SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOLUME
n.NUMBER
15Johnson dfunb
REPORTS ON THE COLLECTIONS OBTAINED BY THE FIRST JOHNSON-SMITHSONIAN DEEP-SEA EXPEDITION
TO THE PUERTO RICAN DEEP
TWO NEW CONGRID EELS AND A NEW FLATFISH
(With
One
Plate)BY EARL
D. REIDAid, Division of Fishes, L'.S. National Miisoiiin
(Punr.icATioM 3251)
CITY
OF WASHINGTON
PUBLISHED BY
THE SMITHSONIAN
INSTITUTIONJUNE
9, 193+SMI'IHSONIAN MISCtLLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOLUME
91,NUMBER
IS3obn8on jfunb
RHPORTS ON THE rOLLf-XTIONS OBTAINED BY THE FIRST JOHNSrjN SMITHSrjNIAN DEEP-SEA EXPEDITION
TO THE PUERTO KICAN DEEP
TWO NEW CONGRID HHLS AND A
NEW FLATFISH
(With One
Plate)BY EARL
D. REIDAid, Division of Fishes, U.S. National
MuMum
fPlbucation 3251
CITY OF
WASHINGTON
PUBLISHED
BY THE
SiMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONJUNE
9, 1934ZU
-Sorb Q0afttmor«(preeeBALTIUORE, MD.,U. S. A.
Jobnson jfunD
TWO NEW CONGRID EELS AND A NEW FLATFISH
By earl
D.REID
Aid, Division of Fishes,
US.
NationalMuseum (With One
Plate)Examination
of the fishesof the familiesCongridaeand
Pleuronec- tidae obtainedby
the First Johnson-SmithsonianDeep-Sea
Expedi- tion reveals three undescribed forms,two
ofwhich
belong to the formerand
one to the latter group.Family CONGRIDAE
Comparison
of the present congrids with material in the NationalMuseum and
examination of the literature leads to uncertainty as to the proper genericassignmentof thesespecimens. Itwould seem
that the confusion regarding thegeneric relationship of the congrideels isdue,at least in part, to theflexibilityof the characters
upon
whichsev- eral of thegeneraare based. Parr,' in his discussionofAriosoma and
related genera, points out the unreliability of the definition of tooth characters as construed by various authors,showing
that interpreta- tion of the definitionsas well as of thetooth characters themselves ismore
or less a matter of individual notion.The
genus Ariosoma, asnow
understood, embraces severalcloselyrelated groups, the ultimate separation ofwhich must
be accomplished beforewe
canhope
for an understandabletaxonomic arrangement
ofthe congrids.These
groups canbeworked
outand
properly classifiedonlywhen
studiedon
a cos- mopolitan basis, as there can beno
doubt that generic relationshipamong
the congrid eels is distributed over widely separated areas.As
pointed out above, tooth character alone hasverylittle value, since the variationsare so extensivethat intergradations are found through- out thegroup
almost without exception.However,
the shapeand
position of the dental plates, spacing of the groups,and
width of the bands of teethseem
tobe themost
reliable dental characters for pur- poses of generic distinction.^Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., vol. 3, art. 5, pp. 19-31. 1932-
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol.91, No. 15
2
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 9IP. Bleeker"^described
and
figured the peculiar bonelike supports of the upper lip inUroconger
Icpturns (Richardson),and
in a recent paper P. J.Schmidt
" describesand
figures the labial elementsand
throws furtherlightupon
theirstructureand
function.Schmidt
erred in his structural description of thesebony
rays in denying their con- nection or articulation with other bones of the head, stating that theywere
freeelements of the lipand
not connected withany
facialbones.This author also refers to the porelike slits in the lip as pocketlike invaginations
between
the labial bones,which
facilitate the stretching out of themembrane, and
says they are not muciferous pores aswas
generally supposed.Examination
of the congrid material in the NationalMuseum
re- veals thepresenceoftheselabial elements in variousdegreesof devel-opment
throughout theentiregroup
of congrids.The
bones are pres- entand
can bedetected withthe aid of apointed instrument in genera with a free superiormargin
to theupper
lip(example Ariosoma),
though the development is comparatively rudimentary in eels of this type. InUroconger
lepturus thebony
rays reach theirpeak
of devel-opment and
are useful as distendable supportsof the labialmembrane.
Partial dissection of a paratype of one of the
new forms
reveals a longitudinalbony
muciferous canal extendingfrom
near the base of the anterior nostril, laterallyjustabovethe lip,tothe posterior border of the orbital rim,where
it bendsupward
followingthe curvature of theeye.The
interior,superior,and
inferior wallsofthetubeare bony.The
exterior isopen
the entire lengthand
covered only by the skin.There
are three small processes along the inferior flange of the tube projecting into the labialmembrane and
appearing as minute sub- dermal pointson the oral edge of the lip.Examination
of U. lepturus revealsthesame
basic principle ofdevelopment of thelabialbones. In genera inwhich
theupper
lip is without a free superiormargin
(ex-ample
Congr'ma) the labial bones reach the extrememargin
of the lipand
insome
instances project prominentlybeyond
the margin.The
muciferous pores of the lip in this type of eelcommunicate
with the facial muciferous canal by very short tubes, it being possible to inserta bristle inone slitand
extract itfrom
another.The
writer, in oneofhisnew
forms,inserted abristle intheanteriorporeand
passedit along the tube to a point opposite the posterior border of the eye,
showing
that these slitlike openings arevents of the muciferous chan- neland
not pocketlike pits for facilitating expansion of the labialmembrane,
as contendedby
Schmidt.^Atlas Ichth. Ind. Need., vol. 4. p. 20. pi. 149. fie. i. 1864.
°C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S., 1929, pp. 189-193. figs. a-d.
NO. 15
TWO NEW
EELSAND A NEW FLATFISH
REID 3Parr^ has given a useful discussion of the congrids related to Ari- osoma,in
which
he synonymizes alargenumber
of generaand shows
thatJordan and Hubbs'
revision of the Japanese genera' (the only recentrevisional attemptofany
greatscope) cannot be accepted with- out modification.No
one seems to have utilized the labial bones in defining genera, save in the case ofUrocongcr
(Bleeker, Schmidt), although these structuresseem
to be important.The
writer has studied anumber
of species of congridsfrom
both the Atlanticand
the Indo-Pacificand
finds thatmost
ofthem
fall into apparently well-defined genera, basedon
the formation of the labial bones, the presence or absence of a free upturned upper lip,and
theform
of thevomerinepatch of teeth.Of Ariosoma and
relatedgroups, the followinghave beenstudied: A. selcnops Reid,A. balaerica (delaRoche),*
A.
gilherti (Ogilby),and
severalJapanese forms,which may
(accordingto Jordan and
Hubbs)
be referableto distinct genera.Of
Proniyllantor,
two
species, P. alcocki Gilbertand Cramer and
P. per- turhator (Parr),have been examined.The
typespecimensof the type species of all thegenerareferred below to thesynonymy
of Cofigrina (savePseudoxcnomystax
dtibins Breder) have been studied, as well as examplesofBathyuroconger
braueri(Weber and
de Beaufort)and
ofUroconger
lepturus (Richardson).The
writer cannot see thatUranoconger Fowler and
MicrocephalocongriisFowler
differfrom
the species of Congriiiainanythingbutrelatively unimportant specific dififerences.The
key given is entirely provisional,sincemany more
speciesand
generawillhavetobeexamined
todeterminetheirexactrelationships, but it is felt that the groupings adopted aremore
natural than any hitherto proposed.KEY
TOGENERA OF CONGRIDAE
DISCUSSED INTHIS PAPER
la. Upper lip turned upward into a flange; bones of the facial canal not send- ing pointed processes into the upturned lip-flange.
Ariosoma Swainson (and related genera), lb. Upper lip without flange; bones of facial canal sending pointed processes
to edgeof lip.
2a. Teeth of vomer not extending far back on the shaft in a single series
;
inner bony casing of facial canal sending 2 or 3 short processes down- ward toedge of the moderatelyextensible upper lip.
^Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., vol. 3. art. s. pp. 19-31, 1932.
^
Mem.
Carnegie Mus., vol. 10, no.2, pp. 191-197, 1925."American specimens;
Norman
(Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 9, vol. 15, p. 314, 1925) gives data to show that the American Ariosoma opisthophthalma (Ran- zani) differs from A. balaerica.4 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 9I3a. Teeth very short, the patches almost pavementHke in appearance
;
vomerine patch of teeth widened posteriorly, covering much of roof of fore part of mouth, and confluent vi^ith the premaxillary patch
;
top of snout swollen Promyllantor Alcock.
3b. Teeth longer, the patches never with the appearance of being pave- mentlike, vomerine patch never widened but always narrowed pos- teriorly and distinctly separated from the premaxillary patch; top of snout littleor not at all swollen.
4a. Snout considerably projecting, all of the premaxillary teeth visible from directly below with mouth tightly closed; dentition normal, the teeth not greatly enlarged; color not blackish.
Congrina Jordan and Hubbs.
4b. Snout scarcely longer than lower jaw, nearly all the premaxillary teeth hidden when viewed from directly below with mouthclosed
;
dentition very strong, teeth of premaxillary, front of vomer, and front of lower jaw greatly enlarged canines; blackish eels from
deep water Baihyuroconger Fowler.
2b. Teethofvomer extendingbackward in a single series tobelow middleof eye; bonycasingof facial canal sending2 or3 long slender processes far backward anddownward to support thevery extensible upper lip.
Uroconger Kaup.
ARIOSOMA
SwainsonARIOSOMA SELENOPS,
n, sp.Text-fig. I
Holotype.-
— U.S.N.M.
no.93310
(Field no. 653),475mm
standard length; Caroline station loi,due
north ofTobago
Island, latitude i8°4o'3o" N., longitude64°5o'oo"W.,
to latitude i8°45'4o" N.,longi- tude 64°48'oo"W., March
4, 1933,ottertrawl, 190to300
fathoms.Paratypes.
— U.S.N.M.
nos.93311-93312
(Fieldnos.638-639),two
specimens, 343 to414 mm
standard length;from
Caroline station 100,due
north ofTobago
Island, latitude i8°38'45" N., longitude 64°52'45"W.,
to latitude i8°4o'i5" N., longitude 64°5o'i5"W., March
4, 1933, otter trawl, 100to300
fathoms.Body
elongate, scaleless, the caudalportion compressed posteriorly.Head
5.9 in total length; snout to vent 2.3; tail 1.6; tip of snout to dorsal origin 6.1; isthmus to vent 3.9.Snout
5 in head; maxillary 3.7; mandible 4; pectoral fin 2.8; longitudinal diameter of orbit (including adiposemembrane)
5.2; verticaldiameter 8,equalto inter- orbital; depth of head atend
of second third 2.7;body
at vent 3.2.Width
of isthmus unusually narrow, 13.3 in length of head or about equal to base of pectoral.Width
ofhead
at end of second third 3.4;body
at vent 4.6. Teeth small, sharp, conical, in bandson
the jaws. Premaxillaryand vomerine
groups not separated by an inter- space but forming a continuous patch anteriorly, extending back onNO. 15
TWO NEW
EELSAND A NEW FLATFISH
REIDthe shaft of the
vomer
inan oblongpatch ofmore
orlessbluntishteeth to opposite the anterior edge of eye. Lateral teeth in four irregularrows becoming
broader anteriorly, all of nearlyuniform
sizeand
loosely attached, being depressiblebackward.A few
teeth in the pre- maxillarygroup
slightly enlarged and caninelike.Tongue
free anteri- orlyand
laterally,narrow and
acutely pointed.Snout
projecting slightlybeyond
tip of mandible so that the foremost teeth of the premaxillarygroup
are visiblewhen viewed from
beneath. Anterior nostril ina short tube neartip of snout; posteriorone ina small pore- like opening well before eye.Eyes
large, about equaling snout, withFig. I.
—
Ariosomaselowps. Holotype, U.S.N.M. 93310. a. Side view of head;
b,upperdentition; c, isthmus. Natural size. Drawings by
Mary
Wallach.conspicuousadipose
membrane
partly concealing the orbital rim. Gill- openings large, vertical, extendingfrom upper
third of pectoral base toventral surface,where
they are separatedby
anarrow
isthmus about equal to pupil diameter.Gape
moderate, about reaching opposite the anterioredgeof pupil. Lipsforming
athin flangewitha free superior border, the basal portion behind the outer fold concealing smallbony
supports similar to thosefound
inUroconger
leptiirus Richardson.Though
distinctly present, theyaremuch
smaller than those found in the above-mentioned speciesand
are probably not functional as dis- tendable supports of the lip. Pores of the head small,few
innumber
and
not especially noticeable, one at the base of the nostril tube pos-6 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 9Iteriorly,one abovetheupperlipata point
midway
inthe length of the gape, one below the eye,and two
behind the orbit.There
is a linear seriesofsixsmallporeson
themandible below the lowerlip, followedby two on
the subbranchial region.The
lateral line originatesmidway
between theeyeand
gill-openingand
continues to the hypural.There
are i66 pores in its course, the last 6 or 7 without external openings.The
eleventh above the pectoral base, twentieth above tipof pectoral,and
fifty-seventh abovethevent. Vertical fins ofmedium
height con- fluentaround
the caudal. Color faded in alcohol to a light brownish, the ventral surface lighter. Dorsal fin with a black margin, anal with a black border posteriorly, pectoral pale. Surface ofhead and body
sprinkledwithfinedarkpoints,most
noticeableon
the branchial region, about the eye,and
at the corner of the mouth,where
theyform
dark shades.This species is very closely related to
Congroniuraena
mellissii Giinther,' agreeing perfectly with Giinther's brief diagnosis of his St.Helena
specimen.However,
asecondexample
recordedand
figuredfrom
the type localityby Cunningham
*shows
thatour fish disagrees with that species in having a longer snout, smaller mouth, lower fins,and
a very different gill-opening. It differsfrom Ariosoma
balaerica(Delaroche)* in the
more
anterior insertion of the dorsal fin, longertail,
and
inthemuch narrower
isthmus,which
in our specimen ismuch narrower
than inany
other congrid eel the writerhas seen.Measurements
of the threespecimensinmillimetersaregiven below.Under
eachmeasurement
three figures are given, referring, in order, tothethreespecimens.Total length 475. 414,345; head80, 74, 62;snout tovent 202, 177, 145; ventto end of tail 274, 236, 195; orbit length including adipose eyelid 15.5, 15, 12;snout 16, 15, 12; maxillary 21.5, 19, 18; mandible 20, 17.5, 16.5; pectoral fin 28, 23,20; branchial opening 13, 11,9; tip ofsnouttodorsal origin 78, Jt^,62;isthmustovent 120, 104,85;depth of
head
at end of its second third 30, 27, 22; width of head atsame
point 23.7, 22, 18; depthofbody
at vent25, 22, 18; widthofbody
at vent 17.5, 16, 13; width of isthmus 6.5, 5, 4.7; width of interorbital 10, 9, 7.3; eye, vertical diameter 10, 9,8.5; height dorsal fin 7, 6, 4;longest ray of dorsal fin 11, 10, 8; height anal fin 5, 4, 4; pores in lateral fine 160-)-6, 1604-8, 160
+
7.'Cat. Fish. British Mus., vol. 8,p. 42, 1870.
*Proc. Zool. Soc. London. 1910, p. 93, pi. 4. fiff- i.
•See
Norman
(Ann. Mag.Nat. Hist.,ser.9,vol. 15,p. 314, 1925), forprobable differences between balaerica and the American opisthophthalma.NO. 15
TWO NEW
EELSAND
ANEW FLATFISH
REID 7CONGRINA
Jordan and HubbsCoiigrina Jordan and Hubbs,
Mem.
Carnegie Mus., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 196, 1925 (genotype Congermuracna aequorea Gilbert and Cramer).Hildcbrandia Jordan and Evermann, Proc. CaliforniaAcad. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 16, no. 15, p. 502, 1927 (genotype Congervmraeimflava Goode and Bean).
Psendoxenomystax Breder, Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., vol. i, no. i, p. 6,
1927 (genotype P. dubhis Breder).
Microccplmlocongrus Fowler, Proc.Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 85,p. 270, 1934 (genotype Bathycongriis mcgalops Fowler).
UranocongerFowler, torn,cit., p.274. 1934 (genotype U. odontostomus Fowler).
The
following species are referred to Congrina: C. aequorea (Gil- bertand Cramer),
C. retrotiucta (Jordanand Snyder)
C. stimpsoni (Fowler), C.megalops
(Fowler),C.odontostomus
(Fowler), C. flava(Goode and Bean),C
roosendaali{^&htr and De
Beaufort),C\ nitens (Jordanand
Bollman),and
C. duhia- (Breder).The
figure and de- scription ofPscudoxcnouiystax
are so similar tomy new
species (es- pecially in view of Parr's remarks) that Ibelieveit belongshere.The new
species differsfrom
all these in various proportional measure- ments. It isespecially close to C. rctrotincta but dift'ersin the shorter preoral length of the snoutand
in having a distinct blackmargin
the full length of the vertical fins.From
C. duhia it is distinguished by the longer trunk,more
attenuated tail,and
by the shape of thevom-
erine patch of teeth.
CONGRINA THYSANOCHILA,
n. sp.Text-fig. 2
Holotype.
— U.S.N.M.
no.93434
(Field no. 137);250 mm
standard length;from
Carolinestation 23. oft'Punta
Cerro Gordo, north coast of Puerto Rico, latitude i8°32'i5" N., longitude 66°i7'45"W.,
to latitude i8°32'oo" N., longitude 66°2i'i5"W., February
4. 1933, otter trawl,260
to360
fathoms.Paratype.
—
-U.S.N.M. no.93466
(Fieldno. 640) ; 225mm
standard length;from
Caroline station 100, due north ofTobago
Island, lati-tude i8°38'45" N., longitude 64°52'45"
W.,
to latitude i8°4o'i5" N., longitude 64°5o'i5"W., March
4, 1933, otter trawl, 100 to300
fathoms.Body
elongate, compressed posteriorly, with the caudal region at- tenuated,though thefin distinct.Head
6.4in the standard length; tip of snout todorsal origin 5.6; to vent 2.7; isthmus to vent 4.3.Eye
5inhead; snout 4; maxillary 2.6;mandible 3.2; pectoral fin 3.6; depth ofheadatend ofsecond third 2.6; widthat
same
point 3.1. (jill-open- ingsextendingdownward and
forward, about equal to interorbital orSMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 91:o;
000
C/^^'
NO. 15
TWO NEW
EELSAND A NEW FLATFISH
REID9
half longitudinal diameter of orbit.
Depth
of bod}' at vent equal to length of lower jaw, width atsame
point equal to length of snout.Isthmus
much
broader than depth of branchial opening, nearly equal tolongitudinal diameter of theeye.Gape
moderate, reaching opposite posterior edge of pupil.Upper jaw
longer than lower, the preoral length about equal to pupil diameter. Anterior nostril in ashort tube close to rostral pit. Posterior nostril in a longitudinal slit at upper front edge of eye with flanged edges folding over the opening anteri- orly.There
are fivelargeslitlikepores or pitsonthe sideof the snout,two
between the anterior nostrils, an oblong one just above the base ofand
onejustbehind thenostril,and two
inthe upper lip.There
are three pairs of pores just below the tip of the mandible, the posterior pair largest, followed by a linear series of seven along the lowerjaw and
throat.There
isa largeporebehindthecornerof themouth
below the posterioredgeof thepupil.Eyes
covered byapronounced
adiposemembrane
concealing the orbital rim.Lip
extending forward to op- positethehindmost
premaxillaryteeth,where
it is joinedby
an inner lip provided with a finely fringed edgeand
extending longitudinally between the outer lipand
themaxillaryband
of teeth.The
upper lip is provided withsmallbony
stays similartothosefound
inUroconger
Icptiirns (Richardson). Teeth small, sharp, conical, in bands
on
the maxillaryand
mandible, in five irregular rows, the width anteriorly tapering to one ortwo
series near the posterior end. Premaxillary teeth inanoval patch, afew
ofwhich
aresmall canines,eventhe hind-most
visiblefrom
directly beneathwhen
themouth
is closed.There
are about 15 teeth inthe premaxillary group.There
are 14 teeth in amore
orlessdiamond-shaped
patchon
the vomer, 2 onthemedian
line in the center of thegroup
enlargedand
caninelike.The
actual shape of thevomerine
patch is obscuredby
confluence with the maxillary bands. All of the larger teethinthemouth
are depressibleposteriorly.The
maxillaryband
of teeth does not extendaround
the head of thevomer
but ceaseslaterally, leaving anaked
areabetween
the premaxil- laryand vomerine
groups, againstwhich
thetipof themandiblecloses.The
lateral line originates in a white poreon
themedian
line at the occiputand
descends to the side of the nape, bendingbackward
at a sharpangle,and
rises slightlyoverthe branchial regionand
gradually descendstotheside. Itissituatedinagroovemarked
out byrectangu- lar dark spots.A
sublineof white pores follow thecourseof the dark spotsin analternatingmanner, and
each poreappears to be connected with a dark areaby
a tube running obliquelyupward and
forward.The two
linesare well separatedanteriorly,gradually fusingtoa single line onthe posterior part of thebody.There
are 31 pores in itscourselO
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 9Ito a point opposite the vent. Dorsal origin above the third seventh of the pectorallength,opposite the eighthporeinthelateralline. Color light brownish-grayabove, lighterbelow, the color well contrasted
on
the side of the head. Vertical fins with a conspicuousnarrow
blackmargin becoming more pronounced
posteriorly but not involving themedian
caudal rays. Pectoralsslightly shaded distally.The
collectioncontainstwo examples
ofthis eel, the largera female with well-developed ova.Family PLEURONECTIDAE
POECILOPSETTA
GiintherPOECILOPSETTA ALBOMARGINATA,
n. sp.Plate I
Holotype.
— U.S.N.M.
no.93303
(Field no. 626) ;98 mm
standard length;from
Caroline station 100,due
north ofTobago
Island, lati-tude i8°38'45" N., longitude 64°52'45"
W.,
to latitude i8°4o'i5" N., longitude 64°5o'i5"W., March
4, 1933, otter trawl, 100 to300
fathoms.Paratypcs.
— U.S.N.M.
no.93304
(Field nos. 624, 625,and
627) ;threespecimens, 105 tO116
mm
standardlength;same
dataas holotype.Head
4.5, depth 2.4in standard length.Upper
eye 2.4 in head, itsupper anterior rim impinging
upon
the dorsal profile,forming
a deep notch beforeeye.Snout
3.1 inhead. Dorsal 59to 64.Anal
51 to 53.Both
fins of equal height, 1.7 in head. Right pectoral with9
rays, its length2inhead,thatofleftside slightlylonger. Ventrals symmetrical, their tips about reaching third anal ray. Caudal rounded-acuminate, the middle rays greater than length of head, 4.2 in standard length.Depth
of caudal peduncle nearly twice its length, 1.5 in head. Scales 19-64-26, rather deciduous, ctenoidon
eyed (right) side, cycloid on blind side. Eightrows on
cheek.No
scaleson
snout, interorbital, or maxillary. Laterallineforming
a high curveanteriorly,which
issome- what
flattenedon
the top,and from
there descending almost perpen- dicularly to the midsides,where
it meets the straight part at a right angle.There
are 71 to74
poresin its course to base of caudal.Eyes
closely approximated, the
upper
slightly the larger, the lower usually slightly in advance of the upper. Maxillary little curved, 3.7 inhead.Mouth
small, oblique.Lower jaw
projecting,themandible with asmall knob.Teeth
irregularly uniserialon
thejaws, slightlylargerand more
numerous
onthe blindside.No
teethonvomer
orpalatines. Gillrakers 10 shortpoints,about 4in pupil. Interorbitalvery narrow, naked, cov-NO. 15
TWO NEW
EELSAND A NEW FLATFISH
REID IIeredwith loose skin. Origin of dorsal
on
left sideabovepupil, tips of the anterior rays free foroverhalftheirlengthbutnotelevated. Color pale yellowish-gray;membranous
edge of scalepockets dark. Dorsal, anal,and
right ventral blackish, with anarrow
pale baseand
a fine milk-white border. Caudal pale grayish with a fine white border, the middle rays darker distally.A
black spot with indefinite boundaries large as eye,on
upperand
lower outer rays of caudal at about the middleof its length. Pectoral blackish. Viscerashowing
throughon
right side as a dark blotch. Left (blind) side without
markings
ofany
kind.Norman
'"hasrevised the species of Poecilopsetta.Only two
species have beenknown from
theNew World,
P. beanii(Goode) and
P.inermis (Breder). P. albomarginata,
which
has beencompared
di- rectlywith the typeand
other material of P. beanii, differsfrom
this speciesin the deeperbody, the larger scales, thecoloration, and other respects. Itappearstodififerstrikinglyfrom
P. inermis" inthemilk- white finedging, theabsenceofany
traceof color patternon
theblind side,and
especially inthestrongly ctenoidscalesof theeyed side.'"Treubia, vol. 13. livr. 3-4, pp. 423-426, 1931.
"Breder, C. M., Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., vol. i, art. i, p. 87, fig. 36, 1925-
<
s
I-
s
a
I