Reviewing: limitations of general officials in article 1 number 20 of 2021 Indonesian draft civil procedure law - Narotama University Repository

(1)

Komunikasi Publikasi dengan Editor Journal

Judul Artikel: Reviewing: limitations of general officials in article 1 number 20 of 2021 Indonesian draft civil procedure law

Penulis:

Habib Adjie (Universitas Narotama, Surabaya, Indonesia; Email: [email protected]) Histori Publikasi

 Pendaftaran akun ke jurnal: 16 August 2022: [IJCC] [Confirmation Required]

Notification about your account creation at ManuscriptLink

 Submit Paper: 17 August 2022: [IJCC] Acknowledgment of a new manuscript submission.

 Keputusan Editor: 17 August 2022: [IJCC] Editor Decision

 Keputusan Editor: 29 September 2022: [IJCC] Editor Decision

 Submit Revisi: 21 October 2022: [IJCC] Acknowledgment of a manuscript revision submission

 Keputusan Editor: 13 December 2022: [IJCC] Editor Decision

 Submit Revisi: 25 January 2023: [IJCC] Acknowledgment of a manuscript revision submission

 Keputusan Editor: 17 March 2023: [IJCC] Editor Decision

(2)

10/1/23,7:17AM Gmail-[IJCC]Acknowledgmentofanewmanuscriptsubmission

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=ff2b48e652&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r2030756713927864446&simpl=msg-a:r-80984276993… 1/1

[IJCC] Acknowledgment of a new manuscript submission

To: "Habib Adjie" <[email protected]>

DearDr.HabibAdjie,

ThankyouforsubmittingthefollowingmanuscripttotheInternationalJournalofCyberCriminology.

Track:RegularTrack

Title:Reviewing:limitationsofgeneralofficialsinarticle1number20of2021Indonesiandraftcivilprocedurelaw Author(s):HabibAdjie

CorrespondingAuthor:HabibAdjie

AffiliationofCorrespondingAuthor:UniversitasNarotama,Surabaya,Indonesia DateofManuscriptSubmission:17-August-20222(UTC)

Inacoupleofdays,aconfirmation emailincluding themanuscript IDwillbeagainforwarded toyouwhenthe journalmanager looksthroughyoursubmission andconfirmsit.Furtherprogress onyoursubmission canbe checkedthroughthefollowingonlinesystem.

*OnlineSystemURL:https://www.manuscriptlink.com/journals/ijcc

Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingyoursubmission,pleasecontactthejournaleditor-in-chief.

Bestregards,

JournalEditor-in-Chief

InternationalJournalofCyberCriminology Homepage:https://www.ijcc.com

=============[Note ]=============

This emailisonlyforthedelivery service . Pleasedonotreplytothismail.

IJCC<[email protected]>

Habib Adjie <[email protected]>

W de , A 7ug1 , 2022 ta 01 : 92 MA

(3)

10/1/23,7:18AM Gmail-[IJCC]EditorDecision

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=ff2b48e652&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-782570519102508197&simpl=msg-a:r-72924340100… 1/1

[IJCC] Editor Decision

ThankyouforsubmittingthefollowingmanuscripttotheInternationalJournalofCyberCriminology.

Track:RegularTrack

ThemanuscriptID:IJCC-167-2022

Wehaveconfirmedandforwardedyoursubmissionforreviewingprocess.Furtherprogressonyoursubmission canbecheckedthroughthefollowingonlinesystem.

Bestregards,

=============[Note]=============

Thisemailisonlyforthedeliveryservice.

Pleasedonotreplytothismail.

Dear Dr. Habib Adjie,

W de , A 7ug1 , 2022 ta 21 : 90 MP

(4)

[IJCC] Editor Decision

WehavereachedadecisionregardingyoursubmissiontotheInternationalJournalofCyberCriminology,

"Reviewing:limitationsofgeneralofficialsinarticle1number20of2021Indonesiandraftcivilprocedurelaw".

Ourdecisionis:RevisionsRequired

Pleasereviseyourmanuscriptbasedonreviewers'commentsandsuggestions accordinglyandresubmityourrevisedmanuscriptnolaterthanonemonth.

Letmeknowifyouhaveanyquestions.

Bestregards,

=============[Note]=============

--- Reviewer-A

Decision:Majorrevisionsrequired

Thepaper "LimitationsofGeneral OfficialsinArticle1 Number20of2021 IndonesianDraft Civil ProcedureLaw"

studiesgeneralofficials'limitationsinIndonesiarelatedtoarrest proceduresasdefinedinArticle1 Number 20of the2021 IndonesianDraft Civil ProcedureLaw.Thestudyexplorestheselimitations,whichencompassconcerns regarding human rights violationsand a lack oftraining and information forinvestigator officials. Thepaper also highlights the theoretical and practical implications of the research, emphasizing the importance of addressing theselimitationsforthelegalsystem'sintegrityandindividualrightsprotection.Here'sacriticalreviewofthepaper:

Thepaper isgenerally well -structured andclear initspresentation oftheresearch topic ,objectives ,and methods .Itshould also provide essential context about the roleoflaw enforcement officials and the importanceofproperarrestprocedures.

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=ff2b48e652&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r8690864445666672603&simpl=msg-a:r755421897008… 1/2

The paper effectively establishes the relevance of the research by emphasizing the significance of criminal procedure laws in maintaining legal justice in Indonesia . It must also highlight the gaps in existing literature and the practical implications of addressing these limitations.

The literature review is quite comprehensive , covering various aspects of criminal procedure , arrest , and detention . However , it's quite lengthy and may benefit from better organization and structure . Consider breaking it down into sub-sections or themes to improve readability.

The paper briefly outlines the research methods used , including data collection and analysis . While this provides a general overview, it lacks specific details about the data sources, sample size, and data analysis techniques. Adding more specifics would enhance the paper.

The paper mentions an exploratory approach but doesn 't elaborate on what this entails . Providing a brief explanation of how this approach was applied and why it was chosen would enhance the paper's clarity.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

u h

T , S 9ep2 , 2022 ta 1: 34 MP

(5)

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/?ik=ff2b48e652&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r8690864445666672603&simpl=msg-a:r755421897008… 2/2

---

Decision:Majorrevisionsrequired

The manuscriptdiscusses variousaspects ofarrestand detentionproceduresin Indonesia,witha focuson their compliancewithhumanrightsandlegalprinciples.However,itneedsimprovementinthefollowingareas.

Thereviewcitesseveralrelevantstudiesandsources,whichaddscredibilitytotheresearch.However, there couldbemorerecentsourcescitedtoensuretheinformationisup-to-date.Additionally,itwouldbe helpfulto providepublicationdatesforthesesourcestogivereaderscontext.

____________________________________________________________

Reviewer -B

Some sentences are lengthy and complex , which may make it challenging for readers to follow. Simplifying sentence structures and eliminating unnecessary repetition can enhance clarity and conciseness.

While the paper provides a broad overview of arrest and detention procedures in Indonesia , it's essential to ensure that all the information presented directly relates to the research topic. Some parts of the review seem to drift away from the central theme, such as the discussion of the code of criminal law.

The transitions between different sections and sources could be smoother. It's important to guide the reader from one idea or source to the next logically . Consider using transition sentences or phrases to improve the flow of the review.

The section briefly introduces the concept of limitations in the implementation of Article 1 Number 20 of the 2021 Indonesian Draft Civil Procedure Law , but it doesn 't delve deeply into these limitations . It would be helpful to integrate these findings more comprehensively into the literature review and analyze how these limitations relate to the broader discussion on arrest and detention procedures in Indonesia.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

(6)

10/1/23,7:20AM Gmail-[IJCC]Acknowledgmentofamanuscriptrevisionsubmission

[IJCC] Acknowledgment of a manuscript revision submission

ThankyouforsubmittingthefollowingmanuscriptrevisiontotheInternationalJournalofCyberCriminology.

Track:RegularTrack

Wehaveconfirmedandforwardedyourrevisionsubmissionforreviewingprocess.Furtherprogressonyour submissioncanbecheckedthroughthefollowingonlinesystem.

Bestregards,

=============[Note]=============

ir

F , O 1ct2 , 2022 ta 9: 35 MA

(7)

Response to Reviewer 1

Sr. No. Reviewer's Comment Response

The paper "Limitations of General Officials in Article 1 Number 20 of 2021 Indonesian Draft Civil Procedure Law" studies general officials' limitations in Indonesia related to arrest procedures as defined in Article 1 Number 20 of the 2021 Indonesian Draft Civil Procedure Law. The study explores these limitations, which encompass concerns regarding human rights violations and a lack of training and information for investigator officials. The paper also highlights the theoretical and practical implications of the research, emphasizing the importance of addressing these limitations for the legal system's integrity and individual rights protection. Here's a critical review of the paper:

Many thanks respected reviewer for your kind remarks and suggestions.

1 The paper is generally well-structured and clear in its presentation of the research topic, objectives, and methods. It should also provide essential context about the role of law enforcement officials and the importance of proper arrest procedures.

Many thanks for your kind suggestions.

We have now provided essential context about the role of law enforcement officials and the importance of proper arrest procedures.

Please see pages 2-4 2 The paper effectively establishes the

relevance of the research by emphasizing the significance of criminal procedure laws in maintaining legal justice in Indonesia. It must also highlight the gaps in existing literature and the practical implications of

Dear reviewer, following your kind guidelines. We have now highlighted the gaps in existing literature and the practical implications of addressing these limitations.

Please see pages 3-5

(8)

Response to Reviewer 2

addressing these limitations.

3 The literature review is quite comprehensive, covering various aspects of criminal procedure, arrest, and detention.

However, it's quite lengthy and may benefit from better organization and structure.

Consider breaking it down into sub-sections or themes to improve readability.

Dear reviewer, Thank you for your kind suggestions. Done as suggested.

Please see pages 6-11

4 The paper briefly outlines the research methods used, including data collection and analysis. While this provides a general overview, it lacks specific details about the data sources, sample size, and data analysis techniques. Adding more specifics would enhance the paper.

Respected reviewer, Thank you.

Done as suggested Please see pages 12-14.

5 The paper mentions an exploratory approach but doesn't elaborate on what this entails. Providing a brief explanation of how this approach was applied and why it was chosen would enhance the paper's clarity.

Thank you, dear reviewer. Done as suggested.

Please see page no 18-19

Sr. No. Reviewer's Comment Response

The manuscript discusses various aspects of arrest and detention procedures in Indonesia, with a focus on their compliance with human rights and legal principles.

Thank you for your feedback on the

paper. Here is the detailed response

please

(9)

However, it needs improvement in the following areas.

1 The review cites several relevant studies and sources, which adds credibility to the research. However, there could be more recent sources cited to ensure the information is up-to-date. Additionally, it would be helpful to provide publication dates for these sources to give readers context.

Dear reviewer, done as suggested.

Please see page 7-12

2 Some sentences are lengthy and complex, which may make it challenging for readers to follow. Simplifying sentence structures and eliminating unnecessary repetition can enhance clarity and conciseness.

Many thanks. done as suggested.

3 While the paper provides a broad overview of arrest and detention procedures in Indonesia, it's essential to ensure that all the information presented directly relates to the research topic. Some parts of the review seem to drift away from the central theme, such as the discussion of the code of criminal law.

Dear reviewer, done as suggested.

Please see pages 7-12

4 The transitions between different sections and sources could be smoother. It's important to guide the reader from one idea or source to the next logically.

Consider using transition sentences or phrases to improve the flow of the review.

Dear reviewer, Thank you.

Done as suggested.

5 The limitation section briefly introduces the concept of limitations in the

Done, dear reviewer as suggested.

Please see page 20-21

(10)

implementation of Article 1 Number 20 of

the 2021 Indonesian Draft Civil Procedure

Law, but it doesn't delve deeply into these

limitations. It would be helpful to integrate

these findings more comprehensively into

the literature review and analyze how these

limitations relate to the broader discussion

on arrest and detention procedures in

Indonesia.

(11)

[IJCC] Editor Decision

WehavereachedadecisionregardingyoursubmissiontotheInternationalJournalofCyberCriminology,

"Reviewing:limitationsofgeneralofficialsinarticle1number20of2021Indonesiandraftcivilprocedurelaw".

Ourdecisionis:RevisionsRequired

Pleasereviseyourmanuscriptbasedonthereviewers'commentsandsuggestions accordinglyandresubmityourrevisedmanuscriptnolaterthanonemonth.

Letmeknowifyouhaveanyquestions.

Bestregards,

=============[Note]=============

e u

T , D 3ec1 , 2022 ta 21 : 24 MP

(12)

10/1/23,7:21AM Gmail-[IJCC]Acknowledgmentofamanuscriptrevisionsubmission

[IJCC] Acknowledgment of a manuscript revision submission

ThankyouforsubmittingthefollowingmanuscriptrevisiontotheInternationalJournalofCyberCriminology.

Track:RegularTrack

Wehaveconfirmedandforwardedyoursubmissionrevisionforreviewingprocess.Furtherprogressonyour submissioncanbecheckedthroughthefollowingonlinesystem.

Bestregards,

=============[Note]=============

W de , nJ 5a 2 , 2023 ta 01 : 21 MA

(13)

Response to Reviewers

Sr. No. Reviewer's Comment Response

The authors did a good job of revising this paper. Here are some minor suggestions.

Many thanks, Respected Reviewer.

1 The paper includes a few references to past research (e.g., Aldyan & Negi, 2022;

Supriyono, Amrullah, & Suarda, 2023), which lends credibility to the study.

However, it could benefit from citing more recent research if available.

Many thanks, for kind comments. We have now cited more recent research.

2 The paper should be well-written with correct grammar and sentence structure. It must effectively convey the research's purpose and findings.

Dear reviewer, done as suggested by your kind self.

3 The abstract needs to be concise and to the point, avoiding unnecessary jargon or verbosity.

Dear reviewer, Thank you for your kind

suggestions. Done as suggested.

(14)

[IJCC] Editor Decision

Congratulations!thefollowingofyourmanuscript.

Track:RegularTrack

HasbeenacceptedforpublicationinInternationalJournalofCyberCriminology(Vol.17No.1,2023).Thankyou foryourinterestinourjournal.YourJournalpaperwouldbeindexedinScopus(Elsevier),GoogleScholar,Scirus, GetCited,Scribd,soon.

Welookforwardtoreceivingyoursubsequentresearchpapers.

Bestregards,

=============[Note]=============

F ir, M 7ar1 , 2023 ta 11 : 83 MA