• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

SDC, Materials and Methods

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "SDC, Materials and Methods"

Copied!
8
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

SDC, Materials and Methods

Maintenance immunosuppression during follow-up

At day 30 posttransplant, 33 of 34 patients from the ABO incompatible group were on tacrolimus and enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium, one patient was on tacrolimus and azathioprine. Median tacrolimus trough level in patients was 10.7 (3.6-20.1) µg/L and the median enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium dose was 1440 (720-1440) mg/day. From the 68 matched control patients, 16 patients were taking tacrolimus in combination either with enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=13), azathioprine (N=1), sirolimus (N=1; Pfizer, New York City, USA) or everolimus (N=2; Novartis). The other 52 patients were on cyclosporine therapy either in combination with enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=50) or everolimus (N=2). No patient was on a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen at this time point. Median trough level was 8.4 (4.4-13.7) µg/L for patients taking tacrolimus and 188 (74-296) µg/L for patients taking cyclosporine. Median enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium dose was 1440 (720-1440) mg/day.

At year one post-transplant, 23 of 26 patients in the ABO incompatible group were receiving tacrolimus in combination with either enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=21), azathioprine (N=1) or everolimus (N=1). The remaining three patients were on cyclosporine plus enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=1), belatacept (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York City, USA) plus enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=1) or everolimus plus enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=1). Median tacrolimus trough level was 8.4 (4.4-13.7) µg/L and the median enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium dose was 1440 (720-1440) mg/day. From the 58 matched control patients, 16 patients were taking tacrolimus in combination with either enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=15) or sirolimus (N=1). Another 36 patients were on cyclosporine either in combination with enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium (N=34) or everolimus (N=2). Six patients were on a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen based on

(2)

7.6 (5.6-14.5) µg/L for patients receiving tacrolimus and 127 (51-170) µg/L for patients taking cyclosporine. Median enteric-coated mycophenolic sodium dose was 1440 (720-1440) mg/day.

All patients had additional methylprednisolone therapy at both time points.

Historical control group of 6 patients desensitized by blood group antigen-specific immunoadsorption

Details on patient treatment are given in reference 3. In brief, patients were desensitized using single-use carbohydrate columns (Glycosorb AB, Glycorex Transplantation AB, Lund, Sweden) with an Octo nova device equipped with a Plasmaflo OP 0.2 plasma separator.

Anticoagulation was performed by sodium citrate. During each IA treatment, 1.5-2 plasma volumes per patient were processed. Two patients (33%) required additional PP treatments.

One patient did not reach the target isoagglutinin titer at the time of transplantation and was therefore not transplanted. The remaining 5 patients received rituximab induction, 2 of 5 patients received basiliximab induction therapy and 4 of 5 patients received preoperative intravenous immunoglobulins. Maintenance immunosuppression, infection prophylaxis and postoperative care were essentially as described for patients treated with non-antigen- specific IA.

(3)

Table S1: Parameters of coagulation, albumin and blood count during desensitization (including patients who were desensitized but not transplanted)

Blood group antigen- specific IA (N=6)

Non-antigen-specific IA (N=39)

P Partial thromboplastin time (s), median (range)

Before 1. IA After 1. IA

After last pretransplant IA

26.2 (23.5-33.2) 23.1 (22.6-31.2) 28.4 (23.5-81.1)

25.3 (22.5-120) 36.0 (24.8-120)a 44.1 (22.4-120)a

0.79 0.02 0.66 International normalized ratio, median (range)

Before 1. IA After 1. IA

After last pretransplant IA

0.97 (0.89-1.06) 1.01 (0.91-1.06) 0.97 (0.90-1.06)

0.99 (0.90-1.18) 1.04 (0.95-1.29) 1.06 (0.97-1.4)

0.27 0.39 0.01 Fibrinogen (g/L), median (range)

Before 1. IA After 1. IA

After last pretransplant IA

3.05 (1.70-3.60) 2.85 (1.50-3.80) 1.90 (1.80-1.90)

3.30 (1.9-6.0) 2.70 (0.8-4.5) 1.50 (0.90-2.90)

0.16 0.42 0.03 Albumin (g/L), median (range)

Before 1. IA After 1. IA

After last pretransplant IA

40.2 (37.7-48.3) 35.5 (35.1-39.6) 35.1 (27.9-38.2)

42.0 (30.7-47.8) 35.9 (27.5-43.2) 29.3 (22.0-33.9)

0.52 0.82 0.12 Hemoglobin (g/dL), median (range)

Before 1. IA After 1. IA

After last pretransplant IA

12.7 (10.7-15.1) 12.05 (11.0-13.5)

11.5 (10.8-12.4)

11.3 (8.5-16.1) 11.5 (8.6-16.1) 10.90 (7.9-14.3)

0.14 0.89 0.10 Leukocytes (/nL), median (range)

Before 1. IA After 1. IA

After last pretransplant IA

9180 (5890-14,240) 8580 (1832-15,130) 9420 (6290-16,300)

6130 (3300-10,570) 7250 (1300-15,360) 8890 (3500-21840)

0.003 0.49 0.61 Thrombocytes (/nL), median (range)

Before 1. IA After 1. IA

After last pretransplant IA

223 (158-298) 182 (145-267) 187 (121-200)

241 (97-489) 185 (90-432) 153 (93-286)

1.00 0.56 0.21

a, patients treated by non-antigen-specific IA had anticoagulation with citrate/heparin,

patients treated with blood group antigen-specific IA had anticoagulation with citrate

only; IA, immunoadsorption

(4)

Table S2: Estimated cost for immunoadsorption using non-antigen-specific as compared to blood group antigen-specific immunoadsorption columns (calculated for transplanted patients only)

Blood group antigen-specific IA

(N=5)

Non-antigen- specific IA

(N=34) Pretransplant

IA column and disposables (including tax) calculated for the median number (N) of pretransplant IA treatments – Euro

16,042 (N=4)

10,568 (N=7) Plasma/albumin and disposables (including

tax) calculated for the median number (N) of additional pretransplant PP treatments – Euro

0 (N=0)

950 (N=1) Posttransplant

IA column and disposables (including tax) calculated for the median number (N) of posttransplant IA treatments – Euro

16,042 (N=4)

0 (N=0) Plasma/albumin and disposables (including

tax) calculated for the median number (N) of posttransplant PP treatments – Euro

0 (N=0)

950 (N=1)

Total cost – Euro 32,084 12,468

IA, immunoadsorption; PP, plasmapheresis

(5)

Figure S1: Treatment algorithm for ABO incompatible living donor kidney

transplantation (since December 01, 2008; with modifications). Patients received

posttransplant immunoadsorption (IA) when their isoagglutinin titer (either Coombs or

Saline technique) exceeded 1:16 or 1:32 during the first or second week after

transplantation, respectively. Tx, transplantation; -X, start of treatment dependent on

baseline isoagglutinin titer (see Table)

(6)

Figure S2: Patient selection

(7)

Figure S3: Direction of the ABO mismatch

(8)

Figure S4: Serum creatinine (A), MDRD-GFR (B) and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio

(C) in 34 ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients compared to 68

matched standard risk recipients. MDRD-GFR, glomerular filtration rate as estimated

by the MDRD formula

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

According to the research findings, learning media using Augmented Reality Technology can be used as an alternative media to aid in the English learning process, and

The user is provided with an android application based Graphic User Interface GUI to exercise the desired control over the lights, fan speed regulation, control of appliances, and