• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

13304 PRODUCTION ENGINEERINGI Petroleum engineering Faculty of Exploration and Production Technology

N/A
N/A
Madu Muda

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "13304 PRODUCTION ENGINEERINGI Petroleum engineering Faculty of Exploration and Production Technology"

Copied!
41
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

13304

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING I

Petroleum engineering

Faculty of Exploration and Production Technology

Universitas Pertamina

(2)

OUTLINE

• Pressure traverse for vertical pipe

• Pressure traverse for horizontal pipe

(3)

THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM

3

Pr PAY ZONE

WELL HEAD

WELL

SEPARATOR

LINE

Pwf Pup

Pdown Ps

(4)

FLUID PARAMETERS IN MULTIPHASE FLOW

SLIPPAGE HOLDUP

FLUID VELOCITY

(5)

FLUID PARAMETERS IN MULTIPHASE FLOW

SLIPPAGE: If a gas-liquid mixture flows up a tubing string, the effects of buoyancy on each of the phase will not be equal. The slip velocity, Vs, is defined as the difference in velocities of the two phase

Vs = Vg – Vo

HOLDUP: to define the volumetric ratio between two phases which occupy a specified volume or length of pipe. The liquid holdup for gas-liquid mixture flowing in a pipe is referred to as HL

HL = volume of liquid in a pipe segment

volume of pipe segment , Hg = volume of gas in a pipe segment volume of pipe segment

HL + Hg = 1

FLUID VELOCITY: to define velocity based upon the total cros=sectional area of the pipe despite the fact that each phase will occupy a fraction of the area (superficial velocity)

𝐕𝐬𝐠 = 𝐪𝐠

𝐀, 𝐕𝐒𝐋 = 𝐪𝐋

𝐀 for more accurate value for the velocity of each phase is 𝐕𝐠 = 𝐪𝐠

𝐀.𝐇𝐠

(6)

VERTICAL FLOWS - SPECIFICITIES

Gas hold up

(7)

DIFFERENT FLOW CONFIGURATIONS – VERTICAL FLOW

finely dispersed bubble

slug

annular

Ugs (m/s)

Continuous phase = the liquid one

U ls(m/s)

Dry gas

condensate Volatile oil Black oil

(8)

VLP CURVE

Frictions

0 pressur loss due to friction (bar)

liquid rate

+

Total pressure losses in the tubing

Total Pressure gradient (bar)

liquid rate

=

pressure loss due to gravity (bar)

liquid rate

gravity

(9)

Pwf hydrostatic pressure

q For given PVT, WHP, GOR, WC and completion

GENERAL SHAPE OF A VLP CURVE

When q increases and is high,

BHP increases because of turbulences

FRICTION DOMINANT REGION

When q increases, Pwf decreases, because gas and liquid phases slip

GRAVITY DOMINANT

REGION

(10)

Pressure loss in the

well

GLR 0 fluid heavier

GLR increases : lot of gas

the velocity increases

turbulences P2increases

optimum GLR

GLR

Gas lift is the only solution to control GLR.

(11)

MULTIPHASE FLOW MODELS

• Correlation of

(12)

CORRELATIONS IN THE CASE OF A WELL FLOW

D g

L U

z f g

P g

c M f

c total

2

2

sin 

  +

=

D g

U f

g g dX

dP

c

M f

c

2 

2

 +

=

hypothesis 1: stationnary flow

hypothesis 2: 2 phase fluid = homogeneous mixture

Bottom hole Well head

Pup Pdown

Pm1 = Pup1 – Pdown1 Pup

Pdown

Pm2 = Pup2 – Pdown2

Etc

Pup Pdown

PmN = PupN - PdownN

(13)

Ha ged o rn and Br o wn’ s me th o d

pressure (100 psi)

depth (1000 ft)

a curve for a specific value of GLR

D, q, Gg, Ta, Go, Gw are fixed

(14)

H aged or n and B ro wn ’s me thod

pressure (100 psi)

depth (1000 ft)

When GLR is low and increases, the pressure loss decreases, but when GLR is too high, the pressure loss increases

GLR increases

(15)

H aged or n and Br own ’s me thod

15

depth (1000 ft)

Example : WHP= 800 psi GLR = 400

depth = 8000 ft

depth

= 7000 ft

7000 + 8000 = 15000 ft

Pwf = 3500 psi

Pwf?

(16)

Hagedorn and Brown’s method

16

depth (1000 ft)

Example : WHP= 0

GLR = 400 scf/bbl depth = 8000 ft

8000 ft

Pwf = 1100 psi

Pwf ?

pressure profile in the well, for WHP = 0

pressure loss in the well

(17)

Conclusion

When WHP increases, the column is heavier.

17

pressure profile in the well, for WHP = 0

P

T

P

T

gas holdup low column heavy

gas holdup high column light

G

G

(18)

OUTFLOW EXERCISE: effect of the well head pressure increase on the pressure loss

• Data:

• GLR: 300 scft/bbl

• well depth: 2000 m

• WHP = 20 bar or 40 bar

• Questions:

• With help from the following shart, estimate the bottom hole pressure for each WHP value.

• Calculate the difference of bottom hole pressure between both cases. What is your conclusion?

(19)

OUTFLOW EXERCISE: effect of the well head pressure increase on the pressure loss

300

GLR = 300 scft/bbl & Z = 2000 m WHP

(bar)

BHP (bar)

ΔP (bar) 20

40

(20)

OUTFLOW EXERCISE: effect of the well head pressure increase on the pressure loss

GLR = 300 cuft/bbl & Z = 2000 m WHP

(bar)

BHP (bar)

ΔP (bar) 20

40

20

300

300

40 136

136

178

178 42

(21)

OUTFLOW EXERCISE: effect of GLR increase on the pressure loss

• Data:

• GLR = 0, 100, 200, 300 or 400 scft/bbl

• well depth: 2000 m

• WHP = 0 bar

• Questions:

• With help from the following shart, estimate the bottom hole pressure for each GLR value.

• Calculate the difference of bottom hole pressure between both successive cases. What is your conclusion ?

(22)

WHP = 0 bar Z = 2000 m GLR

(cuft/bbl)

BHP

(bar) ΔP (bar) 0

100 200 300 400

OUTFLOW EXERCISE: effect of GLR increase

on the pressure loss

(23)
(24)

Multiphase Flow Correlation

• Vertical Multiphase flow (Oil Wells)

Hagedorn and Brown,

• Duns and Ros,

• Ros and Gray,

Beggs and Brill,

• Aziz

• Vertical flow (dry gas wells)

• Cullender,

• Smith,

Poettman

• Vertical flow (wet gas wells)

• Ros and Gray,

• Beggs and Brill

(25)

Multiphase Correlation

• Beggs-Brill Correlation (Beggs and Brill, 1973)

This empirical correlation was developed from air/water two phase flow experiments. It applies to pipes of all inclination angles.

• Hagedorn-Brown Correlation (Brown and Beggs, 1977)

The correlation used here is actually a combination of two correlation:

Hagedorn-Brown correlation for slug flow and Grift Correlation for bubble flow.

They only appply only to vertical wells

• Poettman and Carpenter (Poettmann and Carpenter, 1952 )

Assuming no slip of liquid phase, presented a simplified gas-oil-water three

phase flow model to compute pressure losses in wellbores by estimating

mixture density and friction factor

(26)
(27)

Exercise 1.

A decision has to be made on whether to use 2.991 in. or 3.958 in. ID tubing for a well with the following conditions:

Pseudo steady state inflow

• Initial pressure = 2,500 psi

• PI = 2.0 STB/psi

• Bubble point pressure = 1,200 psi

• Depth (TVD) = 5,000 ft

• Required THP = 300 psi

• GOR = 200 SCF/bbl

Calculate the flow capacity of the well for 2.991 in. or 3.958 in.

A well producing from a pay zone

between 5000 and 5052 ft is completed with 2⅞-in. tubing hung at 5000 ft. the well has a static BHP of 2000 psi and a PI of 0.3 STB/(day)(psi) and produces with a GOR of 300 scf/bbl and a water cut of 10%.

a) At what rate will the well flow with a THP of 100 psi?

b) If rate of production 200 STB/d, what is total of pressure loss in tubing?

(28)

Exercise 2.

No. 1

A well completed with 10,000 ft of 2 7/8" tubing is flowing at a rate of 600 STB/D with a gas-liquid ratio of 1.0 MCF/STB. Assuming a tubing head pressure of 300 psi, calculate the bottomhole flowing pressure. If Tubing size 2 7/8 in ID, water spec

gravity 1.074, gas specific gravity 0.65, average flowing temperature 100 F.

Using each of the 2 7/8" tubing

gradient curves for 50, 100, 200 and 400 STB/d, we can estimate the

bottomhole flowing pressure Pwf for

each flowrate.

(29)

THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM

30

Pr PAY ZONE

WELL HEAD

WELL

SEPARATOR

LINE

Pwf Pup

Pdown Ps

(30)

Production system represented as a network

with branches and loops.

(31)

FLOWLINE PERFORMANCE

• Procedure for calculating the pressure losses occurring in a pipeline are required in the petroleum industry for:

• –Designing flowlines or

• –Designing gathering stations

• The pressure loss in the flowline, expressed as:

• It can be very small for short flowlines, such as might exist in an offshore situation, if the separator is located near

wellhead.

• Conversely, in many producing areas the distance between the wellhead and separator may be several miles, and the

pressure drop in the Flowline might be 20 to 30 percent of the

total pressure loss in the system.

(32)

PRESSURE DROP IN FLOWLINE

• The general pressure gradient equation will apply for flow in pipelines, and all three of the components will apply in most cases.

• Some pipelines can be considered to be essentially horizontal, and in this case the hydrostatic component would be zero. Thus. it is important to have a good correlation for friction factor in pipeline design.

• A substantial part of the total pressure loss in a pipeline can result from Lifting the

• fluids over hills or inclines.

• Also, it has been found that in most cases, hardly any of ' the hydrostatic

pressure loss in the uphill section of a line is regained in the down-hill section.

(33)

FLOWLINE SIZE

• Some aspects of the pipeline design problem are not related to pressure loss only, but include sizing lines and separation facilities such that the separator will not be

overloaded or flooded.

• Separators are usually designed based on a steady rate of gas and liquid flow. If extra liquid volumes or slugs arrive at the separator periodically, means must be provided to handle the extra liquid, this can be accomplished by installing slug catchers upstream to the separator.

• Before separation facilities can be sized, the production engineer must be able to predict the size or volume of the extra liquid and haw fast this volume must be handled.

• The extra liquid can result from changes in flow conditions, such as adding or deleting wells, which will usually changes the liquid holdup in the line.

• If conditions are changed such that liquid holdup is decreased, then the extra volume of liquid removed from the system will eventually arrive at the separator. Designing for this situation requires accurate holdup prediction methods. This type of problem can arise also during PIGGING operations.

(34)

HORIZONTAL FLOW PATTERN

(35)

FLOW PATTERNS INDICATION

(36)

FLOWLINE CORRELATIONS

Correlations: Gilbert and Beggs & Brill

They developed an elegant graphical method for finding the horizontal-flow

pressure losses for Multi-phase flow.

These approach to the horizontal two- phase flow problem was empirical; based on measured values of pipe-flow pressure losses. By supposing that the following measurements have been taken in a large number of flowing wells:

Flowlinelength(pipe)Lf,ft.

Flowlinesize(pipediameter)df,inch.

Tubingsize(tubingdiameter)d,inch.

THPpth,psig.

Workingpressureofseparatorpsep,psig.

Grossliquidrate,bbl/day.

GLR,Scf/bbl.TubingdepthD,ft.

(37)

Exercise 3

From the following given data:

Q = 1000 bbl/day, P

sep

= 80 psig, L

f

= 2500 ft, d

f

= 2 inch, GLR = 1000 Scf/bbl.

Find P

wh

= ?

Hint: the same procedure is followed as in the calculation of

tubing performance pressure traverse curves.

(38)

Exercise 4

• A well is producing at a rate of 1500 STB/day with a GLR of 600 scf/STB. No water is being produced and the well is located at a distance of 6000 ft from the separator. If the separator pressure is fixed at 120 psig.

• Find the required wellhead pressure for flowline sizes of 2 in and 3 in.

(39)
(40)

• Dale Beggs – Production Optimization Using Nodal Analysis

• Appendix B. Pressure Traverse Curves

• For tubing: pg.197 – 335

• For flowline pg 336 - ….

REFERENCES

(41)

TO CALCULATE PRESSURE DROP IN PIPELINE

• Beggs and Brill Correlation can be used to calculate pressure drop in pipeline

• https://petroleumoffice.com/function/pressuregradientbeggsbrill

• https://checalc.com/fluid_flow_beggs_brill.html (be careful with unit)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait