6/26/2018 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/846/874 1/2
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Referee’s Report .
1. Title * Appropriate Should be changed 2. Abstract
Is the length reasonable? * Yes
No
Is it an appropriate summary of the content? * Yes
No 3. Main Text
Is there anything new in this work? * Yes
No
Is the relation to previous studies adequately stated? * Yes
No
Are the assumption(s) and/or method(s) described comprehensively? * Yes
No
Are the new results adequately emphasized? * Yes
No
Referee's Comments
6/26/2018 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/846/874 2/2
The abstract should be improved. The experiment results should be added in the abstract. Some grammar errors should be corrected.
Final comments and recommendations: * 1. In the abstract :
imageries --->images ? 2. Line 21 :
... was installed...
3. line 49-50 :
has been ... have been...
4. Line 369 :
ASAM or other method ?
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
