86 Proceedings of
theBiological Society of Washington.
(Prodr.7:34. 1838) uses the
name
0.purpurataWilld.,but
cites"Onoserispurpurea
Less.syn.119"
insynonymy. He
alsowTongly
citestheoriginalname
ofLinnaeus
filiusas Atractylispurpurata. Lessingatthepage
citedused
thename "0.
purpurataWilld., " ashehad done
earUer in his review of thegenus
inLinnaea
(5:339. 1830). In theIndex Kewensis
(2':350.1894), "Onoseris
purpurea DC.
Prod. vii.34"
is cited as asynonym and
referred to0. purpurata.
As
pointed out above,thisoccursinDe
Candolle onlyasasynonymous name, wrongly
attributed to Lessing.Barnadesia
caryophylla (VeU.) Blake.Xenophontia
caryophylaVeil. Fl.Flum.
346. 1825;Icon. 8: pi.85. 1827, asX.
caryophylla.Barnadesia
roseaLindl.Bot.Reg.
39:pi.29. 1843;Baker
inMart.
Fl. Bras.6^:364.pi.98.
1884 (synonymy).
The apphcation
ofVellozo'sname
to this species is clear.The
earlierspelling ofthespecific
name
{X. caryophyla)istobe taken
asa typographi- cal error;it iscorrectedtoX.
caryophyllaon
the plateintheIcones.Trichocline radiata (VeU.) Blake.
Ingenhusiaradiata
VeU.
Fl.Flum.
351. 1825.Ingen'houziaradiata
VeU.
Fl.Flum.
Icon. 8:pi.93. 1827.Seris
polymorpha
Less.Linnaea
5:254. 1830.OnoserisbrevifoUa
D. Don,
Trans. Linn. Soc. 16:246. 1830.Trichocline
polymorpha Baker
inMart.
Fl. Bras.6^:373.1884 (synonjmay
) .—S.
F.Blake.TERMITE SYNONYMY— ULMERIELLA BAUCKHORNI MEUNIER AND MACROHODOTERMES FULLER.
Since publishing
our paper on "A FossU Termite from Germany,
"Proc
Biol.Soc.Wash.,
Vol. 38,pp. 21-22,Mar.
12, 1925,we have
seenwinged
adults ofMacrohodotermes mossambicus
subspecies transvaalensisFuUer from South
Africaand
find that thewings
of this species ofMacrohodo-
termes differ inno
generic characterfrom
that of Ulmeriella.The
fossUgenus
hasprioritybut, asmany
characters oftermite genera are derivedfrom
other charactersthan
the wings,we
are not prepared to definitely state thatMacrohodotermes
is asynonym
of Ulmeriella.UntU more
isknown
ofthefossilform
itwiU
be advisableto retainthename Macrohodo-
termes,althoughit isprobably
thesame genus
as Ulmeriella,and no
generic characterscan be mentioned
inwhich they
are kno-mi to differ.The
relatively
smaU
size of Ulmeriellacompared
to species ofMacrohodotermes
isnotsignificant.