstitutional on nondelegation grounds a statute establishing a prevailing hourly wage for Oklahoma based on a federal

As shown in this figure, low-LET 90◦ roll angle upset cross section increases with tilt angle due to an increase in charge chord length in the active Si region of the bulk FinFET..

Chapter 2 First-order term of the hypersingular Riesz energy with an external field In the language of Section 1.5, the present chapter contains the proof of Γ-convergence of the

Organizing/Scientific committee member, International Conference of Personalized Medicine and Targeted Therapies in Cancer, Sharjah, UAE 1st Jan to 2nd Feb 2013.. Intel- Ministry of

Title 2: CCC Awareness about Public Health in Rajasthan Department of Health and Family Welfare Ministry of Medical, Health and Family Welfare Seal of Govt.. Jaipur Directorate of