Rural urban fringe/urban fringe/peri urban area: there has been no common agreement on the definition. The relation between a city and its peri-urban area is a functional one, characterized by a commuting flow from the city to the peri- urban area and vice versa (Caruso, 2005, in Winarso et al 2015). Inner Fringe is the area characterized by an advanced stages of transition from rural to urban area-for example, land under.
That even though the appearance of rural activities are still there, the the infiltration of urban activities.
ECONOMI C FACET
TION (REFER
ECONOMI C FACET C FACET URBANIZA OF. 2002) for India case, established that wages and income decline as distance from the city increases. The decline in average per capita income of a village is steep up to a distance of 15 kilometers from the city.
SPATIAL PROCESS
ATION
WHAT IS
WHAT IS CITY-REGION?
City-regions do not always correlate with large metropolitan areas (Le Gale`s, . 2002), who purposely apply this concept to medium-sized cities and their. The consequence of this imprecise but widespread use is that the concept of city-region can be used to refer to almost any individual or a combination of. The minimum common denominator of virtually all definitions of a city-region is the presence of a core city linked by functional ties to a hinterland.
Other authors even include identity and the social and cultural domination by the core city as essential elements of a city-region (Davoudi, 2003, p. 986). However, even the combination of an urban core and a semi-urban and rural hinterland as the essence of a city- region is often modified. In addition, the boundaries of the city-region do not necessarily have to match existing administrative boundaries.
In the rare cases of a perfect match, the functional area of a city-region may coincide with regional or local authority boundaries. Finally, the boundaries of the city-region tend not to be fixed in time and change as a result of transformations in the functional. The city region is based on the area with (i) more than 45 per cent out-commuting and more than 30 per cent commuting to the core (ii) enclosed by a public.
The city region transcends the local level (as the basic administrative unit) and also goes beyond the city level. The concept of city region (which is .. consistent with Geddes’ original definition of conurbation and Gras’ concept of .. metropolitan economy’) moves beyond such distinction and covers not only the. The city-regions are locomotives of the national economies within which they are situated, in that they are the sites of dense masses of interrelated economic activities that also typically have high levels of productivity by reason of their jointly-generated agglomeration economies and their innovative potentials.”.
But it recognises that decisions taken by people – where to live, work, travel to work, shop, visit for entertainment and leisure – and the economic activity by firms and investors – with customers and suppliers – means that there are important economic, environmental and social interdependencies between the city and it’s neighbouring. The vagueness in the definition of what a city- region is has led some researchers to cast doubts on the validity of the concept. It is argued that if neither the boundaries of the city-region are easily determined, nor can we identify who controls the process of institutional reorganization or at what spatial scale interest groups should be mobilized, the idea of the city- region may be of little use (Jonas & Ward, 2002).
In addition, by focusing on just a limited range of economic activities, the city-region literature may be overlooking large parts of the world, such as vast sections of Africa and Latin. And finally, the city-region framework is considered as the ideal scale for policy intervention in a globalized world.
WHY IS
THE RISE OF THE CITY-REGION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
The rise of policy-making at the city-region level represents an important change in scale that has profound implications for the objectives of development policies. Infrastructure endowment, the attraction of foreign investment, and the promotion of local firms were the main axes for policy. The emergence of the city-region dimension as what its proponents consider a “more adequate” scale for policy- making has contributed to accelerate the shift from.
The reproduction of development models is gradually being substituted by custom-made approaches in which a thorough diagnosis of the conditions and the needs of the city-region is the starting point. The first consequence of this change has been the multiplication and variety of development strategies. Best practices are still used, but they need, in theory, to be thoroughly re-tailored to local conditions before being implemented.
A second effect of the shift to territorial policies has been the emphasis placed on the efficiency side of. Whereas traditional top-down sectoral policies were almost always conceived with an implicit balance between. First, vertical coordination of all the institutional actors involved in the development process is required (Va´zquez-Barquero, 2003), since multi-level processes of governance have thus assumed greater importance (Hooghe & Marks, 2001).
Second, the more participatory and voluntary cooperation—demands horizontal coordination between the public and the private sectors, amongst all actors in the local civil society, and of these with the local public institutions (Wheeler, 2002; Va´zquez-Barquero, 2002). Finally, there is an additional requirement for a second type of horizontal coordination that involves different local or regional. Many city-regional development strategies are initiated by local civic groups, such as local economic, social, and/or cultural associations.
With a smaller geographical area of operation, city-region development strategies can often afford to promote the formation of partnerships among local stakeholders, who play a key role in the design and implementation of the strategy (Brenner, 2003, p. 311). By bringing together government, civil society, and the private sector, local agents are empowered and public goods, such as trust, may be generated (Wolfensohn, 2001, p. 48). Bottom-up participatory approaches responding to the effects of global economic change are rarely stand-alone strategies for development, but they are frequently combined with top-down processes of state restructuring and policy-making (Harding, 1999, p. 692).
THANKS!