• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Certification R S P O

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Certification R S P O"

Copied!
100
0
0

Teks penuh

Indonesia National Interpretation RSPO Principles and Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil Production 2018 Approved by the RSPO Board on 20 April 2020. Production data source from 12 months prior to assessment (August 2021 to July) Description of the scope of certification of the supply base. Production data source from 12 months prior to assessment ( August 2021 to July FFB description from other source.

Figure 1. Location Map of PT Bio Inti Agrindo
Figure 1. Location Map of PT Bio Inti Agrindo

Assessment Team

Assessment Methodology, Assessment Process and Locations of Assessment .1 Figure of person days to implement assessment

Assessment Process

Some opportunities for improving the results ASA-1 of the MUTU auditor to the management unit and the results are the subject will be verified at the next assessment. The auditor's journey from the airport in Merauke to the audit site takes about 3-4 hours. The interviewer recorded comments from stakeholders and these have been incorporated into the assessment results.

Locations of Assessment

Field observations and interviews regarding technical work, occupational health and safety aspects, employment, social, ethics and the environment. Observation regarding management of agrochemical material and waste, MSDS, emergency response facilities and types of fertilizers used. Observations related to the management of agrochemical materials and wastes, MSDS, emergency response facilities and types of pesticides used.

Stakeholder Consultation and Stakeholders Contacted .1 Summary of stakeholder consultation process

Stakeholder contacted Please find appendix 1

Observation regarding oil and agrochemical materials and waste management, MSDS, emergency response facilities and types of pesticides used. Monitoring the availability of infrastructure such as employee housing facilities, clean water facilities and electricity facilities. Monitoring the availability of infrastructure such as employee housing facilities, clean water facilities and environmental aspect.

Determining Next Assessment

ASSESSMENT FINDINGS

Summary of Assessment Report of the RSPO Certification

Plantation Business License based on the Decree of the Head of the Office of Investment and One Stop Services of Papua Province No. In addition, the company has also obtained environmental feasibility in accordance with the decree of the Head of the Investment Department and One Stop Services. Stop the integrated service of the Merauke Regency number 663/03/SKKL/Year 2021 on July 29, 2021. However, the progress of completing the permits related to the expansion of the wastewater application area has not yet been completed.

All FFB supplies from outside of the unit of certification are from legal sources

Based on the interviews with employees (harvesters, pesticide sprayers and plant operators), employees had sufficient insight into the procedures regarding recruitment, promotion and termination of employment. To support the above policy, the company has established various procedures regarding occupational health and safety. One of the activities of the Occupational Health and Safety Committee is to carry out monthly evaluations regarding the implementation of occupational health and safety programs.

KK has a SHSHP Committee in each unit, which is responsible for implementing aspects of the SHSHP. For example, at the OHS Committee meeting on 13 April 2022, 17 members from POM 1, POM 2, Estate A, Estate B, Estate C and Plasma attended. Among them are the discussion of the results of the ISO 45001 audit, the management review, the application of procedures when an incident occurs and the competence of employees.

All staff, workers, Scheme Smallholders, out growers, and contract workers are appropriately trained

Based on the interviews with the surrounding communities, residents and workers (harvesters and mill operators), the workers had a good understanding of the communication procedures and personnel who acted as communicators between the company and the community so that illiterate people can be informed by the related communicators. Submission orally or in writing to the company's contact person or through a trade union. However, there is no evidence that the program was developed based on the results of community consultations.

The results of the interview with the company's PIC revealed that the company's CSR program was prepared by the company's management and was not based on the identification of community needs in the preparation of the CSR program. This is because some of the CSR assistance that the company provides is considered to be less targeted by society. Based on this explanation, the company has not been able to demonstrate documentation that the CSR program for community development has been implemented based on the results of consultations with local communities.

The results of document verification and interviews with management and representatives of indigenous peoples show that the company can show documentation of the surrender of customary land for plantation development. Based on interviews with 11 previous land owners or customary rights holders from Mahuze Besar, Kaku, Renggam, Mahuze Milafo, Mahuze Kewam and Gebse clans, information was obtained that before the opening of the oil palm plantation land, the company organized a Tua Marga meeting and clan members at participatory way, explaining that the area on the customary land being released will be planted with oil palm and the Tua Marga as representatives of the clans that owned the customary land agreed to this and without any coercion from any side . Based on the results of interviews with stakeholders (representatives of Selil village, Kindiki village, Mandekman village and plasma and 11 previous land owners), it was found that the company had a positive impact, such as employment of employees, provision of plasma and help with corporate social responsibility.

Based on interviews with 11 former land owners or customary rights holders from the Mahuze Besar, Kaku, Renggam, Mahuze Milafo, Mahuze Kewam and Gebse clans and also as Kindiki dan Selil village community, it is known that the land has been compensated and no no claim/dispute the land between the community and the company.

Any negotiations concerning compensation for loss of legal, customary or user rights are dealt with through a documented system that enables indigenous peoples, local communities and other stakeholders to express their views through their

In the pay slip document, it is known that the nominal value of the employee's overtime wages is in accordance with the overtime calculation. Based on the interviews with employees, it is known that employees already have sufficient insight into the complaints mechanism. On this basis, it is known that the CH has not been able to demonstrate that the contents of the first aid bag/box at the workplace are in accordance with applicable procedures and regulations.

Based on the results of the review of documents on the use of pesticides in 2022, there was no use of Klerat for rat control. This has been confirmed to the company and the company is aware of the issue. Based on the results of the document review, it is known that the application of EFB in July 2022 for Estate B and C is 5,424 Tons.

During the audit activity, there were no new plantings in the company's management area. This is proven by the results of field observations in the area of ​​the HCV border block of the Ngab River 39-66 Estate B, it is known that the river border is guarded by the company. Based on the analysis of the test documents, it can be seen that all the tested parameters are in accordance with the applicable quality standards.

This issue was obtained from the results of interviews with representatives of the Mahuse Milafo tribe.

KER 3.48

The Company disclosed the land clearance without a previous HCV assessment on January 16, 2018 and updated it in February 2020. The Company subsequently conducted an HCV reassessment with independent assessor Ecologica Consultant on January 22 to May 15, 2020. In July 2020 The HCV assessment conducted by the company was approved by the HCV-ALS assessment group and rated Satisfactory/Accepted.

And because the company has not cleared new land since 2018 (November 15, 2018) within its concession area, the company is not required to assess the presence of HCS (High Carbon Stock). The company already has an HCV program based on the recommendations of the 2020 identification assessment carried out by Ecologika Consultants in 2020. The company has not completed a 5-year review of the management of areas of high conservation value because the HCV management and monitoring plan used is the result of the recommendations from the HCV assessment carried out in 2020.

This is evident from the company's HCV management plan developed by involving stakeholders such as the surrounding village community and employees (during the 2020 HCV identification activity). The company has identified HCV, which was carried out by Eclogica Consultant from January 22 to May 15, 2020. Based on the results of interviews with harvest and spray officials on estate A, it is known that the company prohibits employees from keeping protected animals and plants and prohibits the capture, hunting and killing of animals, as well as the destruction of HCV areas.

All employees and the community in the company area are united in the secured area/HCV in the company area.

Conformity Checklist of Certificate and Trademark Use

Evidence of permission or approval certificate and trademark from Certification Body which

Implementation of certificate and trademark used by Client comply with size and type (shape)

  • Summary of RSPO Partial Certification
  • Identification of Findings, Corrective Action, Observations, Opportunity for Improvement and Noteworthy Positive Components
    • Identification of Findings, Corrective Actions and Observations at IC Audit
    • Identification of Findings, Corrective Actions and Observations at ASA-1 Audit
    • Opportunity for Improvement
    • Noteworthy Positive Components
  • Summary of Arising Issues from Public and Auditor Verification Public Issues
  • CERTIFIED ORGANISATION'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNAL RESPONSIBILITY

The results of the interview with the Papua Province Manpower Supervision Agency revealed that the company had not submitted the latest report on the use of PKWT workers. Based on the description above, the non-conformity has been met and the company's plan will be met in the next assessment. The company was therefore unable to ensure that the minimum age requirements for workers were met in accordance with applicable regulations.

The company has not been able to demonstrate that the availability of first aid equipment in the workplace has referred to applicable procedures and regulations. The company has not been able to prove that the contents of the first aid bag/box at the workplace are in accordance with applicable procedures and regulations. The company has not been able to demonstrate that the implementation of waste management is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

The CSR program was not based on the results of consultations and needs were not identified with the community. Based on this interpretation, the company could not prove that the disposal of waste is in accordance with the procedures it has in place. The content of the report on environmental management and monitoring carried out by the company is in accordance with KepmenLH no.

Reports on the handling of hazardous waste are submitted by the company on a quarterly basis. Currently, the company is in the process of obtaining an LA permit in connection with the expansion of the field of use of liquid waste. Management of the plasma farms will be carried out by the company (the plasma is fully managed by the company).

POM 2

Representatives of the Mahuze Milafo tribe, Mahuze Kewam tribe, Mahuze Besar tribe, Kaku tribe and Gebse tribe.

List of Stakeholder Contacted in the RSPO Certification Process

DATE 29 August – 7 September 2022

Implementation of Environmental Aspect, Inspection to Chemical Storage, Hazardous Waste Storage, Fire Control Simulation, POME Dam & land application submission of audit progress. Implementation of Agronomy Aspect (Harvest and Transport, Manure, Application of Pesticides, Road Maintenance, Biological Control Monitoring, EFB Application), Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety Aspect, Implementation of Employment Procedure and Mechanism Aspect. Implementation of environmental and waste management aspect (inspection to chemical storage, fertilizer storage, hazardous waste storage, fire control facilities, waste management), observation of worker facilities (housing, school, place of worship).

Referensi

Dokumen terkait