• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Table S1 Relative hazard of clinical progression from fitting a Cox proportional hazard regression model according to alternative analysis i) – all patients.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Table S1 Relative hazard of clinical progression from fitting a Cox proportional hazard regression model according to alternative analysis i) – all patients."

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Table S1 Relative hazard of clinical progression from fitting a Cox proportional hazard regression model according to alternative analysis i) – all patients.

Crude and adjusted relative hazards of clinical progression

Biomarker Crude RH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMRH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMMRH (95% CI) p-value a) biomarkers fitted as categorical variables

IL-6, pg/ml

<¼1 1.0 1.0 1.0

>1 0.85 (0.60, 1.20) 0.346 1.06 (0.74, 1.50) 0.765 1.08 (0.74, 1.58) 0.694

not measured 0.81 (0.50, 1.29) 0.370 0.94 (0.58, 1.52) 0.798 1.01 (0.37, 2.79) 0.981

LPS, pg/ml

<¼110 1.0 1.0 1.0

>110 1.87 (1.27, 2.76) 0.002 1.79 (1.20, 2.68) 0.004 1.69 (1.11, 2.58) 0.014

not measured 0.91 (0.61, 1.35) 0.631 0.82 (0.54, 1.23) 0.335 0.70 (0.43, 1.14) 0.149

sCD14,mg/ml

<¼3 1.0 1.0 1.0

>3 1.38 (0.97, 1.96) 0.073 1.32 (0.92, 1.89) 0.132 1.30 (0.90, 1.89) 0.164

not measured 1.20 (0.73, 1.97) 0.479 1.08 (0.65, 1.79) 0.771 1.13 (0.37, 3.40) 0.830

TNF-alfa, pg/ml

<¼2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0

>2.5 1.38 (0.96, 1.98) 0.078 1.29 (0.89, 1.85) 0.173 1.27 (0.87, 1.86) 0.211

not measured 1.46 (0.95, 2.24) 0.088 1.29 (0.83, 2.00) 0.255 1.65 (0.83, 3.26) 0.151

Patients were grouped according to whether their value of the biomarker was above or below the median.MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

b) biomarkers fitted as continuous variables in the logescale IL-6, pg/ml

per logehigher 0.90 (0.78, 1.03) 0.124 0.94 (0.80, 1.09) 0.400 0.93 (0.73, 1.17) 0.528 LPS, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.37 (1.15, 1.64) <.001 1.40 (1.16, 1.69) <.001 1.45 (1.19, 1.77) <.001 sCD14,mg/ml

per logehigher 1.32 (0.98, 1.77) 0.069 1.14 (0.84, 1.55) 0.392 1.09 (0.73, 1.63) 0.658 TNF-alfa, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.41 (1.03, 1.93) 0.034 1.25 (0.90, 1.74) 0.187 1.23 (0.81, 1.86) 0.329

MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

(2)

Table S2 Relative hazard of clinical progression from fitting a Cox proportional hazard regression model according alternative analysis ii) – all patients.

Crude and adjusted relative hazards of clinical progression

Biomarker Crude RH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMRH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMMRH (95% CI) p-value a) biomarkers fitted as categorical variables

IL-6, pg/ml

<¼1 1.0 1.0 1.0

>1 0.71 (0.38, 1.31) 0.268 1.00 (0.53, 1.89) 0.991 0.97 (0.48, 1.93) 0.923

not measured 0.55 (0.22, 1.36) 0.198 0.98 (0.38, 2.50) 0.966 0.67 (0.06, 6.97) 0.739

LPS, pg/ml

<¼110 1.0 1.0 1.0

>110 1.44 (0.70, 2.97) 0.321 1.18 (0.55, 2.56) 0.669 1.04 (0.47, 2.33) 0.919

not measured 0.70 (0.35, 1.40) 0.313 0.68 (0.33, 1.40) 0.299 0.54 (0.23, 1.29) 0.165

sCD14,mg/ml

<¼3 1.0 1.0 1.0

>3 1.62 (0.86, 3.06) 0.138 1.63 (0.85, 3.13) 0.140 1.68 (0.85, 3.34) 0.136

not measured 1.05 (0.41, 2.72) 0.916 1.40 (0.53, 3.69) 0.492 1.79 (0.21, 15.44) 0.595

TNF-alfa, pg/ml

<¼2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0

>2.5 1.83 (0.97, 3.43) 0.061 1.99 (1.02, 3.88) 0.044 2.24 (1.10, 4.55) 0.026

not measured 1.35 (0.59, 3.09) 0.472 1.63 (0.70, 3.76) 0.257 2.45 (0.60, 9.97) 0.210

Patients were grouped according to whether their value of the biomarker was above or below the median.MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

b) biomarkers fitted as continuous variables in the logescale IL-6, pg/ml

per logehigher 0.89 (0.64, 1.23) 0.486 0.99 (0.68, 1.44) 0.961 0.93 (0.58, 1.50) 0.762 LPS, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.23 (0.83, 1.85) 0.305 1.18 (0.77, 1.82) 0.439 1.16 (0.74, 1.82) 0.515 sCD14,mg/ml

per logehigher 2.13 (1.19, 3.84) 0.011 1.78 (0.99, 3.21) 0.054 2.00 (0.86, 4.69) 0.109 TNF-alfa, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.88 (1.07, 3.30) 0.027 1.86 (0.96, 3.59) 0.064 2.37 (0.96, 5.85) 0.062

MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

(3)

Table S3 Relative hazard of clinical progression from fitting a Cox proportional hazard regression model according to main analysis – patients with baseline CD4 count >300 cells/ml.

Crude and adjusted relative hazards of clinical progression

Biomarker Crude RH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMRH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMMRH (95% CI) p-value a) biomarkers fitted as categorical variables

IL-6, pg/ml

<¼1 1.0 1.0 1.0

>1 0.86 (0.64, 1.14) 0.282 1.02 (0.77, 1.36) 0.888 1.02 (0.75, 1.39) 0.898

not measured 1.01 (0.71, 1.43) 0.959 1.20 (0.83, 1.72) 0.329 1.19 (0.53, 2.65) 0.671

LPS, pg/ml

<¼110 1.0 1.0 1.0

>110 1.89 (1.37, 2.63) <.001 1.79 (1.28, 2.51) <.001 1.73 (1.22, 2.46) 0.002

not measured 1.29 (0.94, 1.76) 0.111 1.18 (0.86, 1.62) 0.309 1.00 (0.68, 1.47) 0.991

sCD14,mg/ml

<¼3 1.0 1.0 1.0

>3 1.28 (0.96, 1.70) 0.091 1.12 (0.84, 1.50) 0.442 1.12 (0.83, 1.52) 0.442

not measured 1.34 (0.93, 1.94) 0.119 1.25 (0.86, 1.83) 0.242 1.03 (0.43, 2.47) 0.956

TNF-alfa, pg/ml

<¼2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0

>2.5 1.27 (0.94, 1.70) 0.114 1.14 (0.85, 1.54) 0.379 1.11 (0.81, 1.51) 0.521

not measured 1.49 (1.07, 2.07) 0.018 1.37 (0.98, 1.92) 0.065 1.32 (0.74, 2.36) 0.351

Patients were grouped according to whether their value of the biomarker was above or below the median.MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

b) biomarkers fitted as continuous variables in the logescale IL-6, pg/ml

per logehigher 0.86 (0.75, 1.00) 0.044 0.89 (0.76, 1.04) 0.147 0.89 (0.73, 1.09) 0.259 LPS, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.38 (1.18, 1.61) <.001 1.34 (1.14, 1.58) <.001 1.37 (1.14, 1.64) <.001 sCD14,mg/ml

per logehigher 1.34 (1.02, 1.76) 0.033 1.12 (0.85, 1.48) 0.436 1.32 (0.90, 1.94) 0.154 TNF-alfa, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.36 (1.04, 1.77) 0.023 1.22 (0.92, 1.61) 0.172 1.16 (0.81, 1.68) 0.422

MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

(4)

Table S4 Relative hazard of clinical progression from fitting a Cox proportional hazard regression model according to main analysis restricted to 140 patients after controlling for parameters of T-cell activation (i.e. CD8þCD38þ, CD8þHLA-DRþ).

Crude and adjusted relative hazards of clinical progression

Biomarker Crude RH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMRH (95% CI) p-value AdjustedMMRH (95% CI) p-value a) biomarkers fitted as categorical variables

CD8þCD38þ, %

<¼70 1.0 1.0 1.0

>70 0.80 (0.53, 1.19) 0.265 0.87 (0.58, 1.30) 0.500 0.84 (0.51, 1.36) 0.473

not measured 0.70 (0.50, 1.00) 0.047 0.67 (0.47, 0.96) 0.027 0.73 (0.48, 1.09) 0.124

IL-6, pg/ml

<¼1 1.0 1.0 1.0

>1 0.91 (0.69, 1.20) 0.507 1.12 (0.85, 1.47) 0.436 1.07 (0.79, 1.44) 0.670

not measured 1.03 (0.74, 1.45) 0.858 1.28 (0.91, 1.82) 0.157 1.41 (0.66, 3.03) 0.374

LPS, pg/ml

<¼110 1.0 1.0 1.0

>110 1.90 (1.39, 2.60) <.001 1.92 (1.39, 2.66) <.001 1.93 (1.38, 2.70) <.001

not measured 1.31 (0.97, 1.76) 0.077 1.32 (0.97, 1.79) 0.077 1.21 (0.83, 1.75) 0.318

sCD14,mg/ml

<¼3 1.0 1.0 1.0

>3 1.32 (1.00, 1.74) 0.046 1.12 (0.84, 1.48) 0.439 1.11 (0.83, 1.49) 0.486

not measured 1.35 (0.95, 1.93) 0.098 1.28 (0.89, 1.84) 0.183 1.00 (0.43, 2.34) 0.995

TNF-alfa, pg/ml

<¼2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0

>2.5 1.36 (1.03, 1.80) 0.033 1.22 (0.92, 1.62) 0.170 1.14 (0.85, 1.54) 0.383

not measured 1.54 (1.12, 2.11) 0.008 1.43 (1.04, 1.98) 0.028 1.16 (0.65, 2.06) 0.615

HLA-DR, pg/ml

<¼50 1.0 1.0 1.0

>50 0.93 (0.62, 1.40) 0.733 1.02 (0.68, 1.54) 0.925 1.26 (0.77, 2.08) 0.356

not measured 0.78 (0.54, 1.11) 0.161 0.74 (0.51, 1.06) 0.103 0.73 (0.48, 1.09) 0.124

MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test.

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

b) biomarkers fitted as continuous variables in the logescale CD8þCD38þ, %

per logehigher 0.93 (0.32, 2.70) 0.891 0.87 (0.29, 2.57) 0.798 1.02 (0.19, 5.52) 0.979 IL-6, pg/ml

per logehigher 0.90 (0.78, 1.03) 0.124 0.94 (0.80, 1.09) 0.400 0.70 (0.53, 0.93) 0.013 LPS, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.38 (1.20, 1.60) <.001 1.37 (1.18, 1.60) <.001 1.37 (0.95, 1.97) 0.090 sCD14,mg/ml

per logehigher 1.41 (1.10, 1.82) 0.007 1.15 (0.89, 1.49) 0.287 1.22 (0.67, 2.22) 0.507 TNF-alfa, pg/ml

per logehigher 1.44 (1.12, 1.85) 0.005 1.24 (0.95, 1.61) 0.122 1.27 (0.75, 2.15) 0.379 HLA-DR, pg/ml

per logehigher 0.97 (0.76, 1.24) 0.829 0.99 (0.76, 1.29) 0.952 0.85 (0.55, 1.33) 0.485

MAll models (a separate one for each biomarker) adjusted forage, CD4, VL, HCV/HBV, year of test, duration of HIV infection at the date of the test.

MMFurther mutually adjusted for all biomarkers.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait