• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Repositori Institusi | Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana: LEARNER’S ENGAGEMENT WITH GRAMMARLY: EFL STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LOW PROFICIENCY LEVELS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Repositori Institusi | Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana: LEARNER’S ENGAGEMENT WITH GRAMMARLY: EFL STUDENTS ACROSS DIFFERENT LOW PROFICIENCY LEVELS"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

40 References

Ariyanto, M. S. A., Mukminatien, N., & Tresnadewi, S. (2021). College students’ perceptions of an automated writing evaluation as a supplementary feedback tool in a writing class. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 27(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v27i1p41-51

Barrot, J. S. (2022). Integrating Technology into ESL/EFL Writing through Grammarly. RELC Journal, 53(3), 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220966632

Chapelle, C. A., E. Cotos, and J. Y. Lee. 2015. Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Language Testing 32: 385–405.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214565386

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Fitria, T. N. (2021). The use technology based on artificial intelligence in English teaching and learning. ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 6(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v

Gao, J. (2021). Exploring the Feedback Quality of an Automated Writing Evaluation System Pigai.

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(11), 322–330.

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19657

Geng, J., & Razali, A. B. (2022). Effectiveness of the automated writing evaluation program on improving undergraduates’ writing performance. English Language Teaching, 15(7), 49.

https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n7p49

Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2021). How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing?Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–

20.

(2)

41

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002

Hyland, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31, 217–

230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

Jingxin, G., & Razali, A. B. (2020). Tapping the potential of Pigai automated writing evaluation (AWE) program to give feedback on EFL writing. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12B), 8334–8343. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082638

Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44(February), 100450.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323

Liu, Y. (2021). Understanding how Chinese university students engage with teacher written feedback in an EFL context: A multiple case study. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 25, 84–107.

https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.05

Miranty, D., & Widiati, U. (2021). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) in higher education:

Indonesian EFL students’ perceptions about Grammarly use across student cohorts. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 11(4), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.12 Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign

language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135–153.

https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025

(3)

42

Ranalli, J. (2018). Automated written corrective feedback: how well can students make use of it?

Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 653–674.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994

Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52(February), 100816.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816

Setyani, E. D., Bunau, E., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2023). The influence of Grammarly towards Indonesian EFL students’ first-degree thesis writing confidence. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i1.6773

Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2022). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: a systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2817–2842.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019

Zhang, Z. (2020). Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing:

Student perceptions and revisions. Assessing Writing, 43, Article 100439.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439

Referensi

Dokumen terkait